Abstract
Sense of agency refers to the feeling of controlling an external event through one’s own action. On one influential view, sense of agency is inferred after an action, by “retrospectively” comparing actual effects of actions against their intended effects. However, it has been recently shown that earlier processes, linked to action selection, may also contribute to sense of agency, in advance of the action itself, and independently of action effects. The inferior parietal cortex (IPC) may underpin this “prospective” contribution to agency, by monitoring signals relating to fluency of action selection in dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC). Here, we combined transcranial stimulation (TMS) with subliminal priming of action selection to investigate the causal role of these regions in the prospective coding of agency. In a first experiment, we showed that TMS over left IPC at the time of action selection disrupts perceived control over subsequent effects of action. In a second experiment, we exploited the temporal specificity of single-pulse TMS to pinpoint the exact timing of IPC contribution to sense of agency. We replicated the reduction in perceived control at the point of action selection, while observing no effect of TMS-induced disruption of IPC at the time of action outcomes.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Amassian VE, Cracco RQ, Maccabee PJ, Cracco JB, Rudell AP, Eberle L (1998) Transcranial magnetic stimulation in study of the visual pathways. J Clin Neurophysiol 15:288–403
Blakemore SJ, Wolpert D, Frith C (1998) Central cancellation of self-produced tickle sensation. Nat Neurosci 1:635–640
Boroojerdi B, Meister IG, Foltys H, Sparing R, Cohen LG, Topper R (2002) Visual and motor cortex excitability: a transcranial magnetic stimulation study. Clin Neurophysiol 113:1501–1504
Buelte D, Meister IG, Staedtgen M, Dambeck N, Sparing R, Grefkes C, Boroojerdi B (2008) The role of the anterior intraparietal sulcus in crossmodal processing of object features in humans: an rTMS study. Brain Res 1217:110–118
Chambon V, Haggard P (2012) Sense of control depends on fluency of action selection, not motor performance. Cognition 125:441–451
Chambon V, Haggard P (2013) Premotor or ideomotor: how does the experience of action come about? In: Prinz W, Beisert M, Herwig A (eds) Action science: foundations of an emerging discipline. MIT Press, Cambridge
Chambon V, Wenke D, Fleming SM, Prinz W, Haggard P (2013) An online neural substrate for sense of agency. Cereb Cortex 23:1031–1037
Damen TG, van Baaren RB, Djiksterhuis A (2014) You should read this! Perceiving and acting upon action primes influences one’s sense of agency. J Exp Soc Psychol 50:21–26
David N, Cohen MX, Newen A, Bewernick BH, Shah NJ, Fink GR, Vogeley K (2007) The extrastriate cortex distinguishes between the consequences of one’s own and others’ behavior. NeuroImage 36:1004–1014
David N, Newen A, Vogeley K (2008) The “sense of agency” and its underlying cognitive and neural mechanisms. Conscious Cogn 17:523–534
Dehaene S, Artiges E, Naccache L, Martelli C, Viard A, Schürhoff F, Recasens C, Martinot ML, Leboyer M, Martinot JL (2003) Conscious and subliminal conflicts in normal subjects and patients with schizophrenia: the role of the anterior cingulate. Proc Natl Acad Sci 100:13722–13727
Farrer C, Franck N, Georgieff N, Frith CD, Decety J, Jeannerod M (2003) Modulating the experience of agency: a positron emission tomography study. NeuroImage 18:324–333
Farrer C, Frey SH, Van Horn JD, Tunik E, Turk D, Inati S, Grafton ST (2008) The angular gyrus computes action awareness representations. Cereb Cortex 18:254–261
Fourneret P, Jeannerod M (1998) Limited conscious monitoring of motor performance in normal subjects. Neuropsychologia 36:1133–1140
Franck N, Farrer C, Georgieff N, Marie-Cardine M, Dalery J, d’Amato T, Jeannerod M (2001) Defective recognition of one’s own actions in patients with schizophrenia. Am J Psychiatry 158:454–459
Frith CD, Friston K, Liddle PF, Frackowiak RSJ (1991) Willed action and the prefrontal cortex in man: a study with PET. Proc R Soc Lond B Bio Sci 244:241–246
Frith CD, Blakemore SJ, Wolpert DM (2000) Abnormalities in the awareness and control of action. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 355:1771–1788
Garrido MI, Kilner JM, Stephan KE, Friston KJ (2009) The mismatch negativity: a review of underlying mechanisms. Clin Neurophysiol 120:453–463
Gentsch A, Schütz-Bosbach S (2011) I did it: unconscious expectation of sensory consequences modulates the experience of self-agency and its functional signature. J Cogn Neurosci 23:3817–3828
Gerloff C, Corwell B, Chen R, Hallett M, Cohen LG (1997) Stimulation over the human supplementary motor area interferes with the organization of future elements in complex motor sequences. Brain 120:1587–1602
Haggard P (2005) Conscious intention and motor cognition. Trends Cogn Sci 9:290–295
Haggard P, Chambon V (2012) Sense of agency. Curr Biol 22:390–392
Haggard P, Clark S (2003) Intentional action: conscious experience and neural prediction. Conscious Cogn 12:695–707
Haggard P, Tsakiris M (2009) The experience of agency: feelings, judgements, and responsibility. Curr Dir Psychol Sci 18:242–246
Haggard P, Clark S, Kalogeras J (2002) Voluntary action and conscious awareness. Nat Neurosci 5:382–385
Herwig U, Satrapi P, Schonfeldt-Lecuona C (2003) Using the international 10–20 EEG system for positioning of transcranial magnetic stimulation. Brain Topogr 16:95–99
Kamitani Y, Shimojo S (1999) Manifestation of scotomas created by transcranial magnetic stimulation of human visual cortex. Nat Neurosci 2:767–771
Kammer T, Nusseck HG (1998) Are recognition deficits following occipital lobe TMS explained by raised detection threshold? Neuropsychologia 36:1161–1166
Keel JC, Smith MJ, Wassermann EM (2001) A safety screening questionnaire for transcranial magnetic stimulation. Clin Neurophysiol 112:720
Kessels RP, d’Alfonso AA, Postma A, de Haan EH (2000) Spatial working memory performance after high-frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation of the left and right posterior parietal cortex in humans. Neurosci Lett 287:68–70
Leube DT, Knoblich G, Erb M, Grodd W, Bartels M, Kircher TT (2003) The neural correlates of perceiving one’s own movements. NeuroImage 20:2084–2090
Lingnau A, Vorberg D (2005) The time course of response inhibition in masked priming. Percept Psychophys 67:545–557
Linser K, Goschke T (2007) Unconscious modulation of the conscious experience of control. Cognition 104:459–475
MacDonald PA, Paus T (2003) The role of parietal cortex in awareness of self-generated movements: a transcranial magnetic stimulation study. Cereb Cortex 13:962–967
Martikainen MH, Kaneko K, Hari R (2005) Suppressed responses to self-triggered sounds in the human auditory cortex. Cereb Cortex 15:299–302
Metcalfe J, Greene MJ (2007) Metacognition of agency. J Exp Psychol Gen 136:184–199
Moore JW, Fletcher PC (2012) Sense of agency: a review of cue integration approaches. Conscious Cogn 21:59–68
Moore J, Haggard P (2008) Awareness of action: inference and prediction. Conscious Cogn 17:136–144
Moore JW, Sukhvinder OS (2012) Intentional binding and the sense of agency: a review. Conscious Cogn 21:546–561
Moore JW, Wegner DM, Haggard P (2009) Modulating the sense of agency with external cues. Conscious Cogn 18:1056–1064
Muri RM, Buhler R, Heinemann D, Mosimann UP, Felblinger J, Schlaepfer TE, Hess CW (2002) Hemispheric asymmetry in visuospatial attention assessed with transcranial magnetic stimulation. Exp Brain Res 143:426–430
Nieto-Castañón A, Fedorenko E (2012) Subject-specific functional localizers increase sensitivity and functional resolution of multi-subject analyses. Neuroimage 15:1646–1669
Okamoto M, Dan H, Sakamoto K, Takeo K, Shimizu K, Kohno S, Oda I, Isobe S, Suzuki T, Kohyama K, Dan I (2004) Three-dimensional probabilistic anatomical cranio-cerebral correlation via the international 10–20 system oriented for transcranial functional brain mapping. Neuroimage 21:99–111
Oliver R, Bjoertomt O, Driver J, Greenwood R, Rothwell J (2009) Novel “hunting” method using transcranial magnetic stimulation over parietal cortex disrupts visuospatial sensitivity in relation to motor thresholds. Neuropsychologia 47:3152–3161
Prime SL, Vesia M, Crawford JD (2008) Transcranial magnetic stimulation over posterior parietal cortex disrupts transsaccadic memory of multiple objects. J Neurosci 28:6938–6949
Rajkowska G, Goldman-Rakic PS (1995a) Cytoarchitectonic definition of prefrontal areas in the normal human cortex: I. Remapping of areas 9 and 46 using quantitative criteria. Cereb Cortex 5:307–322
Rajkowska G, Goldman-Rakic PS (1995b) Cytoarchitectonic definition of prefrontal areas in the normal human cortex: II. Variability in locations of areas 9 and 46 and relationship to the Talairach Coordinate System. Cereb Cortex 5:323–337
Robertson EM, Theoret H, Pascual-Leone A (2003) Studies in cognition: the problems solved and created by transcranial magnetic stimulation. J Cogn Neurosci 15:948–960
Rossi S, Cappa SF, Babiloni C, Pasqualetti P, Miniussi C, Carducci F, Babiloni F, Rossini PM (2001) Prefrontal cortex in long-term memory: an ‘‘interference’’ approach using magnetic stimulation. Nat Neurosci 4:948–952
Sack AT, Cohen Kadosh R, Schuhmann T, Moerel M, Walsh V, Goebel R (2009) Optimizing functional accuracy of TMS in cognitive studies: a comparison of methods. J Cogn Neurosci 21:201–221
Sanches M, Caetano S, Nicoletti M, Monkul ES, Chen HH, Hatch JP, Yeh PH, Mullis RL, Keshavan MS, Rajowska G, Soares JC (2009) An MRI-based approach for the measurement of the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex in humans. Psychiatry Res 173:150–154
Sanger TD, Garg RR, Chen R (2001) Interactions between two different inhibitory systems in the human cortex. J Physiol 530:307–317
Sato A (2009) Both motor prediction and conceptual congruency between preview and action–effect contribute to explicit judgement of agency. Cognition 110:74–83
Sidarus N, Chambon V, Haggard P (2013) Priming of actions increases sense of control over unexpected outcomes. Conscious Cogn 22:1403–1411
Stenner MP, Bauer M, Sidarus N, Heinze HJ, Haggard P, Dolan RJ (2014) Subliminal action priming modulates the perceived intensity of sensory action consequences. Cognition 130:227–235
Synofzik M, Thier P, Lindner A (2006) Internalizing agency of self-action: perception of one’s own hand movements depends on an adaptable prediction about the sensory action outcome. J Neurophysiol 96:1592–1601
Synofzik M, Vosgerau G, Newen A (2008) Beyond the comparator model: a multifactorial two-step account of agency. Conscious Cogn 17:219–239
Thut G, Northoff G, Ives JR, Kamitani Y, Pfennig A, Kampmann F, Schomer DL, Pascual-Leone A (2003) Effects of single-pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) on functional brain activity: a combined event-related TMS and evoked potential study. Clin Neurophysiol 114:2071–2080
Vesia M, Monteon JA, Sergio LE, Crawford JD (2006) Hemispheric asymmetry in memory-guided pointing during single-pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation of human parietal cortex. J Neurophysiol 96:3016–3027
Vesia M, Yan X, Henriques DY, Sergio LE, Crawford JD (2008) Transcranial magnetic stimulation over human dorsal–lateral posterior parietal cortex disrupts integration of hand position signals into the reach plan. J Neurophysiol 100:2005–2014
Vesia M, Prime SL, Yan X, Sergio LE, Crawford JD (2010) Specificity of human parietal saccade and reach regions during transcranial magnetic stimulation. J Neurosci 30:13053–13065
Vorberg D, Mattler U, Heinecke A, Schmidt T, Schwarzbach J (2003) Different time courses for visual perception and action priming. Proc Natl Acad Sci 100:6275–6280
Voss M, Moore J, Hauser M, Gallinat J, Heinz A, Haggard P (2010) Altered awareness of action in schizophrenia: a specific deficit in predicting action consequences. Brain 133:3104–3112
Wassermann EM (1998) Risk and safety of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation: report and suggested guidelines from the international workshop on the safety of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 108:1–16
Wenke D, Fleming SM, Haggard P (2010) Subliminal priming of action influences sense of control over effects of action. Cognition 115:26–38
Acknowledgments
JWM and PH were supported by EU project VERE. VC was supported by a postdoctoral fellowship of the Région Ile-de-France (Paris), ANR-10-LABX-0087 IEC and ANR-10-IDEX-0001-02 PSL*. PH was supported by a Leverhulme Trust Major Research Fellowship and an ESRC Professorial Fellowship (Grant No. RES-062-23-2183), and ERC Advanced Grant HUMVOL.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
V. Chambon and J. W. Moore contributed equally to this work.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Chambon, V., Moore, J.W. & Haggard, P. TMS stimulation over the inferior parietal cortex disrupts prospective sense of agency. Brain Struct Funct 220, 3627–3639 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00429-014-0878-6
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00429-014-0878-6