Abstract
Efficient performance in an environment filled with complex objects is often achieved through the temporal maintenance of conjunctions of features from multiple dimensions. The most striking finding in the study of binding in visual short-term memory (VSTM) is equal memory performance for single features and for integrated multi-feature objects, a finding that has been central to several theories of VSTM. Nevertheless, research on binding in VSTM focused almost exclusively on low-level features, and little is known about how items from low- and high-level visual dimensions (e.g., colored manmade objects) are maintained simultaneously in VSTM. The present study tested memory for combinations of low-level features and high-level representations. In agreement with previous findings, Experiments 1 and 2 showed decrements in memory performance when non-integrated low- and high-level stimuli were maintained simultaneously compared to maintaining each dimension in isolation. However, contrary to previous findings the results of Experiments 3 and 4 showed decrements in memory performance even when integrated objects of low- and high-level stimuli were maintained in memory, compared to maintaining single-dimension objects. Overall, the results demonstrate that low- and high-level visual dimensions compete for the same limited memory capacity, and offer a more comprehensive view of VSTM.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Allen, R., Baddeley, A. D., & Hitch, G. J. (2006). Is the binding of visual features in working memory resource-demanding? Journal of Experimental Psychology General, 135, 298–313. doi:10.1037/0096-3445.135.2.298.
Alvarez, G. A., & Cavanagh, P. (2004). The capacity of visual short-term memory is set both by visual information load and by number of objects. Psychological Science, 15, 106–111. doi:10.1111/j.0963-7214.2004.01502006.x.
Awh, E., & Jonides, J. (2001). Overlapping mechanisms of attention and spatial working memory. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 5, 119–126. doi:10.1016/S1364-6613(00)01593-X.
Baddeley, A. D. (1986). Working Memory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Baddeley, A. D., & Hitch, G. (1974). Working memory. In G. H. Bower (Ed.), The Psychology of Learning and Motivation (Vol. 8, pp. 47–89). New York: Academic Press.
Biederman, I. (1987). Recognition-by-components: a theory of human image understanding. Psychological Review, 94, 115–147. doi:10.1037//0033-295X.94.2.115.
Biederman, I. & Ju, G. (1988). Surface versus edge-based determinants of Visual Recognition. Cognitive Psychology, 20, 38–64. doi:10.1016/0010-0285(88)90024-2.
Brady, T. F., Konkle, T., Alvarez, G. A., & Oliva, A. (2013). Real-world objects are not represented as bound units: independent forgetting of different object details from visual memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology General, 142, 791–808. doi:10.1037/a0029649.
Brady, T. F., Konkle, T., Oliva, A., & Alvarez, G. A. (2009). Detecting changes in real-world objects. The relationship between visual long-term memory and change blindness. Communicative and Integrative Biology, 2, 1–3. doi:10.4161/cib.2.1.7297.
Bramao, I., Reis, A., Peterson, K. M., & Faisca, L. (2011). The role of color information on object recognition: a review and meta-analysis. Acta Psychologica, 138, 244–253. doi:10.1016/j.actpsy.2011.06.010.
Colzato, L. S., Raffone, A., & Hommel, B. (2006). What do we learn from binding features? Evidence for multilevel feature integration. Journal of Experimental Psychology Human Perception and Performance, 32, 705–716. doi:10.1037/0096-1523.32.3.705.
Cowan, N. (2001). The magical number 4 in short-term memory: a reconsideration of mental storage capacity. Behavioral Brain Sciences, 24, 87–114. doi:10.1017/S0140525X01003922.
Cowan, N., Blume, C. L., & Saults, J. S. (2013). Attention to attributes and objects in working memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition, 39, 731–747. doi:10.1037/a0029687.
Curby, K. M., & Gauthier, I. (2007). A visual short-term memory advantage for faces. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 14, 620–628. doi:10.3758/BF03196811.
Davis, G., & Holmes, A. (2005). The capacity of visual short-term memory is not a fixed number of objects. Memory and Cognition, 33, 185–195. doi:10.3758/BF03195307.
Della Sala, S., Gray, C., Baddeley, A. D., Allamano, N., & Wilson, L. (1999). Pattern span: a tool for unwelding visuo-spatial memory. Neuropsychologia, 37, 1189–1199. doi:10.1016/S0028-3932(98)00159-6.
Delvenne, J.-F., & Bruyer, R. (2004). Does visual short-term memory store bound features? Visual Cognition, 11, 1–27. doi:10.1080/13506280344000167.
DeYoe, E. A., & van Essen, D. C. (1988). Concurrent processing streams in monkey visual cortex. Trends in Neuroscience, 11, 219–226. doi:10.1016/0166-2236(88)90130-0.
DiCarlo, J. J., & Cox, D. D. (2007). Untangling invariant object recognition. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 11, 333–341. doi:10.1016/j.tics.2007.06.010.
Engel, A. K., & Singer, W. (2001). Temporal binding and the neural correlates of sensory awareness. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 5, 16–25. doi:10.1016/S1364-6613(00)01568-0.
Grill-Spector, K., & Malach, R. (2004). The human visual cortex. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 27, 649–677. doi:10.1146/annurev.neuro.27.070203.144220.
Hommel, B., & Colzato, L. S. (2009). When an object is more than a binding of its features: evidence for two mechanisms of visual feature integration. Visual Cognition, 17, 120–140. doi:10.1080/13506280802349787.
Kahneman, D., Treisman, A., & Gibbs, B. J. (1992). The reviewing of object files: Object-specific integration of information. Cognitive Psychology, 24, 175–219. doi:10.1016/0010-0285(92)90007-O.
Kobatake, E., & Tanaka, K. (1994). Neuronal selectivities to complex object features in the ventral visual pathway of the macaque cerebral cortex. Journal of Neurophysiology, 71, 856–867.
Lepsien, J., & Nobre, A. C. (2007). Attentional modulation of object representations in working memory. Cerebral Cortex, 17, 2072–2083. doi:10.1093/cercor/bhl116.
Li, F. F., VanRullen, R., Koch, C., & Perona, P. (2002). Rapid natural scene categorization in the near absence of attention. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA, 99, 9596–9601. doi:10.1073/pnas.092277599.
Logie, R. H. (1995). Visuospatial Working Memory. Hove: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Logothetis, N. K., & Sheinberg, D. L. (1996). Visual object recognition. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 19, 577– 621.
Luck, S. J., & Beach, N. J. (1998). Visual attention and the binding problem: A neurophysiological perspective. In R. Wright (Ed.), Visual attention (pp. 455–478). New York: Oxford University Press.
Luck, S. J., & Vogel, E. K. (1997). The capacity of visual working memory for features and conjunctions. Nature, 390, 279–281.
Luck, S. J., & Vogel, E. K. (2013). Visual working memory capacity: from psychophysics and neurobiology to individual differences. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 17, 391–400.
Luria, R. & Vogel, E. K. (2011). Shape and color conjunction stimuli are represented as bound objects in visual working memory. Neuropsychologia, 49, 1632–1639. doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2010.11.031.
Ma, W. J., Husain, M., & Bays, P. M. (2014). Changing concepts of working memory. Nature Neuroscience, 17, 347–356.
Naor-Raz, G., & Tarr, M. J. (2003). Is color an intrinsic property of object representation? Perception, 32, 667–680. doi:10.1068/p5050.
Ostergaard, A., & Davidoff, J. (1985). Some effects of color on naming and recognition of objects. Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition, 11, 579–587. doi:10.1037//0278-7393.11.3.579.
Pashler, H. (1988). Familiarity and visual change detection. Perception and Psychophysics, 44, 369–378. doi:10.3758/BF03210419.
Phillips, W. A. (1974). On the distinction between sensory storage and short-term visual memory. Perception and Psychophysics, 16, 283–290.
Price, C. J., & Humphreys, G. W. (1989). The effects of surface detail on object categorization and naming. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology-Human Experimental Psychology, 41, 797–827.
Reddy, L., Reddy, L., & Koch, C. (2006). Face identification in the near-absence of focal attention. Vision Research, 46, 2336–2343. doi:10.1016/j.visres.2006.01.020.
Riesenhuber, M., & Poggio, T. (1999). Hierarchical models of object recognition in cortex. Nature Neuroscience, 2, 1019–1025. doi:10.1038/14819.
Riesenhuber, M., & Poggio, T. (2000). Models of object recognition. Nature Neuroscience, 3, 1199–1204. doi:10.1038/81479.
Serences, J. T., Ester, E. F., Vogel, E. K., & Awh, E. (2009). Stimulus-specific delay activity in human primary visual cortex. Psychological Science, 20, 207–214. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.2009.02276.x.
Serre, T., Oliva, A., & Poggio, T. (2007). A feedforward architecture accounts for rapid categorization. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA, 104, 6424–6429. doi:10.1073/pnas.0700622104.
Singer, W. (2009). Distributed processing and temporal codes in neuronal networks. Cognitive Neurodynamics, 3, 189–196. doi:10.1007/s11571-009-9087-z.
Song, J.-Y., & Jiang, Y. (2006). Visual working memory for simple and complex features: an fMRI study. Neuroimage, 30, 963–972. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2005.10.006.
Tanaka, K. (1996). Inferotemporal cortex and object vision. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 19, 109–139.
Tarr, M. J., & Bulthoff, H. H. (1998). Image-based object recognition in man, monkey and machine. Cognition, 67, 1–20. doi:10.1016/S0010-0277(98)00026-2.
Treisman, A. (1996). The binding problem. Current Opinion in Neurobiology, 6, 171–178. doi:10.1016/S0959-4388(96)80070-5.
Treisman, A., & Gelade, G. (1980). A feature integration theory of attention. Cognitive Psychology, 12, 97–136.
Ungerleider, L. G., & Bell, A. H. (2011). Uncovering the visual “alphabet”: advances in our understanding of object perception. Vision Research, 51, 782–799. doi:10.1016/j.visres.2010.10.002.
VanRullen, R. (2009). Binding hardwired versus on-demand feature conjunctions. Visual Cognition, 17, 103–119. doi:10.1080/13506280802196451.
Vogel, E. K., Woodman, G. F., & Luck, S. J. (2001). Storage of features, conjunctions, and objects in visual working memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology Human Perception and Performance, 27, 92–114. doi:10.1037/0096-1523.27.1.92.
Von der Malsburg, C. (1999). The what and why of binding: the modeler’s perspective. Neuron, 24, 95–104. doi:10.1016/S0896-6273(00)80825-9.
Wheeler, M. E., & Treisman, A. (2002). Binding in short-term visual memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 131, 48–64. doi:10.1037//0096-3445.131.1.48.
Wong, J. H., Peterson, M. S., & Thompson, J. C. (2008). Visual working memory capacity for objects from different categories: a face-specific maintenance effect. Cognition, 108, 719–731. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2008.06.006.
Wurm, L. H., Legge, G. E., Isenberg, L. M., & Luebker, A. (1993). Color improves object recognition in normal and low vision. Journal of Experimental Psychology Human Perception and Performance, 19, 899–911. doi:10.1037/0096-1523.19.4.899.
Xu, Y. (2002). Limitations in object-based feature encoding in visual short-term memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology Human Perception and Performance, 28, 458–468. doi:10.1037//0096-1523.28.2.458.
Acknowledgments
This research was supported by The Israel Science Foundation (Grant No. 771/12).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Electronic supplementary material
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Magen, H. An integrative view of storage of low- and high-level visual dimensions in visual short-term memory. Psychological Research 81, 462–479 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00426-016-0747-4
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00426-016-0747-4