Skip to main content
Log in

Front-end recovery of protein from lignocellulosic biomass and its effects on chemical pretreatment and enzymatic saccharification

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Bioprocess and Biosystems Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Front-end protein recovery from biomass at different maturities, and its effects on chemical pretreatment and enzyme hydrolysis of partially deproteinized fiber were investigated. The protein recovery from alfalfa and switchgrass biomass using sodium dodecyl sulfate and potassium hydroxide treatments was ~50–65 % of initial biomass protein. When hot water was used as extraction media, the protein recovery was 52.9 and 43.7 % of total protein in switchgrass and alfalfa, respectively. For any treatment, relative protein recovery was higher from switchgrass than from alfalfa. Only approximately half the total protein was recovered from relatively mature (early fall) biomass compared with midsummer harvested biomass. When protein was recovered partially using sodium dodecyl sulfate or potassium hydroxide, and leftover fiber pretreated, aqueous ammonia pretreatment removed 58.5–60.1 % of lignin and retained more cellulose in the fiber compared with acid pretreatment (nearly no lignin removal). Protein removal was helpful in the enzyme digestibility of fibers. Delignification of ammonia pretreated partially deproteinized alfalfa fiber was in the range of 34.4–45 %, while dilute sulfuric acid did not remove lignin effectively. Overall, the higher delignification and enzyme digestibilities were observed in aqueous ammonia pretreated partially deproteinized alfalfa fibers regardless of biomass type.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Dale BE, Allen MS, Laser M, Lynd LR (2009) Protein feeds coproduction in biomass conversion to fuels and chemicals. Biofuels Bioproducts Biorefining 3(2):219–230

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Walker HG, Kohler GO (1983) Utilization of press cake from LPC operations. In: Telek L, Graham HD (eds) Leaf protein concentrates. AVI Publishing, Connecticut

    Google Scholar 

  3. Bals B, Teachworth L, Dale BE (2007) Extraction of proteins from switchgrass using aqueous ammonia within an integrated biorefinery. Appl Biochem Biotechnol 143:187–198

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Bae DH, Gilman BE, Welch JG, Palmer RH (1983) Quality of forage from Miscanthus sinensis. J Dairy Sci 66:630–633

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Dale BE, Matsuoka M (1981) Protein recovery from leafy crop residues during biomass refining. Biotechnol Bioeng 23(6):1417–1420

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Takara D, Khanal S (2011) Green processing of tropical banagrass into biofuel and biobased products: an innovative biorefinery approach. Biores Technol 102:1587–1592

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Lamsal BP, Koegel RG, Boettcher ME (2003) Separation of protein fractions in alfalfa juice: effects of some pretreatment methods. T ASAE 46(3):715–720

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Mullen CA, Boateng AA (2008) Chemical composition of bio-oils produced by fast pyrolysis of two energy crops. Energy Fuels 22(3):2104–2109

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Tan LL, Li CZ (2000) Formation of NOx and SOx precursors during the pyrolysis of coal and biomass. Part I. Effects of reactor configuration on the determined yields of HCN and NH3 during pyrolysis. Fuel 79(15):1883–1889

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. NREL (National Renewable Energy Laboratory) (2008) LAP (Laboratory Analytical Procedure). http://www.nrel.gov/biomass/analytical_procedures.html. Golden, CO, USA

  11. ASABE Standards (2008) 55th edn, American Society of Agricultural and Biological Engineers, St. Joseph

  12. AOAC International (1998) Official Methods of Analysis of AOAC International, 16th edn, 4th rev. Method 992.23—Crude Protein in Cereal Grains and Oilseeds—Generic Combustion Method, The Association, Gaithersburg

  13. Wu Z, Lee YY (1997) Ammonia recycled percolation as a complementary pretreatment to the dilute-acid process. Appl Biochem Biotech 63–65:21–34

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Taso GT, Ladisch MR, Voloch M, Bienkowski P (1982) Production of ethanol and chemicals from cellulosic materials. Process Biochem 17(5):34–38

    Google Scholar 

  15. Bienkowski P, Ladisch MR, Voloch M, Taso GT (1984) Acid hydrolysis of pretreated lignocelluloses from corn residue. Biotechnol Bioeng Symp Ser 14:512–524

    Google Scholar 

  16. McMillan JD (1994) Pretreatment of lignocellulosic biomass. In: Himmel ME, Baker JO, Overend RP (eds) Enzymatic conversion of biomass for fuels production, ACS Symp Series, vol 566. ACS, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  17. Hsu TA (1996) Pretreatment of biomass. In: Wyman CE (ed) Handbook on bioethanol production and utilization. Taylor & Francis, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  18. Jacobsen SE, Wyman CE (2000) Applied Biochemistry and Biotechnology 84–86(1–9):81–96

    Google Scholar 

  19. Lee YY, Iyer P, Torget RW (1999) Dilute-acid hydrolysis of lignocellulosic biomass. Adv Biochem Eng Biotechnol 65:93–115

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Ruttan RF (1909) Ethyl alcohol from sawdust and other wood waste. Soc Chem Ind 28:1290–1294

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Faith WL, Hall JA (1944) Ethyl alcohol from waste wood by a modified Scholler process. Chem Eng News 22:525–526

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Sherrard EC, Kressman FW (1945) Review of process in the United States prior to World War II. Ind Eng Chem 37(1):5–8

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Harris EE, Begliner E, Hajny GJ, Sherrard EC (1945) Hydrolysis of wood. Treatment with sulfuric acid in a stationary digester. Ind Eng Chem 37(1):12–23

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Faith WL (1945) Development of the Scholler process in the United States. Ind Eng Chem 37(1):9–11

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Harris EE, Begliner E (1946) Madison wood sugar process. Ind Eng Chem 38:890–895

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Mosier N, Wyman C, Dale BE, Elander R, Lee YY, Holtzapple M, Ladisch M (2005) Features of promising technologies for pretreatment of lignocellulosic biomass. Biores Technol 96:673–686

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Kim TH, Lee YY (2006) Fractionation of corn stover by hot-water and aqueous ammonia treatment. Biores Technol 97:224–232

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Kim TH (2011) Sequential hydrolysis of hemicellulose and lignin in lignocellulosic biomass by two-stage percolation process using dilute sulfuric acid and ammonium hydroxide. Korean J Chem Eng 28(11):2156–2162

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The funding for work was provided by Iowa State University through Agricultural Experiment Station Project. We appreciate Dr. John F. Schmitz’s preliminary work on protein separation from biomass.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to B. P. Lamsal.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kim, T.H., Yoo, C.G. & Lamsal, B.P. Front-end recovery of protein from lignocellulosic biomass and its effects on chemical pretreatment and enzymatic saccharification. Bioprocess Biosyst Eng 36, 687–694 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00449-013-0892-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00449-013-0892-8

Keywords

Navigation