Abstract
Aedes aegypti (L.) is an important dengue, chikungunya, and yellow fever vector. Immature stages of this species inhabit human-made containers placed in residential landscapes, and the application of larvicides inside containers that cannot be eliminated is still considered a priority in control programs. Larvicidal efficacy is influenced by several factors, including the formulation used, the water quality, and the susceptibility of larvae, among others. If an attractant can be incorporated into a slow-release larvicide formulation, it will be feasible to direct the larvae into the source of insecticide and thereby improving its efficacy. We studied the influence of 1-octen-3ol and 3-methylphenol on the rate of Ae. aegypti larvae mortality using the larvicides Bacillus thuringiensis var. israelensis (Bti), temephos, and spinosad. These chemicals were combined with the larvicides mixed with agar during the bioassays. Mortality was registered every 10 min, and a lethal time 50 (LT50) was calculated. The inclusion of the Ae. aegypti larvae attractants with the larvicides into a solid agar matrix improved their efficiency obtaining a strong and marked reduction in the LT50 compared with the use of larvicides alone.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Aly C (1985) Feeding rate of larval Aedes vexans stimulated by food substances. J Am Mosq Control Assoc 1:506–510
Ang KT, Satwant S (2001) Epidemiology and new initiatives in the prevention and control of dengue in Malaysia. Dengue Bull 25:7–14
Barber JT, Burnton CP (1983) Chemotaxis of Culex pipiens quinquefasciatus larvae (Diptera: Culicidae) in response to amino acids. J Med Entomol 20:641–643
Barrera R (1996) Competition and resistance to starvation in larvae of container‐inhabiting Aedes mosquitoes. Ecol Entomol 21(2):117–127
Braga IA, Lima JBP, Soares SS, Valle D (2004) Aedes aegypti resistance to temephos during 2001 in several municipalities in the states of Rio de Janeiro, Sergipe and Alagoass, Brazil. Mem Inst Oswaldo Cruz 99:199–203
Bret BL, Larson LL, Schoonover JR, Sparks TC, Thompson GD (1997) Biological properties of spinosad. Down Earth 52(1):6–13
Cetin H, Yanikoglu A, Cilek JE (2005) Evaluation of the naturally-derived insecticide spinosad against Culex pipiens L.(Diptera: Culicidae) larvae in septic tank water in Antalya, Turkey. J Vector Ecol 30(1):151
Chadee DD, Ward RA, Novak RJ (1998) Natural habitats of Aedes aegypti in the Caribbean—a review. J Am Mosq Control 14(1):5–11
Chunsuttiwat S, Wasakarawa S (1994) Dengue vector control in Thailand: development towards environmental protection. Gaoxiong Yi Xue Ke Xue Za Zhi 10:122–123
Cook SM, Khan ZR, Pickett JA (2006) The use of push-pull strategies in integrated pest management. Annu Rev Entomol 52(1):375
Coosemans M, Carnevale P (1995) Malaria vector control: a critical review on chemical methods and insecticides. Ann Soc Belg Med Trop 75:13–31
Curtis CF, Hill N (1988) Comparison of methods of repelling mosquitoes. Entomol Exp Appl 49(1–2):175–179
Federici, BA, Wu D (1994) Synergism of insecticidal activity of Bacillus thuringiensis. In:R. Akhurst (ed.). Proc 2nd Canberra Bacillus thuringiensis meeting
Gonzalez PV, Gonzlez Audino PA, Masuh HM (2015) Behavioral response of Aedes aegypti (Diptera: Culicidae) larvae to synthetic and natural attractants and repellents. J Med Entomol. doi:10.1093/jme/tjv136
Gratz NG (1999) Emerging and resurging vector-borne diseases. Annu Rev Entomol 44(1):51–75
Harburguer LV, Seccacini E, Masuh H, Gonzalez Audino P, Zerba E, Licastro S (2009) Thermal behaviour and biological activity against Aedes aegypti (Diptera: Culicidae) of permethrin and pyriproxyfen in a smoke-generating formulation. Pest Manag Sci 65:1208–1214
Hertlein MB, Mavrotas C, Jousseaume C, Lysandrou M, Thompson GD, Jany W, Ritchie SA (2010) A review of spinosad as a natural product for larval mosquito control. J Am Mosq Control 26(1):67–87
Hwang YS, Kramer WL, Mulla MS (1980) Oviposition attractants and repellents of mosquitoes. Isolation and identification of oviposition repellents for Culex mosquitoes. J Chem Ecol 6:71–80
Kovendan K, Murugan K, Kumar AN, Vincent S, Hwang JS (2012) Bioefficacy of larvicidal and pupicidal properties of Carica papaya (Caricaceae) leaf extract and bacterial insecticide, spinosad, against chikungunya vector, Aedes aegypti (Diptera: Culicidae). Parasitol Res 110(2):669–678
Litchfield JA, Wilcoxon F (1949) A simplified method of evaluating dose-effect experiments. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 96(2):99–113
Majori G, Sabatinelli G, Villani F, Petrarca V (1986) Studies on insecticide susceptibility of Anopheles gambiae and Culex quinquefasciatus in the area of Ouagadougou, Burkina Faso (west Africa). J Am Mosq Control 2:305–309
Menger DJ, Otieno B, De Rijk M, Mukabana WR, Van Loon JJ, Takken W (2014) A push-pull system to reduce house entry of malaria mosquitoes. Malar J 13:119
Merritt RW, Dadd RH, Walker ED (1992) Feeding behavior, natural food, and nutritional relationships of larval mosquitoes. Annu Rev Entomol 37:349–376
Ocampo CB, Salazar-Terreros MJ, Mina NJ, Mc Allister S, Brogdon W (2011) Insecticide resistance status of Aedes aegypti in 10 localities in Colombia. Acta Trop 118(1):37–44
Patil CD, Patil SV, Salunke BK, Salunkhe RB (2012) Insecticidal potency of bacterial species Bacillus thuringiensis SV2 and Serratia nematodiphila SV6 against larvae of mosquito species Aedes aegypti, Anopheles stephensi, and Culex quinquefasciatus. Parasitol Res 110(5):1841–1847
Pilger D, De Maesschalckm M, Horstick O, San Martin JL (2010) Dengue outbreak response: documented effective interventions and evidence gaps. insectTropIKA.net. http://journal.tropika.net/pdf/tropika/v1n1/a02v1n1.pdf
Sadanandane C, Boopathi Doss PS, Jambulingam P, Zaim M (2009) Efficacy of two formulations of the bioinsecticide spinosad against Culex quinquefasciatus in India. J Am Mosq Control 25(1):66–73
Saunders DG, Bret BL (1997) Fate of spinosad in the environment. Down Earth 52(1):14–20
Scott T, Morrison A, Lorenz L, Clark G, Strickman D, Kittayapong P (2000) Longitudinal studies of Aedes agypti (Diptera: Culicidae) in Thailand and Puerto Rico: population dynamics. J Med Entomol 32:77–88
Seccacini E, Masuh H, Licastro S, Zerba E (2006) Laboratory and scaled up evaluation of cis-permethrin applied as a new ultra low volume formulation against Aedes aegypti (Diptera: Culicidae). Acta Trop 97:1–4
Service MW (1992) Importance of ecology in Aedes aegypti control. Southeast Asian J Trop Med Public Health 23:681–690
Skovmand O, Thiery I, Benzon GL, Sinegre G, Monteny N, Becker N (1998) Potency of products based on Bacillus thuringiensis var. israelensis: interlaboratory variations. J Am Mosq Control 14(3):298–304
Swaddiwudhipong W, Lerdlukanavonge P, Khumklam P, Koonchote S, Nguntra P, Chaovakiratipong C (1992) A survey of knowledge, attitude and practice of the prevention of dengue hemorrhagic fever in an urban community of Thailand. Southeast Asian J Trop Med Public Health 23:207–211
Thomas MB, Godfray HC, Read AF, Van Den Berg H, Tabashnik BE, van Lenteren JC, Wage JK, Takken W (2012) Lessons from agriculture for the sustainable management of malaria vectors. PLoS Med 9(7), e1001262
Tikar SN, Kumar A, Prasad GBKS, Prakash S (2009) Temephos-induced resistance in Aedes aegypti and its cross-resistance studies to certain insecticides from India. Parasitol Res 105(1):57–63
Tikar SN, Yadav R, Mendki MJ, Rao AN, Sukumaran D, Parashar BD (2014) Oviposition deterrent activity of three mosquito repellents diethyl phenyl acetamide (DEPA), diethyl m toluamide (DEET), and diethyl benzamide (DEB) on Aedes aegypti, Aedes albopictus, and Culex quinquefasciatus. Parasitol Res 113(1):101–106
Walker K, Lynch M (2007) Contributions of Anopheles larval control to malaria suppression in tropical Africa: review of achievements and potential. Med Vet Entomol 21:2–21
World Health Organization (WHO) (2006a) Report of the scientific working group meeting on dengue. TDR/SWG/08, Geneva, Switzerland
World Health Organization (WHO) (2006b) Pesticides and their application: for the control of vectors and pests of public health importance. 6th ed, Geneva, Switzerland
World Health Organization (WHO) (2007a) Methoprene in drinking-water: use for vector control in drinking-water sources and containers—background document for development of WHO guidelines for drinking-water quality WHO/SDE/NSM/07.01/11
World Health Organization (WHO) (2007b) Novaluron in drinking-water: use for vector control in drinking-water sources and containers—background document for development of WHO guidelines for drinking-water quality WHO/SDE/WSH/07.01/11
World Health Organization (WHO) (2008) Pyriproxyfen in drinking-water: use for vector control in drinking-water sources and containers—background document for development of WHO guidelines for drinking-water quality WHO/HSE/AMR/08.03/9
World Health Organization (WHO) (2009) Temephos in drinking-water: use for vector control in drinking-water sources and containers—background document for development of WHO guidelines for drinking-water quality WHO/HSE/WSH/09.01/1
World Health Organization (WHO) (2010) Spinosad DT in drinking-water: use for vector control in drinking-water sources and containers—background document for development of WHO guidelines for drinking-water quality WHO/HSE/WSH/10.01/12
Xia Y (2008) Molecular and cellular studies of mosquito odorant receptors and olfactory-driven larval behavior, PhD Thesis, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
Xue RD, Barnard DR, Ali A (2001) Laboratory and field evaluation of insect repellents as oviposition deterrents against the mosquito Aedes albopictus. Med Vet Entomol 15(2):126–131
Acknowledgments
This study received financial support by the ANPCyT of Argentina (PICT 2008–797). LH, PGA, and HM are members of the CONICET. PG has a grant from CONICET.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Gonzalez, P.V., Harburguer, L., González-Audino, P.A. et al. The use of Aedes aegypti larvae attractants to enhance the effectiveness of larvicides. Parasitol Res 115, 2185–2190 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00436-016-4960-2
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00436-016-4960-2