Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Outcomes of cataract operations in extreme high axial myopia

  • Cataract
  • Published:
Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

To analyse the outcomes of phacoemulsification in extreme axial myopia

Methods

Consecutive cases of phacoemulsification in eyes with axial length ≥ 30.0 mm from January 1, 2010 to Dec 31, 2013 in a tertiary referral eye hospital were retrospectively reviewed. A single intraocular lens (IOL) type was used for all cases. Main outcome measures included perioperative complications and refractive outcome.

Results

Two hundred and twenty-one eyes were identified. Intraoperatively, two eyes (0.9 %) had unstable capsular bag and three (1.4 %) had posterior capsular rupture. At a mean follow-up duration was 27.4 ± 14.6 months, three eyes (1.5 % of 198 eyes with no history of retinal detachment or macular hole) developed retinal detachment. There was an overall hyperopic shift with a mean biometry error of 0.45 ± 1.21 D in all eyes. The mean absolute biometry prediction error was 0.98 ± 0.83 D in all eyes, 1.11 ± 0.86 D and 0.85 ± 0.82 D in eyes receiving negative- and positive-power IOL, respectively (p = 0.042). A total of 61.2 % of eyes had refractive outcome within ± 1.0 D of target spherical equivalent. Regression analysis showed low IOL power as an independent predictor for greater postoperative absolute biometry error (p = 0.014).

Conclusions

We showed no increase in perioperative complications in eyes with extreme high axial myopia. In eyes with long axial length, implantation of IOL with lower power was associated with more hyperopic shift, which was more pronounced with negative-power IOL.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Fan DS, Lam DS, Lam RF, Lau JT, Chong KS, Cheung EY, Lai RY, Chew SJ (2004) Prevalence, incidence, and progression of myopia of school children in Hong Kong. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 45:1071–1075

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Grossniklaus HE, Green WR (1992) Pathologic findings in pathologic myopia. Retina 12:127–133

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Tano Y (2002) Pathologic myopia: where are we now? Am J Ophthalmol 134:645–660

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Narendran N, Jaycock P, Johnston RL, Taylor H, Adams M, Tole DM, Asaria RH, Galloway P, Sparrow JM (2009) The Cataract National Dataset electronic multicentre audit of 55,567 operations: risk stratification for posterior capsule rupture and vitreous loss. Eye (Lond) 23:31–37. doi:10.1038/sj.eye.6703049

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Petermeier K, Gekeler F, Messias A, Spitzer MS, Haigis W, Szurman P (2009) Intraocular lens power calculation and optimized constants for highly myopic eyes. J Cataract Refract Surg 35:1575–1581. doi:10.1016/j.jcrs.2009.04.028

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Holladay JT (2004) Visual acuity measurements. J Cataract Refract Surg 30:287–290. doi:10.1016/j.jcrs.2004.01.014

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Lyle WA, Jin GJ (1996) Phacoemulsification with intraocular lens implantation in high myopia. J Cataract Refract Surg 22:238–242

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Fan DS, Lam DS, Li KK (1999) Retinal complications after cataract extraction in patients with high myopia. Ophthalmology 106:688–691. doi:10.1016/s0161-6420(99)90152-5, discussion 691–682

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Zuberbuhler B, Seyedian M, Tuft S (2009) Phacoemulsification in eyes with extreme axial myopia. J Cataract Refract Surg 35:335–340. doi:10.1016/j.jcrs.2008.10.044

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Haug SJ, Bhisitkul RB (2012) Risk factors for retinal detachment following cataract surgery. Curr Opin Ophthalmol 23:7–11. doi:10.1097/ICU.0b013e32834cd653

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Daien V, Le Pape A, Heve D, Carriere I, Villain M (2015) Incidence, risk factors, and impact of age on retinal detachment after cataract surgery in France: a national population study. Ophthalmology 122:2179–2185. doi:10.1016/j.ophtha.2015.07.014

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Lin JY, Ho WL, Ger LP, Sheu SJ (2013) Analysis of factors correlated with the development of pseudophakic retinal detachment--a long-term study in a single medical center. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 251:459–465. doi:10.1007/s00417-012-2043-3

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Ripandelli G, Scassa C, Parisi V, Gazzaniga D, D’Amico DJ, Stirpe M (2003) Cataract surgery as a risk factor for retinal detachment in very highly myopic eyes. Ophthalmology 110:2355–2361. doi:10.1016/s0161-6420(03)00819-4

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Coppe AM, Lapucci G (2008) Posterior vitreous detachment and retinal detachment following cataract extraction. Curr Opin Ophthalmol 19:239–242. doi:10.1097/ICU.0b013e3282fc9c4a

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Neuhann IM, Neuhann TF, Heimann H, Schmickler S, Gerl RH, Foerster MH (2008) Retinal detachment after phacoemulsification in high myopia: analysis of 2356 cases. J Cataract Refract Surg 34:1644–1657. doi:10.1016/j.jcrs.2008.06.022

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Shen P, Zheng Y, Ding X, Liu B, Congdon N, Morgan I, He M (2013) Biometric measurements in highly myopic eyes. J Cataract Refract Surg 39:180–187. doi:10.1016/j.jcrs.2012.08.064

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Berges O, Puech M, Assouline M, Letenneur L, Gastellu-Etchegorry M (1998) B-mode-guided vector-A-mode versus A-mode biometry to determine axial length and intraocular lens power. J Cataract Refract Surg 24:529–535

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Olsen T, Nielsen PJ (1989) Immersion versus contact technique in the measurement of axial length by ultrasound. Acta Ophthalmol (Copenh) 67:101–102

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Findl O, Kriechbaum K, Sacu S, Kiss B, Polak K, Nepp J, Schild G, Rainer G, Maca S, Petternel V, Lackner B, Drexler W (2003) Influence of operator experience on the performance of ultrasound biometry compared to optical biometry before cataract surgery. J Cataract Refract Surg 29:1950–1955

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Hennessy MP, Franzco, Chan DG (2003) Contact versus immersion biometry of axial length before cataract surgery. J Cataract Refract Surg 29:2195–2198

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Zaldivar R, Shultz MC, Davidorf JM, Holladay JT (2000) Intraocular lens power calculations in patients with extreme myopia. J Cataract Refract Surg 26:668–674

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Tsang CS, Chong GS, Yiu EP, Ho CK (2003) Intraocular lens power calculation formulas in Chinese eyes with high axial myopia. J Cataract Refract Surg 29:1358–1364

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Haigis W (2009) Intraocular lens calculation in extreme myopia. J Cataract Refract Surg 35:906–911. doi:10.1016/j.jcrs.2008.12.035

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Preussner PR (2010) Intraocular lens calculation in extreme myopia. J Cataract Refract Surg 36:531–532. doi:10.1016/j.jcrs.2009.10.038, author reply 532–534

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Barrett GD (1993) An improved universal theoretical formula for intraocular lens power prediction. J Cataract Refract Surg 19:713–720

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Olsen T (2007) Calculation of intraocular lens power: a review. Acta Ophthalmol Scand 85:472–485. doi:10.1111/j.1600-0420.2007.00879.x

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Abulafia A, Barrett GD, Rotenberg M, Kleinmann G, Levy A, Reitblat O, Koch DD, Wang L, Assia EI (2015) Intraocular lens power calculation for eyes with an axial length greater than 26.0 mm: comparison of formulas and methods. J Cataract Refract Surg 41:548–556. doi:10.1016/j.jcrs.2014.06.033

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Chong EW, Mehta JS (2015) High myopia and cataract surgery. Curr Opin Ophthalmol. doi:10.1097/icu.0000000000000217

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. The Royal College of Ophthalmologists (2010) Cataract Surgery Guidelines. London. https://www.rcophth.ac.uk/wp-content/uploads/2014/12/2010-SCI-069-Cataract-Surgery-Guidelines-2010-SEPTEMBER-2010.pdf.Accessed 12 Jan 2016

  30. Day AC, Donachie PH, Sparrow JM, Johnston RL (2015) The royal college of ophthalmologists’ national ophthalmology database study of cataract surgery: report 1, visual outcomes and complications. Eye (Lond) 29:552–560. doi:10.1038/eye.2015.3

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Jaycock P, Johnston RL, Taylor H, Adams M, Tole DM, Galloway P, Canning C, Sparrow JM (2009) The Cataract National Dataset electronic multi-centre audit of 55,567 operations: updating benchmark standards of care in the United Kingdom and internationally. Eye (Lond) 23:38–49. doi:10.1038/sj.eye.6703015

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Lundstrom M, Behndig A, Kugelberg M, Montan P, Stenevi U, Thorburn W (2011) Decreasing rate of capsule complications in cataract surgery: eight-year study of incidence, risk factors, and data validity by the Swedish National Cataract Register. J Cataract Refract Surg 37:1762–1767. doi:10.1016/j.jcrs.2011.05.022

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tommy C. Y. Chan.

Ethics declarations

Funding

No funding was received for this research.

Conflict of interest

All authors certify that they have no affiliations with or involvement in any organization or entity with any financial interest (such as honoraria; educational grants; participation in speakers’ bureaus; membership, employment, consultancies, stock ownership, or other equity interest; and expert testimony or patent-licensing arrangements), or non-financial interest (such as personal or professional relationships, affiliations, knowledge or beliefs) in the subject matter or materials discussed in this manuscript.

Ethical approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. For this type of study formal consent is not required

Informed consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Lam, J.K.M., Chan, T.C.Y., Ng, A.L.K. et al. Outcomes of cataract operations in extreme high axial myopia. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 254, 1811–1817 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00417-016-3414-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00417-016-3414-y

Keywords

Navigation