Alternative splicing of transcription factors in plant responses to low temperature stress: mechanisms and functions
- First Online:
- Cite this article as:
- Seo, P.J., Park, M. & Park, C. Planta (2013) 237: 1415. doi:10.1007/s00425-013-1882-4
- 3k Views
Transcription factors play a central role in the gene regulatory networks that mediate various aspects of plant developmental processes and responses to environmental changes. Therefore, their activities are elaborately regulated at multiple steps. In particular, accumulating evidence illustrates that post-transcriptional control of mRNA metabolism is a key molecular scheme that modulates the transcription factor activities in plant responses to temperature fluctuations. Transcription factors have a modular structure consisting of distinct protein domains essential for DNA binding, dimerization, and transcriptional regulation. Alternative splicing produces multiple proteins having different structural domain compositions from a single transcription factor gene. Recent studies have shown that alternative splicing of some transcription factor genes generates small interfering peptides (siPEPs) that negatively regulate the target transcription factors via peptide interference (PEPi), constituting self-regulatory circuits in plant cold stress response. A number of splicing factors, which are involved in RNA binding, splice site selection, and spliceosome assembly, are also affected by temperature fluctuations, supporting the close association of alternative splicing of transcription factors with plant responses to low temperatures. In this review, we summarize recent progress on the temperature-responsive alternative splicing of transcription factors in plants with emphasis on the siPEP-mediated PEPi mechanism.
KeywordsAlternative splicingArabidopsisCold stressPeptide interference (PEPi)Small interfering peptide (siPEP)Splicing factorTranscription factor
C-repeat binding factor
CIRCADIAN CLOCK-ASSOCIATED 1
Dehydration-responsive element binding protein 2
- HD-ZIP III
Class III homeodomain-leucine zipper
LONG HYPOCOTYL IN FAR-RED 1
INDETERMINATE DOMAIN 14
LATE ELONGATED HYPOCOTYL
MINI ZINC FINGER
Premature termination codon
Shoot apical meristem
Small interfering peptide
Zinc finger-homeodomain proteins
Transcription factor is a critical component of the gene regulatory networks that mediate virtually all aspects of plant growth and developmental processes. It also plays a central role in plant responses to biotic and abiotic stresses. Therefore, the transcription factor activities are coordinately regulated at various steps to fine-tune signal transduction pathways in diverse cellular signaling networks for optimal growth and survival under given growth conditions (Shinozaki et al. 2003; Yamaguchi-Shinozaki and Shinozaki 2006). Well-established molecular and biochemical mechanisms underlying regulation of transcription factor activities include gene transcriptional regulation, post-transcriptional regulation of RNA metabolism, protein translation, post-translational modifications, and controlled protein turnover (Yun et al. 2008).
Recent studies have shown that post-transcriptional control of RNA metabolism is widespread in plant genomes. For example, over 60 % of intron-containing genes undergo alternative splicing in Arabidopsis (Syed et al. 2012). Alternative splicing provides proteome diversity and, thus, expands the repertoire of gene/protein activities in response to developmental and environmental cues (Matlin et al. 2005; Syed et al. 2012). The number of splice variants would be much more than we expected, as we explore more alternatively spliced variants in different cell types, tissues, developmental stages, and environmental conditions (Syed et al. 2012).
While alternative splicing is an important gene regulatory mechanism per se to generate diverse functional proteins, it is also associated with other gene regulatory mechanisms, such as peptide interference (PEPi) that is mediated by small interfering peptides (siPEPs) (Seo et al. 2011b). Dynamic dimer formation is important for the regulatory specificity and functional reliability of transcription factors (Baxevanis and Vinson 1993). Most transcription factors form homodimers and heterodimers to diversify DNA-binding specificities and target selection (Baxevanis and Vinson 1993; Izawa et al. 1993; Vinson et al. 1993). Notably, dimer formation also underlies the dominant-negative regulation of transcription factors, which is mediated by a group of siPEPs (Seo et al. 2011b).
The siPEPs refer to a distinct class of proteins with unique structural organizations and limited sequence similarities to certain members of transcription factors. They have dimerization domains that are required for protein–protein interactions, but lack functional domains, such as those for DNA binding and/or transcriptional regulation (Yun et al. 2008; Seo et al. 2011b). The known siPEPs have no transcriptional regulatory activity. Instead, they are able to interact with target transcription factors via the dimerization domains homologous to those of the target transcription factors. As a result, the siPEPs competitively interfere with functional dimer formation of the transcription factors (Seo et al. 2011b; Staudt and Wenkel 2011) and, thus, the functional mechanism has been designated PEPi. The PEPi is conceptually similar to the RNA interference (RNAi) that is mediated by small interfering RNAs (siRNAs), such as microRNAs (miRNAs), but distinct from the latter in that the former functions at the protein level (Ramachandran and Chen 2008; Staudt and Wenkel 2011; Naqvi et al. 2012). It has been predicted that over 80 siPEPs are encoded in the Arabidopsis genome (Seo et al. 2011b), suggesting that the siPEP-mediated PEPi is a widely conserved transcriptional regulatory mechanism in plant genomes.
Interestingly, alternative splicing is closely associated with siPEP biogenesis. At least part of the splice variants of transcription factors apparently lack functional domains required for DNA binding and transcriptional regulation (Seo et al. 2011b, 2012), indicating that they are transcriptionally inactive. However, it can act as siPEP by forming nonfunctional heterodimers with functional transcription factors, establishing a distinct self-regulatory circuit.
Alternative splicing is also associated with the regulation of mRNA stability. Many splice variants contain premature termination codons that are targeted by the nonsense-mediated decay (NMD) mechanism (Kurihara et al. 2009; Rebbapragada and Lykke-Andersen 2009; Palusa and Reddy 2010). It has been predicted that approximately 10–15 % of splice variants are coupled with NMD in Arabidopsis (Kalyna et al. 2012), supporting that alternative splicing mediates controlled turnover of gene transcripts.
An interesting observation is that alternative splicing is often responsive to cold stress in plants (Iida et al. 2004; Palusa et al. 2007). A large portion of transcription factor genes undergoes alternative splicing (Barbazuk et al. 2008; Li et al. 2012a; Mastrangelo et al. 2012; Severing et al. 2012). Accordingly, alternative splicing is considered as a way of perceiving temperature fluctuations and modulating transcription factor activity, perhaps by linking gene expression regulation with the PEPi and/or NMD mechanism, in temperature signaling cascades in plants.
This review summarizes temperature-responsive alternative splicing events in plants and point outs their physiological significance in regulating transcription factor activity. We especially focus on the siPEP-mediated PEPi mechanism in association with alternative splicing events of transcription factor genes. We also provide insights into the biological relevance of alternative splicing as a way of self-regulating transcription factor activities in plant responses to low temperature stress that profoundly affects crop productivity in the cool and temperate zones.
siPEP as a self-regulatory scheme of transcription factors
Discovery of plant siPEPs
It has been reported that truncated forms of transcription factors, which do not have DNA-binding domains and/or transcriptional regulation domains, play a dominant-negative role in gene expression regulation (Mizukami et al. 1996; Tzeng and Yang 2001). Although this phenomenon has been employed to design synthetic peptides for targeted inactivation of specific transcription factors (Ferrario et al. 2004), it has not been explored whether this mechanism is a general scheme for transcriptional control in living organisms.
The genomic siPEPs in plants have been discovered by Wenkel et al. (2007); Kim et al. (2008). It has been found that a group of small proteins consisting of less than 150 residues, designated LITTLE ZIPPER 1-4 (ZPR1-4), plays a role in shoot apical meristem (SAM) development and leaf polarity determination. For example, the ZPR3 protein consists of 67 residues. It has a protein–protein interaction domain that has a limited sequence similarity to those of class III homeodomain-leucine zipper (HD-ZIP III) transcription factors, such as REVOLUTA (REV), PHABULOSA (PHB), and PHAVOLUTA (PHV). However, the ZPR3 protein does not possess protein domains required for DNA binding and transcriptional activation and, thus, has no ability to regulate gene transcription but interferes with the transcriptional activities of HD-ZIP III transcription factors by forming nonfunctional heterodimers. Consistent with the dominant-negative regulation of the HD-ZIP III proteins by ZPR3, higher-order mutants of the ZPR genes are phenotypically similar to the gain-of-function phb-1D dominant mutant, and the phb-1D phenotype is compromised in the phb-1D × zpr3-1D plants (Kim et al. 2008). Other ZPR proteins, such as ZPR1, ZPR2, and ZPR4, are predicted to function in a similar manner as the ZPR3 protein (unpublished, Kim et al.).
Genomic siPEPs in Arabidopsis
Based on the structural organization of the ZPR proteins and their functional roles as the dominant-negative regulators of HD-ZIP III transcription factors, at least 80 potential siPEPs have been identified in the Arabidopsis genome (Seo et al. 2011b). The newly identified siPEPs, although they lack one or more protein domains required for transcription factor activities, belong to various transcription factor families.
The MINI ZINC FINGER (MIF) proteins have been identified as putative zinc finger (ZF) motif-containing transcription factors functioning in diverse growth hormone signaling and flower architecture (Hu and Ma 2006). Later, it has been found that the MIF proteins do not have transcription factor activities themselves but regulate the activities of the ZF-HOMEODOMAIN (ZHD) transcription factors by competitively forming nonfunctional heterodimers (Hong et al. 2011), similar to what have been observed with the ZPR proteins (Kim et al. 2008).
The atypical helix-loop-helix (HLH) protein LONG HYPOCOTYL IN FAR-RED 1 (HFR1) retains the HLH domain, but has defects in the basic DNA-binding domain. It has been shown that the HFR1 protein plays a dominant-negative role in photomorphogenesis (Hornitschek et al. 2009). As inferred form the structural feature of the HFR1 protein, it interacts with the PHYTOCHROME-INTERACTING FACTOR 4 (PIF4) and PIF5 proteins that are responsible for shade avoidance response by binding directly to the G-boxes in shade marker gene promoters (Hornitschek et al. 2009). HFR1 accumulates in the shade and forms non-DNA-binding heterodimers with the PIF transcription factors, thus fine-tuning plant response to the shade.
It is remarkable that the HFR1 protein itself is also targeted by HLH motif-containing KIDARI (KDR) proteins consisting of ~100 residues. The KDR proteins lack protein domains required for transcription factor activities. They interact with HFR1 through the HLH motif and prevent HFR1 from binding to the PIF transcription factors (Hyun and Lee 2006; Hong et al. 2013), providing a double layer of competitive inhibition for the transcriptional control of PIF target genes.
HFR1 also plays a regulatory role in diverse light responses (Duek and Fankhauser 2003; Yang et al. 2005; Zhang et al. 2008). KDR is crucial for both phytochrome A and cryptochrome 1 signaling (Duek and Fankhauser 2003), and thereby the KDR-HFR1 interaction is relevant to blue and far-red light responses. The PRE3/bHLH135/ATBS1/TMO7 non-DNA-binding HLH motif-containing protein is also supposed to play a role in light signaling through interactions with HFR1. The PRE3/bHLH135/ATBS1/TMO7 gene is transcriptionally regulated by red, far-red, and blue lights, and transgenic plants overexpressing the PRE3 gene are accordingly hyposensitive to red, far-red, and blue lights (Castelain et al. 2012). PRE3 physically interacts with HFR1 and, thus, it seems that PRE3 represses the HFR1 action like the KDR proteins.
The HLH motif-containing BANQUO1 (BNQ1)/bHLH136, BNQ2/bHLH134, and BNQ3/bHLH161 proteins also interact with HFR1 (Mara et al. 2010). The BNQ proteins are likely to have somewhat distinct physiological roles in comparison to those of KDR and PRE3. It has been reported that the BNQ1, BNQ2, and BNQ3 genes are regulated by floral homeotic proteins APETALA3 (AP3) and PISTILLATA (PI) in floral organogenesis (Mara et al. 2010). Altogether, it seems likely that HFR1 serves as an integrator of diverse input signals mediated by the atypical HLH proteins. Therefore, dynamic interactions and competitions among the HLH proteins constitute a web of complex regulatory networks in plant photomorphogenesis and organ development.
A number of additional siPEPs remain to be functionally characterized in plant genomes. Their physiological roles and mechanistic basis are currently unclear in most cases. They would probably regulate the activities of specific transcription factors through competitive inhibition of the target transcription factors in distinct cellular processes and signaling pathways.
Alternative splicing in plants
Alternative splicing of primary transcripts has evolved to overcome the limited coding capacities of eukaryotic genomes by producing multiple proteins from a single gene and, thus, enhance the transcriptome diversity and proteome plasticity. Recent advances in high-throughput sequencing techniques allow us to explore the extent of alternative splicing events in plants. It has been estimated that over 60 % of intron-containing genes undergo alternative splicing in plants (Marquez et al. 2012; Syed et al. 2012).
Alternative splicing is involved in a wide range of plant growth and developmental processes, such as flowering induction (Eckardt 2002; Slotte et al. 2009) and plant responses to environmental fluctuations and pathogen attacks (Barbazuk et al. 2008), indicating that enhanced diversity of transcriptomes and proteomes is required to cope with plant developmental fitness and environmental adaptation.
Cold-responsive gene regulation and alternative splicing are frequently associated with each other in plants (Iida et al. 2004; Palusa et al. 2007). For instance, wheat WDREB2 gene, an ArabidopsisDEHYDRATION-RESPONSIVE ELEMENT BINDING PROTEIN 2 (DREB2) gene homolog, produces three different transcripts through exon skipping at low temperatures (Egawa et al. 2006). The three transcript isoforms have different accumulation patterns, and the relative ratio of the transcript isoforms is modulated in response to temperature changes. Likewise, rice DREB2-type gene, OsDREB2B, also undergoes alternative splicing to produce two isoforms, OsDREB2B1 and OsDREB2B2 (Matsukura et al. 2010). Accumulation of the isoforms is differentially regulated by temperatures.
Alternative splicing of transcription factor genes is also responsive to high temperatures. For instance, two transcription factor genes, CIRCADIAN CLOCK-ASSOCIATED 1 (CCA1) and LATE ELONGATED HYPOCOTYL (LHY) that encode MYB domain-containing members, produce differential isoforms at high ambient temperatures. At warm temperatures, whereas the alternative splicing of the CCA1 gene is enhanced, that of the LHY gene is suppressed (Filichkin et al. 2010; James et al. 2012). In addition, the alternative splicing of the ArabidopsisHEAT SHOCK TRANSCRIPTION FACTOR A2 gene is affected under extreme heat conditions (Liu et al. 2013).
Alternative splicing as a way of producing siPEP
It has been proposed that plant siPEPs are evolutionarily originated from transcription factor proteins by partial duplication of the transcription factor genes and the duplication point is prior to the diversification of flowering plants (Wenkel et al. 2007; Hu et al. 2008). It is notable that partial loss of the transcription factor domains leads to the generation of siPEPs, which are functionally active players in the regulation of transcription factor activities, rather than production of nonfunctional proteins.
siPEPs in plant development and physiology
Sugar metabolism is intimately linked with plant adaptation response to environmental stress conditions, such as low temperatures. Soluble sugars accumulate under cold stress conditions and act as compatible osmolytes to reduce ice nucleation in the extracellular regions (Ruelland et al. 2009). Accumulation of starch is also modulated to optimize plant growth under the conditions of limited nutrition availability induced by temperature extremes (Nägele et al. 2011).
Alternative splicing of the ArabidopsisINDETERMINATE DOMAIN 14 (IDD14) gene regulates starch metabolism under cold conditions (Seo et al. 2011a). In response to low temperatures, alternative splicing of the IDD14 gene produces two splice isoforms, IDD14α encoding a functional IDD14 transcription factor and IDD14β encoding a truncated form, by intron retention. The IDD14β form has defects in the ZF DNA-binding motif, but retains the protein domain required for dimer formation and transcriptional regulation. It interacts with IDD14α to interfere with the formation of IDD14α–IDD14α homodimers Transgenic plants overexpressing the IDD14α gene (35S:IDD14α) exhibit distinct growth alterations possibly by inducing the QUA-QUINE STARCH (QQS) gene, which is involved in starch degradation (Li et al. 2009). Accordingly, the 35S:IDD14α and 35S:QQS transgenic plants contain reduced starch contents and exhibit stunted growth phenotypes, whereas the 35S:IDD14β transgenic plants contain high starch contents, supporting the dominant-negative role of IDD14β (Seo et al. 2011a). The IDD14 alternative splicing is induced by cold stress, and accordingly the expression of the QQS gene is suppressed under identical conditions.
At low temperatures, plants trigger a wide array of transcriptional regulatory cascades to induce freezing tolerance. A key regulatory circuit of cold response is composed of C-REPEAT/DEHYDRATION-RESPONSIVE ELEMENT BINDING FACTORS (CBF/DREBs) and its downstream targets COLD-REGULATED (COR) genes and, thus, designated CBF-COR regulon, in higher plants (Badawi et al. 2007; Mao and Chen 2012). The CBF-COR pathway is also associated with the circadian clock (Gilmour et al. 1998; Fowler et al. 2005; Franklin and Whitelam 2007), underscoring the coincidence of endogenous physiology with environmental stimuli.
The core clock components CCA1 and LHY transcriptionally regulate the CBF genes by binding directly to the gene promoters (Dong et al. 2011). Consistently, transgenic plants overexpressing the CCA1 gene exhibit substantially enhanced freezing tolerance, whereas CCA1-deficient mutants are sensitive to low temperatures (Dong et al. 2011; Seo et al. 2012).
The CCA1 gene undergoes alternative splicing, which is suppressed at low temperatures (Park et al. 2012; Seo et al. 2012). The CCA1 alternative splicing produces two splice variants, CCA1α and CCA1β. The truncated CCA1β form lacks MYB DNA-binding domain, but has domains responsible for dimerization and transcriptional regulation. It inhibits the DNA binding of CCA1α and LHY by forming non-DNA-binding heterodimers. Consistent with the suppression of the CCA1α activity by CCA1β, the phenotypes of the 35S:CCA1α transgenic plants are rescued by CCA1β coexpression. At low temperatures, CCA1α is liberated from CCA1β and form CCA1α–CCA1α and LHY-CCA1α dimers, which bind to the CBF gene promoters for induction of freezing tolerance (Dong et al. 2011; Seo et al. 2012). In addition to the enhanced freezing tolerance, the 35S:CCA1β transgenic plants also exhibit altered rhythmic expression of clock-regulated genes, similar to what observed in cca1 lhy double mutants (Seo et al. 2012). These observations indicate that rhythmic expression of cold-responsive genes is also critical for plant adaptation response to low temperatures.
The linkage of the circadian clock with temperature responses via alternative splicing is also observed in other organisms. Alternative splicing of the FREQUENCY (FRQ) gene links the circadian clock with ambient temperature responses in Neurospora crassa (Liu et al. 1997), indicating that alternative splicing provides a critical molecular scheme for the clock to optimize their growth under unfavorable growth conditions. It seems that the alternative splicing-mediated self-regulatory circuits of key transcription factors provide a fine-tuning mechanism of plant adaptation to low temperatures by balancing positive and negative signaling elements.
Flowering time control
Exposure to a prolonged period of low nonfreezing temperatures promotes flowering in many plant species, which is termed vernalization. The FLOWERING LOCUS C (FLC) gene is a vital player in the vernalization process in Arabidopsis (Kim et al. 2009a; Andrés and Coupland 2012). A MADS-box gene homologous to the ArabidopsisFLC gene has also been isolated in Poncirus trifoliata (Zhang et al. 2009). The PtFLC gene is transcriptionally regulated by seasonal temperature fluctuations. It is also regulated post-transcriptionally by alternative splicing by means of exon skipping, resulting in five splice variants. The alternative splicing pattern of the PtFLC gene is altered through developmental stages and further influenced by temperature fluctuations (Zhang et al. 2009). The smaller splice variants possibly act as dominant-negative repressors by either competing for DNA binding or forming nonfunctional heterodimers with the functional PtFLC protein (Chen and Coleman 2006; Zhang et al. 2009). Given that the molar ratio of the five splice variants varies through developmental stages and, thus, probably contributes to phase transitions, alternative splicing of the PtFLC gene would provide a way of linking temperature signals with endogenous developmental programs in Poncirus trifoliata.
Secondary cell wall biosynthesis
SECONDARY WALL-ASSOCIATED NAC DOMAIN 1 (SND1) transcription factors regulate secondary cell wall biosynthesis by inducing their own genes and PtrMYB021 gene in Populus trichocarpa (Li et al. 2012a). Ectopic expression of the SND1 genes results in growth retardation as well as ectopic xylogenesis. The SND1 gene undergoes alternative splicing to produce a truncated PtrSND1-A2 isoform through intron retention. The SND1-A2 isoform suppresses the expression of the PtrSND1 and PtrMYB021 genes, suggesting that the splice variant acts as a dominant-negative regulator of the PtrSND1 transcription factors. The PtrSND1-A2 isoform possesses dimerization domain, but lacks DNA-binding and transactivation domains. Accordingly, the PtrSND1-A2 protein forms nonfunctional heterodimers with the functional PtrSND1 transcription factors (Li et al. 2012b).
It is currently unclear whether the alternative splicing of the PtrSND1 gene is influenced by temperature changes. Secondary cell wall biosynthesis is influenced by cold temperatures (Lefebvre et al. 2011). Therefore, it is possible that alternative splicing of the PtrSND1 genes serves as a molecular mechanism to optimize vascular development and secondary cell wall biosynthesis under cold conditions.
Alternative splicing and NMD under cold conditions
Aberrant mRNA transcripts containing premature stop codons are often produced during the transcriptional and post-transcriptional steps. If they are translated, the result would be deleterious gain-of-function or dominant-negative activity of the resulting proteins (Kurihara et al. 2009; Filichkin et al. 2010). Nonsense-mediated mRNA decay (NMD) is a widely conserved eukaryotic pathway that reduces errors in gene expression by eliminating the aberrant mRNAs (Chang et al. 2007; Kurihara et al. 2009). The NMD pathway is mainly mediated by UP-FRAMESHIFT 1 (UPF1), UPF2, and UPF3 proteins in plants (Kim et al. 2009b; Kurihara et al. 2009). It has been found that alternative splicing also regulates the levels of mRNA transcripts by producing mRNA transcripts that contain premature termination codons, which are targeted by NMD (Lareau et al. 2007; Filichkin et al. 2010).
Extensive analyses of large populations of Arabidopsis transcripts have shown that the NMD pathway is closely linked with alternative splicing (Palusa and Reddy 2010; Kalyna et al. 2012). The serine/arginine-rich (SR) genes encode RNA-binding proteins that act as splicing regulators. It has been shown that the splice variants of the SR genes are targeted by NMD (Palusa and Reddy 2010). Surprisingly, genome-wide high-resolution RT-PCR analyses indicate that approximately 11–18 % of splice variants are degraded by NMD in Arabidopsis (Kalyna et al. 2012), supporting the close linkage of alternative splicing with NMD. Although not all transcripts having premature termination codons are targeted by NMD, it seems obvious that the presence of unproductive splice variants can influence the level of functional mRNA transcripts (Fig. 1).
The LHY and PSEUDO RESPONSE REGULATOR 7 (PRR7) genes undergo alternative splicing, which is regulated primarily by temperature signals (Filichkin and Mockler 2012; James et al. 2012). Alternative splicing of the LHY gene produces a splice variant that is transcriptionally nonfunctional and, thus, is degraded by NMD (Filichkin and Mockler 2012; James et al. 2012). Given that the promoter strength is not affected by temperature changes, it is evident that alternative splicing of the LHY gene contributes to reducing the LHY gene transcripts (James et al. 2012). It is, therefore, likely that the LHY alternative splicing provides an additional layer of regulating the circadian clock function in temperature responses and, thus, compensates the effect of temperature fluctuations on plant development.
Temperature-responsive splicing factors
A large portion of intron-containing genes in plants undergoes alternative splicing, which is regulated by a set of splicing factors (Syed et al. 2012). Differential regulation of the abundance and activity of splicing factors is critical for the controlled expression of target genes under diverse growth conditions (Palusa et al. 2007). It is notable that a number of splicing factors involved in pre-mRNA splicing are influenced by temperature signals.
The SR splicing factors, a family of splicing regulators with one or two RNA recognition motifs (RRMs) in the N-terminal region and one arg/ser-rich domain in the C-terminal region, are highly conserved in plants (Matlin et al. 2005). They are involved in both constitutive and alternative splicing events and determine the selection of splice sites in a concentration-dependent manner by forming differential spliceosome complexes (Kalyna and Barta 2004; Matlin et al. 2005). The SR genes exhibit distinct spatial and temporal expression patterns under fluctuating environmental conditions. The expression of the tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum) splicing factor genes, Le9G8-SR and LeSF2-SR1, is altered dramatically at low temperatures (Fung et al. 2006). In Arabidopsis, the expression of AtSR45a and AtSR30 genes is differentially regulated by cold temperatures (Tanabe et al. 2007). Considering that many of the genes encoding splicing factors are influenced by temperature changes and not a few cold-responsive transcription factor genes undergo alternative splicing, alternative splicing is apparently associated with plant responses to temperature changes in many cases.
The splice variants of the SR proteins seem to have distinct functions, further diversifying the regulatory mechanisms in pre-mRNA splicing. At least 95 transcripts are produced from the 15 SR genes (Palusa et al. 2007). In addition, their alternative splicing patterns are regulated by diverse environmental cues, such as temperature, light, and growth hormones (Isshiki et al. 2006; Palusa et al. 2007). In particular, heat and cold stress conditions substantially affect the splicing patterns (Palusa et al. 2007). For instance, six splice variants, designated AtSR45a1-a-e and AtSR45a2, are generated from the SR45a gene by alternative selection of transcriptional initiation sites and alternative splicing of introns. The ratio of the splice variants is altered in plants exposed to low temperatures. The levels of AtSR45a1-a and AtSR45a2 transcripts are reduced in response to low temperatures, whereas those of the other four transcripts are unchanged under identical conditions (Tanabe et al. 2007).
The Arabidopsis SR1 protein is a plant homolog of the human general/alternative splicing factor SF2/ASF. The SR1 gene produces five different splice variants through alternative utilization of competing 3′ splice sites and suppression of 5′ splice sites in intron 9 (Lazar and Goodman 2000). The ratio of the SR1/SR1B transcripts generated by alternative splicing is under temperature control. The temperature-dependent regulation of the SR1B/SR1 ratio suggests a role of SR1B in plant adaptation response to ambient temperatures (Lazar and Goodman 2000). In addition, the splicing patterns of a number of other SR genes, including SR1/SR34, SR33/SCL33, RS31, RS40, and RSZ32, are also changed at temperature extremes (Palusa et al. 2007).
Recent reports show that a special type of alternative splicing event occurs at the tandem 3′ splice site. In plants and animals, some of the splice acceptor sites have special consensus sequences that have tandem repeats of the consensus sequence ‘‘NAG’’ (N stands for A, C, G, T) and are, thus, termed ‘‘NAGNAG acceptor’’ sites (Hinzpeter et al. 2010). Alternative splicing at the NAGNAG acceptor sites is widespread in many organisms. Both AG alleles of a NAGNAG acceptor can be chosen by spliceosome and, thus, alternative splicing at the NAGNAG acceptor results in the insertion or deletion of one amino acid. In this regard, alternative selection of the 3′ splice sites diversifies the protein structures and proteome plasticity (Hiller et al. 2004; Schindler et al. 2008). The NAGNAG acceptor sites are frequently found in the Arabidopsis genome and remarkably enriched in the genes encoding SR and SR-related proteins (Schindler et al. 2008). Alternative splicing of the SR genes at the NAGNAG receptor sites is also responsive to low temperatures (Schindler et al. 2008), further supporting that alternative splicing is intimately associated with temperature responses in plants.
Moreover, a number of splicing factors, other than SR proteins, are also under temperature control. The conserved SNW/Ski-interacting protein (SKIP) domain-containing protein is a splicing factor. It regulates alternative splicing possibly by modulating the recognition or cleavage of the splice donor and acceptor sites (Wang et al. 2012). The SKIP protein interacts with the spliceosomal splicing factor SR45 and is related with alternative splicing of the clock genes, such as PSEUDORESPONSE REGULATOR7 (PRR7) and PRR9, in a temperature-dependent manner (Wang et al. 2012). It is likely that the SKIP protein integrates temperature information into the circadian clock oscillators, contributing to maintaining temperature compensation.
The STABILIZED1 (STA1) protein is a pre-mRNA splicing factor that is homologous to the human U5 small ribonucleoprotein-associated 102-kD protein (Lee et al. 2006). The STA1 gene is induced by cold temperatures to confer freezing tolerance. The sta1-1 mutant has alterations in the alternative splicing patterns of the COR15A gene, resulting in hypersensitivity to freezing stress (Lee et al. 2006). The STA1 gene is crucial for temperature-responsive splicing and the turnover of unstable transcripts to reconcile plant fitness under cold stress conditions.
Alternative splicing is widely conserved in eukaryotes. Numerous examples illustrate that temperature-responsive alternative splicing is prevalent in plants and plays a role in a broad spectrum of plant responses to low temperatures by diversifying transcriptomes and proteome plasticity.
Alternative splicing is also linked with diverse gene regulatory mechanisms, such as PEPi that regulates gene transcription by modulating transcription factor activities. Plant siPEPs produced by alternative splicing of transcription factor genes form a self-regulatory circuit, as exemplified by CCA1 alternative splicing (Park et al. 2012; Seo et al. 2012), establishing an elaborate signaling scheme in plants. It has been estimated that the number of alternatively spliced transcription factor genes is over 330 in Arabidopsis and rice (Seo et al. 2011a). Further investigations on the roles of plant siPEPs and underlying molecular mechanisms would unravel the biological relevance of alternative splicing in plant adaptation responses and establish novel functional linkages with other gene regulatory mechanisms, such as chromatin modification (Blencowe 2006).
Alternative splicing is profoundly affected by low temperatures in plants. Therefore, it is perceived as a way of integrating temperature signals into plant development and endogenous cellular physiology. Despite its close association of alternative splicing with temperature signals, just a few responsible splicing factors have been characterized so far. It is also unknown how environmental stress signals affect the activities of splicing factors in most cases. Molecular and biochemical investigations on the splicing factors and phenotypic examinations of plants that are defective in the splicing factors and their target genes would help to understand the molecular mechanisms underlying temperature-responsive alternative splicing of cold-responsive transcription factor genes.
Alternative splicing can be biotechnologically explored as a means of elaborate control of transcription factor activities in crop plants. Engineering of the alternative splicing patterns through mutations in splice sites can be applied for modifying plant development and responses to environmental stresses. Modulations of splicing factor activities would be an alternative approach to precisely control plant functions for improved stress tolerance.
This work was supported by the Leaping Research (20120005600) and Global Research Lab (2012055546) Programs provided by the National Research Foundation of Korea, the Next-Generation BioGreen 21 Program (Plant Molecular Breeding Center No. 201203013055290010200) provided by the Rural Development Administration, and by a Grant from the Agricultural R & D Promotion Center (309017-05-4-HD140), Korea Ministry for Food, Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries. It was also supported in part by the Human Frontier Science Program (RGP0002/2012).
Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits any use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and the source are credited.