Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Visualisation of the intact dura mater and brain surface in infant autopsies: a minimally destructive technique for the post-mortem assessment of head injury

  • Technical Note
  • Published:
International Journal of Legal Medicine Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

During the post-mortem examination of babies and young children, it is important to be able to visualise the brain and its coverings, particularly in cases where a head injury is likely to have occurred. In this paper, we present an improved method for removal of the calvarial bones in infant autopsies to enable viewing of the dura mater and brain. In contrast to the standard post-mortem procedure for observing and removing the brain, this novel technique is minimally disruptive, allowing the dura mater to remain undamaged. Specialised paediatric neurosurgical tools were used to remove the skull bones from 23 neonates, infants and young children during post-mortem examination. In 21 of our 23 cases, the calvarial bones were removed successfully with the dura mater remaining intact. In one case, there was a thickening of the dura mater which created a strong adherence of this membrane to the bone. In another case, the dura mater was slightly damaged due to the inexperience of the operator in using the neurosurgical tools. This method of calvarial bone removal reduces the degree of post-mortem artefact and enhances the ability to observe and photographically document autopsy findings, including the artefact-free detection of signs of injury such as epidural or subdural haematoma, and brain swelling. This technique has now become a routine practise in both of our units to remove the skull bones in infant/young children post-mortem examinations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

References

  1. Piteau SJ, Ward MGK, Barrowman NJ, Plint AC (2012) Clinical and radiographic characteristics associated with abusive and non-abusive head trauma: a systematic review. Pediatrics 130:315–323

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Case ME, Graham MA, Handy TC, Jentzen JM, Monteleone JA (2001) Position paper on fatal abusive head injuries in infants and young children. Am J Forensic Med Pathol 22:112–122

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Minns A, Lo TYM (2009) Head and neck injuries. In: Busuttil A, Keeling JW (eds) Pediatric forensic medicine and pathology. Hodder Arnold, London, p 295

    Google Scholar 

  4. Dunham C, Perry A (2011) The nervous system. In: Stocker JT, Dehner LP, Husain AN (eds) Pediatric pathology, 3rd edn. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Philadelphia, p 357

    Google Scholar 

  5. Garrett D (2013) National center for prosecution of child abuse, overcoming defense expert testimony in abusive head trauma cases. http://www.ndaa.org/pdf/Abusive%20 HeadTrauma_NDAA.pdf. Accessed 2 July 2014

  6. Pomara C, Karch SB, Fineschi V (2010) The autopsy. In: Pomara C, Karch SB, Fineschi V (eds) Forensic autopsy: a handbook and atlas. CRC Press, Florida, p 49

    Google Scholar 

  7. Collins P (1995) Neonatal anatomy and growth. In: Williams PL (ed) Gray’s anatomy: the anatomical basis of medicine and surgery, 38th edn. Churchill Livingstone, New York, p 354

    Google Scholar 

  8. Hayden L, Kulak D, Maxwell F, Wentzkes S (2008) Osteopathic diagnosis. In: Moeckel E, Mitha N (eds) Textbook of pediatric osteopathy. Churchill Livingstone, Edinburgh, p 123

    Google Scholar 

  9. Amiel-Tison C, Gosselin J, Infante-Rivard C (2002) Head growth and cranial assessment at neurological examination in infancy. Dev Med Child Neurol 44:643–648

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Scheuer L, Black S (2000) Developmental juvenile osteology. Academic, California, p 107

    Google Scholar 

  11. Okazaki H, Campbell RJ (1979) Nervous system. In: Ludwig J (ed) Current methods of autopsy practice. W B Saunders Company, Philadelphia, pp 97–98

    Google Scholar 

  12. Riezzo I (2010) Pediatric and fetal autopsies. In: Pomara C, Karch SB, Fineschi V (eds) Forensic autopsy: a handbook and atlas. CRC Press, Florida, pp 79–83

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  13. Medtronic (2013) cranial surgery: meeting the challenges. http://www.medtronic. com/for-healthcare-professionals/products-therapies/ear-nose-throat/therapies/cranial-surgery/#tab1. Accessed 18 July 2014

  14. Stocker JT (2011) The pediatric autopsy. In: Stocker JT, Dehner LP, Husain AN (eds) Pediatric pathology, 3rd edn. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Philadelphia, pp 14–15

    Google Scholar 

  15. Keeling JW (2007) The perinatal necropsy. In: Keeling JW, Khong TY (eds) Fetal and neonatal pathology, 4th edn. Springer, London, pp 39–42

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  16. Slater BJ, Lenton KA, Kwan MD, Gupta DM, Wan DC, Longaker MT (2008) Cranial sutures: a brief review. Plast Reconstr Surg 121:170e–178e

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Opperman LA, Passarelli RW, Morgan EP, Reintjes M, Ogle RC (1995) Cranial sutures require tissue interactions with dura mater to resist osseous obliteration in vitro. J Bone Miner Res 10:1978–1987

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Sergueef N (2007) Cranial osteopathy for infants, children and adolescents: a practical handbook. Churchill Livingstone, Philadelphia, p 53

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This article presents independent research funded by the Home Office Science Secretariat, Science Group. The views expressed in this publication are those of the author(s) and not necessarily those of the Home Office. Initial training in the use of the equipment was provided to ECC but no funding or research support was received from the equipment manufacturer (Medtronic Xomed Inc.).

Conflict of interest

None.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Emma C. Cheshire.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Cheshire, E.C., Malcomson, R.D.G., Rutty, G.N. et al. Visualisation of the intact dura mater and brain surface in infant autopsies: a minimally destructive technique for the post-mortem assessment of head injury. Int J Legal Med 129, 307–312 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00414-014-1110-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00414-014-1110-1

Keywords

Navigation