Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Keep calm! Gender differences in mental rotation performance are modulated by habitual expressive suppression

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Psychological Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Men have been frequently found to perform more accurately than women in mental rotation tasks. However, men and women also differ with regard to the habitual use of emotion regulation strategies, particularly with regard to expressive suppression, i.e., the suppression of emotional expression in behavior. As emotional suppression is more often used by men, emotion regulation strategies might be a variable modulating gender differences in mental rotation performance. The present study, therefore, examined the influences of gender and emotion regulation strategies on mental rotation performance accuracy and feedback processing. Twenty-eight men and 28 women matched for relevant demographic variables performed mental rotation tasks of varying difficulty over a prolonged time. Emotional feedback was given immediately after each trial. Results showed that women reported to use expressive suppression less frequently than men. Women made more errors in the mental rotation task than men confirming earlier demonstrations of gender differences. Furthermore, women were more impaired by the negative feedback as indicated by the increased likelihood of subsequent errors compared with men. Task performance of women not habitually using expressive suppression was most inferior and most strongly influenced by failure feedback compared with men. Women using expressive suppression more habitually did not significantly differ in mental rotation accuracy and feedback processing from men. Hence, expressive suppression reduces gender differences in mental rotation accuracy by improving cognitive performance following failure feedback.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aldao, A., Nolen-Hoeksema, S., & Schweizer, S. (2010). Emotion-regulation strategies across psychopathology: a meta-analytic review. Clinical Psychology Review, 30, 217–237.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Butler, E. A., Egloff, B., Wilhelm, F. H., Smith, N. C., Erickson, E. A., & Gross, J. J. (2003). The social consequences of expressive suppression. Emotion, 3(1), 48–67.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Butler, E. A., Gross, J. J., & Barnard, K. (2014). Testing the effects of suppression and reappraisal on emotional concordance using a multivariate multilevel model. Biological Psychology, 98, 6–18.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Carver, C. S., & Scheier, M. F. (2008). Feedback processes in the simultaneous regulation of action and affect. In J. Y. Shah & W. L. Gardner (Eds.), Handbook of motivation science (pp. 308–324). New York: Guildford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chipman, K., & Kimura, D. (1998). An investigation of sex differences on incidental memory for verbal and pictorial material. Learning and Individual Differences, 10(4), 259–272. doi:10.1016/S1041-6080(99)80122-8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crossley, M., DArcy, C., & Rawson, N. S. B. (1997). Letter and category fluency in community-dwelling Canadian seniors: a comparison of normal participants to those with dementia of the Alzheimer or vascular type. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 19(1), 52–62. doi:10.1080/01688639708403836.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Dan-Glauser, E. S., & Gross, J. J. (2013). Emotion regulation and emotion coherence: evidence for strategy-specific effects. Emotion, 13(5), 832–842.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Elliott, R., Sahakian, B. J., Herrod, J. J., Robbins, T. W., & Paykel, E. S. (1997). Abnormal response to negative feedback in unipolar depression: evidence for a diagnosis specific impairment. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery and Psychiatry, 63, 74–82.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • First, M. B., Spitzer, R. L., Gibbon, M., & Williams, J. B. W. (1997). User’s guide for the structured clinical interview for DSM-IV axis I disorders. Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fladung, A. K., Baron, U., Gunst, I., & Kiefer, M. (2010). Cognitive reappraisal modulates performance following negative feedback in patients with major depressive disorder. Psychological Medicine, 40, 1703–1710.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Friese, M., Binder, J., Luechinger, R., Boesinger, P., & Rasch, B. (2013). Suppressing emotions impairs subsequent stroop performance and reduces prefrontal brain activation. PLoS One, 8(4), e60385. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0060385.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Garnefski, N., Kraaij, V., & van Etten, M. (2005). Specificity of relations between adolescents’ cognitive emotion regulation strategies and Internalizing and externalizing psychopathology. Journal of Adolescence, 28(5), 619–631.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Greenwald, A. G., Draine, S. C., & Abrams, R. L. (1996). Three cognitive markers of unconscious semantic activation. Science, 273(5282), 1699–1702.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Grön, G., Wunderlich, A. P., Spitzer, M., Tomczak, R., & Riepe, M. W. (2000). Brain activation during human navigation: gender-different neural networks as substrate of performance. Nature Neuroscience, 3, 404–408.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gross, J. J. (1998). Antecedent- and response-focused emotion regulation: divergent consequences for experience, expression, and physiology. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74(1), 224–237.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gross, J. J., & John, O. P. (2003). Individual differences in two emotion regulation processes: implications for affect, relationships, and well-being. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85(2), 348–362.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gross, J. J., & Levenson, R. W. (1993). Emotional suppression: physiology, self-report, and expressive behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 64(6), 970–986.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Halpern, D. F. (2000). Sex differences in cognitive abilities. Mahwah: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hautzinger, M., & Bailer, M. (1993). Allgemeine depressionsskala—ADS. Weinheim: Beltz.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holden, C. (2005). Sex and the suffering brain. Science, 308(5728), 1574.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Horn, W. (1983). L-P-S Leistungsprüfsystem (2nd ed.). Göttingen: Hogrefe.

    Google Scholar 

  • Inzlicht, M., & Gutsell, J. N. (2007). Running on empty: neural signals for self-control failure. Psychological Science, 18(11), 933–937.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Joormann, J., & Gotlib, I. H. (2010). Emotion regulation in depression: relation to cognitive inhibition. Cognition and Emotion, 24(2), 281–298.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Kiefer, M., Schuch, S., Schenck, W., & Fiedler, K. (2007). Mood states modulate activity in semantic brain areas during emotional word encoding. Cerebral Cortex, 17(7), 1516–1530.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kimura, D. (1999). Sex and cognition. Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kluger, A. N., & DeNisi, A. (1996). The effects of feedback interventions on performance: a historical review, a meta-analysis, and a preliminary feedback intervention theory. Psychological Bulletin, 119(2), 254–284.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kret, M. E., & de Gelder, B. (2012). A review on sex differences in processing emotional signals. Neuropsychologia, 50(7), 1211–1221. doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2011.12.022.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kring, A. M., & Gordon, A. H. (1998). Sex differences in emotion: expression, experience, and physiology. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74(3), 686–703. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.74.3.686.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kudielka, B. M., & Kirschbaum, C. (2005). Sex differences in HPA axis responses to stress: a review. Biological Psychology, 69(1), 113–132.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kuhl, J. (1981). Motivational and functional helplessness - The moderating effect of state versus action orientation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 40(1), 155–170. doi:10.1037//0022-3514.40.1.155.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kwon, H., Yoon, K. L., Joormann, J., & Kwon, J.-H. (2013). Cultural and gender differences in emotion regulation: relation to depression. Cognition and Emotion, 27(5), 769–782.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lang, P. (1980). Behavioral treatment and bio-behavioral assessment: computer applications. In J. B. Sidowski, J. H. Johnson, & T. A. Williams (Eds.), Technology in mental health care delivery systems (pp. 119–137). Norwood: Ablex.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lundberg, U. (2005). Stress hormones in health and illness: the roles of work and gender. Psychoneuroendocrinology, 30(10), 1017–1021.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Margraf, J., & Schneider, S. (2006). Diagnostisches Interview bei psychischen Störungen (3rd ed.). Heidelberg: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moore, S. A., Zoellner, L. A., & Mollenholt, N. (2008). Are expressive suppression and cognitive reappraisal associated with stress-related symptoms? Behaviour Research and Therapy, 46, 999–1000.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nolen-Hoeksema, S., Wisco, B. E., & Lyubomirsky, S. (2008). Rethinking rumination. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 3(5), 400–424.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ochsner, K. N., & Gross, J. J. (2005). The cognitive control of emotion. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 9(5), 242–249. doi:10.1016/j.tics.2005.03.010.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Radloff, L. S. (1977). The CES-D Scale. A self-report depression scale for research in the general population. Applied Psychological Measurement, 1(3), 385–401.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Raftery, J. N., & Bizer, G. Y. (2009). Negative feedback and performance: the moderating effect of emotion regulation. Personality and Individual Differences, 47, 481–486.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Richards, J. M., & Gross, J. J. (2000). Emotion regulation and memory: the cognitive costs of keeping one’s cool. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79(3), 410–424.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Roberts, T. A. (1991). Gender and the influence of evaluations on self-assessments in achievement settings. Psychological Bulletin, 109(2), 297–308.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rode, C., Wagner, M., & Güntürkün, O. (1995). Menstrual-cycle affects functional cerebral asymmetries. Neuropsychologia, 33(7), 855–865. doi:10.1016/0028-3932(95)00015-U.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ruchsow, M., Herrnberger, B., Wiesend, C., Grön, G., Spitzer, M., & Kiefer, M. (2004). The effect of erroneous responses on response monitoring in patients with major depressive disorder: a study with event related potentials. Psychophysiology, 41, 833–840.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Seedat, S., Scott, K. M., Angermeyer, M. C., Berglund, P., Bromet, E. J., Brugha, T. S., et al. (2009). Cross-national associations between gender and mental disorders in the World Health Organization World Mental Health Surveys. Archives of General Psychiatry, 66(7), 785–795.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Sheldon, K. M., Ryan, R. M., Rawsthorne, L. J., & Ilardi, B. (1997). Trait self and true self: cross-role variation in the Big-Five personality traits and its relations with psychological authenticity and subjective well-being. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73(6), 1380–1393.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shepard, R. N., & Metzler, J. (1971). Mental rotation of three-dimensional objects. Science, 171(972), 701–703.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Spielberger, C. D., Jacobs, G. A., Russell, S., & Crane, R. S. (1983). Assessment of anger: the state-trait anger scale. In J. N. Butcher & C. D. Spielberger (Eds.), Advances in personality assessment (Vol. 2). Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Su, J. C., Lee, R. M., & Oishi, S. (2013). The role of culture and self-construal in the link between expressive suppression and depressive symptoms. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 44(2), 316–331.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tapley, S. M., & Bryden, M. P. (1977). An investigation of sex differences in spatial ability: mental rotation of three-dimensional objects. Canadian Journal of Psychology, 31(3), 122–130.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Voyer, D., Voyer, S., & Bryden, M. P. (1995). Magnitude of sex differences in spatial abilities: a meta-analysis and consideration of critical variables. Psychological Bulletin, 117, 250–270.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, Y., Yang, L., & Wang, Y. (2014). Suppression (but not reappraisal) impairs subsequent error detection: an ERP study of emotions regulation´s resource-depleting effect. PLoS One, 9(4), e96339. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0096339.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Wietasch, A. K., Kiefer, M., & Spitzer, M. (2007). Neuropsychologie. In A. Rohde & A. Marneros (Eds.), Geschlechtsspezifische Psychiatrie und Psychotherapie. Ein Handbuch (pp. 305–323). Stuttgart: Kohlhammer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolf, C. C., Ocklenburg, S., Oren, B., Becker, C., Hofstatter, A., Bos, C., et al. (2010). Sex differences in parking are affected by biological and social factors. Psychological Research, 74(4), 429–435. doi:10.1007/s00426-009-0267-6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wrosch, C., Scheier, M. F., Miller, G. E., Schulz, R., & Carver, C. S. (2003). Adaptive self-regulation of unattainable goals: goal disengagement, goal reengagement, and subjective well-being. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 29(12), 1494–1508.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors thank Kerstin Krupp and Stefanie Müller for their help during data acquisition.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Markus Kiefer.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The study was not funded. The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. This article does not contain any studies with animals performed by any of the authors.

Informed consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Fladung, AK., Kiefer, M. Keep calm! Gender differences in mental rotation performance are modulated by habitual expressive suppression. Psychological Research 80, 985–996 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00426-015-0704-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00426-015-0704-7

Keywords

Navigation