Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Optical coherence tomography measurements with the LENTIS Mplus multifocal intraocular lens

  • Miscellaneous
  • Published:
Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

To investigate optical coherence tomography (OCT) measurements following implantation of the LENTIS Mplus multifocal IOL, compared with a control group.

Methods

OCT scans were performed on 50 eyes with the Topcon 3D OCT-1000 in two groups of patients. The first group consisted of patients following implantation of the LENTIS Mplus, and a second group of age-matched control eyes following implantation of a monofocal aspheric IOL. Macular thickness and macular volume values were compared between groups and assessment for any onscreen visible artifacts.

Results

OCT scans were successfully performed in all 50 eyes with no visible artifacts in either group during scan acquisitions. There were no statistically significant differences (p > 0.05) in any measured or calculated macular thickness or volume values between the two groups.

Conclusions

OCT measurements with the Topcon 3D OCT-1000 is possible and free from visible artifacts in eyes which have had the LENTIS Mplus multifocal IOL implanted. Macular thickness and volume values were similar to those of an age-matched control group of monofocal aspheric IOLs.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Cvenkel B, Kontestabile AS (2011) Correlation between nerve fibre layer thickness measured with spectral domain OCT and visual field in patients with different stages of glaucoma. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 249:575–584

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Hoeh AE, Ruppenstein M, Ach T, Dithmar S (2010) OCT patterns of macular edema and response to bevacizumab therapy in retinal vein occlusion. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 248:1567–1572

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Sadda SR, Liakopoulos S, Keane PA, Ongchin SC, Msutta S, Chang KT, Walsh AC (2010) Relationship between angiographic and optical coherence tomographic (OCT) parameters for quantifying choroidal neovascular lesions. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 248:175–184

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Smretschnig E, Krebs I, Moussa S, Ansari-Shahrezaei S, Binder S (2010) Cirrus OCT versus Spectralis OCT: differences in segmentation in fibrovascular pigment epithelial detachment. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 248:1693–1698

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Huang D, Swanson EA, Lin CP, Schuman JS, Stinson WG, Chang W, Hee MR, Flotte T, Gregory K, Puliafito CA, Fujimoto JG (1991) Optical coherence tomography. Science 254:1178–1181

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Schulze A, Lamparter J, Pfeiffer N, Berisha F, Schmidtmann I, Hoffmann EM (2011) Diagnostic ability of retinal ganglion cell complex, retinal nerve fiber layer, and optic nerve head measurements by Fourier-domain optical coherence tomography. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 1039–1045

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Huang JY, Pekmezci M, Yaplee S, Lin S (2010) Intra-examiner repeatability and agreement of corneal pachymetry map measurement by time-domain and fourier-domain optical coherence tomography. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 248:1647–1656

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Sakata LM, Deleon-Ortega J, Sakata V, Girkin CA (2009) Optical coherence tomography of the retina and optic nerve—a review. Clin Exp Ophthalmol 37:90–99

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. McAlinden C, Moore JE (2011) Multifocal intraocular lens with a surface-embedded near section: short-term clinical outcomes. J Cataract Refract Surg 37:441–445

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Ferrer-Blasco T, Madrid-Costa D, Garcia-Lazaro S, Cervino A, Montes-Mico R (2011) Stereopsis in bilaterally multifocal pseudophakic patients. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 249:245–251

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Gierek-Ciaciura S, Cwalina L, Bednarski L, Mrukwa-Kominek E (2010) A comparative clinical study of the visual results between three types of multifocal lenses. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 248:133–140

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. McAlinden C, Pesudovs K, Moore JE (2010) The development of an instrument to measure quality of vision: the Quality of Vision (QoV) questionnaire. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 51:5537–5545

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Inoue M, Bissen-Miyajima H, Yoshino M, Suzuki T (2009) Wavy horizontal artifacts on optical coherence tomography line-scanning images caused by diffractive multifocal intraocular lenses. J Cataract Refract Surg 35:1239–1243

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Posner M, Naroo SA, Nithyanandarajah G, Trivedy M, Sharma A (2010) Multifocal contact lenses and posterior pole imaging. Cont Lens Anterior Eye 33:151

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Lehr R (1992) Sixteen S-squared over D-squared: a relation for crude sample size estimates. Stat Med 11:1099–1102

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Eirini Skiadaresi.

Additional information

No author has a financial or proprietary interest in any material or method mentioned.

Authors have full control of all primary data, and they agree to allow Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology to review their data upon request.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Skiadaresi, E., McAlinden, C., Ravalico, G. et al. Optical coherence tomography measurements with the LENTIS Mplus multifocal intraocular lens. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 250, 1395–1398 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00417-011-1901-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00417-011-1901-8

Keywords

Navigation