Skip to main content
Log in

Phylogenetic significance of chaetal arrangement and chaetogenesis in Maldanidae (Annelida)

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Zoomorphology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Chaetae are important structures to facilitate locomotion in annelids. Being at the interface between the organisms and its environment, chaetae are supposed to underlie strong functional constraints to optimize the relation between structure and function. As such chaetae are potentially susceptible for convergent evolution. On the other hand, chaetae gained enormous taxonomic importance due to their conservative structure in species and supraspecific taxa which reasonably can only be explained by strong evolutionary constrains that conserve their structure. In this paper, we study the chaetation and chaetogenesis in two species of Maldanidae, Clymenura clypeata Saint-Joseph 1894 and Johnstonia clymenoides Quatrefages 1866 to unravel conservative traits in their structure and development. In a literature survey across maldanids, we address questions on the ontogenetic variation, on homology and on the phylogenetic significance especially of the bearded hooked neurochaetae. We provide evidence that functionally constraint ontogenetic variation overlies historically (phylogenetically) constraint expression of structural information and can show that within maldanids a variety of different chaetal types must be homologous due to their ontogenetic continuity. Furthermore, we use chaetation and chaetal characters to discuss the subgroup relationships within Maldanomorpha in the light of recent cladistics analyses based on morphological and molecular data. This study shows that functional considerations need to use phylogenies as backbone.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Arwidsson I (1906) Studien über die skandinavischen und arktischen Maldaniden nebst Zusammenstellung der übringen bisher bekannten Arten dieser Familie. Dissertation, University of Uppsala

  • Bartolomaeus T (1995a) Structure and formation of the uncini in Pectinaria koreni, Pectinaria auricoma (Terebellida) and Spirorbis spirorbis (Sabellida): implications for annelid phylogeny and the position of the Pogonophora. Zoomorphology 115:161–177

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bartolomaeus T (1995b) Zur Ultrastruktur von Psammodrilus balanoglossoides: Hypothesen zur Stellung der Psammodrilida innerhalb der Annelida. Microfauna Mar 10:295–303

    Google Scholar 

  • Bartolomaeus T (1998) Chaetogenesis in polychaetous Annelida: significance for annelid systematics and the position of the Pogonophora. Zoology 100:348–364

    Google Scholar 

  • Bartolomaeus T (2002) Structure and formation of thoracic and abdominal uncini in Fabricia stellaris (Müller 1774)—implication for the evolution of Sabellida (Annelida). Zool Anz 241:1–17

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bartolomaeus T, Meyer K (1997) Development and phylogenetic significance of hooked setae in Arenicolidae (Polychaeta, Annelida). Invertebr Biol 116:227–242

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bleidorn C, Hausen H (2007) Axiothella isocirra, a new species of Maldanidae (Annelida: Polychaeta) from Belize. Proc Biol Soc Wash 120:49–55

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bleidorn C, Vogt L, Bartolomaeus T (2003) New insights into polychaete phylogeny (Annelida) inferred from 18S rDNA sequences. Mol Phylogenet Evol 29:279–288

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Blumer MJF, Gahleitner P, Narzt T et al (2002) Ribbons of semithin sections: an advanced method with a new type of diamond knife. J Neurosci Methods 120:11–16

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bouligand Y (1967) Les soies et les cellules associées chez deux Annélides Polychètes. Zeitschrift für Zellforsch. und mikroskopische Anat 79:332–363

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • De Assis JE, Christoffersen ML (2011) Phylogenetic relationships within Maldanidae (Capitellida, Annelida), based on morphological characters. Syst Biodivers 9:233–245

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • de Matos Nogueira JM, Fitzhugh K, Hutchings P (2013) The continuing challenge of phylogenetic relationships in Terebelliformia (Annelida: Polychaeta). Invertebr Syst 27(2):186–238

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fauchald K (1977) The polychaete worms: Definitions and keys to the orders, families and genera. Nat Hist Mus Los Angeles County Sci Ser 28:1–188

    Google Scholar 

  • Fitzhugh K (1991) Uncini and the anchor-function hypothesis: empirical tests and causal explanations. Bull Mar Sci 48:574–583

    Google Scholar 

  • Green KD (1997) Petaloclymene pacifica, a new genus and species of Maldanidae (Annelida: Polychaeta). Bull Mar Sci 60:235–239

    Google Scholar 

  • Grobe P, Vogt L (2009) Morph. D. Base 2.0. In: A public date base Morphol. Data, metadata, phylogenetic matrices. http://www.morphdbase.de

  • Hausen H (2005) Chaetae and chaetogenesis in polychaetes (Annelida). Hydrobiologia 535–536:37–52

    Google Scholar 

  • Hausen H, Bleidorn C (2006) Significance of chaetal arrangement for maldanid systematics (Annelida, Maldanidae). Sci Mar 70(S3):75–79

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holthe T (1986) Evolution, systematics and distribution of the Polychaeta Terebellomorpha, with a catalogue of the taxa and a bibliography. Gunneria 55:1–236

    Google Scholar 

  • Imajima M, Shiraki Y (1982) Maldanidae (Annelida: Polychaeta) from Japan (Part 1). Bull Natl Sci Museum Tokyo 8(1):7–46

    Google Scholar 

  • Koide Y, Hasan I, Asanuma A, Fujii Y, Ogawa Y, Kobayashi H, Ozeki Y (2015) Expression of various types of glycans in the lugworm. Ann Mar Biol Res 2(1):1005

    Google Scholar 

  • Kongsrud JA, Rapp HT (2012) Nicomache (Loxochona) lokii sp. nov. (Annelida: Polychaeta: Maldanidae) from the Loki’s Castle vent field: an important structure builder in an Arctic vent system. Polar Biol 35:161–170

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kremer JR, Mastronarde DN, McIntosh JR (1996) Computer visualization of three-dimensional image data using IMOD. J Struct Biol 116:71–76

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Merz RA (2015) Textures and traction: how tube-dwelling polychaetes get a leg up. Inv Biol 134:61–77

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Merz RA, Woodin SA (2000) Hooked setae : tests of the anchor hypothesis. Invertebr Biol 19:67–82

    Google Scholar 

  • Merz R, Woodin S (2006) Polychaete chaetae: function, fossils, and phylogeny. Integr Comp Biol 46:481–496

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Meyer K, Bartolomaeus T (1996) Ultrastructure and formation of the hooked setae in Owenia fusiformis delle Chiaje, 1842: implications for annelid phylogeny. Can J Zool 74:2143–2153

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meyer R, Bartolomaeus T (1997) Ultrastruktur und Morphogenese der Hakenborsten bei Psammodrilus balanoglossoides—Bedeutung für die Stellung der Psammodrilida (Annelida). Microfauna Mar 11:87–113

    Google Scholar 

  • Meyer C, Westheide W (1997) Boguea panwaensis, a new species from Thailand: the first member of the Bogueinae (Polychaeta: Matdanidae) to be found outside northeast America. Proc Biol Soc Wash 110:203–209

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Clair R, Cloney R (1974) Patterns of morphogenesis mediated by dynamic microvilli: chaetogenesis in Nereis vexillosa. Cell Tissue Res 151:141–157

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ogawa Y, Kimura S, Wada M (2011) Electron diffraction and high-resolution imaging on highly-crystalline β-chitin microfibril. J Struct Biol 176:83–90

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Pilgrim M (1977) The functional morphology and possible taxonomic significance of the parapodia of the maldanid polychaetes Clymenella torquata and Euclymene oerstedi. J Morphol 152:281–302

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rouse GW, Pleijel F (2001) Polychaetes. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Rousset V, Pleijel F, Rouse G et al (2007) A molecular phylogeny of annelids. Cladistics 22:1–23

    Google Scholar 

  • Schroeder P (1984) Chaetae. In: Bereiter-Hahn J, Matoltsy AG, Richards KS (eds) Biol. Integument SE—18. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg, pp 297–309

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Souza CP, Almeida BC, Colwell RR, Rivera IN (2011) The importance of chitin in the marine environment. Mar Biotec 13:823–830

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Specht A, Westheide W (1988) Intra-and interspecific ultrastructural character variation: the chaetation of the Microphthalmus listensis species group (Polychaeta, Hesionidae). Zoomorphology 107:371–376

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Struck TH, Schult N, Kusen T et al (2007) Annelid phylogeny and the status of Sipuncula and Echiura. BMC Evol Biol 7:57

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Struck TH, Paul C, Hill N et al (2011) Phylogenomic analyses unravel annelid evolution. Nature 471:95–98

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Tilic E, Hausen H, Bartolomaeus T (2014) Chaetal arrangement and chaetogenesis of hooded hooks in Lumbrineris (Scoletoma) fragilis and Lumbrineris tetraura (Eunicida, Annelida). Invertebr Biol 133:354–370

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tilic E, Lehrke J, Bartolomaeus T (2015) Homology and evolution of the Chaetae in Echiura (Annelida). PLoS One 10(3):e0120002

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Weigert A, Helm C, Meyer M et al (2014) Illuminating the base of the annelid tree using transcriptomics. Mol Biol Evol 31(6):1391–1401

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wolf PS (1983) A revision of the bogueidae and its reduction to bogueinae a subfamily of maldanidae polychaeta. Proc Biol Soc Wash 96:238–249

    Google Scholar 

  • Woodin SA, Merz RA (1987) Holding on by their hooks: anchors for worms. Evolution 41(2):427–432

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We express our gratitude to the staff of the Station de Biologie Marine in Concarneau for years of hospitality and support of our research. We would also like to thank Tatjana Bartz and Claudia Müller for technical support. Our thanks are also due to two anonymous referees. Their efforts increased the quality of this paper.

Conflict of interest

Author declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical standard

We neither used endangered species nor were the investigated animals collected in protected areas. All animals were collected with the permission of the local marine biological stations: the Station Biologie Marine, Concarneau (France), and the Station Marine d’ Arcachon (France). All applicable international, national and/or institutional guidelines for the care and use of animals were followed. The authors received no specific funding for this work.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ekin Tilic.

Additional information

Communicated by A. Schmidt-Rhaesa.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Tilic, E., von Döhren, J., Quast, B. et al. Phylogenetic significance of chaetal arrangement and chaetogenesis in Maldanidae (Annelida). Zoomorphology 134, 383–401 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00435-015-0272-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00435-015-0272-9

Keywords

Navigation