Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Variability in developmental timings of the knee in young American children as assessed through Pyle and Hoerr’s radiographic atlas

  • Technical Note
  • Published:
International Journal of Legal Medicine Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study examines the accuracy of the Pyle and Hoerr radiographic atlas technique in an effort to document the extent of normal variation associated with developmental timings in the knee for purposes of age estimation. The atlas has been previously tested; however, accuracy rates were produced from a dataset, which spread in age from mostly 7–16 years. This study took a closer look at the younger age groups, examining radiographs from 297 children (147 female and 150 male) from birth to 6 years. Standard deviations representing the difference between the skeletal and chronological age were calculated according to two groupings. Each group represents episodes, or time periods, of differential developmental rates as expressed through the number of plates within the atlas dedicated to documenting each year of life. The beginning year of life is characterized by the most rapid of development as represented by the numerous image plates used to depict this time period. Individuals assigned to plates with a skeletal age between birth and 1 year were grouped collectively to document the variation associated with such rapidly changing morphology (SD = 2.5 months in female children; 2.3 months in male children). Years 1–3.8 years (female) and 1–4.5 years (male) were represented by two or three images within the atlas, and therefore, individuals assigned to plates with a skeletal age falling within this range were placed within a second grouping (SD = 5.2 months in female children; 7.0 months in male children). As expected, variation was observed to decrease as developmental processes accelerated in the younger children. The newly calculated standard deviations offer tighter predictions for estimating age in young children while at the same time maintaining an acceptable width that accounts for normal variation in developmental timings.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

References

  1. Greulich WW, Pyle SI (1959) Radiographic atlas of skeletal development of the hand and wrist, 2nd edn. Stanford University Press, Stanford

    Google Scholar 

  2. Bogin B (1988) Patterns of human growth. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  3. Bogin B, MacVean RB (1982) Ethnic and secular influences on the size and maturity of seven year old children living in Guatemala City. Am J Phys Anthropol 59(4):393–398

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Eveleth PB, Tanner JM (1990) Worldwide variation in human growth. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  5. Tanner JM (1962) Growth at adolescence, 2nd edn. Blackwell Scientific Publications, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  6. Garn SM, Rohmann CG, Blumenthal T, Silverman FN (1967) Ossification communalities of the hand and other body parts: their implication to skeletal assessment. Am J Phys Anthropol 27:75–82

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Scheuer L, Black S (2000) Developmental juvenile osteology, 1st edn. Academic Press, London

    Google Scholar 

  8. Todd TW (1937) Atlas of skeletal maturation, 1st edn. The C.V. Mosby Company, St. Louis

    Google Scholar 

  9. Franklin D (2010) Forensic age estimation in human skeletal remains: current concepts and future directions. Legal Med 12(1):1–7. doi:10.1016/j.legalmed.2009.09.001

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Ritz-Timme S, Cattaneo C, Collins MJ, Waite ER, Schutz HW, Kaatsch HJ, Borrman HIM (2000) Age estimation: the state of the art in relation to the specific demands of forensic practise. Int J Legal Med 113:129–136

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Antonov A (1947) Children born during the siege of Leningrad in 1942. J Pediatr 30(3):250–259

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Greulich WW (1957) A comparison of the physical growth and development of American-born and native Japanese children. Am J Phys Anthropol 15:489

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Schmeling A, Olze A, Reisinger W, Geserick G (2005) Forensic age estimation and ethnicity. Legal Med 7:134–137. doi:10.1016/j.legalmed.2004.07.004

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Schmeling A, Reisinger W, Loreck D, Vendura K, Markus W, Geserick G (2000) Effects of ethnicity on skeletal maturation: consequences for forensic age estimations. Int J Legal Med 113:253–258

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Smith CA (1947) Effects of maternal undernutrition upon thenewborn infant in Holland (1944–1945). J Pediatr 30(3):229–243

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Schaefer MC (2008) A summary of epiphyseal union timings in Bosnian males. Int J Osteoarchaeol 18(5):536–545

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Schaefer MC, Black S, Scheuer JL (2009) Juvenile osteology—a practitioners guide. Elsevier, London

    Google Scholar 

  18. Maresh MM (1970) Measurements from roentgenograms. In: McCammon RW (ed) Human growth and development. C.C. Thomas, Springfield, pp 157–170

    Google Scholar 

  19. Gindhart PS (1973) Growth standards for the tibia and radius in children aged one month through eighteen years. Am J Phys Anthropol 39:41–48

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Martorell R, Yarbrough C, Klein RE, Lechtig A (1979) Malnutrition, body size, and skeletal maturation: interrelationships and implications for catch-up growth. Hum Biol 51(3):371–389

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Prader A, Tanner J, Von Harnack G (1963) Catch-up growth following illness or starvation: an example of developmental canalization in man. J Pediatr 62(5):646–659

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Brodeur AE, Silberstein MJ, Gravis ER (1981) Radiology of the pediatric elbow. G.K. Hall Medical Publishers, Boston

    Google Scholar 

  23. De Roo T, Scröder HJ (1976) Pocket atlas of skeletal age. Martinus Nijhoff Medical Division, The Hague

    Book  Google Scholar 

  24. Hoerr NL, Pyle SI, Francis CC (1962) Radiographic atlas of skeletal development of the foot and ankle. Charles C. Thomas, Springfield

    Google Scholar 

  25. Pyle SI, Hoerr NL (1969) A radiographic standard of reference for the growing knee, 1st edn. Charles C. Thomas, Springfield

    Google Scholar 

  26. Roche AF, Chumlea C, Thissen D (1988) Assessing the skeletal maturity of the hand-wrist: FELS method. Charles C. Thomas, Springfield

    Google Scholar 

  27. Tanner JM, Healy MJR, Goldstein H, Cameron N (2001) Assessment of skeletal maturity and prediction of adult height (TW3 method). Saunders, London

    Google Scholar 

  28. Tanner JM, Whitehouse RH, Healy MJR (1962) A new system for estimating skeletal maturity from the hand and wrist with standards derived from a study of 2600 healthy British children. Part II. The scoring system. International Child Centre, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  29. Tanner JM, Whitehouse RH, Marshall WA, Healy MJR, Goldstein H (1975) Assessment of skeletal maturity and prediction of adult height. Academic Press, London

    Google Scholar 

  30. Garn SM (1981) The growth of growth. Am J Phys Anthropol 56:521–530

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Tanner JM (1981) A history of the study of human growth. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  32. Hackman L, Black S (2013) The reliability of the Greulich and Pyle atlas when applied to a modern Scottish population. J Forensic Sci 58(1):114–119. doi:10.1111/j.1556-4029.2012.02294.x

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Hackman L, Black S (2013) Age estimation from radiographic images of the knee. J Forensic Sci 58(3):732–737. doi:10.1111/1556-4029.12077

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Hackman L, Davies CM, Black S (2013) Age estimation using foot radiographs from a modern Scottish population. J Forensic Sci 58:S146–S150. doi:10.1111/1556-4029.12004

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Ousley S, Daly S, Frazee K, Stull K (2013) A radiographic database for estimating biological parameters in modern subadults. Final Technical Report, National Institute of Justice Award

  36. Cole TJ (2000) Secular trends in growth. Proc Nutr Soc 59:317–324

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Cole TJ (2003) The secular trend in human physical growth: a biological view. Econ Hum Biol 1(2):161–168

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Hawley NL, Rousham EK, Norris SA, Pettifor JM, Cameron N (2009) Secular trends in skeletal maturity in South Africa: 1962–2001. Ann Hum Biol 36(5):584–594. doi:10.1080/03014460903136822

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Klepinger LL (2001) Stature, maturational variation and secular trends in forensic anthropology. J Forensic Sci 46(4):788–790

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Loesch DZ, Stokes K, Huggins RM (2000) Secular trend in body height and weight of Australian children and adolescents. Am J Phys Anthropol 111(4):545–556

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Krämer JA, Schmidt S, Jürgens K-U, Lentschig M, Schmeling A, Vieth V (2014) The use of magnetic resonance imaging to examine ossification of the proximal tibial epiphysis for forensic age estimation in living individuals. Forensic Sci Med Pathol:1–8

  42. Krämer JA, Schmidt S, Jürgens K-U, Lentschig M, Schmeling A, Vieth V (2014) Forensic age estimation in living individuals using 3.0 T MRI of the distal femur. Int J Legal Med 128 (3):509–514

  43. O'Connor JE, Coyle J, Spence LD, Last J (2013) Epiphyseal maturity indicators at the knee and their relationship to chronological age: Results of an Irish population study. Clin Anat 26 (6):755–767

  44. O'Connor JE, Bogue C, Spence LD, Last J (2008) A method to establish the relationship between chronological age and stage of union from radiographic assessment of epiphyseal fusion at the knee: an Irish population study. J Anat 212:198–209

  45. Dedouit F, Auriol J, Rousseau H, Rougé D, Crubézy E, Telmon N (2012) Age assessment by magnetic resonance imaging of the knee: a preliminary study. Forensic Sci Int 217 (1):232. e231–232. e237

Download references

Acknowledgments

I would like to thank Dr. Ousley from Mercyhurst University for creating the radiographic database from which this research is based.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Centre for Anatomy & Human Identification, College of Life Sciences, University of Dundee, Dundee, UK

    Lucina Hackman

  2. Department of Radiology, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, 48824, USA

    Maureen Schaefer & John Gallagher

Authors
  1. Maureen Schaefer
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Lucina Hackman
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. John Gallagher
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lucina Hackman.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Schaefer, M., Hackman, L. & Gallagher, J. Variability in developmental timings of the knee in young American children as assessed through Pyle and Hoerr’s radiographic atlas. Int J Legal Med 130, 501–509 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00414-015-1141-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00414-015-1141-2

Keywords

Search

Navigation