Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Critical histologic appraisal of the pseudocapsule of small renal tumors

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Virchows Archiv Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Small renal tumors are usually enwrapped in a pseudocapsule with well-confined borders, a feature that facilitates the performance of nephron-sparing surgeries (NSS). Our study was designed to evaluate the histologic features of the pseudocapsule of small renal tumors. One hundred seventy-eight renal tumors (≤4 cm), which were surgically removed by total nephrectomy, partial nephrectomy, or enucleation procedures during 2002–2013, were re-examined microscopically. Special attention was paid to the completeness and thickness of the pseudocapsule as well as the extra-pseudocapsular extension (EPE); components of the pseudocapsule and the intra-pseudocapsular vasculature (size/number) were evaluated. The data were analyzed according to the histological tumor types, Fuhrman grades, and sizes. Student’s t test and chi-square tests were used for statistical analysis. Among 178 renal tumors, clear cell renal carcinomas (RCC) showed the thickest pseudocapsule (average 0.23 mm), while oncocytoma showed the thinnest (average thickness of 0.09 mm). Chromophobe RCC had the highest rate of EPE and the highest percentage of tumors with larger (≥0.2 mm) intra-pseudocapsular arteries. The EPE rate was also related to the nuclear grade (p = 0.001). Muscular differentiation, reticulin, and collagen components were present in the fibrous stroma of the pseudocapsule. Our study suggests that clear cell RCC has the thickest pseudocapsule while oncocytoma has a poorly developed pseudocapsule, but shows the least infiltrative pattern. In small RCC (≤4.0 cm), the EPE rate is related to tumor grade but not to tumor size. Larger arterioles (≥0.2 mm) are encountered infrequently within the tumor pseudocapsule, with the highest percentage being found in chromophobe RCC and the lowest in papillary RCC.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Carini M, Minervini A, Masieri L, Lapini A, Serni S (2006) Simple enucleation for the treatment of PT1a renal cell carcinoma: our 20-year experience. Eur Urol 50(6):1263–1268

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Lam JS, Shvarts O, Pantuck AJ (2004) Changing concepts in the surgical management of renal cell carcinoma. Eur Urol 45:692–705

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Uzzo RG, Novick AC (2001) Nephron sparing surgery for renal tumors: indications, techniques and outcomes. J Urol 166:6–18

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Patard J-J, Shvarts O, Lam JS, et al. (2004) Safety and efficacy of partial nephrectomy for all T1 tumors based on an international multicenter experience. J Urol 171:2181–2185

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Li QL, Guan HW, Zhang QP, Zhang LZ, Wang FP, Liu YJ (2003) Optimal margin in nephron-sparing surgery for renal cell carcinoma 4 cm or less. Eur Urol 44(4):448–451

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Sutherland SE, Resnick MI, Maclennan GT, Goldman HB (2002) Does the size of the surgical margin in partial nephrectomy for renal cell cancer really matter? J Urol 167:61–64

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Castilla EA, Liou LS, Abrahams NA, et al. (2002) Prognostic importance of resection margin width after nephron-sparing surgery for renal cell carcinoma. Urology 60:993–997

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Li QL, Cheng L, Guan HW, Zhang Y, Wang FP, Song XS (2008) Safety and efficacy of mini-margin nephron-sparing surgery for renal cell carcinoma 4-cm or less. Urology 71:924–927

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Minervini A, di Cristofano C, Lapini A, et al (2009) Histopathologic analysis of peritumoral pseudocapsule and surgical margin status after tumor enucleation for renal cell carcinoma. Eur Urol 55:1410–1418

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Steinbach F, Stockle M, Griesinger A, Stockel S, Stein R, Miller DP, et al. (1994) Multifocality in renal cell tumors: a retrospective analysis of 56 patients treated with radical nephrectomy. J Urol 152:1393–1396

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Kletscher BA, Qian J, Bostwick DG, Andrews PE, Zincke H (1995) Prospective analysis of multifocality in renal cell carcinoma: influence of histological pattern, grade, number, size, volume and deoxyribonucleic acid ploidy. J Urol 153:904–906

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Gohji K, Hara I, Gotoh A, Eto H, Miyake H, Sugiyama T, et al. (1998) Multifocal renal cell carcinoma in Japanese patients with tumors with maximal diameter of 50 mm or less. J Urol 159:1144–1147

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Carini M, Minervini A, Lapini A, Masieri L, Serni S (2006) Simple enucleation for the treatment of renal cell carcinoma between 4 and 7 cm in greatest dimension: progression and long-term survival. J Urol 175:2022–2026

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Minervini A, Serni S, Tuccio A, et al. (2011) Local recurrence after tumour enucleation for renal cell carcinoma with no ablation of the tumour bed: results of a prospective single-centre study. BJU Int 107:1394–1399

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Eble J, Epstein J, Sesterhenn I, Sauter G (2004) Pathology and genetics of tumours of the urinary system and male genital organs (IARC WHO Classification of Tumours) Publisher: World Health Organization; 1 edition ISBN-10: 283224159, ISBN-13: 978-9283224150

  16. Lau W, Blute ML, Zincke H (2000) Matched comparison of radical nephrectomy versus elective nephron-sparing surgery for renal cell carcinoma: evidence for increased renal failure rate on long term follow-up (>10 years). J Urol 163(Suppl):153 abstract no. 681

    Google Scholar 

  17. Becker F, Siemer S, Humke U, Hack M, Ziegler M, Stöckle M. Elective nephron sparing surgery should become standard treatment for small unilateral renal cell carcinoma: long-term survival data of 216 patients. Eur Urol 2006; 49:308–313.

  18. Carini M, Minervini A, Serni S (2007) Nephron-sparing surgery: current developments and controversies. Eur Urol 51:12–14

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Sprenkle PC, Power N, Ghoneim T, Touijer KA, Dalbagni G, Russo P, Coleman JA (2012) Comparison of open and minimally invasive partial nephrectomy for renal tumors 4-7 centimeters. Eur Urol 61(3):593–599

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Antonelli A, Cozzoli A, Nicolai M, et al. (2008) Nephron-sparing surgery versus radical nephrectomy in the treatment of intracapsular renal cell carcinoma up to 7 cm. Eur Urol 53:803–809

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Leibovich BC, Blute ML, Cheville JC, Lohse CM, Weaver AL, Zincke H (2004) Nephron sparing surgery for appropriately selected renal cell carcinoma between 4 and 7 cm results in outcome similar to radical nephrectomy. J Urol 171:1066–1070

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Sutherland SE, Resnick MI, Maclennan GT, et al. (2002) Does the size of the surgical margin in partial nephrectomy for renal cell cancer really matter? J Urol 167:61–64

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Li QL, Cheng L, Guan HW, et al. (2008) Safety and efficacy of minimargin nephron-sparing surgery for renal cell carcinoma 4-cm or less. Urology 71:924–927

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Lapini A, Serni S, Minervini A, et al. (2005) Progression and long-term survival after simple enucleation for the elective treatment of renal cell carcinoma: experience in 107 patients. J Urol 174:57–60

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Carini M, Minervini A, Masieri L, et al. (2006) Simple enucleation for the treatment of PT1a renal cell carcinoma: our 20-year experience. Eur Urol 50:1263–1268

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Yossepowitch O, Thompson RH, Leibovich BC, et al. (2008) Positive surgical margins at partial nephrectomy: predictors and oncological outcomes. J Urol 179:2158–2163

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Chen XS, Zhang ZT, Du J, Bi XC, Sun G, Yao X. Optimal surgical margin in nephron-sparing surgery for T1b renal cell carcinoma. Urology. 2012;79(4):836-839.

  28. Delahunt B, Cheville JC, Martignoni G, Humphrey PA, Magi-Galluzzi C, McKenney J, Egevad L, Algaba F, Moch H, Grignon DJ, Montironi R, Srigley JR (2013) Members of the ISUP Renal Tumor Panel. The International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) grading system for renal cell carcinoma and other prognostic parameters. Am J Surg Pathol 37(10):1490–1504

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. De Riese W, Reale E (1991) The capsule of the renal cell carcinoma (clear cell phenotype) contains modified smooth muscle cells. J Submicrosc Cytol Pathol 23:237–244

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Roquero L, Kryvenko ON, Gupta NS, Lee MW (2015) Characterization of fibromuscular pseudocapsule in renal cell carcinoma. Int J Surg Pathol

  31. Petersson F, Branzovsky J, Martinek P, Korabecna M, Kruslin B, Hora M, Peckova K, Bauleth K, Pivovarcikova K, Michal M, Svajdler M, Sperga M, Bulimbasic S, Leroy X, Rychly B, Trivunic S, Kokoskova B, Rotterova P, Podhola M, Suster S, Hes O (2014) The leiomyomatous stroma in renal cell carcinomas is polyclonal and not part of the neoplastic process. Virchows Arch 465(1):89–96

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Peckova K, Grossmann P, Bulimbasic S, Sperga M, Perez Montiel D, Daum O, Rotterova P, Kokoskova B, Vesela P, Pivovarcikova K, Bauleth K, Branzovsky J, Dubova M, Hora M, Michal M, Hes O (2014) Renal cell carcinoma with leiomyomatous stroma—further immunohistochemical and molecular genetic characteristics of unusual entity. Ann Diagn Pathol 18(5):291–296

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Singh C, Kendi AT, Manivel JC, Pambuccian SE. Renal angiomyoadenomatous tumor. Ann Diagn Pathol. 2012;16(6):470-6.

  34. Nikaido T, Nakano M, Kato M, Suzuki M, Ishikura H, Aizawa S. Characterization of smooth muscle components in renal angiomyolipomas: histological and immunohistochemical comparison with renal capsular leiomyomas. Pathol Int. 2004;54(1):1-9.

Download references

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Loyola University Medical Center, 2160 S 1st Ave., Chicago, IL, 60153, USA

    Lu Wang, Jingyang Feng & Maria M. Picken

  2. Strich School of Medicine, Loyola University Medical Center, 2160 S 1st Ave., Chicago, IL, 60153, USA

    Helyn Alvarez & Connor Snarskis

  3. Department of Urology,, Loyola University Medical Center, 2160 S 1st Ave., Chicago, IL, 60153, USA

    Gopal Gupta

Authors
  1. Lu Wang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Jingyang Feng
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Helyn Alvarez
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Connor Snarskis
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Gopal Gupta
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Maria M. Picken
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Maria M. Picken.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Wang, L., Feng, J., Alvarez, H. et al. Critical histologic appraisal of the pseudocapsule of small renal tumors. Virchows Arch 467, 311–317 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00428-015-1797-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00428-015-1797-5

Keywords

Search

Navigation