Abstract
Human off-vertical axis rotation (OVAR) in the dark typically produces perceived motion about a cone, the amplitude of which changes as a function of frequency. This perception is commonly attributed to the fact that both the OVAR and the conical motion have a gravity vector that rotates about the subject. Little-known, however, is that this rotating-gravity explanation for perceived conical motion is inconsistent with basic observations about self-motion perception: (a) that the perceived vertical moves toward alignment with the gravito-inertial acceleration (GIA) and (b) that perceived translation arises from perceived linear acceleration, as derived from the portion of the GIA not associated with gravity. Mathematically proved in this article is the fact that during OVAR these properties imply mismatched phase of perceived tilt and translation, in contrast to the common perception of matched phases which correspond to conical motion with pivot at the bottom. This result demonstrates that an additional perceptual rule is required to explain perception in OVAR. This study investigates, both analytically and computationally, the phase relationship between tilt and translation at different stimulus rates—slow (45°/s) and fast (180°/s), and the three-dimensional shape of predicted perceived motion, under different sets of hypotheses about self-motion perception. We propose that for human motion perception, there is a phase-linking of tilt and translation movements to construct a perception of one’s overall motion path. Alternative hypotheses to achieve the phase match were tested with three-dimensional computational models, comparing the output with published experimental reports. The best fit with experimental data was the hypothesis that the phase of perceived translation was linked to perceived tilt, while the perceived tilt was determined by the GIA. This hypothesis successfully predicted the bottom-pivot cone commonly reported and a reduced sense of tilt during fast OVAR. Similar considerations apply to the hilltop illusion often reported during horizontal linear oscillation. Known response properties of central neurons are consistent with this ability to phase-link translation with tilt. In addition, the competing “standard” model was mathematically proved to be unable to predict the bottom-pivot cone regardless of the values used for parameters in the model.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Albright TD (1989) Centrifugal directional bias in the middle temporal visual area (MT) of the macaque. Vis Neurosci 2: 177–188
Anastasopoulos D, Bronstein AM (1999) A case of thalamic syndrome: somatosensory influences on visual orientation. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 67: 390–394
Angelaki DE (1991) Dynamic polarization vector of spatially tuned neurons. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 38: 1053–1060
Angelaki DE (1992) Spatio-temporal convergence (STC) in otolith neurons. Biol Cybern 67: 83–96
Angelaki DE, Dickman JD (2000) Spatiotemporal processing of linear acceleration: primary afferent and central vestibular neuron responses. J Neurophysiol 84: 2113–2132
Angelaki DE, Bush GA, Perachio AA (1993) Two-dimensional spatiotemporal coding of linear acceleration in vestibular nuclei neurons. J Neurosci 13: 1403–1417
Angelaki DE, Shaikh AG, Green AM, Dickman JD (2004) Neurons compute internal models of the physical laws of motion. Nature 430: 560–564
Averbeck BB, Latham PE, Pouget A (2006) Neural correlations, population coding and computation. Nat Rev Neurosci 7: 358–366
Baker JF, Perlmutter SI, Peterson BW, Rude SA, Robinson FR (1987) Simultaneous opposing adaptive changes in cat vestibulo-ocular reflex direction for two body orientations. Exp Brain Res 69: 220–224
Baloh RW, Halmagyi GM (1996) Disorders of the vestibular system. Oxford University Press, Oxford
Benson AJ, Diaz E, Farrugia P (1975) The perception of body orientation relative to a rotating linear acceleration vector. Fortschr Zool 23: 264–274
Bockisch CJ, Straumann D, Haslwanter T (2003) Eye movements during multi-axis whole-body rotations. J Neurophysiol 89: 355–366
Borah J, Young LR, Curry RE (1988) Optimal estimator model for human spatial orientation. Ann N Y Acad Sci 545: 51–73
Bos JE, Bles W (2002) Theoretical considerations on canal-otolith interaction and an observer model. Biol Cybern 86: 191–207
Bottini G, Sterzi R, Paulesu E, Vallar G, Cappa SF, Erminio F, Passingham RE, Frith CD, Frackowiak RS (1994) Identification of the central vestibular projections in man: a positron emission tomography activation study. Exp Brain Res 99: 164–169
Boyle R, Belton T, McCrea RA (1996) Responses of identified vestibulospinal neurons to voluntary eye and head movements in the squirrel monkey. Ann N Y Acad Sci 781: 244–263
Brandt T, Dieterich M (1999) The vestibular cortex. Its locations, functions, and disorders. Ann N Y Acad Sci 871: 293–312
Brandt T, Dieterich M, Danek A (1994) Vestibular cortex lesions affect the perception of verticality. Ann Neurol 35: 403–412
Brandt T, Glasauer S, Dieterich M (2002) Vestibular brainstem disorders: clinical syndromes in roll plane and their model simulation. Mov Disord 17(Suppl 2): S58–62
Bril B, Brenière Y (1993) Posture and independent locomotion in early childhood: learning to walk or learning postural dynamic control?. In: Savelsbergh GJP (eds) The development of coordination in infancy. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 337–358
Clark B, Graybiel A (1966) Factors contributing to the delay in the perception of the oculogravic illusion. Am J Psychol 79: 377–388
Cohen L (1971) Synchronous bimanual movements performed by homologous and non-homologous muscles. Percept Mot Skills 32: 639–644
Correia MJ, Guedry FE Jr (1966) Modification of vestibular responses as a function of rate of rotation about an Earth-horizontal axis. Acta Otolaryngol 62: 297–308
Curthoys IS (1996) The delay of the oculogravic illusion. Brain Res Bull 40: 407–412
Denise P, Darlot C, Droulez J, Cohen B, Berthoz A (1988) Motion perceptions induced by off-vertical axis rotation (OVAR) at small angles of tilt. Exp Brain Res 73: 106–114
Dickman JD, Angelaki DE (2002) Vestibular convergence patterns in vestibular nuclei neurons of alert primates. J Neurophysiol 88: 3518–3533
Dickman JD, Angelaki DE (2004) Dynamics of vestibular neurons during rotational motion in alert rhesus monkeys. Exp Brain Res 155: 91–101
Dieterich M, Brandt T (1993) Ocular torsion and tilt of subjective visual vertical are sensitive brainstem signs. Ann Neurol 33: 292–299
Droulez J, Darlot C (1989) The geometric and dynamic implications of the coherence constraints in three-dimensional sensorimotor interactions. In: Jeannerod M (eds) Attention and performance. Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale, pp 495–526
Fanelli R, Raphan T, Schnabolk C (1990) Neural network modeling of eye compensation during off-vertical-axis rotation. Neural Netw 3: 265–276
Fernández C, Goldberg JM (1971) Physiology of peripheral neurons innervating semicircular canals of the squirrel monkey. II. Response to sinusoidal stimulation and dynamics of peripheral vestibular system. J Neurophysiol 34: 661–675
Foster IZ, Hanes DA, Barmack NH, McCollum G (2007) Spatial symmetries in vestibular projections to the uvula-nodulus. Biol Cybern 96: 439–453
Fredrickson JM, Scheid P, Figge U, Kornhuber HH (1966) Vestibular nerve projection to the cerebral cortex of the rhesus monkey. Exp Brain Res 2: 318–327
Glasauer S (1995) Linear acceleration perception: frequency dependence of the hilltop illusion. Acta Otolaryngol Suppl 520: 37–40
Goldberg JM, Fernández C (1984) The vestibular system. In: Darian-Smith I (eds) The nervous system, vol III. American Physiological Society, Bethesda, pp 977–1022
Grant W, Best W (1987) Otolith-organ mechanics: lumped parameter model and dynamic response. Aviat Space Environ Med 58: 970–976
Graybiel A, Brown R (1951) The delay in visual reorientation following exposure to a change in direction of resultant force on a human centrifuge. J Gen Psychol 45: 143–150
Green AM, Angelaki DE (2004) An integrative neural network for detecting inertial motion and head orientation. J Neurophysiol 92: 905–925
Grossberg S, Mingolla E, Pack C (1999) A neural model of motion processing and visual navigation by cortical area MST. Cereb Cortex 9: 878–895
Guedry FE Jr (1974) Psychophysics of vestibular sensation. In: Kornhuber HH (eds) Vestibular system. Part 2: psychophysics and applied aspects and general interpretations, vol VI/2. Springer, Berlin, pp 3–154
Guedry FE Jr, Stockwell CW, Gilson RD (1971) Comparison of subjective responses to semicircular canal stimulation produced by rotation about different axes. Acta Otolaryngol 72: 101–106
Guedry FE, Rupert AH, McGrath BJ, Oman CM (1992) The dynamics of spatial orientation during complex and changing linear and angular acceleration. J Vestib Res 2: 259–283
Hain TC (1986) A model of the nystagmus induced by off vertical axis rotation. Biol Cybern 54: 337–350
Haslwanter T, Jaeger R, Mayr S, Fetter M (2000) Three-dimensional eye-movement responses to off-vertical axis rotations in humans. Exp Brain Res 134: 96–106
Hawrylyshyn PA, Rubin AM, Tasker RR, Organ LW, Fredrickson JM (1978) Vestibulothalamic projections in man–a sixth primary sensory pathway. J Neurophysiol 41: 394–401
Hixson WC, Niven JI, Correia MJ (1966) Kinematics nomenclature for physiological accelerations. Monograph 14. Naval Aerospace Medical Institute, Pensacola
Holly JE (1996) Subject-coincident coordinate systems and sustained motions. Int J Theor Phys 35: 445–473
Holly JE (1997) Three-dimensional baselines for perceived self-motion during acceleration and deceleration in a centrifuge. J Vestib Res 7: 45–61
Holly JE (2000) Baselines for three-dimensional perception of combined linear and angular self-motion with changing rotational axis. J Vestib Res 10: 163–178
Holly JE (2003) Perceptual disturbances predicted in zero-g through three-dimensional modeling. J Vestib Res 13: 173–186
Holly JE (2004) Vestibular coriolis effect differences modeled with three-dimensional linear-angular interactions. J Vestib Res 14: 443–460
Holly JE, Harmon KJ (2009) Spatial disorientation in gondola centrifuges predicted by the form of motion as a whole in 3-D. Aviat Space Environ Med 80: 125–134
Holly JE, McCollum G (1996) The shape of self-motion perception—II. Framework and principles for simple and complex motion. Neuroscience 70: 487–513
Holly JE, McCollum G, Boyle R (1999) Identification of head motions by central vestibular neurons receiving linear and angular input. Biol Cybern 81: 177–188
Holly JE, Pierce SE, McCollum G (2006) Head tilt-translation combinations distinguished at the level of neurons. Biol Cybern 95: 311–326
Holly JE, Vrublevskis A, Carlson LE (2008) Whole-motion model of perception during forward- and backward-facing centrifuge runs. J Vestib Res 18: 171–186
Kaptein RG, Van Gisbergen JA (2006) Canal and otolith contributions to visual orientation constancy during sinusoidal roll rotation. J Neurophysiol 95: 1936–1948
Kelso JA (1984) Phase transitions and critical behavior in human bimanual coordination. Am J Physiol 246: R1000–1004
Kelso JA, Holt KG, Rubin P, Kugler PN (1981) Patterns of human interlimb coordination emerge from the properties of non-linear, limit cycle oscillatory processes: theory and data. J Mot Behav 13: 226–261
Klam F (2004) Head movement-related signals and the representation of space in parietal cortex: an electrophysiological study with awake behaving monkeys. Ph.D. Collège de France, University Paris VI, Paris, France
Kushiro K, Dai M, Kunin M, Yakushin SB, Cohen B, Raphan T (2002) Compensatory and orienting eye movements induced by off-vertical axis rotation (OVAR) in monkeys. J Neurophysiol 88: 2445–2462
Lackner JR, DiZio P (1988) Visual stimulation affects the perception of voluntary leg movements during walking. Perception 17: 71–80
Lackner JR, Graybiel A (1978) Some influences of touch and pressure cues on human spatial orientation. Aviat Space Environ Med 49: 798–804
Laurens J, Droulez J (2007) Bayesian processing of vestibular information. Biol Cybern 96: 389–404
Mayne R (1974) A systems concept of the vestibular organs. In: Kornhuber HH (eds) Vestibular system. Part 2: psychophysics and applied aspects and general interpretations, vol VI. Springer, Berlin, pp 493–580
McCollum G (2007) Spatial symmetry groups as sensorimotor guidelines. J Vestib Res 17: 347–359
McCollum G, Boyle R (2001) Conditional transitions in gaze dynamics: role of vestibular nuclei in eye-only and eye/head gaze behaviors. Biol Cybern 85: 423–436
McCollum G, Boyle R (2004) Rotations in a vertebrate setting: evaluation of the symmetry group of the disynaptic canal-neck projection. Biol Cybern 90: 203–217
McCollum G, Holroyd C, Castelfranco AM (1995) Forms of early walking. J Theor Biol 176: 373–390
McCrea RA, Gdowski GT, Boyle R, Belton T (1999) Firing behavior of vestibular neurons during active and passive head movements: vestibulo-spinal and other non-eye-movement related neurons. J Neurophysiol 82: 416–428
McGrath BJ, Guedry FE, Oman CM, Rupert AH (1995) Vestibulo-ocular response of human subjects seated in a pivoting support system during 3 Gz centrifuge stimulation. J Vestib Res 5: 331–347
Mechsner F (2004) A psychological approach to human voluntary movements. J Mot Behav 36: 355–370
Merfeld DM, Zupan LH (2002) Neural processing of gravitoinertial cues in humans. III. Modeling tilt and translation responses. J Neurophysiol 87: 819–833
Merfeld DM, Young LR, Oman CM, Shelhamer MJ (1993) A multidimensional model of the effect of gravity on the spatial orientation of the monkey. J Vestib Res 3: 141–161
Merfeld DM, Zupan L, Peterka RJ (1999) Humans use internal models to estimate gravity and linear acceleration. Nature 398: 615–618
Merfeld DM (1995a) Modeling human vestibular responses during eccentric rotation and off vertical axis rotation. Acta Otolaryngol Suppl 520: 354–359
Merfeld DM (1995b) Modeling the vestibulo-ocular reflex of the squirrel monkey during eccentric rotation and roll tilt. Exp Brain Res 106: 123–134
Merfeld DM, Zupan LH, Gifford CA (2001) Neural processing of gravito-inertial cues in humans. II. Influence of the semicircular canals during eccentric rotation. J Neurophysiol 85: 1648–1660
Merfeld DM, Park S, Gianna-Poulin C, Black FO, Wood S (2005a) Vestibular perception and action employ qualitatively different mechanisms. I. Frequency response of VOR and perceptual responses during translation and tilt. J Neurophysiol 94: 186–198
Merfeld DM, Park S, Gianna-Poulin C, Black FO, Wood S (2005b) Vestibular perception and action employ qualitatively different mechanisms. II. VOR and perceptual responses during combined tilt and translation. J Neurophysiol 94: 199–205
Mergner T, Schweigart G, Botti F, Lehmann A (1998) Eye movements evoked by proprioceptive stimulation along the body axis in humans. Exp Brain Res 120: 450–460
Mittelstaedt ML, Jensen W (1999) Centrifugal force affects perception but not nystagmus in passive rotation. Ann N Y Acad Sci 871: 435–438
Mittelstaedt ML, Mittelstaedt H (1996) The influence of otoliths and somatic graviceptors on angular velocity estimation. J Vestib Res 6: 355–366
Miyamoto T, Fukushima K, Takada T, De Waele C, Vidal PP (2005) Saccular projections in the human cerebral cortex. Ann N Y Acad Sci 1039: 124–131
Nashner LM, Black FO, Wall C III (1982) Adaptation to altered support and visual conditions during stance: patients with vestibular deficits. J Neurosci 2: 536–544
Ormsby CC, Young LR (1977) Integration of semicircular canal and otolith information for multisensory orientation stimuli. Math Biosci 34: 1–21
Paige GD, Seidman SH (1999) Characteristics of the VOR in response to linear acceleration. Ann N Y Acad Sci 871: 123–135
Park S, Gianna-Poulin C, Black FO, Wood S, Merfeld DM (2006) Roll rotation cues influence roll tilt perception assayed using a somatosensory technique. J Neurophysiol 96: 486–491
Perlmutter SI, Iwamoto Y, Baker JF, Peterson BW (1999) Spatial alignment of rotational and static tilt responses of vestibulospinal neurons in the cat. J Neurophysiol 82: 855–862
Pouget A, Dayan P, Zemel RS (2003) Inference and computation with population codes. Annu Rev Neurosci 26: 381–410
Raphan T, Schnabolk C (1988) Modeling slow phase velocity generation during off-vertical axis rotation. Ann N Y Acad Sci 545: 29–50
Reymond G, Droulez J, Kemeny A (2002) Visuovestibular perception of self-motion modeled as a dynamic optimization process. Biol Cybern 87: 301–314
Rock I (1997) The perception of movement. In: Rock I, Palmer S (eds) Indirect perception. MIT Press, Cambridge, pp 209–247
Roy JE, Cullen KE (2001) Selective processing of vestibular reafference during self-generated head motion. J Neurosci 21: 2131–2142
Schnabolk C, Raphan T (1992) Modeling 3-D slow phase velocity estimation during off-vertical-axis rotation (OVAR). J Vestib Res 2: 1–14
Schor RH, Miller AD, Timerick SJ, Tomko DL (1985) Responses to head tilt in cat central vestibular neurons. II. Frequency dependence of neural response vectors. J Neurophysiol 53: 1444–1452
Schor RH, Steinbacher BC Jr., Yates BJ (1998) Horizontal linear and angular responses of neurons in the medial vestibular nucleus of the decerebrate cat. J Vestib Res 8: 107–116
Seidman SH, Bush G, Paige GD, Tomko DL (1998a) Perception of translational motion in the absence of non-otolith cues. Soc Neurosc Abstr 24(1): 416
Seidman SH, Telford L, Paige GD (1998b) Tilt perception during dynamic linear acceleration. Exp Brain Res 119: 307–314
Shelhamer M, Robinson DA, Tan HS (1992) Context-specific adaptation of the gain of the vestibulo-ocular reflex in humans. J Vestib Res 2: 89–96
Snapp-Childs W, Corbetta D (2005) Learning to walk: individual differences and early strategies. J Sport Exer Psych 27(Suppl S): S143–S144
Takeda N, Tanaka-Tsuji M, Sawada T, Koizuka I, Kubo T (1995) Clinical investigation of the vestibular cortex. Acta Otolaryngol Suppl 520: 110–112
Telford L, Seidman SH, Paige GD (1997) Dynamics of squirrel monkey linear vestibuloocular reflex and interactions with fixation distance. J Neurophysiol 78: 1775–1790
Vingerhoets RA, Medendorp WP, Van Gisbergen JA (2006) Time course and magnitude of illusory translation perception during off-vertical axis rotation. J Neurophysiol 95: 1571–1587
Wertheim AH, Mesland BS, Bles W (2001) Cognitive suppression of tilt sensations during linear horizontal self-motion in the dark. Perception 30: 733–741
Wood SJ, Reschke MF, Sarmiento LA, Clement G (2007) Tilt and translation motion perception during off-vertical axis rotation. Exp Brain Res 182: 365–377
Wright WG, DiZio P, Lackner JR (2005) Vertical linear self-motion perception during visual and inertial motion: more than weighted summation of sensory inputs. J Vestib Res 15: 185–195
Yong NA, Paige GD, Seidman SH (2007) Multiple sensory cues underlying the perception of translation and path. J Neurophysiol 97: 1100–1113
Young LR (1984) Perception of the body in space: mechanisms. In: Darian-Smith I (eds) The nervous system, vol III. American Physiological Society, Bethesda, pp 1023–1066
Zupan LH, Merfeld DM (2005) Human ocular torsion and perceived roll responses to linear acceleration. J Vestib Res 15: 173–183
Zupan LH, Merfeld DM, Darlot C (2002) Using sensory weighting to model the influence of canal, otolith and visual cues on spatial orientation and eye movements. Biol Cybern 86: 209–230
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Holly, J.E., Wood, S.J. & McCollum, G. Phase-linking and the perceived motion during off-vertical axis rotation. Biol Cybern 102, 9–29 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00422-009-0347-0
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00422-009-0347-0