Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Electron paramagnetic resonance in human fingernails: the sponge model implication

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Radiation and Environmental Biophysics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The most significant problem of electron paramagnetic resonance (EPR) fingernail dosimetry is the presence of two signals of non-radiation origin that overlap the radiation-induced signal (RIS), making it almost impossible to perform dose measurements below 5 Gy. Historically, these two non-radiation components were named mechanically induced signal (MIS) and background signal (BKS). In order to investigate them in detail, three different methods of MIS and BKS mutual isolation have been developed and implemented. After applying these methods, it is shown here that fingernail tissue, after cut, can be modeled as a deformed sponge, where the MIS and BKS are associated with the stress from elastic and plastic deformations, respectively. A sponge has a unique mechanism of mechanical stress absorption, which is necessary for fingernails in order to perform its everyday function of protecting the fingertips from hits and trauma. Like a sponge, fingernails are also known to be an effective water absorber. When a sponge is saturated with water, it tends to restore to its original shape, and when it loses water, it becomes deformed again. The same happens to fingernail tissue. It is proposed that the MIS and BKS signals of mechanical origin be named MIS1 and MIS2 for MISs 1 and 2, respectively. Our suggested interpretation of the mechanical deformation in fingernails gives also a way to distinguish between the MIS and RIS. The results obtained show that the MIS in irradiated fingernails can be almost completely eliminated without a significant change to the RIS by soaking the sample for 10 min in water. The proposed method to measure porosity (the fraction of void space in spongy material) of the fingernails gave values of 0.46–0.48 for three of the studied samples. Existing results of fingernail dosimetry have been obtained on mechanically stressed samples and are not related to the “real” in vivo dosimetric properties of fingernails. A preliminary study of these properties of pre-soaked (unstressed) fingernails has demonstrated their significant difference from fingernails stressed by cut. They show a higher stability signal, a less intensive non-radiation component, and a nonlinear dose dependence. The findings in this study set the stage for understanding fingernail EPR dosimetry and doing in vivo measurements in the future.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Symons MC, Chandra H, Wyatt JL (1995) Electron paramagnetic resonance spectra of irradiated finger-nails: a possible measure of accidental exposure. Radiat Prot Dosim 58:11–15

    Google Scholar 

  2. Dalgarno BG, McClymont JD (1989) Evaluation of ESR as a radiation accident dosimetry technique. Appl Radiat Isot 40:1013–1020

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Romanyukha A, Trompier F, LeBlanc B, Calas C, Clairand I, Mitchell CA, Smirniotopoulos JG, Swartz HM (2007) EPR dosimetry in chemically treated fingernails. Radiat Meas 42:1110–1113

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Trompier F, Kornak L, Calas C, Romanyukha A, LeBlanc B, Clairand I, Mitchell CA, Swartz HM (2007) Protocol for emergency EPR dosimetry in fingernails. Radiat Meas 42:1085–1088

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Chandra H, Symons MC (1987) Sulphur radicals formed by cutting alpha-keratin. Nature 328:833–834

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  6. Ignatiev EA, Romanyukha AA, Koshta AA, Wieser A (1996) Selective saturation method for EPR dosimetry with tooth enamel. Appl Radiat Isot 47:333–337

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Finlay AY, Frost P, Keith AD, Snipes W (1980) An assessment of factors influencing flexibility of human fingernails. Br J Dermatol 103:357–365

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Swartz HM, Iwasaki A, Walczak T, Demidenko E, Salikhov I, Khan N, Lesniewski P, Thomas JA, Romanyukha A, Schauer DA, Starewicz P (2006) In vivo EPR dosimetry to quantify exposures to clinically significant doses of ionising radiation. Radiat Prot Dosim 120:163–170

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Zdravkova M, Crokart N, Trompier F, Beghein N, Gallez B, Debuyst R (2004) Non-invasive determination of the irradiation dose in fingers using low-frequency EPR. Phys Med Biol 49:2891–2898

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Farren L, Shayler S, Ennos AR (2004) The fracture properties and mechanical design of human fingernails. J Exp Biol 207:735–741

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Egawa M, Ozaki Y, Takahashi M (2006) In vivo measurement of water content of the fingernail and its seasonal change. Skin Res Technol 12:126–132

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Mason P (1963) Density and structure of alpha-keratin. Nature 197:179–180

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  13. Romanyukha A, Trompier F, Swartz HM (2007) EPR dosimetry with fingernails. US Patent Provisional No. 60/924,034, USA

  14. Stern DK, Diamantis S, Smith E, Wei H, Gordon M, Muigai W, Moshier E, Lebwohl M, Spuls P (2007) Water content and other aspects of brittle versus normal fingernails. J Am Acad Dermatol 57:31–36

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Bethesda, MD, USA

    R. A. Reyes, A. Romanyukha & C. A. Mitchell

  2. United States Naval Dosimetry Center, Bethesda, MD, USA

    A. Romanyukha & L. A. Benevides

  3. Institut de Radioprotection et de Sûreté Nucléaire, Fontenay-aux-roses, France

    F. Trompier & I. Clairand

  4. Howard University, Washington, DC, USA

    T. De

  5. Dartmouth Medical School, Hanover, NH, USA

    H. M. Swartz

Authors
  1. R. A. Reyes
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. A. Romanyukha
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. F. Trompier
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. C. A. Mitchell
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. I. Clairand
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. T. De
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. L. A. Benevides
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. H. M. Swartz
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to A. Romanyukha.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Reyes, R.A., Romanyukha, A., Trompier, F. et al. Electron paramagnetic resonance in human fingernails: the sponge model implication. Radiat Environ Biophys 47, 515–526 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00411-008-0178-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00411-008-0178-8

Keywords

Search

Navigation