Skip to main content
Log in

Feasibility of percutaneous organ biopsy as part of a minimally invasive perinatal autopsy

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Virchows Archiv Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

To determine the feasibility of percutaneous fetal organ biopsies in the context of a ‘minimally invasive’ perinatal autopsy after stillbirth and termination for abnormality is the aim of this study. We assessed successful biopsy rate and the proportion adequate for histological examination in 30 fetuses undergoing organ sampling before autopsy. The relationship between gestational age, body weight, death–biopsy interval, operator experience and successful biopsy rate was investigated. Significant findings from conventional block histology were compared with corresponding percutaneous biopsies. Of 210 organ biopsies attempted from seven target organs, 107 were obtained, of which 94 were adequate for pathological comment. The median delivery–autopsy interval was 4 (range 2–11) days. Adequate samples were obtained from the lung in 86% cases (95% CI 68, 96%), liver 76% (95% CI 56, 90%) and less frequently for the myocardium, kidney, adrenal, thymus and spleen. There was no relationship between biopsy success and time to biopsy, gestational age, body weight and user experience. No histological abnormalities found at autopsy were diagnosed from needle biopsies. Although targeted percutaneous biopsies appear feasible for some organs, fewer than 50% of all biopsies are adequate for histological examination. This technique cannot be considered to provide useful clinical information as part of a ‘minimally invasive’ perinatal autopsy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Alderliesten ME, Peringa J, van der Hulst VP, Blaauwgeers HL, van Lith JM (2003) Perinatal mortality: clinical value of postmortem magnetic resonance imaging compared with autopsy in routine obstetric practice. BJOG 110:378–382

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Boyd PA, Tondi F, Hicks NR, Chamberlain PF (2004) Autopsy after termination of pregnancy for fetal anomaly: retrospective cohort study. BMJ 328:137

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Breeze AC, Cross JJ, Hackett GA, Jessop FA, Joubert I, Lomas DJ, Set PA, Whitehead AL, Lees CC (2006) Use of a confidence scale in reporting postmortem fetal magnetic resonance imaging. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 28:918–924

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Brookes JA, Hall-Craggs MA, Sams VR, Lees WR (1996) Non-invasive perinatal necropsy by magnetic resonance imaging. Lancet 348:1139–1141

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Cox P, Scott R (2001) Perinatal pathology in 2001. Arch Dis Child 84:457–458

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Farina J, Millana C, Fdez-Acenero MJ, Furio V, Aragoncillo P, Martin VG, Buencuerpo J (2002) Ultrasonographic autopsy (echopsy): a new autopsy technique. Virchows Arch 440:635–639

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Foroudi F, Cheung K, Duflou J (1995) A comparison of the needle biopsy post mortem with the conventional autopsy. Pathology 27:79–82

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Griffiths PD, Paley MN, Whitby EH (2005) Post-mortem MRI as an adjunct to fetal or neonatal autopsy. Lancet 365:1271–1273

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Griffiths PD, Variend D, Evans M, Jones A, Wilkinson ID, Paley MN, Whitby E (2003) Postmortem MR imaging of the fetal and stillborn central nervous system. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 24:22–27

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Huisman TA, Wisser J, Stallmach T, Krestin GP, Huch R, Kubik-Huch RA (2002) MR autopsy in fetuses. Fetal Diagn Ther 17:58–64

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Khong TY, Tanner AR (2006) Foetal and neonatal autopsy rates and use of tissue for research: The influence of ‘organ retention’ controversy and new consent process. J Paediatr Child Health 42:366–369

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Nicholl RM, Balasubramaniam VP, Urquhart DS, Sellathurai N, Rutherford MA (2007) Postmortem brain MRI with selective tissue biopsy as an adjunct to autopsy following neonatal encephalopathy. Eur J Paediatr Neurol 11:167–174

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists, Royal College of Pathologists. Fetal and perinatal pathology: report of a joint working party. London: RCOG Press, 2001

  14. Rushton DI (1998) Perinatal pathology: centralise or perish. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 105:5–7

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Sebire NJ (2006) Towards the minimally invasive autopsy. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 28:865–867

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Silver RM (2007) Fetal death. Obstet Gynecol 109:153–167

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Wellman KF (1969) The needle autopsy. A retrospective evaluation of 294 consecutive cases. Am J Clin Pathol 52:441–444

    Google Scholar 

  18. Woodward PJ, Sohaey R, Harris DP, Jackson GM, Klatt EC, Alexander AL, Kennedy A (1997) Postmortem fetal MR imaging: comparison with findings at autopsy. AJR Am J Roentgenol 168:41–46

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Members of the Cambridge post mortem MRI study group also include: Dr Justin Cross, Professor David J Lomas, and Ms Ilse Joubert (of the Department of Radiology, University of Cambridge and Addenbrooke’s Hospital). We are indebted to the parents who agreed to take part in this study at a very difficult time.

We also acknowledge the assistance of Andrew F Dean (Department of Histopathology, Addenbrooke’s Hospital), and Dr Nicholas Coleman (Hutchison-MRC Centre, Cambridge), and the paediatric pathology service staff of Addenbrooke’s Hospital: Nicola Wood, Gillian Kenyon, Simon Brown, and Michelle Macer. We also wish to thank the midwives and medical staff of the Rosie Hospital, Cambridge for their support.

This study was supported by a grant from the Trustees of the Addenbrooke’s Charities, and ACGB’s salary was supported by Cambridge Fetal Care.

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Consortia

Corresponding author

Correspondence to C. C. Lees.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Breeze, A.C.G., Jessop, F.A., Whitehead, A.L. et al. Feasibility of percutaneous organ biopsy as part of a minimally invasive perinatal autopsy. Virchows Arch 452, 201–207 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00428-007-0548-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00428-007-0548-7

Keywords

Navigation