Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Macular pigment optical density measurements by one-wavelength reflection photometry—influence of cataract surgery on the measurement results

  • Retinal Disorders
  • Published:
Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

The main objective of the present study was the investigation of possible influence of lens opacification on macular pigment optical density (MPOD) measurements.

Methods

Eighty-six eyes of 64 patients (mean age 73.4 ± 8.3 years) were included in the study. MPOD was prospectively measured using the one-wavelength reflection method (Visucam500, Carl Zeiss Meditec AG) before and after cataract extraction, with implantation of a blue-light filtering intraocular lens (AlconSN60WF). The median of the maximum optical density (MaxOD) and the median of the mean optical density (MeanOD) measurements of macular pigment across the subject group were evaluated.

Results

Statistically significant differences were noticed between pre-operative and post-operative measurements, the absolute values were generally lower after cataract extraction. The following median (lower/upper quartile) differences across the group were determined: MaxOD −33.8 % (−46.2 to −19.1 %), MeanOD −44.0 % (−54.6 to −26.6 %). Larger changes were observed in elderly patients [<70 years of age (n = 25 eyes): MaxOD −13.4 % (−20.5 to 3.6 %), MeanOD −23.6 % (−30.5 to −15.3 %) versus patients ≥70 years (n = 61 eyes) MaxOD −40.5 % (−53.2 to −30.1 %), MeanOD −47.2 % (−57.8 to −40.1 %)] and in patients with progressed stage of cataract. MaxOD for lens opacification grade 1 (n = 9 eyes): −27.4 % (−42.1 to −19.6 %), grade 2 (n = 26 eyes): −35.0 % (−44.2 to −25.3 %), grade 3 (n = 21 eyes): −34.4 % (−45.4 to −11.4 %), grade 4 (n = 25 eyes): −32.6 % (−53.2 to −6.4 %), and grade 5 (n = 5 eyes): −53.5 % (−61.7 to −38.7 %) and MeanOD for cataract stage 1 (n = 9 eyes): −42.6 % (−46.0 to −26.0 %), stage 2 (n = 26 eyes): −44.1 % (−51.8 to −26.2 %), stage 3 (n = 21 eyes): −45.7 % (−54.7 to −24.7 %), stage 4 (n = 25 eyes): −39.5 % (−59.4 to −26.1 %), and stage 5 (n = 5 eyes): −57.0 % (−66.1 to −51.4 %).

Conclusions

As established by comparison of pre- to post-operative measurements, cataract presented a strong effect on MPOD measured by one-wavelength reflection method. Particular care should therefore be taken when evaluating MPOD using this method in elderly patients with progressed stage of cataract. Future optimization of correcting parameters of scattered light and consideration of cataract influence may allow more precise evaluation of MPOD.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Snodderly DM, Auran JD, Delory FC (1984) The macular pigment. II. Spatial distribution in primate retinas. Invest Ophthalmol Vis 25:674–685

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Snodderly DM, Brown PK, Delori FC, Auran JD (1984) The macular pigment. I. absorbance spectra, localization, and discrimination from other yellow pigments in primate retinas. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 25:660–673

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Sommerburg OG, Siems WG, Hurst JS, Lewis JW, Kliger DS, van Kuijk FJ (1999) Lutein and zeaxanthin are associated with photoreceptors in the human retina. Curr Eye Res 19:491–495

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Liew SHT, Clare EG, Spector TD, Mellerio J, Van Kuijk FJ, Beatty S, Fitzke F, Marshall J, Hammond CJ (2005) Central retinal thickness is positively correlated with MPOD. Exp Eye Res 82:915–920

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Krinsky NI, Landrum JT, Bone RA (2003) Biologic mechanisms of the protective role of lutein and zeaxanzhin in the eye. Annu Rev Nutr 23:171–201

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Hirsch J, Curcio CA (1989) The spatial resolution capacity of human foveal retina. Vision Res 29:1095–1101

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Hammond BR Jr, Wooten BR (2005) CFF thresholds: relation to macular pigment optical density. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt 25:315–319

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Kvansakul J, Rodriguez-Carmona M, Edgar DF, Barker FM, Köpcke W, Schalch W, Barbur JL (2006) Supplementation with the carotenoids lutein or zeaxanthin improves human visual performance. Ophthalmol Physiol Opt 26:362–371

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Rodriguez-Carmona M, Kvansakul J, Harlow JA, Köpcke W, Schalch W, Barbur JL (2006) The effects of supplementation with lutein and/or zeaxanthin on human macular pigment density and colour vision. Ophthal Physiol Opt 26:137–147

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Stringham JM, Hammond BR Jr (2007) The glare hypothesis of macular pigment function. Optom Vis Sci 84:859–864

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Berrow EJ, Bartlett HE, Eperjesi F, Gibson JM (2013) The effects of a lutein-based supplement on objective and subjective measures of retinal and visual function in eyes with age-related maculopathy—a randomised controlled trial. Br J Nutr 109:2008–2014

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Nolan JM, Loughman J, Akkali MC, Stack J, Scanlon G, Davison P, Beatty S (2011) The impact of MP augmentation on visual performance in normal subjects: COMPASS. Vision Res 51:459–469

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Bernstein PS, Khachik F, Carvalho LS, Muir GJ, Zhao DY, Katz NB (2001) Identification and quantitation of carotenoids and their metabolites in the tissues of the human eye. Exp Eye Res 72:215–223

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Reading VM, Weale RA (1974) Macular pigment and chromatic aberration. J Opt Soc Am 64:231–234

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Kirshfeld K (1982) Carotenoid pigments: their possible role in protecting against photooxidation in eyes and photoreceptor cells. Proc Res Soc Lond B 216:71–85

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Putnam CM, Kinerk WT, Bassi CJ (2013) Central serous chorioretinopathy produces macular pigment profile changes. Optom Vis Sci 90:206–212

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Nolan JM, Stack J, O’Donovan O, Loane E, Beatty S (2007) Risk factors for age-related maculopathy are associated with a relative lack of macular pigment. Exp Eye Res 84:61–74

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Helb HM, Charbel Issa P, van der Veet RLP, Berendschot TTJM, Scholl HPN, Holz FG (2008) Abnormal macular pigment distribution in type 2 idiopathic macular telangiectasia. Retina 28:808–816

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Loane E, Kelliher C, Beatty S, Nolan JM (2008) The rationale and evidence base for a protective role of macular pigment in age-related maculopathy. Br J Ophthalmol 92:1163–1168

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Beatty S, Murray IJ, Henson DB, Carden D, Koh HH, Boulton ME (2001) Macular pigment and risk for age-related macular degeneration in subjects from a northern European population. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 42:439–446

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Bernstein PS, Zhao DY, Wintch SW, Ermakov IV, McClane RW, Gellermann W (2002) Resonance Raman measurement of macular carotenoids in normal subjects and in ARMD patients. Ophthalmology 109:1780–1787

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Kaya S, Weigert G, Pemp B, Sacu S, Werkmeister RM, Dragostinoff N, Garhöfer G, Schmidt-Erfurth U, Schmetterer L (2012) Comparison of macular pigment in patients with age-related macular degeneration and healthy control subjects—a study using spectral fundus reflectance. Acta Ophthalmol 90:e399–e403

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Wüstemeyer H, Jahn C, Nestler A, Barth T, Wolf S (2002) A new instrument for the quantification of macular pigment density: first results in patients with AMD and healthy subjects. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 240:666–671

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Hammond BR Jr, Johnson EJ, Russell RM, Krinsky NI, Yem KJ, Edwards RB, Snodderly DM (1997) Dietary modification of human macular pigment density. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 38:1795–1801

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Leung IY (2008) Macular pigment: new clinical methods of detection and the role of carotenoids in atrophic age-related macular degeneration. Optometry 79:266–272

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Berendschot TT, Goldbohm RA, Klöpping WA, van de Kraats J, van Norel J, van Norren D (2000) Influence of lutein supplementation on macular pigment, assessed with two objective techniques. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 41:3322–3326

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Bone RA, Landrum W, Guerra LH, Ruiz CA (2003) Lutein and zeaxanthin dietary supplements raise MPD and serum concentrations of these carotenoids im humans. J Nutr 133:992–998

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Richer S, Stiles W, Statkute L, Pulido J, Frankowski J, Rudy D, Pei K, Tsipursky M, Nyland J (2004) Double-masked, placebo controlled, randomized trial of lutein and antioxidant supplementation in the intervention of atrophic ARMD: the veterans last Study (lutein antioxidant supplementation trial). Optometry 75:216–230

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Dawczynski J, Jentsch S, Schweitzer D, Hammer M, Lang GE, Strobel J (2013) Long term effects of lutein, zeaxanthin and omega-3 LCPUFAs supplementation on optical density of macular pigment in AMD patients: the LUTEGA study. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 251(12):2711-2723. doi:10.1007/s00417-013-2376-6

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Gale CR, Hall NF, Phillips DI (2003) Lutein and zeaxanthin status and risk of atrophic age-related macular degeneration. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 44:2461–2465

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Yonova-Doing E, Hysi PG, Venturini C, Williams KM, Nag A, Beatty S, Liew SH, Gilbert CE, Hammond CJ (2013) Candidate gene study of macular response to supplemental lutein and zeaxanthin. Exp Eye Res 115:172–177

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Trieschmann M, Beatty S, Nolan JM, Hense HW, Heimes B, Austermann U, Fobker M, Pauleikhoff D (2007) Changes in macular pigment optical density and serum concentrations of its constituent carotenoids following supplemental lutein and zeaxanthin: the LUNA study. Exp Eye Res 84:718–728

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Dawczynski J, Jentsch S, Schweitzer D, Hammer M, Strobel J (2012) Changes of macular pigment and drusen morphology in patients with lutein supplementation. Klein Monatsbl Augenheilkd 229:69–71

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Bernstein PS, Delori FC, Richer S, van Kuijk FJ, Wenzel AJ (2009) The value of measurement of macular carotenoid pigment optical densities and distributions in age-related macular degeneration and other retinal disorders. Vision Res 50:716–728

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Howells O, Eperjesi F, Bartlett H (2011) Measuring macular pigment optical density in vivo:a review of techniques. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 249:315–347

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Delori FC (1994) Spectrophotometer for noninvasive measurement of intrinsic fluorescence and reflectance of the ocular fundus. Appl Opt 33:7439–7452

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Delori FC (2004) Autofluorescence method to measure macular pigment optical densities fluorometry and autofluorescence imaging. Arch Biochem Biophys 430:156–162

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Rougier MB, Delyfer MN, Korobelnik JF (2008) Measuring macular pigment in vivo. J Fr Ophthalmol 31:445–453

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Bernstein PS, Sharifzadeh M, Liu A, Ermakov I, Nelson K, Sheng X, Panish C, Carlstrom B, Hoffmann RO, Gellermann W (2013) Blue-light reflectance imaging of macular pigment in infants and children. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 54:4034–4040

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Van de Kraats J, Berendschot T, van Norren D (1996) The pathways of light measured in fundus reflectometry. Vision Res 36:2229–2247

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Van de Kraats J, Berendschot T, Valen S, van Norren D (2006) Fast assessment of the central macular pigment density with natural pupil using the macular pigment reflectometer. J Biomed Opt 11:064031. doi:10.1117/1.2398925

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Schweitzer D, Jentsch S, Dawczynski J, Hammer M, Wolf S, Wolf-Schnurrbusch U (2010) Simple and objective method for routine detection of the macular pigment xanthophyll. J Biomed Opt 15:061714. doi:10.1117/1.3526358

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Van den Berg TJ, Ijspeert JK, de Waard PW (1991) Dependence of intraocular stray light on pigmentation and light transmission through the ocular wall. Vision Res 31:1361–1367

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Artigas JM, Felipe A, Navea A, Fandiño A, Artigas C (2012) Spectral transmission of the human crystalline lens in adult and elderly persons: color and total transmission of visible light. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 53:4076–4084

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Terade H, Sawa M, Akiba J, Ueno N, Chakrabarti B (1994) Spectral transmittance of normal human crystalline lens. Nihon Ganka Gakkai Zasshi 98:1101–1108

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Van den Berg TJTP, van Rijn LJ, Michael R, Heine C, Coeckelbergh T, Nischler C, Wilhelm H, Grabner G, Emesz M, Barraquer RI, Coppens JE, Franssen L (2007) Straylight effects with aging and lens extraction. Ophthalmol 144:358–363

    Google Scholar 

  47. Van den Berg TJTP, Ijspeert JK (1994) Light scattering in donor lenses. Vision Res 35:169–177

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Van de Kraats J, van Norren D (2007) Optical density of the aging human ocular media in the visible and the UV. J Opt Soc Am 24:1842–1857

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Sasamoto Y, Gomi F, Sawa M, Sakaguchi H, Tsujikawa M, Nishida K (2011) Effect of cataract in evaluation of macular pigment optical density by autofluorescence spectrometry. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 52:927–932

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Delori FC, Goger DG, Dorey CK (2001) Age-related accumulation and spatial distribution of lipofuscin in RPE of normal subjects. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 42:1855–1866

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Van den Berg TJ, Felius J (1995) Relationship between spectral transmittance and slit lamp color of human lenses. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 36:322–329

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Boettner EA, Reimer WJ (1962) Transmission of the ocular media. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1:776–783

    Google Scholar 

  53. Algvere PV, Torstensson PA, Tengroth BM (1993) Light transmittance of ocular media in living rabbit eyes. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 34:349–354

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Bernstein PS, Yoshida MD, Katz NB, McClane RW, Gellermann W (1998) Raman detection of macular carotenoid pigments in intact human retina. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 39:2003–2011

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Gellermann W, Ermakov IV, Ermakova MR, McClane RW, Zhao DY, Bernstein PS (2002) In vivo resonant Raman measurement of macular carotenoid pigments in the young and the aging human retina. J Opt Soc Am A 19:1172–1186

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  56. Ciulla TA, Hammond BR Jr, Yung CY, Linda M, Pratt LM (2001) Macular pigment optical density before and after cataract extraction. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 42:1338–1341

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. Berendschot TT, van Norren D (2005) On the age dependency of the macular pigment optical density. Exp Eye Res 81:602–609

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. Loan JM, Stack J, O’Donavan O, Loan E, Betty S (2007) Risk factors for age-related maculopathy are associated with a lack of macular pigment. Exp Eye Res 84:61–74

    Article  Google Scholar 

  59. Ciulla TA, Hammond BR Jr (2004) Macular pigment density and aging, assessed in the normal elderly and those with cataracts and age-related macular degeneration. Am J Ophthalmol 138:582–587

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  60. Delori FC, Goger DG, Hammond BR, Snodderly DM, Burns SA (2001) Macular pigment density measured by autofluorescence spectrometry: comparison with reflectometry and heterochromatic flicker photometry. J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis 18:1212–1230

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  61. Berendschot TT, Broekmans WM, Klopping-Ketelaar IA, Kardinaal AF, van Poppel G, van Norren D (2002) Lens aging in relation to nutritional determinants and possible risk factors for age-related cataract. Arch Ophthalmol 120:1732–1737

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  62. Werner JS, Donnelly SK, Kliegl R (1987) Aging and human macular pigment density. Appended with translations from the work of Max Schultze and Ewald Hering. Vision Res 27:257–268

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  63. Bone RA, Landrum JT, Fernandez L, Tarsis SL (1988) Analysis of the macular pigment by HPLC: retinal distribution and age study. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 29:843–849

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  64. Bernstein PS, Zhao DY, Sharifzadeh M, Ermakov IV, Gellermann W (2004) Resonance Raman measurement of macular carotenoids in the living human eye. Arch Biochem Biophys 430:163–169

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  65. Berendschot TT, van Norren D (2004) Objective determination of the macular pigment optical density using Fundus reflectance spectroscopy. Arch Biochem Biophys 430:149–155

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  66. Wooten BR, Hammond BR Jr (2005) Spectral absorbance and spatial distribution of MP using heterochromatic flicker photometry. Optom Vis Sci 82:378–386

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  67. Lam RF, Rao SK, Fan DS, Lau FT, Lam DS (2005) Macular pigment optical density in a Chinese sample. Curr Eye Res 30:799–805

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  68. Beatty S, Murray IJ, Henson DB, Carden D, Koh H, Boulton ME (2001) Macular pigment and risk for age-related macular degeneration in subjects from a Northern European population. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 42:439–446

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  69. Nolan J, O’Donovan O, Kavanagh H, Stack J, Harrison M, Muldoon A, Mellerio J, Beatty S (2004) Macular pigment and percentage of body fat. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 45:3940–3950

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  70. Hammond BR Jr, Caruso-Avery M (2000) Macular pigment optical density in a Southwestern sample. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 41:1492–1497

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  71. Obana A, Hiramitsu T, Gohto Y, Ohira A, Mizuno S, Hirano T, Bernstein PS, Fujii H, Iseki K, Tanito M, Hotta Y (2008) Macular carotenoid levels of normal subjects and age-related maculopathy patients in a Japanese population. Ophthalmology 115:147–157

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  72. Chen SF, Chang Y, Wu JC (2001) The spatial distribution of macular pigment in humans. Curr Eye Res 23:422–434

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  73. Mellerio J, Ahmadi-Lari S, van Kuijk F, Pauleikhoff D, Bird A, Marshall J (2002) A portable instrument for measuring macular pigment with central fixation. Curr Eye Res 25:37–47

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  74. Nolan JM, O’Reilly P, Loughman J, Stack J, Loane E, Connolly E, Beatty S (2009) Augmentation of macular pigment following implantation of blue light–filtering intraocular lenses at the time of cataract surgery. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 50:4777–4785

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  75. Demirel S, Bilici S, Batıoglu F, Ozmert E (2014) The effect of age and cataract surgery on macular pigment optic density: a cross-sectional, comparative study. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 252(2):213–218. doi:10.1007/s00417-013-2424-2

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  76. Johnson CA, Adams AJ, Twelker JD, Quigg JM (1988) Age-related changes in the central visual field for short wavelength-sensitive pathways. J Opt Soc Am A 5:2131–2139

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors extend their sincere thanks to all the patients who volunteered their service to make this study possible.

Conflict of interest

None of the authors has any financial interest in the presented study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Ophthalmology, University Hospital Leipzig, Liebigstrasse 10-14, 04103, Leipzig, Germany

    Bogdana Komar, Franziska Georgia Rauscher, Renate Wiedemann & Jens Dawczynski

Authors
  1. Bogdana Komar
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Franziska Georgia Rauscher
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Renate Wiedemann
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Jens Dawczynski
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jens Dawczynski.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Komar, B., Rauscher, F.G., Wiedemann, R. et al. Macular pigment optical density measurements by one-wavelength reflection photometry—influence of cataract surgery on the measurement results. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 252, 1717–1727 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00417-014-2627-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00417-014-2627-1

Keywords

Search

Navigation