Skip to main content
Log in

Predators induce egg retention in prey

  • Behavioural Ecology
  • Published:
Oecologia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

To prevent predation on their eggs, prey often avoid patches occupied by predators. As a result, they need to delay oviposition until they reach predator-free patches. Because many species allocate energy to egg production in a continuous fashion, it is not clear what kind of mechanism prey use to delay oviposition. We used females of the phytoseiid mite Neoseiulus cucumeris to study these mechanisms. Females were placed in patches with pollen, a food source they use for egg production, and they were exposed to another phytoseiid mite, Iphiseius degenerans, which is an intraguild predator of N. cucumeris juveniles. We found that the oviposition of N. cucumeris females on patches with the predator was lower than on patches without the predator. Cues left by the intraguild predator were not sufficient to elicit such behaviour. Females of N. cucumeris reduced oviposition when exposed to the predator by retaining the egg inside their body, resulting in a lower developmental rate once these eggs were laid. Hence, females are capable of retaining eggs, but the development of these eggs continues inside the mother’s body. In this way, females gain some time to search for less risky oviposition sites.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aljetlawi AA, Sparrevik E, Leonardsson K (2004) Prey–predator size-dependent functional response: derivation and rescaling to the real world. J Anim Ecol 73(2):239–252

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Angelon KA, Petranka JW (2002) Chemicals of predatory mosquitofish (Gambusa affinis) influence selection of oviposition site by Culex mosquitoes. J Chem Ecol 28:797–805

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bell G (1980) The costs of reproduction and their consequences. Am Nat 136:20–38

    Google Scholar 

  • Binckley CA, Resetarits WJ (2002) Reproductive decisions under threat of predation: squirrel treefrog (Hyla squirella) responses to banded sunfish (Enneacanthus obesus). Oecologia 130(1):157–161

    Google Scholar 

  • Binckley CA, Resetarits WJ (2003) Functional equivalence of non-lethal effects: generalized fish avoidance determines distribution of gray treefrog, Hyla chrysoscelis, larvae. Oikos 102(3):623–629

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bouletreau-Merle J, Fouillet P (2002) How to overwinter and be a founder: egg-retention phenotypes and mating status in Drosophila melanogaster. Evol Ecol 16(4):309–332

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chase JM (1999) Food web effects of prey size refugia: variable interactions and alternative stable equilibria. Am Nat 154(5):559–570

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • De Courcy-Williams ME, Kravar-Garde L, Fenlon JS, Sunderland KD (2004) Phytoseiid mites in protected crops: the effect of humidity and food availability on egg hatch and adult life span of Iphiseius degenerans, Neoseiulus cucumeris, N. californicus, and Phytoseiulus persimilis (Acari: Phytoseiidae). Exp Appl Acarol 32:1–13

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • De Moraes GJ, McMurtry JA, Denmark HA, Campos CB (2004) A revised catalog of the mite family Phytoseiidae. 1st edn. Magnolia, Auckland

  • Eitam A, Blaustein L (2004) Oviposition habitat selection by mosquitoes in response to predator (Notonecta maculata) density. Physiol Entomol 29(2):188–191

    Google Scholar 

  • Faraji F, Janssen A, Sabelis MW (2001) Predatory mites avoid ovipositing near counterattacking prey. Exp Appl Acarol 25:613–623

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Faraji F, Janssen A, Sabelis MW (2002) Oviposition patterns in a predatory mite reduce the risk of egg predation caused by prey. Ecol Entomol 27:660–664

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Janssen A, Faraji F, van der Hammen T, Magalhães S, Sabelis MW (2002) Interspecific infanticide deters predators. Ecol Lett 5:490–494

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kessler A, Baldwin IT (2002) Manduca quinquemaculata’s optimization of intra-plant oviposition to predation, food quality and thermal constraints. Ecology 83:2346–2354

    Google Scholar 

  • Koskela E, Juutistenaho P, Mappes T, Oksanen TA (2000) Offspring defence in relation to litter size and age: experiment in the bank vole Clethrionomys glareolus. Evol Ecol 14:99–109

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Magalhaes S, Janssen A, Montserrat M, Sabelis MW (2005a) Prey attack and predators defend: counterattacking prey trigger parental care in predators. Proc R Soc Lond B 272(1575):1929–1933

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Magalhaes S, Tudorache C, Montserrat M, van Maanen R, Sabelis MW, Janssen A (2005b) Diet of intraguild predators affects antipredator behavior in intraguild prey. Behav Ecol 16(2):364–370

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mappes J, Kaitala A (1995) Host–plant selection and predation risk for offspring of the parent bug. Ecology 76(8):2668–2670

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mokany A, Shine R (2003) Oviposition site selection by mosquitoes is affected by cues from conspecific larvae and anuran tadpoles. Austral Ecol 28(1):33–37

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Montgomerie RD, Weatherhead PJ (1988) Risks and rewards of nest defence by parent birds. Quart Rev Biol 63:167–187

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Murphy PJ (2003a) Context-dependent reproductive site choice in a Neotropical frog. Behav Ecol 14(5):626–633

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Murphy PJ (2003b) Does reproductive site choice in a neotropical frog mirror variable risk facing offspring? Ecol Monogr 73(1):45–67

    Google Scholar 

  • Nomikou M, Janssen A, Sabelis MW (2003) Herbivore host plant selection: whitefly learns to avoid host plants that harbour predators of her offspring. Oecologia 136:484–488

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Polis GA, Holt RD (1992) Intraguild predation—the dynamics of complex trophic interactions. Trends Ecol Evol 7:151–154

    Google Scholar 

  • Reguera P, Gomendio M (2002) Flexible oviposition behavior in the golden egg bug (Phyllomorpha laciniata) and its implications for offspring survival. Behav Ecol 13(1):70–74

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Resetarits WJ (2001) Colonization under threat of predation: avoidance of fish by an aquatic beetle, Tropisternus lateralis (Coleoptera: Hydrophilidae). Oecologia 129(1):155–160

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sabelis MW (1981) Biological control of two-spotted spider mites using phytoseiid predators. Part 1. PhD Thesis, University of Wageningen, Wageningen

  • Stav G, Blaustein L, Margalith J (1999) Experimental evidence for predation risk sensitive oviposition by a mosquito, Culiseta longiareolata . Ecol Entomol 24(2):202–207

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trivers RL (1972) Parental investment and sexual selection. In: Campbell B (ed) Sexual selection and descent of man. Aldine, Chicago, IL

  • Trivers RL (1974) Parent–offspring conflict. Am Zool 14:249–264

    Google Scholar 

  • van Rijn PCJ, Tanigoshi LK (1999) Pollen as food source for the predatory mites Iphiseius degenerans and Neoseiulus cucumeris (Acari: Phytoseiidae): dietary range and life history. Exp Appl Acarol 23:785–802

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williams GC (1966) Natural selection, the cost of reproduction and the refinement of Lack’s principle. Am Nat 100:687–690

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang Y, Zhang ZQ, Lin J, Ji J (2000) Potential of Amblyseius cucumeris (Acari: Phytoseiidae) as a biocontrol agent against Schizotetranychus nanjingensis (Acari: Tetranychidae) in Fujian, China. Syst Appl Acarol Spec Publ 4:109–124

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

Maria Nomikou, Belén Belliure, Tessa van der Hammen, Pauline de Bruijn, João Ferreira, Christian Tudorache and Roos van Maanen are thanked for discussions. M. M. and A. J. were employed by the University of Amsterdam within the framework of an NWO-Pioneer project granted to A. M. de Roos, C. B. was supported by the Departament d’Universitats, Recerca i Societat de la Informació, and S. M. was supported by a Praxis XXI grant from the Portuguese government. The animals used for the research described in this publication are not test animals in the legal sense.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Marta Montserrat.

Additional information

Communicated by Sven Bacher.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Montserrat, M., Bas, C., Magalhães, S. et al. Predators induce egg retention in prey. Oecologia 150, 699–705 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-006-0527-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-006-0527-8

Keywords

Navigation