Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Surgical management of proximal bile duct cancer: extended right lobe resection increases resectability and radicality

  • New Surgical Horizons
  • Published:
Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract.

Background: Surgical resection provides the only chance of cure for patients suffering from hilar cholangiocarcinoma. Although appropriate procedures are not agreed upon, an increase in radicality has been observed during the past 20 years.

Methods: The literature as well as our own experience after 133 resections of hilar cholangiocarcinomas were reviewed.

Results: Tumor-free margins represent the most important prognostic parameter. Hilar resections as least radical resective procedure will generate rates of formally curative resections of less than 50%. Even after these formally curative resections, long-term survival cannot be achieved. Only additional liver resections will increase the number of long-term survivors to significant figures. In our series, the best 5-year survival rate of 72% was achieved after right trisegmentectomy with concomitant resection of the portal vein bifurcation.

Conclusion: Right trisegmentectomy and combined portal vein resection represent the best way to comply with basic rules of surgical oncology for hilar cholangiocarcinoma. This procedure will provide the most pronounced benefit among various types of liver resection, whereas local resections of the extrahepatic bile duct must be considered as an oncologically inefficient procedure.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1.
Fig. 2.
Fig. 3.
Fig. 4.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Okuda K, Kubo Y, Okazaki N, Arishima T, Hashimoto M (1977) Clinical aspects of intrahepatic bile duct carcinoma including hilar carcinoma: a study of 57 autopsy-proven cases. Cancer 39:232–246

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Bhuiya M-R, Nimura Y, Kamiya J, Kondo S, Fukata S, Hayakawa N, Shionoya S (1992) Clinicopathologic studies on perineural invasion of bile duct carcinoma. Ann Surg 215:344–349

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Weinbren K, Mutum S-S (1983) Pathological aspects of cholangiocarcinoma. J Pathol 139:217–238

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Born P, Rosch T, Willkomm G, Sandschin W, Fitz N, Weigert N, Ott R, Frimberger E, Allescher H, Classen M (1999) Initial experience with a new Yamakawa-type prosthesis for long-term percutaneous transhepatic drainage. Endoscopy 31:748–750

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Kaufman S-L (1995) Percutaneous palliation of unresectable pancreatic cancer. Surg Clin North Am 75:989–999

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Schlitt H-J, Weimann A, Klempnauer J, Oldhafer K-J, Nashan B, Raab R, Pichlmayr R (1999) Peripheral hepatojejunostomy as palliative treatment for irresectable malignant tumors of the liver hilum. Ann Surg 229:181–186

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Jarnagin W-R, Fong Y, DeMatteo R-P, Gonen M, Burke E-C, Bodniewicz BSJ, Youssef BAM, Klimstra D, Blumgart L-H (2001) Staging, resectability, and outcome in 225 patients with hilar cholangiocarcinoma. Ann Surg 234:507–517

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Miyazaki M, Ito H, Nakagawa K, Ambiru S, Shimizu H, Shimizu Y, Kato A, Nakamura S, Omoto H, Nakajima N, Kimura F, Suwa T (1998) Aggressive surgical approaches to hilar cholangiocarcinoma: hepatic or local resection? Surgery 123:131–136

    Google Scholar 

  9. Nimura Y, Kamiya J, Kondo S, Nagino M, Uesaka K, Oda K, Sano T, Yamamoto H, Hayakawa N (2000) Aggressive preoperative management and extended surgery for hilar cholangiocarcinoma: Nagoya experience. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg 7:155–162

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Mittal B, Deutsch M, Iwatsuki S (1985) Primary cancers of the extrahepatic biliary passages. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 11:849–855

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Kawarada Y, Isaji S, Taoka H, Tabata M, Das B-C, Yokoi H (1999) S4a+S5 with caudate lobe (S1) resection using the Taj Mahal liver parenchymal resection for carcinoma of the biliary tract. J Gastrointest Surg 3:369–373

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Bismuth H (1982) Surgical anatomy and anatomical surgery of the liver. World J Surg 6:3–9

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Neuhaus P, Jonas S, Bechstein W-O, Lohmann R, Radke C, Kling N, Wex C, Lobeck H, Hintze R (1999) Extended resections for hilar cholangiocarcinoma. Ann Surg 230:808–818

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Scheele J, Altendorf-Hofmann A, Stangl R, Schmidt K (1996) Surgical resection of colorectal liver metastases: Gold standard for solitary and radically resectable lesions. Swiss Surg (Suppl) 4:4–17

    Google Scholar 

  15. Iwasaki Y, Okamura T, Ozaki A, Todoroki T, Takase Y, Ohara K, Nishimura A, Otsu H (1986) Surgical treatment for carcinoma at the confluence of the major hepatic ducts. Surg Gynecol Obstet 162:457–464

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Mizumoto R, Kawarada Y, Suzuki H (1986) Surgical treatment of hilar carcinoma of the bile duct. Surg Gynecol Obstet 162:153–158

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Makuuchi M, Thai BL, Takayasu K, et al (1990) Preoperative portal embolization to increase safety of major hepatectomy for hilar bile duct carcinoma: a preliminary report. Surgery 107:521–527

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Hatfield ARW, Tobias R, Terblanche J, et al (1982) Preoperative external biliary drainage in obstructive jaundice: a prospective controlled clinical trial. Lancet 2:896–899

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Hintze R-E, Abou-Rebyeh H, Adler A, Veltzke-Schlieker W, Felix R, Wiedenmann B (2001) Magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography-guided unilateral endoscopic stent placement for Klatskin tumors. Gastrointest Endosc 53:40–46

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Vogl T-J, Balzer J-O, Dette K, Hintze R, Pegios W, Maurer J, Keck H, Neuhaus P, Felix R (1998) Initially unresectable hilar cholangiocarcinoma: hepatic regeneration after transarterial embolization. Radiology 208:217–222

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Bismuth H, Nakache R, Diamond T (1992) Management strategies in resection for hilar cholangiocarcinoma. Ann Surg 215:31–38

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Kosuge T, Yamamoto J, Shimada K, Yamasaki S, Makuuchi M (1999) Improved surgical results for hilar cholangiocarcinoma with procedures including major hepatic resection. Ann Surg 230:663–671

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Kitagawa Y, Nagino M, Kamiya J, Uesaka K, Sano T, Yamamoto H, Hayakawa N, Nimura Y (2001) Lymph node metastasis from hilar cholangiocarcinoma: audit of 110 patients who underwent regional and paraaortic node dissection. Ann Surg 233:385–392

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Tojima Y, Nagino M, Ebata T, Uesaka K, Kamiya J, Nimura Y (2003) Immunohistochemically demonstrated lymph node micrometastasis and prognosis in patients with otherwise node-negative hilar cholangiocarcinoma. Ann Surg 237:201–207

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Izbicki J-R, Hosch S-B, Pichlmeier U, Rehders A, Busch C, Niendorf A, Passlick B, Broelsch C-E, Pantel K (1997) Prognostic value of immunohistochemically identifiable tumor cells in lymph nodes of patients with completely resected esophageal cancer. N Engl J Med 337:1188–1194

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Klinik für Allgemein-, Viszeral und Transplantationschirurgie, Charité, Campus Virchow Klinikum, Humboldt University Berlin, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353, Berlin, Germany

    Peter Neuhaus, Sven Jonas, Utz Settmacher, Armin Thelen & Christoph Benckert

  2. Strahlenklinik und Poliklinik, Charité, Campus Virchow Klinikum, Humboldt University Berlin, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353, Berlin, Germany

    Enrique Lopez-Hänninen

  3. Zentrale Interdisziplinäre Endoskopie/Medizinische Klinik mit Schwerpunkt Hepatologie und Gastroenterologie, Charité, Campus Virchow Klinikum, Humboldt University Berlin, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353, Berlin, Germany

    Rainer E. Hintze

Authors
  1. Peter Neuhaus
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Sven Jonas
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Utz Settmacher
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Armin Thelen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Christoph Benckert
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Enrique Lopez-Hänninen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Rainer E. Hintze
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Peter Neuhaus.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Neuhaus, P., Jonas, S., Settmacher, U. et al. Surgical management of proximal bile duct cancer: extended right lobe resection increases resectability and radicality. Langenbecks Arch Surg 388, 194–200 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00423-003-0383-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00423-003-0383-5

Keywords

Search

Navigation