Abstract
Background
Virtual reality surgery simulation training improves resident performance as measured by the simulator itself and wet-lab performance. This study aims to determine whether virtual surgery simulator training improves actual resident cataract surgery performance.
Methods
The first 50 phacoemulsification cases of 20 residents, at a single residency program (Henry Ford Hospital), were retrospectively compared as two groups: before (2007–8) and after (2009–10) introduction of the Eyesi virtual surgery simulator to the surgical training program. Primary outcomes were the incidence of posterior capsule tears and operation duration. All residents received traditional didactic and wet-lab training. Instructor surgeons were surveyed for their impression of the simulator’s contribution to resident surgical training.
Results
The nonsimulator and simulator groups each comprised 500 cases with 40 and 35 posterior capsule tears respectively. Capsular tear rates for the nonsimulator and simulator groups were 8.8 % and 10 % respectively for the first 25 cases, and 7.2 % and 3.6 % (P = 0.11) respectively for cases 26 through 50 . The percentage of long cases (defined as >40 min) for cases 10 through 50 was 42.3 % and 32.4 % (P = 0.005) for the nonsimulator and simulator groups respectively.
Conclusions
Virtual reality surgical simulator training mildly shortens the learning curve for the first 50 phacoemulsification cases. The less adept residents appear to benefit most.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Randleman JB, Wolfe JD, Woodward M, Lynn MJ, Cherwek DH, Srivastava SK (2007) The resident surgeon phacoemulsification learning curve. Arch Ophthalmol 125:1215–1219
Rowden A, Krishna R (2002) Resident cataract surgical training in United States residency programs. J Cataract Refract Surg 28:2202–2205
Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education program requirements for GME in ophthalmology. (Revised 7/1/2009) PDF II.D.4 (page 7) Available at: http://www.acgme.org/acWebsite/RRC_240/240_prIndex.asp Accessed February 7, 2012
Rogers GM, Oetting TA, Lee AG, Grignon C, Greenlee E, Johnson AT, Beaver HA, Carter K (2009) Impact of a structured surgical curriculum on ophthalmic resident cataract surgery complication rates. J Cataract Refract Surg 35:1956–1960
Ezra DG, Aggarwal R, Michaelides M, Okhravi N, Verma S, Benjamin L, Bloom P, Darzi A, Sullivan P (2009) Skills acquisition and assessment after a microsurgical course for ophthalmology residents. Ophthalmology 116:257–262
Mahr A, Hodge DO (2008) Construct validity of anterior segment anti-tremor and forceps surgical simulator training modules: attending versus resident surgeon performance. J Cataract Refract Surg 34:980–985
Privett B, Greelee E, Rogers G, Oetting TA (2010) Construct validity of surgical simulator as a valid model for capsulorhexis training. J Cataract Refract Surg 36:1835–1838
Belyea DA, Brown SE, Rajjoub LZ (2011) Influence of surgery simulator training on ophthalmology resident phacoemulsification performance. J Cataract Refract Surg 37:1756–1761
Ahmed Y, Scott IU, Greenberg PB (2011) A survey of the role of virtual surgery simulators in ophthalmic graduate medical education. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 249:1263–1265
Acknowledgements
Russell Pokroy received fellowship grants from the American Physicians Fellowship for Medicine in Israel, and from the Israel Ophthalmic Society.
Competing interest
None to declare.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Meeting presentations
Presented in part at the Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology (ARVO), Fort Lauderdale, FL, USA, May 2011.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Pokroy, R., Du, E., Alzaga, A. et al. Impact of simulator training on resident cataract surgery. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 251, 777–781 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00417-012-2160-z
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00417-012-2160-z