Gradient compression garments protect against orthostatic intolerance during recovery from bed rest
- Michael B. StengerAffiliated withWyle Science, Technology and Engineering Group Email author
- , Stuart M. C. LeeAffiliated withWyle Science, Technology and Engineering Group
- , L. Christine RibeiroAffiliated withWyle Science, Technology and Engineering Group
- , Tiffany R. PhillipsAffiliated withWyle Science, Technology and Engineering Group
- , Robert J. Ploutz-SnyderAffiliated withUniversities Space Research Association
- , Michael C. WilligAffiliated withJES Tech
- , Christian M. WestbyAffiliated withUniversities Space Research Association
- , Steven H. PlattsAffiliated withBiomedical Research and Environmental Sciences Division, NASA Johnson Space Center
Rent the article at a discountRent now
* Final gross prices may vary according to local VAT.Get Access
Abdomen-high, lower body graded compression garments (GCGs) may represent the next-generation of orthostatic intolerance protection with applications for exploration missions and commercial space flight.
To evaluate the efficacy of the GCG to prevent orthostatic intolerance after a 14-day 6° head-down tilt bed rest (BR) and to determine whether wearing thigh-high compression garments impairs recovery from BR.
Sixteen (12 M, 4 F) subjects participated in a 15-min 80° head-up tilt test 5 day before BR (BR-5), on the last morning of BR (BR+0), and on day 1 (BR+1) and 3 after BR (BR+3). No subjects wore the GCG on BR-5, and all subjects wore the GCG during testing on BR+0. Control subjects (n = 8) wore the GCG only through testing on BR+0. Treatment subjects (n = 8) wore the GCG on BR+0 and thigh-high garments on BR+1 and BR+2.
No subjects were presyncopal during tilt on BR+0 while wearing the GCG. Despite lower plasma volume index (BR-5: 1.52 ± 0.06, BR+0: 1.32 ± 0.05 l/m2), the tilt-induced increase in heart rate (ΔHR, 17 ± 2 bpm) and decrease in stroke volume (ΔSV, −28 ± 3 ml) on BR+0 were less than on BR-5 (24 ± 2 bpm, −43 ± 4 ml). On BR+1 ΔHR in the control group (33 ± 4 bpm) was higher than in the treatment group (23 ± 2 bpm) but there were no group differences on BR+3.
Wearing the GCG prevented the orthostatic intolerance that is normally present after BR. Thigh-high garments provided protection after BR, and wearing these garments did not impair recovery.
KeywordsSpaceflight Countermeasure Anti-gravity suit Tilt test Presyncope
- Gradient compression garments protect against orthostatic intolerance during recovery from bed rest
European Journal of Applied Physiology
Volume 114, Issue 3 , pp 597-608
- Cover Date
- Print ISSN
- Online ISSN
- Springer Berlin Heidelberg
- Additional Links
- Anti-gravity suit
- Tilt test
- Industry Sectors
- Author Affiliations
- 1. Wyle Science, Technology and Engineering Group, 1290 Hercules Ave, Houston, TX, 77058, USA
- 2. Universities Space Research Association, Houston, TX, USA
- 3. JES Tech, Houston, TX, USA
- 4. Biomedical Research and Environmental Sciences Division, NASA Johnson Space Center, Houston, TX, USA