Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Deviation from a preoperative surgical and anaesthetic care plan is associated with increased risk of adverse intraoperative events in major abdominal surgery

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Perioperative coordination facilitates team communication and planning. The aim of this study was to determine how often deviation from predicted surgical conditions and a pre-established anaesthetic care plan in major abdominal surgery occurred, and whether this was associated with an increase in adverse clinical events.

Methods

In this prospective observational study, weekly preoperative interdisciplinary team meetings were conducted according to a joint care plan checklist in a tertiary care centre in France. Any discordance with preoperative predictions and deviation from the care plan were noted. A link to the incidence of predetermined adverse intraoperative events was investigated.

Results

Intraoperative adverse clinical events (ACEs) occurred in 15 % of all cases and were associated with postoperative complications [relative risk (RR) = 1.5; 95 % confidence interval (1.1; 2.2)]. Quality of prediction of surgical procedural items was modest, with one in five to six items not correctly predicted. Discordant surgical prediction was associated with an increased incidence of ACE. Deviation from the anaesthetic care plan occurred in around 13 %, which was more frequent when surgical prediction was inaccurate (RR > 3) and independently associated with ACE (odds ratio 6).

Conclusion

Surgery was more difficult than expected in up to one out of five cases. In a similar proportion, disagreement between preoperative care plans and observed clinical management was independently associated with an increased risk of adverse clinical events.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Lingard L, Espin S, Rubin B, Whyte S, Colmenares M, Baker GR, Doran D, Grober E, Orser B, Bohnen J, Reznick R (2005) Getting teams to talk: development and pilot implementation of a checklist to promote interprofessional communication in the OR. Qual Saf Health Care 14:340–346

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. McGreevy JM, Otten TD (2007) Briefing and debriefing in the operating room using fighter pilot crew resource management. J Am Coll Surg 205:169–176

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Einav Y, Gopher D, Kara I, Ben-Yosef O, Lawn M, Laufer N, Liebergall M, Donchin Y (2010) Preoperative briefing in the operating room: shared cognition, teamwork, and patient safety. Chest 137:443–449

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Khoshbin A, Lingard L, Wright JG (2009) Evaluation of preoperative and perioperative operating room briefings at the Hospital for Sick Children. Can J Surg 52:309–315

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Haynes AB, Weiser TG, Berry WR, Lipsitz SR, Breizat A-HS, Dellinger EP, Herbosa T, Joseph S, Kibatala PL, Lapitan MCM, Merry AF, Moorthy K, Reznick RK, Taylor B, Gawande AA (2009) A surgical safety checklist to reduce morbidity and mortality in a global population. N Engl J Med 360:491–499

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. de Vries EN, Prins HA, Crolla RMPH, den Outer AJ, van Andel G, van Helden SH, Schlack WS, van Putten MA, Gouma DJ, Dijkgraaf MGW, Smorenburg SM, Boermeester MA (2010) Effect of a comprehensive surgical safety system on patient outcomes. N Engl J Med 363:1928–1937

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Mathieu JE, Heffner TS, Goodwin GF, Salas E, Cannon-Bowers JA (2000) The influence of shared mental models on team process and performance. J Appl Psychol 85:273–283

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien P-A (2004) Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg 240:205–213

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Fleisher LA, Beckman JA, Brown KA, Calkins H, Chaikof EL, Chaikof E, Fleischmann KE, Freeman WK, Froehlich JB, Kasper EK, Kersten JR, Riegel B, Robb JF, Smith SC Jr, Jacobs AK, Adams CD, Anderson JL, Antman EM, Buller CE, Creager MA, Ettinger SM, Faxon DP, Fuster V, Halperin JL, Hiratzka LF, Hunt SA, Lytle BW, Nishimura R, Ornato JP, Page RL, Riegel B, Tarkington LG, Yancy CW (2007) ACC/AHA 2007 guidelines on perioperative cardiovascular evaluation and care for noncardiac surgery: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (writing committee to revise the 2002 Guidelines on Perioperative Cardiovascular Evaluation for Noncardiac Surgery) developed in collaboration with the American Society of Echocardiography, American Society of Nuclear Cardiology, Heart Rhythm Society, Society of Cardiovascular Anesthesiologists, Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, Society for Vascular Medicine and Biology, and Society for Vascular Surgery. J Am Coll Cardiol 50:e159–e241

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Smetana GW, Lawrence VA, Cornell JE (2006) Preoperative pulmonary risk stratification for noncardiothoracic surgery: systematic review for the American College of Physicians. Ann Intern Med 144:581–595

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Qaseem A, Snow V, Fitterman N, Hornbake ER, Lawrence VA, Smetana GW, Weiss K, Owens DK, Aronson M, Barry P, Casey DE Jr, Cross JT Jr, Fitterman N, Sherif KD, Weiss KB (2006) Risk assessment for and strategies to reduce perioperative pulmonary complications for patients undergoing noncardiothoracic surgery: a guideline from the American College of Physicians. Ann Intern Med 144:575–580

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Lingard L, Regehr G, Orser B, Reznick R, Baker GR, Doran D, Espin S, Bohnen J, Whyte S (2008) Evaluation of a preoperative checklist and team briefing among surgeons, nurses, and anesthesiologists to reduce failures in communication. Arch Surg 143:12–17, discussion 18

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Gawande AA, Zinner MJ, Studdert DM, Brennan TA (2003) Analysis of errors reported by surgeons at three teaching hospitals. Surgery 133:614–621

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Haute Autorité de Santé, France (2005 June) Referentiel de Pratiques Professionnelles Transfusion en anesthésie-réanimation

  15. Awad SS, Fagan SP, Bellows C, Albo D, Green-Rashad B, De la Garza M, Berger DH (2005) Bridging the communication gap in the operating room with medical team training. Am J Surg 190:770–774

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Healey AN, Undre S, Sevdalis N, Koutantji M, Vincent CA (2006) The complexity of measuring interprofessional teamwork in the operating theatre. J Interprof Care 20:485–495

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Taneva S, Grote G, Easty A, Plattner B (2010) Decoding the perioperative process breakdowns: a theoretical model and implications for system design. Int J Med Inform 9:14–30

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Infante C (2006) Bridging the “system’s” gap between interprofessional care and patient safety: sociological insights. J Interprof Care 20:517–525

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Manser T (2009) Teamwork and patient safety in dynamic domains of healthcare: a review of the literature. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 53:143–151

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Papaspyros SC, Javangula KC, Adluri RKP, O’Regan DJ (2010) Briefing and debriefing in the cardiac operating room. Analysis of impact on theatre team attitude and patient safety. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg 10:43–47

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Gittell JH, Fairfield KM, Bierbaum B, Head W, Jackson R, Kelly M, Laskin R, Lipson S, Siliski J, Thornhill T, Zuckerman J (2000) Impact of relational coordination on quality of care, postoperative pain and functioning, and length of stay: a nine-hospital study of surgical patients. Med Care 38:807–819

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Wheelan SA, Burchill CN, Tilin F (2003) The link between teamwork and patients’ outcomes in intensive care units. Am J Crit Care 12:527–534

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Nielsen PE, Goldman MB, Mann S, Shapiro DE, Marcus RG, Pratt SD, Greenberg P, McNamee P, Salisbury M, Birnbach DJ, Gluck PA, Pearlman MD, King H, Tornberg DN, Sachs BP (2007) Effects of teamwork training on adverse outcomes and process of care in labor and delivery: a randomized controlled trial. Obstet Gynecol 109:48–55

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Paull DE, Mazzia LM, Izu BS, Neily J, Mills PD, Bagian JP (2009) Predictors of successful implementation of preoperative briefings and postoperative debriefings after medical team training. Am J Surg 198:675–678

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Firth-Cozens J (2004) Why communication fails in the operating room. Qual Saf Health Care 13:327

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflicts of interest

None of the authors has any conflict of interest to declare. The study was exclusively funded with departmental resources and has not received any external financial support.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to T. Gauss.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Gauss, T., Merckx, P., Brasher, C. et al. Deviation from a preoperative surgical and anaesthetic care plan is associated with increased risk of adverse intraoperative events in major abdominal surgery. Langenbecks Arch Surg 398, 277–285 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00423-012-1028-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00423-012-1028-3

Keywords

Navigation