Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Relationship of change in central corneal thickness to visual field progression in eyes with glaucoma

  • Glaucoma
  • Published:
Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

To assess the relationship between baseline central corneal thickness (CCT) and/or ongoing CCT change over time with subsequent visual field progression.

Methods

One hundred sixty three eyes of 163 patients with medically treated glaucoma were followed up for 6.8 ± 1.8 years. Exclusion criteria was laser or intraocular surgery. Baseline and follow up CCT, confocal scanning laser tomography and visual fields were performed. CCT and CCT change related to visual field progression using Glaucoma Progress Analysis were assessed. Multivariate logistic regression analysis for predictive factors of glaucoma progression was used to analyze data.

Results

Thinner baseline CCT was associated with more advanced damage at presentation, mean deviation (MD) (r = 0.17, p = 0.02) and neuroretinal rim area (NRR) (r = 0.20, p = 0.02). Progressing eyes had significantly thinner (p = 0.01) baseline CCT compared to non-progressing eyes. The slope of visual field change was significantly greater (p = 0.05) for thinner (<540 μm) as compared to thicker eyes. A small but significant CCT reduction (12.78 ± 13.35 μm, p < 0.0001) was noted in all eyes; however, there was no significant difference (p = 0.95) in the amount of change between progressing and non-progressing eyes. CCT change did not correlate with MD or NRR change. A thinner CCT (Odds ratio = 1.80, p = 0.02), but not CCT change (Odds ratio = 1.07, p = 0.69), was a significant risk factor for glaucoma progression.

Conclusions

CCT correlates significantly with the amount of glaucomatous damage at presentation. Thinner corneas may be associated with increased risk of visual field progression. CCT reduced slightly over time in eyes with glaucoma; but the magnitude of this change was not related to visual field progression.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Goldmann H, Schmidt T (1957) Uber applanationstonometrie. Ophthalmologica 134:221–242

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Hansen FK, Ehlers N (1971) Elevated tonometer readings caused by a thick cornea. Acta Ophthalmol 49:775–778

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Ehlers N, Bramsen T, Sperling S (1975) Applanation tonometry and central corneal thickness. Acta Ophthalmol 53:34–43

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Whitacre MM, Stein RA, Hassanein K (1993) The effect of corneal thickness on applanation tonometry. Am J Ophthalmol 115:592–596

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Orssengo GJ, Pye DC (1999) Determination of the true intraocular pressure and modulus of elasticity of the human cornea in vivo. Bull Math Biol 61:551–572

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Doughty MJ, Zaman ML (2000) Human corneal thickness and its impact on intraocular pressure measures: a review and metaanalysis approach. Surv Ophthalmol 44:367–408

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Kohlhaas M, Boehm AG, Spoerl E, Pürsten A, Grein HJ, Pillunat LE (2006) Effect of central corneal thickness, corneal curvature, and axial length on applanation tonometry. Arch Ophthalmol 124:471–476

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Gordon MO, Beiser JA, Brandt JD, Heuer DK, Higginbotham EJ, Johnson CA, Keltner JL, Miller JP, Parrish RK 2nd, Wilson MR, Kass MA (2002) The Ocular Hypertension Treatment Study: baseline factors that predict the onset of primary open-angle glaucoma. Arch Ophthalmol 120:714–720

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. European Glaucoma Prevention Study (EGPS) Group, Miglior S, Pfeiffer N, Torri V, Zeyen T, Cunha-Vaz J, Adamsons I (2007) Predictive factors for open-angle glaucoma among patients with ocular hypertension in the European Glaucoma Prevention Study. Ophthalmology 114:3–9

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Medeiros FA, Sample PA, Weinreb RN (2003) Corneal thickness measurements and visual function abnormalities in ocular hypertensive patients. Am J Ophthalmol 135:131–137

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Medeiros FA, Sample PA, Weinreb RN (2003) Corneal thickness measurements and frequency doubling technology perimetry abnormalities in ocular hypertensive eyes. Ophthalmology 110:1903–1908

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Leske MC, Wu SY, Hennis A, Honkanen R, Nemesure B, Barbados Eye Study Group (2008) Risk factors for incident open-angle glaucoma: The Barbados Eye Studies. Ophthalmology 115:85–93

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Kim JW, Chen PP (2004) Central corneal pachymetry and visual field progression in patients with open-angle glaucoma. Ophthalmology 111:2126–2132

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Herndon LW, Weizer JS, Stinnett SS (2004) Central corneal thickness as a risk factor for advanced glaucoma damage. Arch Ophthalmol 122:17–21

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. De Moraes CG, Juthani VJ, Liebmann JM, Teng CC, Tello C, Susanna R Jr, Ritch R (2011) Risk factors for visual field progression in treated glaucoma. Arch Ophthalmol 129(5):562–568

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Hong S, Kim CY, Seong GJ, Hong YJ (2007) Central corneal thickness and visual field progression in patients with chronic primary angle-closure glaucoma with low intraocular pressure. Am J Ophthalmol 143(2):362–363

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Medeiros FA, Zangwill LM, Mansouri K, Lisboa R, Tafreshi A, Weinreb RN (2012) Incorporating risk factors to improve the assessment of rates of glaucomatous progression. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 53(4):2199–2207

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Francis BA, Varma R, Chopra V, Lai MY, Shtir C, Azen SP, Los Angeles Latino Eye Study Group (2008) Intraocular pressure, central corneal thickness, and prevalence of open-angle glaucoma: the Los Angeles Latino Eye Study. Am J Ophthalmol 146:741–6

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Brandt JD, Gordon MO, Gao F, Beiser JA, Miller JP, Kass MA, the Ocular Hypertension Treatment Study Group (2012) Adjusting intraocular pressure for central corneal thickness does not improve prediction models for primary open-angle glaucoma. Ophthalmology 119(3):437–42

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Medeiros FA, Weinreb RN (2012) Is corneal thickness an independent risk factor for glaucoma? Ophthalmology 119(3):435–436

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Nemesure B, Wu SY, Hennis A, Leske MC (2003) Corneal thickness and intraocular pressure in the Barbados Eye Studies. Arch Ophthalmol 121:240–4

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Aghaian E, Choe JE, Lin S, Stamper RL (2004) Central corneal thickness of Caucasians, Chinese, Hispanics, Filipinos, African Americans, and Japanese in a glaucoma clinic. Ophthalmology 111:2211–2219

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Foster PJ, Baasanhu J, Alsbirk PH, Munkhbayar D, Uranchimeg D, Johnson GJ (1998) Central corneal thickness and intraocular pressure in a Mongolian population. Ophthalmology 105:969–973

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Weizer JS, Stinnett SS, Herndon LW (2006) Longitudinal changes in central corneal thickness and their relation to glaucoma status: an 8 year follow up study. Br J Ophthalmol 90:732–736

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Brandt JD, Gordon MO, Beiser JA, Lin SC, Alexander MY, Kass MA, Ocular Hypertension Treatment Study Group (2008) Changes in central corneal thickness over time. Ophthalmology 115:1550–1556

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Oriowo OM (2009) Profile of central corneal thickness in diabetics with and without dry eye in a Saudi population. Optometry 80(8):442–446

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Bosworth CF, Sample PA, Johnson CA, Weinreb RN (2000) Current practice with standard automated perimetry. Semin Ophthalmol 15(4):172–181

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Bengtsson B, Heijl A (2008) A visual field index for calculation of glaucoma rate of progression. Am J Ophthalmol 145(2):343–353

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Leung C, Zangwill L, Girkin C (2011) Structure. In: Weinreb RN, Garway-Heath DF, Leung C, Crowston JG, Medeiros FA (eds) Progression of glaucoma. World Glaucoma Association Consensus Series 8. Kugler Publications, Amsterdam, pp 45–88

  30. Chauhan BC, Hutchison DM, LeBlanc RP, Artes PH, Nicolela MT (2005) Central corneal thickness and progression of the visual field and optic disc in glaucoma. Br J Ophthalmol 89:1008–1012

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Jonas JB, Stroux A, Velten I, Juenemann A, Martus P, Budde WM (2005) Central corneal thickness correlated with glaucoma damage and rate of progression. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 46:1269–1274

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Leske MC, Heijl A, Hussein M, Bengtsson B, Hyman L, Komaroff E, Early Manifest Glaucoma Trial Group (2003) Factors for glaucoma progression and the effect of treatment: the early manifest glaucoma trial. Arch Ophthalmol 121:48–56

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Viswanathan D, Goldberg I, Graham SL (2012) Longitudinal effect of topical antiglaucoma medications on central corneal thickness. (2012) Sep 7. doi:10.1111/j.1442-9071.2012.02870.x

Download references

Disclosure

The authors have no financial relationship to disclose.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Hub 1, 2 Technology place, Australian School of Advanced Medicine, Macquarie University, Sydney, NSW, 2109, Australia

    Deepa Viswanathan & Stuart L. Graham

  2. Save Sight institute, Department of Ophthalmology, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, 2000, Australia

    Ivan Goldberg & Stuart L. Graham

Authors
  1. Deepa Viswanathan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Ivan Goldberg
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Stuart L. Graham
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Deepa Viswanathan.

Additional information

The authors have full control of all primary data and we agree to allow Graefe’s Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology to review the data upon request.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Viswanathan, D., Goldberg, I. & Graham, S.L. Relationship of change in central corneal thickness to visual field progression in eyes with glaucoma. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 251, 1593–1599 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00417-013-2295-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00417-013-2295-6

Keywords

Search

Navigation