Skip to main content
Log in

Ecological sounds affect breath duration more than artificial sounds

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Psychological Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Previous research has demonstrated that auditory rhythms affect both movement and physiological functions. We hypothesized that the ecological sounds of human breathing can affect breathing more than artificial sounds of breathing, varying in tones for inspiration and expiration. To address this question, we monitored the breath duration of participants exposed to three conditions: (a) ecological sounds of breathing, (b) artificial sounds of breathing having equal temporal features as the ecological sounds, (c) no sounds (control). We found that participants’ breath duration variability was reduced in the ecological sound condition, more than in the artificial sound condition. We suggest that ecological sounds captured the timing of breathing better than artificial sounds, guiding as a consequence participants’ breathing. We interpreted our results according to the Theory of Event Coding, providing further support to its validity, and suggesting its possible extension in the domain of physiological functions which are both consciously and unconsciously controlled.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Agostini, T., Righi, G., Galmonte, A., & Bruno, P. (2004). The relevance of auditory information in optimizing hammer throwers performance. In P. B. Pascolo (Ed.), Biomechanics and sports (pp. 67–74). Vienna: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen, J. L., Penhune, V. B., & Zatorre, R. J. (2008). Listening to musical rhythms recruits motor regions of the brain. Cerebral Cortex, 18, 2844–2854.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Effenberg, A. O. (2005). Movement sonification: effects on perception and action. IEEE Multimedia, 12, 53–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ekman, I., Kjellström, B., Falk, K., Norman, J., & Swedberg, K. (2011). Impact of device-guided slow breathing on symptoms of chronic heart failure: a randomized controlled feasibility study. European Journal of Heart Failure, 13, 1000–1005.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Elliott, W. J., & Izzo, J. L, Jr. (2006). Device-guided breathing to lower blood pressure: case report and clinical overview. Medscape General Medicine, 8(3), 23.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Gavish, B. (2010). Device-guided breathing in the home setting: technology, performance and clinical outcomes. Biological Psychology, 84, 150–156.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hommel, B., Müsseler, J., Aschersleben, G., & Prinz, W. (2001). The theory of event coding (TEC): a framework for perception and action planning. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 24, 849–878.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kohler, E., Keysers, C., Umiltà, M. A., Fogassi, L., Gallese, V., et al. (2002). Hearing sounds, understanding actions: action representation in mirror neurons. Science, 297, 846–848.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lahav, A., Katz, T., Chess, R., & Saltzman, E. (2013). Improved motor sequence retention by motionless listening. Psychological Research, 77, 310–319.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mahtani, K. R., Nunan, D., & Heneghan, C. J. (2012). Device-guided breathing exercises in the control of human blood pressure: systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of Hypertension, 30, 852–860.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Meuret, A. E., Wilhelm, F. H., & Roth, W. T. (2001). Respiratory biofeedback-assisted therapy in panic disorder. Behavior Modification, 25(4), 584–605.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Murgia, M., Forzini, F., & Agostini, T. (2014). Migliorare le prestazioni sportive. Superare il doping con la psicologia sperimentale applicata al movimento. Milan: Franco Angeli.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murgia, M., Hohmann, T., Galmonte, A., Raab, M., & Agostini, T. (2012). Recognising one’s own motor actions through sound: the role of temporal factors. Perception, 41, 976–987.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Nombela, C., Hughes, L. E., Owen, A. M., & Grahn, J. A. (2013). Into the groove: can rhythm influence Parkinson’s disease? Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, 37, 2564–2570.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Pelton, T. A., Johannsen, L., Chen, H., & Wing, A. M. (2010). Hemiparetic stepping to the beat: asymmetric response to metronome phase shift during treadmill gait. Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair, 24, 428–434.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ritz, T., Meuret, A. E., Bhaskara, L., & Petersen, S. (2013). Respiratory muscle tension as symptom generator in individuals with high anxiety sensitivity. Psychosomatic Medicine, 75, 187–195.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rizzolatti, G., & Craighero, L. (2004). The mirror-neuron system. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 27, 169–192.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rizzolatti, G., Fadiga, L., Gallese, V., & Fogassi, L. (1996). Premotor cortex and the recognition of motor actions. Cognitive Brain Research, 3, 131–141.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Schmitz, G., Mohammadi, B., Hammer, A., Heldmann, M., Samii, A., et al. (2013). Observation of sonified movements engages a basal ganglia frontocortical network. BMC Neuroscience, 14, 32.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Stupacher, J., Hove, M. J., Novembre, G., Schütz-Bosbach, S., & Keller, P. E. (2013). Musical groove modulates motor cortex excitability: a TMS investigation. Brain and Cognition, 82, 127–136.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Thaut, M. H., & Abiru, M. (2010). Rhythmic auditory stimulation in rehabilitation of movement disorders: a review of current research. Music Perception, 27, 263–269.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zmigrod, S., & Hommel, B. (2009). Auditory event files: integrating auditory perception and action planning. Attention, Perception, and Psychophysics, 71, 352–362.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank Bernhard Hommel and two anonymous reviewers for their valuable suggestions.

Ethical standards

The present study was approved by the Research Ethics Committee of the University of Trieste in compliance with national legislation, the Ethical Code of the Italian Association of Psychology, and the ethical standards laid down in the 1964 Declaration of Helsinki and its later amendments.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mauro Murgia.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Murgia, M., Santoro, I., Tamburini, G. et al. Ecological sounds affect breath duration more than artificial sounds. Psychological Research 80, 76–81 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00426-015-0647-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00426-015-0647-z

Keywords

Navigation