Skip to main content
Log in

The effects of poling on physiological, kinematic and kinetic responses in roller ski skating

  • Original Article
  • Published:
European Journal of Applied Physiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

We investigated the effects of poling on physiological, kinematic and kinetic responses in the G4 skating technique where the poling movement is synchronized with the leg push-off on one side (strong side) followed by a forward arm swing during the leg push-off on the other side (weak side).

Methods

G4 skating with (G4-P) and without (G4-NP) poling was compared in 17 elite male cross-country skiers during 4-min submaximal tests on a 2 % inclined roller ski treadmill at 10, 15 and 20 km h−1.

Results

G4-P demonstrated less ventilatory stress and higher gross efficiency compared to G4-NP at all velocities, and the blood lactate concentration was lower at the high velocity (all P < 0.05). Furthermore, longer cycle lengths and lower cycle rates were found with G4-P at all velocities, with correspondingly lower peak ski forces, increased ski velocities and less angling and edging of the skis (all P < 0.05). The peak ski forces on the strong side were lower than on the weak side with G4-P at all velocities (all P < 0.05), but no differences between the sides were found with G4-NP.

Conclusions

The reduced physiological cost, higher gross efficiency and longer cycle lengths together with the lower ski forces at a given work rate with G4-P demonstrate the effectiveness of poling in the G4 skating technique. Thus, poling provides possibilities to increase total propulsion, to reduce ski forces and to enhance skiing efficiency.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

F f :

Friction force

F n :

Normal force

g :

Gravitational acceleration

G3:

A skating technique, also referred to as V1 or Double Dance, that involves one double poling action for each leg push-off

G4/G4-P:

A skating technique, also referred to as V2-alternate or Open Field Skate, that involves one double poling action for two leg push-offs

G4-NP:

Simulation of the G4 skating technique without poles

m :

Body mass

PF:

Pole force component

P f :

Power against friction

P g :

Power against gravity

RER:

Respiratory exchange ratio

RPE:

Rating of perceived exertion

v :

Velocity of the treadmill belt

VCO2 :

Carbon dioxide consumption

VO2 :

Oxygen consumption

α :

Incline

µ :

Friction coefficient

References

  • Ainegren M, Carlsson P, Tinnsten M (2008) Roller ski rolling resistance and its effects on elite athletes’ performance (P225). engineering of sport 7, Vol 2. pp 393–400

  • Bilodeau B, Rundell KW, Roy B, Boulay MR (1996) Kinematics of cross-country ski racing. Med Sci Sports Exerc 28(1):128–138

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Borg G (1970) Perceived exertion as an indicator of somatic stress. Scand J Rehabil Med 2(2):92–98

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hoffman MD, Kassay KM, Zeni AI, Clifford PS (1996) Does the amount of exercising muscle alter the aerobic demand of dynamic exercise? Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol 74(6):541–547

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hollman JH, Brey RH, Bang TJ, Kaufman KR (2007) Does walking in a virtual environment induce unstable gait? An examination of vertical ground reaction forces. Gait Posture 26(2):289–294

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Holmberg HC, Lindinger S, Stoggl T, Eitzlmair E, Muller E (2005) Biomechanical analysis of double poling in elite cross-country skiers. Med Sci Sports Exerc 37(5):807–818

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hoset M, Rognstad AB, Rølvåg T, Ettema G, Sandbakk O (2014) Construction of an instrumented roller ski and validation of three-dimensional forces in the skating technique. Sports Eng 17:23–32

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Medbo JI, Mamen A, Holt Olsen O, Evertsen F (2000) Examination of four different instruments for measuring blood lactate concentration. Scand J Clin Lab Invest 60(5):367–380

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Millet GY, Hoffman MD, Candau RB, Clifford PS (1998) Poling forces during roller skiing: effects of technique and speed. Med Sci Sports Exerc 30(11):1645–1653

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Pellegrini B, Bortolan L, Schena F (2011) Poling force analysis in diagonal stride at different grades in cross country skiers. Scand J Med Sci Sports 21(4):589–597

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Peronnet F, Massicotte D (1991) Table of nonprotein respiratory quotient: an update. Can J Sport Sci 16(1):23–29

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rundell KW, McCarthy JR (1996) Effect of kinematic variables on performance in women during a cross-country ski race. Med Sci Sports Exerc 28(11):1413–1417

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sandbakk O, Holmberg HC, Leirdal S, Ettema G (2010) Metabolic rate and gross efficiency at high work rates in world class and national level sprint skiers. Eur J Appl Physiol 109(3):473–481

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sandbakk O, Ettema G, Holmberg HC (2012) The influence of incline and speed on work rate, gross efficiency and kinematics of roller ski skating. Eur J Appl Physiol 112(8):2829–2838

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sandbakk O, Ettema G, Holmberg HC (2013) The physiological and biomechanical contributions of poling to roller ski skating. Eur J Appl Physiol. doi:10.1007/s00421-013-2629-4

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Smith GA (1992) Biomechanical analysis of cross-country skiing techniques. Med Sci Sports Exerc 24(9):1015–1022

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Stoggl TL, Muller E (2009) Kinematic determinants and physiological response of cross-country skiing at maximal speed. Med Sci Sports Exerc 41(7):1476–1487

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Stoggl T, Kampel W, Muller E, Lindinger S (2010) Double-push skating versus V2 and V1 skating on uphill terrain in cross-country skiing. Med Sci Sports Exerc 42(1):187–196

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Van Hall G, Jensen-Urstad M, Rosdahl H, Holmberg HC, Saltin B, Calbet JA (2003) Leg and arm lactate and substrate kinetics during exercise. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab 284(1):E193–E205

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank; Martin Hoset and Asgeir Rognstad for their help with data collection and analysis, Christina Åsan Grasaas and Knut Skovereng with assistance during testing, and the participants and their coaches for their enthusiastic cooperation. The Norwegian Olympic Committee financially supported this study.

Conflict of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Øyvind Sandbakk.

Additional information

Communicated by Jean-René Lacour.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Grasaas, E., Hegge, A.M., Ettema, G. et al. The effects of poling on physiological, kinematic and kinetic responses in roller ski skating. Eur J Appl Physiol 114, 1933–1942 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00421-014-2926-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00421-014-2926-6

Keywords

Navigation