Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Persistence of invading gypsy moth populations in the United States

  • Population Ecology
  • Published:
Oecologia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Exotic invasive species are a mounting threat to native biodiversity, and their effects are gaining more public attention as each new species is detected. Equally important are the dynamics of exotic invasives that are previously well established. While the literature reports many examples of the ability of a newly arrived exotic invader to persist prior to detection and population growth, we focused on the persistence dynamics of an established invader, the European gypsy moth (Lymantria dispar) in the United States. The spread of gypsy moth is largely thought to be the result of the growth and coalescence of isolated colonies in a transition zone ahead of the generally infested area. One important question is thus the ability of these isolated colonies to persist when subject to Allee effects and inimical stochastic events. We analyzed the US gypsy moth survey data and identified isolated colonies of gypsy moth using the local indicator of spatial autocorrelation. We then determined region-specific probabilities of colony persistence given the population abundance in the previous year and its relationship to a suite of ecological factors. We observed that colonies in Wisconsin, US, were significantly more likely to persist in the following year than in other geographic regions of the transition zone, and in all regions, the abundance of preferred host tree species and land use category did not appear to influence persistence. We propose that differences in region-specific rates of persistence may be attributed to Allee effects that are differentially expressed in space, and that the inclusion of geographically varying Allee effects into colony-invasion models may provide an improved paradigm for addressing the establishment and spread of gypsy moth and other invasive exotic species.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Allee WC, Emerson AE, Park O, Park T, Schmidt KP (1949) Principles of animal ecology. WB Saunders, Philadelphia

    Google Scholar 

  • Allen JC, Schaffer WM, Rosko D (1993) Chaos reduces species extinction by amplifying local population noise. Nature 364:229–232

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Anselin L (1995) Local Indicators of Spatial Association - Lisa. Geogr Anal 27:93–115

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berger J (1990) Persistence of different-sized populations: An empirical assessment of rapid extinctions in bighorn sheep. Conserv Biol 4:91–98

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bess HA, Spurr SH, Littlefield EW (1947) Forest site conditions and the gypsy moth. Harv For Bull 22:1–26

    Google Scholar 

  • Bivand R (2004) Spatial dependence: weighting schemes, statistics, and models. http://cran.r-project.org/doc/packages/spdep.pdf. (cited 15 July 2004)

  • Boots B (2002) Local measures of spatial association. Ecoscience 9:168–176

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell RW (1967) The analysis of numerical change in gypsy moth populations. For Sci Monogr 15:1–33

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell RW (1973) Numerical behavior of a gypsy moth population system. For Sci 19:162–167

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell RW, Sloan RJ, Biazak CE (1977) Sources of mortality among late instar gypsy moth (Lepidoptera : Lymantriidae) larvae in sparse populations. Environ Entomol 6:865–871

    Google Scholar 

  • Decision-Support System for the Slow-the-Spread Project (2005) http://da.ento.vt.edu/. Cited 6 June 2005

  • Doane CC (1970) Primary pathogens and their role in development of an epizootic in gypsy moth. J Invertebr Pathol 15:21–27

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Doane CC, McManus ME (eds) (1981) The gypsy moth: research toward integrated pest management. USDA Tech Bull 1584, Washington

  • Drake JM (2004) Allee effects and the risk of biological invasion. Risk Anal 24:795–802

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Drake JM, Lodge DM (2004) Effects of environmental variation on extinction and establishment. Ecol Lett 7:26–30

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Drake JM, Lodge DM (2005) Allee effects, propagule pressure and the probability of establishment: risk analysis for biological invasions. Biol Invasions (in press)

  • Dwyer G, Dushoff J, Yee SH (2004) The combined effects of pathogens and predators on insect outbreaks. Nature 430:341–345

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Earn DJD, Rohani P, Grenfell BT (1998) Persistence, chaos and synchrony in ecology and epidemiology. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 265:7–10

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Elkinton JS, Gould JR, Liebhold AM, Smith HR, Wallner WE (1989) Are gypsy moth populations regulated at low density? In: Wallner WE, McManus KA (eds) Lymantriidae: a comparison of features of new and old world tussock moths. USDA For Serv GTR-NE-123, Washington, pp 233–249

    Google Scholar 

  • Elkinton JS, Liebhold AM (1990) Population dynamics of gypsy moth in North America. Annu Rev Entomol 35:571–596

    Google Scholar 

  • Elkinton JS, Healy WM, Buonaccorsi JP, Boettner GH, Hazzard A, Liebhold AM, Smith HR (1996) Interactions among gypsy moths, white-footed mice, and acorns. Ecology 77:2332–2342

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elkinton JS, Liebhold AM, Muzika RM (2004) Effects of alternative prey on predation by small mammals on gypsy moth pupae. Popul Ecol 46:171–178

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fagan WF (1999) Weak influences of initial conditions on metapopulation persistence times. Ecol Appl 9:1430–1438

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fagan WF, Lewis MA, Neubert MG, van den Driessche P (2002) Invasion theory and biological control. Ecol Lett 5:147–157

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Getis A, Ord JK (1996) Local spatial statistics: an overview. In: Longley P, Batty M (eds) Spatial analysis: modelling in a GIS environment. Wiley, New York, pp 261–277

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilbert M, Gregoire J-C, Freise JF, Heitland W (2004) Long-distance dispersal and human population density allow the prediction of invasive patterns in the horse chestnut leafminer Cameraria ohridella. J Anim Ecol 73:459–468

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gypsy Moth Digest (2004) USDA Forest Service, State and Private Forestry, Morgantown, WV http://na.fs.fed.us/wv/gmdigest/index.html (cited 15 July 2004)

  • Hanski I (1994) A Practical Model of Metapopulation Dynamics. J Anim Ecol 63:151–162

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hanski I (1999) Habitat connectivity, habitat continuity, and metapopulations in dynamic landscapes. Oikos 87:209–219

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hastings A (1996) Models of spatial spread: a synthesis. Biol Conserv 78:143–148

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hastings A (2003) Metapopulation persistence with age-dependent disturbance or succession. Science 301:1525–1526

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Heino M, Kaitala V, Ranta E, Lindström J (1997) Synchronous dynamics and rates of extinction in spatially structured populations. P Roy Soc Lond B Biol 264:481–486

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hengeveld R (1988) Mechanisms of Biological Invasions. J Biogeogr 15:819–828

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hosmer DW, Lemeshow S (2001) Applied logistic regression, 2nd edn. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones CG, Ostfeld RS, Richard MP, Schauber EM, Wolff JO (1998) Chain reactions linking acorns to gypsy moth outbreaks and Lyme disease risk. Science 279:1023–1026

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Keitt TH, Lewis MA, Holt RD (2001) Allee effects, invasion pinning, and species’ borders. Am Nat 157: 203–216

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Krushelnycky PD, Loope LL, Joe SM (2004) Limiting spread of a unicolonial invasive insect and characterization of seasonal patterns of range expansion. Biol Invasions 6:47–57

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leung B, Drake JM, Lodge DM (2004) Predicting invasions: Propagule pressure and the gravity of allee effects. Ecology 85:1651–1660

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levins R (1969) Some demographic and genetic consequences of environmental heterogeneity for biological control. Bull Entomol Soc Am 15: 237–240

    Google Scholar 

  • Liebhold A, Bascompte J (2003) The Allee effect, stochastic dynamics and the eradication of alien species. Ecol Lett 6:133–140

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liebhold AM, Halverson JA, Elmes GA (1992) Gypsy-moth invasion in North-America - a quantitative-analysis. J Biogeogr 19:513–520

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leuschner WA, Young JA, Walden SA, Ravlin FW (1996) Potential benefits of slowing the gypsy moth’s spread. South J Appl For 20: 65–73

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewis MA, Kareiva P (1993) Allee dynamics and the spread of invading organisms. Theoret Pop Biol 43:141–158

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mason CJ, McManus ML (1981) Larval dispersal of the gypsy moth. In: Doane CC, McManus ML (eds) The gypsy moth: Research toward integrated pest management. USDA Tech Bull 1584, Washington, pp 161–202

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayo JH, Straka TJ, Leonard DS (2003) The cost of slowing the spread of the gypsy moth (Lepidoptera: Lymantriidae). J Econ Entomol 96:1448–1454

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • McFadden MW, McManus ME (1991) An Insect out of control? The potential for spread and establishment of the gypsy moth in new forest areas in the United States. In: Baranchikov YN, Mattson WJ, Hain FP, Payne TL (eds) Forest insect guilds: patterns of interaction with host trees, GTR-NE-153. USDA Forest Service, Washington, pp 172–186

    Google Scholar 

  • Moilanen A, Hanski I (1998) Metapopulation dynamics: effects of habitat quality and landscape structure. Ecology 79:2503–2515

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morin RS, Liebhold AM, Luzader ER, Lister AJ, Gottschalk KW, Twardus DB (2005) Mapping host-species abundance of three major exotic forest pests USDA research Paper NE-726, USDA Forest Service, Newtown Square, Pennsylvania

  • Odell TM, Mastro VC (1980) Crepuscular activity of gypsy moth adults (Lymantria dispar). Environ Entomol 9:613–617

    Google Scholar 

  • Pimentel D, Lach L, Zuniga R, Morrison D (2000) Environmental and economic costs of nonindigenous species in the United States. Bioscience 50:53–65

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • R Development Core Team (2004) http://www.r-project.org (cited 9 July 2004)

  • Redman AM, Scriber JM (2000) Competition between the gypsy moth, Lymantria dispar, and the northern tiger swallowtail, Papilio canadensis: interactions mediated by host plant chemistry, pathogens, and parasitoids. Oecologia 125:218–228

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rohani P, Earn DJD, Grenfell BT (1999) Opposite patterns of synchrony in sympatric disease metapopulations. Science 286:968–971

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sample BE, Butler L, Zivkovich C, Whitmore RC, Reardon R (1996) Effects of Bacillus thuringiensis Berliner var. kurstaki and defoliation by the gypsy moth, Lymantria dispar (L.) (Lepidoptera: Lymantriidae) on native arthropods in West Virginia. Can Entomol 128:573–592

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • SAS Institute (1999) SAS/STAT® User’s guide, Version 8. Cary, NC

  • Schwalbe CP (1981) Disparlure-baited traps for survey and detection. In: Doane CC, McManus ML (Eds) The gypsy moth research toward integrated pest management. USDA Tech Bull 1584, Washington, pp. 542–548

    Google Scholar 

  • Sharov AA, Liebhold AM (1998a) Quantitative analysis of gypsy moth spread in the Central Appalachians. In: Baumgartner, et al (eds) Population and Community Ecology for Insect Management and Conservation. Balkema, Rotterdam, pp 99–110

    Google Scholar 

  • Sharov AA, Liebhold AM (1998b) Model of slowing the spread of gypsy moth (Lepidoptera : Lymantriidae) with a barrier zone. Ecol Appl 8:1170–1179

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sharov AA, Pijanowski BC, Liebhold AM, Gage SH (1999) What affects the rate of gypsy moth (Lepidoptera: Lymantriidae) spread: winter temperature or forest susceptibility?. Agric For Entomol 1:37–45

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sharov AA, Leonard D, Liebhold AM, Roberts EA, Dickerson W (2002) “Slow the Spread”: a national program to contain the gypsy moth. J Forest 100:30–35

    Google Scholar 

  • Sharov AA, Liebhold AM, Ravlin FW (1995) Prediction of gypsy-moth (Lepidoptera, Lymantriidae) mating success from pheromone trap counts. Environ Entomol 24:1239–1244

    Google Scholar 

  • Sharov AA, Liebhold AM, Roberts EA (1997) Correlation of counts of gypsy moths (Lepidoptera: Lymantriidae) in pheromone traps with landscape characteristics. Forest Sci 43:483–490

    Google Scholar 

  • Shea K (1998) Management of populations in conservation, harvesting and control. Trends Ecol Evol 13:371–375

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shigesada N, Kawasaki K (1997) Biological invasions: theory and practice. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Shigesada N, Kawasaki K, Takeda Y (1995) Modeling stratified diffusion in biological invasions. Am Nat 146:229–251

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smart J, Sutherland WJ, Watkinson AR, Gill JA (2004) A new means of presenting the results of logistic regression. Bull Ecol Soc Am 85: 100–102

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stephens PA, Sutherland WJ, Feckleton RP (1999) What is the Allee effect? Oikos 87: 185–190

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thurber DK, McClain WR, Whitmore RC (1994) Indirect effects of gypsy-moth defoliation on nest predation. J Wildl Manage 58:493–500

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tobin PC, Sharov AA, Leonard DS, Roberts EA, Liebhold AM (2004) Management of the gypsy moth through a decision algorithm under the Slow-the-Spread project. Am Entomol 50:200–209

    Google Scholar 

  • USGS (2003) National Land Cover Data. http://landcover.usgs.gov/natllandcover.asp. (cited 9 July 2004)

  • USGS (2004) North America digital elevation model. http://edcdaac.usgs.gov/gtopo30/Readme.html (cited 20 June 2004)

  • Williams DW, Liebhold AM (1995) Influence of weather oil the synchrony of gypsy-moth (Lepidoptera, Lymantriidae) outbreaks in New-England. Environ Entomol 24:987–995

    Google Scholar 

  • With KA (2004) Assessing the risk of invasive spread in fragmented landscapes. Risk Analysis 24:803–815

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We thank Sandy Liebhold, Randy Morin, and Gino Luzader (USDA Forest Service), Desta Fekedulegn and Jonathan Cumming (West Virginia University Statistics and Biology, respectively), and Andy Roberts and Matt Learn (Virginia Tech University Entomology) for their assistance. We also thank Sandy Liebhold and Mary Ann Fajvan for their critical comments in the preparation of this manuscript. This research was supported by USDA Forest Service Research Cooperative grant no. 04-CA-11242343-063.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Patrick C. Tobin.

Additional information

Communicated by John Reeve

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Whitmire, S.L., Tobin, P.C. Persistence of invading gypsy moth populations in the United States. Oecologia 147, 230–237 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-005-0271-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-005-0271-5

Keywords

Navigation