Skip to main content
Log in

Plant production and alternate prey channels impact the abundance of top predators

Oecologia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

While numerous studies have examined the effects of increased primary production on higher trophic levels, most studies have focused primarily on the grazing food web and have not considered the importance of alternate prey channels. This has happened despite the fact that fertilization not only increases grazing herbivore abundance, but other types of consumers such as detritivores that serve as alternate prey for generalist predators. Alternate prey channels can sustain generalist predators at times when prey abundance in the grazing food web is low, thus increasing predator densities and the potential for trophic cascades. Using arthropod data from a fertilization experiment, we constructed a hierarchical Bayesian model to examine the direct and indirect effects of plant production and alternate prey channels on predators in a salt marsh. We found that increased plant production positively affected the density of top predators via effects on lower trophic level herbivores and mesopredators. Additionally, while the abundance of algivores and detritivores positively affected mesopredators and top predators, respectively, the effects of alternate prey were relatively weak. Because previous studies in the same system have found that mesopredators and top predators rely on alternate prey such as algivores and detritivores, future studies should examine whether fertilization shifts patterns of prey use by predators from alternate channels to the grazing channel. Finally, the hierarchical Bayesian model used in this study provided a useful method for exploring trophic relationships in the salt marsh food web, especially where causal relationships among trophic groups were unknown.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Agusti N, Shayler SP, Harwood JD, Vaughan IP, Sunderland KD, Symondson WOC (2003) Collembola as alternative prey sustaining spiders in arable ecosystems: prey detection within predators using molecular markers. Mol Ecol 12:3467–3475

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson WB, Polis GA (2004) Allochthonous nutrient and food inputs: consequences for temporal stability. In: Polis GA, Power ME, Huxel GR (eds) Food webs at the landscape level. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, pp 82–95

    Google Scholar 

  • Arhonditsis GB et al (2006) Exploring ecological patterns with structural equation modeling and Bayesian analysis. Ecol Model 192:385–409

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berliner LM (1996) Hierarchical Bayesian time series models. In: Hanson KM, Silver RN (eds) Maximum entropy and Bayesian methods. Kluwer, Dordrecht

    Google Scholar 

  • Cardinale BJ, Bennett DM, Nelson CE, Gross K (2009) Does productivity drive diversity or vice versa? A test of the multivariate productivity-diversity hypothesis in streams. Ecology 90:1227–1241

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Carlin BP, Clark JS, Gelfand AE (2006) Elements of hierarchical Bayesian inference. In: Clark JS, Gelfand AE (eds) Hierarchical modelling for the environmental sciences. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Cebrian J et al (2009) Producer nutritional quality controls ecosystem trophic structure. PLoS ONE 4:1–5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clark JS (2005) Why environmental scientists are becoming Bayesians. Ecol Lett 8:2–14

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cressie N, Calder CA, Clark JS, Ver Hoef JM, Wikle CK (2009) Accounting for uncertainty in ecological analysis: the strengths and limitations of hierarchical statistical modeling (with discussion). Ecol Appl 19:553–570

    Google Scholar 

  • Denno RF (1976) Ecological significance of wing-polymorphism in Fulgoroidea which inhabit tidal salt marshes. Ecol Entomol 1:257–266

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Denno RF, Gratton C, Peterson MA, Langellotto GA, Finke DL, Huberty AF (2002) Bottom–up forces mediate natural-enemy impact in a phytophagous insect community. Ecology 83:1443–1458

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Denno RF, Gratton C, Döbel HG, Finke DL (2003) Predation risk affects relative strength of top–down and bottom–up impacts on insect herbivores. Ecology 84:1032–1044

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Döbel HG, Denno RF (1994) Predator planthopper interactions. In: Denno RF, Perfect TJ (eds) Planthoppers: their ecology and management. Chapman and Hall, New York, pp 325–399

  • Ferrenberg SM, Denno RF (2003) Competition as a factor underlying the abundance of an uncommon phytophagous insect, the salt marsh planthopper Delphacodes penedetecta. Ecol Entomol 29:58–66

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Finke DL, Denno RF (2002) Intraguild predation diminished in complex-structured vegetation: implications for prey suppression. Ecology 83:643–652

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Finke DL, Denno RF (2004) Predator diversity dampens trophic cascades. Nature 429:407–410

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Forkner RE, Hunter MD (2000) What goes up must come down? Nutrient addition and predation pressure on oak herbivores. Ecology 81:1588–1600

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gelfand A (1996) Model determination using sampling based methods. In: Gilks W, Richardson S, Spiegelhalter D (eds) Markov Chain Monte Carlo in practice. Chapman and Hall, Boca Raton, pp 145–161

  • Gratton C, Denno RF (2003) Inter-year carryover effects of a nutrient pulse on Spartina plants, herbivores, and natural enemies. Ecology 84:2692–2707

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gruner DS et al (2008) A cross-system synthesis of consumer and nutrient resource control on producer biomass. Ecol Lett 11:740–755

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Haddad NM, Haarstad J, Tilman D (2000) The effects of long-term nitrogen loading on grassland insect communities. Oecologia 124:73–84

    Google Scholar 

  • Hirucki-Raring L, Ver Hoef JM, Boveng PL, Bengtson JL (2012) A Bayesian hierarchical model of Antarctic fur seal foraging and pup growth related to sea ice and prey abundance. Ecol Appl 22:668–684

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirchner T (1977) The effects of resource enrichment on the diversity of plants and arthropods in a shortgrass prairie. Ecology 58:1334–1344

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kuusk A-K, Ekbom B (2010) Lycosid spiders and alternative food: feeding behavior and implications for biological control. Biol Control 55:20–26

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee S-Y (2007) Structural equation modeling: a Bayesian approach. Wiley, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • McCann K, Hastings A, Huxel GR (1998) Weak trophic interactions and the balance of nature. Nature 395:794–798

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • McCann KS, Rasmussen JB, Umbanhower J (2005) The dynamics of spatially coupled food webs. Ecol Lett 8:513–523

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Miyashita T, Takada M (2007) Habitat provisioning for aboveground predators decreases detritivores. Ecology 88:2803–2809

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Murphy SM, Wimp GM, Lewis D, Denno RF (2012) Nutrient presses and pulses differentially impact plants, herbivores, detritivores and their natural enemies. PLoS ONE 7:e43929

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Oelbermann K, Scheu S (2009) Control of aphids on wheat by generalist predators: effets of predator density and the presence of alternative prey. Entomol Exp Appl 132:225–231

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oelbermann K, Langel R, Scheu S (2008) Utilization of prey from a decomposer system by generalist predators of grassland. Oecologia 155:605–617

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ogle K (2009) Hierarchical Bayesian statistics: merging experimental and modeling approaches in ecology. Ecol Appl 19:577–581

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Pickney J, Zingmark RG (1993) Biomass and production of benthic microalgal communities in estuarine habitats. Estuaries 16:887–897

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Polis GA, Strong DR (1996) Food web complexity and community dynamics. Am Nat 147:813–846

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Royle JA, Dorazio R (2008) Hierarchical modeling and inference in ecology. Academic, San Diego

    Google Scholar 

  • Settle WH et al (1996) Managing tropical rice pests through conservation of generalist natural enemies and alternative prey. Ecology 77:1975–1988

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shimazaki A, Miyashita T (2005) Variable dependence on detrital and grazing food webs by generalist predators: aerial insects and web spiders. Ecography 28:485–494

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Siemann E (1998) Experimental tests of effects of plant productivity and diversity on grassland arthropod diversity. Ecology 79:2057–2070

    Google Scholar 

  • Singer MS, Farkas TE, Skorik CM, Mooney KA (2012) Tritrophic interactions at a community level: effects of host plant species quality on bird predation of caterpillars. Am Nat 179:363–374

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Spiegelhalter DJ, Best NG, Carlin BP, Van der Linde A (2002) Bayesian measures of model complexity and fit (with discussion). J R Stat Soc B 64:583–616

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spiegelhalter D, Thomas A, Best N, Lunn D (2003) WinBUGS user manual. Cambridge: MRC Biostatistics Unit

  • Strauss SY (1987) Direct and indirect effects of host-plant fertilization on an insect community. Ecology 68:1670–1678

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sullivan MJ, Moncreiff CA (1988) Primary production of edaphic algal communities in a Mississippi salt marsh. J Phycol 24:49–58

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Valiela I, Cole ML (2002) Comparative evidence that salt marshes and mangroves may protect seagrass meadows from land-derived nitrogen loads. Ecosystems 5:92–102

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Raalte CD, Valiela I, Teal JM (1976) Production of epibenthic salt marsh algae: Light and nutrient limitation. Limnol Oceanogr 21:862–872

    Google Scholar 

  • Vince SW, Valiela I (1981) An experimental study of the structure of herbivorous insect communities in a salt marsh. Ecology 62:1662–1678

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vitousek PM et al (1997) Human alteration of the global nitrogen cycle: sources and consequences. Ecol Appl 7:737–750

    Google Scholar 

  • von Berg K, Thies C, Tscharntke T, Scheu S (2010) Changes in herbivore control in arable fields by detrital subsidies depend on predator species and vary in space. Oecologia 163:1033–1042

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • White GC, Bennetts RE (1996) Analysis of frequency count data using the negative binomial distribution. Ecology 77:2549–2557

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wikle CK (2003) Hierarchical models in environmental science. Int Stat Rev 71:181–199

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wimp GM et al (2013) Predator hunting mode influences patterns of prey use from grazing and epigeic food webs. Oecologia 171:505–515

    Google Scholar 

  • Wimp GM, Murphy SM, Finke DL, Huberty AF, Denno RF (2010) Increased primary production shifts the structure and composition of a terrestrial arthropod community. Ecology 91:3303–3311

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wise DH, Snyder WE, Tuntibunpakul P, Halaj J (1999) Spiders in decomposition food webs of agroecosystems: theory and practice. J Arachnol 27:363–370

    Google Scholar 

  • Wise DH, Moldenhauer DM, Halaj J (2006) Using stable isotopes to reveal shifts in prey consumption by generalist predators. Ecol Appl 16:865–876

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We thank members of the DC PIG, a plant–insect discussion group composed of members from DC-area universities and institutions, for comments that improved this manuscript, as well as Stephen Baker, Scott Collins, Matthew Hamilton, Danny Lewis, Eric Mooring, Martha Weiss, Mark Wilber, Scott Williams, Elise Zipkin and three anonymous reviewers. Robert F. Denno, Deborah L. Finke, and Andrea F. Huberty assisted with data collection. Ali Arab’s research was partially supported by a Georgetown University Junior Faculty Research Fellowship. The experiments were conducted in Tuckerton, NJ, USA, and comply with the current laws of the United States. Ken Able at the Rutgers University Marine Station facilitated our research at the Tuckerton field site.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ali Arab.

Additional information

Communicated by Scott Collins.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (DOC 473 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Arab, A., Wimp, G.M. Plant production and alternate prey channels impact the abundance of top predators. Oecologia 173, 331–341 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-013-2618-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-013-2618-7

Keywords

Navigation