Skip to main content
Log in

Morphometric variation in allopatric populations of Aegla platensis (Crustacea: Decapoda: Anomura): possible evidence for cryptic speciation

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Zoomorphology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Aegla platensis is a freshwater crustacean species that forms a nonmonophyletic group, which may indicate that the taxon is composed of cryptic species. Our objective was to test if allopatric populations of A. platensis differ in carapace shape, aiming to clarify the species situation. We used a geometric morphometric approach to analyze the carapace shape of 11 populations of A. platensis, four from Argentina and seven from Brazil. Our results showed that all the populations differ significantly in carapace shape, except two populations from Argentina and two from Brazil. The Argentinean and Brazilian populations formed two separate groups and were separated by high values of shape distance. This suggests the existence of reproductive isolation between the populations from the two groups. Shape distances between populations within each country were lower. Allopatric populations of A. platensis may be isolated from each other by the difficulty of migration, leading to interruption of gene flow and differentiation in carapace shape.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adams DC, Funk DJ (1997) Morphometric inferences on sibling species and sexual dimorphism in Neochlamisus bebbianae leaf beetles: multivariate applications of thin-plate spline. Syst Biol 46:180–194

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Adams DC, Rohlf FJ, Slice DE (2004) Geometric morphometrics: ten years of progress following the ‘revolution’. Ital J Zool 71:5–16

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Adams DC, Rohlf FJ, Slice DE (2013) A field comes of age: geometric morphometrics in the 21st century. Hystrix 24:7–14

    Google Scholar 

  • Alibert P, Moureau B, Dommergues J-L, David B (2001) Differentiation at microgeographical scale within two species of ground beetle, Cabarus auronitens and C. nemoralis (Coleoptera, Carabidae): a geometrical morphometric approach. Zool Scr 30:299–311

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Almeida MJ, Flores AAV, Queiroga H (2008) Effect of crab size and habitat type on the locomotory activity of juvenile shore crabs, Carcinus maenas. Estuar Coast Shelf Sci 80:509–516

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Apte S, Smith PJ, Wallis GP (2007) Mitochondrial phylogeography of New Zealand freshwater crayfishes, Paranephrops spp. Mol Ecol 16:1897–1908

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bartholomei-Santos ML, Roratto PA, Santos S (2011) High genetic differentiation of Aegla longirostri (Crustacea, Decapoda, Anomura) populations in southern Brazil revealed by multi-loci microsatellite analysis. Genet Mol Res 10:4133–4146

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Baylac M (2008) Rmorph: a R geometric and multivariate morphometrics library. Available from the author: baylac@mnhn.fr

  • Bertocchi S, Brusconi S, Gherardi F, Buccianti A, Scalici M (2008) Morphometrical characterization of the Austropotamobius pallipes species complex. J Nat Hist 42:2063–2077

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bickford D, Lohman DJ, Sodhi NS, Ng PKL, Meier R, Winker K, Ingram KK, Das I (2007) Cryptic species as a window on diversity and conservation. Trends Ecol Evol 22:148–155

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bond-Buckup G, Buckup L (1994) A família Aeglidae (Crustacea, Decapoda, Anomura). Arq Zool 32:159–346

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bond-Buckup G, Bueno AAP, Keunecke KA (1996) Primeiro estágio juvenil de Aegla prado Schmitt (Crustacea, Decapoda, Anomura, Aeglidae). Rev Bras Zool 13:1049–1061

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bond-Buckup G, Jara CG, Pérez-Losada M, Buckup L, Crandall KA (2008) Global diversity of crabs (Aeglidae: Anomura: Decapoda) in freshwater. Hydrobiologia 595:267–273

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bookstein FL (1991) Morphometric tools for landmarks data. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Buhay JE, Moni G, Mann N, Crandall KA (2007) Molecular taxonomy in the dark: evolutionary history, phylogeography, and diversity of cave crayfish in the subgenus Aviticambarus, genus Cambarus. Mol Phylogenet Evol 42:435–448

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cordeiro-Estrela P, Baylac M, Denys C, Marinho-Filho J (2006) Interspecific patterns of skull variation between sympatric Brazilian vesper mice: geometric morphometrics assessment. J Mammal 87:1270–1279

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dalosto M, Santos S (2011) Differences in oxygen consumption and diel activity as adaptations related to microhabitat in Neotropical freshwater decapods (Crustacea). Comp Biochem Phys A 160:461–466

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Daniels SR, Gouws G, Stewart BA, Coke M (2003) Molecular and morphometric data demonstrate the presence of cryptic lineages among freshwater crabs (Decapoda: Potamonautidae: Potamonautes) from the Drakensberg Mountains, South Africa. Biol J Linn Soc 78:129–147

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fornel R, Cordeiro-Estrela P, Freitas TRO (2010) Skull shape and size variation in Ctenomys minutus (Rodentia: Ctenomyidae) in geographical, chromosomal polymorphism, and environmental contexts. Biol J Linn Soc 101:705–720

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Giri F, Loy A (2008) Size and shape variation of two freshwater crabs in Argentinean Patagonia: the influence of sexual dimorphism, habitats, and species interaction. J Crustac Biol 28:37–45

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gittenberger E (1991) What about non-adaptive radiation? Biol J Linn Soc 43:263–272

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harris DJ, Crandall KA (2000) Intragenomic variation within ITS1 and ITS2 of freshwater crayfishes (Decapoda: Cambaridae): implications for phylogenetic and microsatellite studies. Mol Biol Evol 17:284–291

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hepp LU, Fornel R, Restello RM, Trevisan A, Santos S (2012) Intraspecific morphological variation in a freshwater crustacean Aegla plana in Southern Brazil: effects of geographical isolation on carapace shape. J Crustac Biol 32:511–518

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hillis DM (1987) Molecular versus morphological approaches to systematics. Annu Rev Ecol Evol Sci 18:23–42

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hopkins MJ, Thurman CL (2010) The geographic structure of morphological variation in eight species of fiddler crabs (Ocypodidae: genus Uca) from the eastern United States and Mexico. Biol J Linn Soc 100:248–270

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jara CG (1989) Aegla denticulata lacustris, new subspecies, from lake Rupanco, Chile (Crustacea, Decapoda, Anomura, Aeglidae). Proc Biol Soc Wash 102:385–393

    Google Scholar 

  • Klingenberg CP (2011) MorphoJ: an integrated software package for geometric morphometrics. Mol Ecol Resour 11:353–357

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Klingenberg CP, Barluenga M, Meyer A (2002) Shape analysis of symmetric structures: quantifying variation among individuals and asymmetry. Evolution 56:1909–1920

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Knowlton N (1986) Cryptic and sibling species among the Decapoda Crustacea. J Crustac Biol 6:356–363

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kozak KH, Weisrock DW, Larson A (2006) Rapid lineage accumulation in a non-adaptive radiation: phylogenetic analysis of diversification rate in eastern North American woodland salamanders (Plethodontidae: Plethodon). P R Soc B 273:539–546

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • López-Greco LS, Viau V, Lavolpe M, Bond-Buckup G, Rodriguez EM (2004) Juvenile hatching and maternal care in Aegla uruguayana (Anomura, Aeglidae). J Crustac Biol 24:309–313

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Losos JB (2010) Adaptive radiation, ecological opportunity, and evolutionary determinism. Am Nat 175:623–639

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Martin JW, Abele LG (1988) External morphology of the genus Aegla (Decapoda, Anomura, Aeglidae). Sm C Zool 453:iv+46

  • Mathews LM, Adams L, Anderson E, Basile M, Gottardi E, Buckholt MA (2008) Genetic and morphological evidence for substantial hidden biodiversity in a freshwater crayfish species complex. Mol Phylogenet Evol 48:126–135

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mitteroecker P, Gunz P (2009) Advances in geometric morphometrics. Evol Biol 36:235–247

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moritz C (1994) Defining ‘Evolutionary Significant Units’ for conservation. Trends Ecol Evol 9:373–375

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Morrone JJ, Lopretto EC (1994) Distributional patterns of freshwater Decapoda (Crustacea: Malacostraca) in southern South America: a panbiogeographic approach. J Biogeogr 21:97–109

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nicolet H (1849) Crustaceos. In: Gay C (ed) Historia Física y Politica de Chile: Zoologia. Maulde y Renou, Paris, pp 198–201

  • Nosil P (2008) Ernst Mayr and the integration of geographic and ecological factors in speciation. Biol J Linn Soc 95:26–46

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pérez-Losada M, Bond-Buckup G, Jara CG, Crandall KA (2004) Molecular systematics of Southern South American freshwater “crabs” Aegla (Decapoda: Anomura: Aeglidae) using multiple heuristic tree search approaches. Syst Biol 53:767–780

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Pfenninger M, Schwenk K (2007) Cryptic and animal species are homogeneously distributed among taxa and biogeographical regions. BMC Evol Biol 7:1–6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • R Development Core Team (2012) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. ISBN 3-900051-07-0. http://www.r-project.org/

  • Rieseberg LH, Burke JM (2001) The biological reality of species: gene flow, selection, and collective evolution. Taxon 50:47–67

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rohlf FJ (2010) tpsDig2, version 2.16. Department of Ecology and Evolution, State University of New York, Stony Brook, NY. http://life.bio.sunysb.edu/morph

  • Rohlf FJ, Marcus LF (1993) A revolution in morphometrics. Trends Ecol Evol 8:129–132

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rohlf FJ, Slice D (1990) Extensions of the Procrustes method for the optimal superimposition of landmarks. Syst Zool 39:40–59

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rudolph E, Retamal F, Martínez A (2010) Cultivo de camarón de río Samastacus spinifrons: ¿una nueva alternativa para la diversificación de la acuicultura chilena? Lat Am J Aquat Res 38:254–264

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rufino M, Abelló P, Yule AB (2004) The effect of alcohol and freezing preservation on carapace size and shape in Liocarcinus depurator (Crustacea, Brachyura). In: Morphometrics. Springer, Heidelberg, pp. 45–53

  • Sáez AG, Lozano E (2005) Body doubles. Nature 433:111

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Santos S, Bond-Buckup G, Pérez-Losada M, Jara CG, Crandall KA, Buckup L (2010) New records and description of a new species of Aeglidae (Crustacea: Anomura) from river basins in Southern Brazil. Nauplius 18:79–86

    Google Scholar 

  • Santos S, Jara CG, Bartholomei-Santos ML, Pérez-Losada M, Crandall KA (2013) New species and records of the genus Aegla Leach, 1820 (Crustacea, Anomura, Aeglidae) from the West-Central region of Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil. Nauplius 21:211–223

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schemske DW (2000) Understanding the origin of species. Evolution 54:1069–1073

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schluter D, Mcphail JD (1993) Character displacement and replicate adaptive radiation. Trends Ecol Evol 8:197–200

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Schmitt W (1942) The species of Aegla, endemic South American fresh-water crustaceans. Proc U S Nat 91:431–520

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Slatkin M (1987) Gene flow and the geographic structure of natural populations. Science 236:787–792

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sobel JM, Chen GF, Watt LR, Schemske DW (2009) The biology of speciation. Evolution 64:295–315

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Trevisan A, Masunari S (2010) Geographical distribution of Aegla schmitti Hobbs III, 1979 (Decapoda Anomura Aeglidae) and morphometric variations in male populations from Paraná State, Brazil. Nauplius 18:45–55

    Google Scholar 

  • Trevisan A, Hepp LU, Santos S (2009) Abundância e distribuição de Aeglidae (Crustacea: Anomura) em função do uso da terra na bacia hidrográfica do Rio Jacutinga, Rio Grande do Sul, Brasil. Zoologia 26:419–426

    Google Scholar 

  • Zelditch ML, Swiderski DL, Sheets HD, Fink WL (2004) Geometric morphometrics for biologists: a primer. Elsevier Academic Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors are grateful to the Fundación Miguel Lillo, in the person of Marcela Peralta, for the samples of Aegla platensis. To Dr. Michel Baylac for the Rmorph package. To Alberto Senra Gonçalves for the help with figures and comments on the manuscript. To Marcelo Marchet Dalosto for the help with translations and comments on the manuscript. To CNPq (Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico) for the scholarship and the productivity grant to SS, and to CAPES (Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior) for the master’s degree scholarship to ABM.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sandro Santos.

Additional information

Communicated by Andreas Schmidt-Rhaesa.

Appendix

Appendix

See Table 2.

Table 2 Result of the pairwise MANOVA for populations of Aegla platensis, with Bonferroni correction to adjustment of p value

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Marchiori, A.B., Fornel, R. & Santos, S. Morphometric variation in allopatric populations of Aegla platensis (Crustacea: Decapoda: Anomura): possible evidence for cryptic speciation. Zoomorphology 134, 45–53 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00435-014-0242-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00435-014-0242-7

Keywords

Navigation