Abstract
Let ES(n) denote the minimum natural number such that every set of ES(n) points in general position in the plane contains n points in convex position. In 1935, Erdős and Szekeres proved that ES\((n) \le {2n-4 \atopwithdelims ()n-2}+1\). In 1961, they obtained the lower bound \(2^{n-2}+1 \le \mathrm{ES}(n)\), which they conjectured to be optimal. In this paper, we prove that
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Brass, P., Moser, W., Pach, J.: Convex polygons and the Erdős–Szekeres problem, Chap. 8.2. The Book Research Problems in Discrete Geometry. Springer, Berlin (2005)
Chung, F.R.K., Graham, R.L.: Forced convex \(n\)-gons in the plane. Discrete Comput. Geom. 19, 367–371 (1998)
Erdős, P., Szekeres, G.: A combinatorial problem in geometry. Compos. Math. 2, 463–470 (1935)
Erdős, P., Szekeres, G.: On some extremum problems in elementary geometry. Ann. Univ. Sci. Budapest. Eötvös, Sect. Math. 3/4, 53–62 (1960–61)
Kleitman, D.J., Pachter, L.: Finding convex sets among points in the plane. Discrete Comput. Geom. 19, 405–410 (1998)
Norin, S., Yuditsky, Y.: Erdős–Szekeres without induction. http://arxiv.org/abs/1509.03332 (2015)
Tóth, G., Valtr, P.: Note on the Erdős–Szekeres theorem. Discrete Comput. Geom. 19, 457–459 (1998)
Tóth, G., Valtr, P.: The Erdős–Szekeres theorem: upper bounds and related results. In: Goodman, J.E., et al. (eds.) Combinatorial and Computational Geometry. MSRI Publications, vol. 52, pp. 557–568. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2006)
Vlachos, G.: On a conjecture of Erdős and Szekeres. http://arxiv.org/abs/1505.07549 (2015)
Acknowledgments
Hossein Nassajian Mojarrad was partially supported by Swiss National Science Foundation Grants 200020-144531, 200021-137574, 200020-162884 and 200020-144531.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Editor in Charge: János Pach
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Mojarrad, H.N., Vlachos, G. An Improved Upper Bound for the Erdős–Szekeres Conjecture. Discrete Comput Geom 56, 165–180 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00454-016-9791-5
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00454-016-9791-5