Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Dog owners show experience-based viewing behaviour in judging dog face approachability

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Psychological Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Our prior visual experience plays a critical role in face perception. We show superior perceptual performance for differentiating conspecific (vs non-conspecific), own-race (vs other-race) and familiar (vs unfamiliar) faces. However, it remains unclear whether our experience with faces of other species would influence our gaze allocation for extracting salient facial information. In this eye-tracking study, we asked both dog owners and non-owners to judge the approachability of human, monkey and dog faces, and systematically compared their behavioural performance and gaze pattern associated with the task. Compared to non-owners, dog owners assessed dog faces with shorter time and fewer fixations, but gave higher approachability ratings. The gaze allocation within local facial features was also modulated by the ownership. The averaged proportion of the fixations and viewing time directed at the dog mouth region were significantly less for the dog owners, and more experienced dog owners tended to look more at the dog eyes, suggesting the adoption of a prior experience-based viewing behaviour for assessing dog approachability. No differences in behavioural performance and gaze pattern were observed between dog owners and non-owners when judging human and monkey faces, implying that the dog owner’s experience-based gaze strategy for viewing dog faces was not transferable across faces of other species.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bar, M., & Biederman, I. (1998). Subliminal visual priming. Psychological Science, 9, 464–469.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barton, J. J. S., Radcliffe, N., Cherkasova, M. V., Edelman, J., & Intriligator, J. M. (2006). Information processing during face recognition: the effects of familiarity, inversion, and morphing on scanning fixations. Perception, 35, 1089–1105.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Borghi, A. M., & Cimatti, F. (2010). Embodied cognition and beyond: acting and sensing the body. Neuropsychologia, 48, 763–773.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bruce, V. (1982). Changing faces: visual and non-visual coding processes in face recognition. The British Journal of Psychology, 73, 105–116.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buchan, J. N., Pare, M., & Munhall, K. G. (2000). Spatial statistics of gaze fixations during dynamic face processing. Social Neuroscience, 2, 1–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carmel, D., & Bentin, S. (2002). Domain specificity versus expertise: factors influencing distinct processing of faces. Cognition, 83, 1–29.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Crespi, S., Robino, C., Silva, O., & de’Sperati, C. (2012). Spotting expertise in the eyes: Billiards knowledge as revealed by gaze shifts in a dynamic visual prediction task. Journal of Vision, 12(11), 30.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Dehon, H., & Brédart, S. (2001). An other-race effect in age estimation from faces. Perception, 30, 1107–1113.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Donovan, T., & Manning, D. J. (2007). The radiology task: bayesian theory and perception. British Journal of Radiology, 80, 389–391.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Guo, K. (2012). Holistic gaze strategy to categorize facial expression of varying intensities. PLoS ONE, 7(8), e42585.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Guo, K. (2013). Size-invariant facial expression categorization and associated gaze allocation within social interaction space. Perception, 42, 1027–1042.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Guo, K., Mahmoodi, S., Robertson, R. G., & Young, M. P. (2006). Longer fixation duration while viewing face images. Experimental Brain Research, 171, 91–98.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Guo, K., Tunnicliffe, D., & Roebuck, H. (2010). Human spontaneous gaze patterns in viewing of faces of different species. Perception, 39, 533–542.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Guo, K., & Shaw, H. (2015). Face in profile view reduces perceived facial expression intensity: an eye-tracking study. Acta Psychologica, 155, 19–28.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Heisz, J. J., & Shore, D. I. (2008). More efficient scanning for familiar faces. Journal of Vision, 8, 1–10.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hills, P. J., & Lewis, M. B. (2011). Reducing the own-race bias in face recognition by attentional shift using fixation crosses preceding the lower half of a face. Visual Cognition, 19, 313–339.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Humphrey, K., & Underwood, G. (2009). Domain knowledge moderates the influence of visual saliency in scene recognition. British Journal of Psychology, 100, 377–398.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kestenbaum, R. (1992). Feeling happy versus feeling good: the processing of discrete and global categories of emotional expressions by children and adults. Developmental Psychology, 28, 1132–1142.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kundel, H. L., Nodine, C. F., Krupinski, E. A., & Mello-Thomas, C. (2008). Using gaze-tracking data and mixture distribution analysis to support a holistic model for the detection of cancers on mammograms. Academic Radiology, 15, 881–886.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Levin, D. T. (2000). Race as a visual feature: using visual search and perceptual discrimination tasks to understand face categories and the cross-race recognition deficit. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 129, 559–574.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Malcolm, G. L., Lanyon, L. J., Fugard, A. J. B., & Barton, J. J. S. (2008). Scan patterns during the processing of facial expression versus identity: an exploration of task-driven and stimulus-driven effects. Journal of Vision, 8(8), 2.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Matsumoto, H., Terao, Y., Yugeta, A., Fukuda, H., Emoto, M., et al. (2011). Where do neurologists look when viewing brain ct images? an eye-tracking study involving stroke cases. PLoS ONE, 6(12), e28928.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • McKone, E., Kanwisher, N., & Duchaine, B. C. (2006). Can generic expertise explain special processing for faces? Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 11, 8–15.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Meissner, C. A., & Brigham, J. C. (2001). Thirty years of investigating the own-race bias in memory for faces: a meta-analytic review. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 7, 3–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nabatilan, L. B., Aghazadeh, F., Nimbarte, A. D., Harvey, C. C., & Chowdhury, S. K. (2012). Effect of driving experience on visual behaviour and driving performance under different driving conditions. Cognition, Technology & Work, 14, 355–363.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nodine, C. F., Kundel, H. L., Lauver, S. C., & Toto, L. C. (1996). Nature of expertise in searching mammograms for breast masses. Academic Radiology, 3, 1000–1006.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • O’Toole, A. J., Deffenbacher, K. A., Valentin, D., & Abdi, H. (1994). Structural aspects of face recognition and the other-race effect. Memory and Cognition, 22, 208–224.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Pascalis, O., & Bachevalier, J. (1998). Face recognition in primates: a cross species study. Behavioural Processes, 43, 87–96.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Pihko, E., Virtanen, A., Saarinen, V. M., Pannasch, S., Hirvenkari, L., Tossavainen, T., … Hari, R. (2011). Experiencing art: the influence of expertise and painting abstraction level. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 5, 94. doi:10.3389/fnhum.2011.00094.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Reingold, E. M., Charness, N., Pomplun, M., & Stampe, D. M. (2001). Visual span in expert chess players: evidence from eye movements. Psychological Science, 12, 48–55.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rousselet, G. A., Mace, M. J. M., & Fabre-Thorpe, M. (2004). Animal and human faces in natural scenes: how specific to human faces is the N170 ERP component? Journal of Vision, 4, 13–21.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Schyns, P. G., Petro, L. S., & Smith, M. L. (2007). Dynamics of visual information integration in the brain for categorizing facial expressions. Current Biology, 17, 1580–1585.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Underwood, G. (1998). Eye guidance in reading and scene perception (1st ed.). Amsterdam: Elsevier.

    Google Scholar 

  • Valentine, T. (1991). A unified account of the effects of distinctiveness, inversion, and race in face recognition. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 43, 161–204.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Valentine, T., & Endo, M. (1992). Towards an exemplar model of face processing: the effects of race and distinctiveness. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section A: Human Experimental Psychology, 44, 671–703.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van Belle, G., Ramon, M., Lefèvre, P., & Rossion, B. (2010). Fixation patterns during recognition of personally familiar and unfamiliar faces. Frontiers in Psychology, 1, 20. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2010.00020.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Vernon, R. J. W., Sutherland, C. A. M., Young, A. W., & Hartley, T. (2014). Modeling first impressions from highly variable facial images. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 111, 3353–3361.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vogt, S., & Magnussen, S. (2007). Expertise in pictorial perception: eye-movement patterns and visual memory in artists and laymen. Perception, 36, 91–100.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wan, M., Bolger, N., & Champagne, F. A. (2012). Human perception of fear in dogs varies according to experience with dogs. PLoS ONE, 7(12), e51775.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Waters, A. J., Underwood, G., & Findlay, J. M. (1997). Studying expertise in music reading: use of a pattern-matching paradigm. Perception and Psychophysics, 59, 477–488.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Willis, M. L., Palermo, R., & Burke, D. (2011). Judging approachability on the face of it: the influence of face and body expressions on the perception of approachability. Emotion, 11, 514–523.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wood, G., Batt, J., Appelboam, A., Harris, A., & Wilson, M. R. (2014). Exploring the impact of expertise, clinical history, and visual search on electrocardiogram interpretation. Medical Decision Making, 34, 75–83.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Young, A. W., Hellawell, D., & Hay, D. C. (1987). Configurational information in face perception. Perception, 16, 747–759.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Zangemeister, W. H., Sherman, K., & Stark, L. (1995). Evidence for a global scanpath strategy in viewing abstract compared with realistic images. Neuropsychologia, 33, 1009–1025.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Psychology, University of Lincoln, Brayford Pool, Lincoln, LN6 7TS, UK

    Carla Jade Gavin, Sarah Houghton & Kun Guo

Authors
  1. Carla Jade Gavin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Sarah Houghton
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Kun Guo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kun Guo.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Gavin, C.J., Houghton, S. & Guo, K. Dog owners show experience-based viewing behaviour in judging dog face approachability. Psychological Research 81, 75–82 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00426-015-0718-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00426-015-0718-1

Keywords

Search

Navigation