Skip to main content
Log in

A Method for Determining Optimal Mean Airway Pressure in High-Frequency Oscillatory Ventilation

  • Published:
Lung Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

“Optimal” mean airway pressure (MAP) during high-frequency oscillatory ventilation (HFOV) can be defined as the pressure that allows for maximal alveolar recruitment while minimizing alveolar overdistension. Choosing a MAP near or just below the point of maximal curvature (PMC) of the volume–pressure characteristics of the lung can serve as a guide to avoid overdistention during HFOV, while simultaneously preventing derecruitment. The purpose of this study was to assess whether optimal MAP at the PMC can be determined by using measures of PaO2 in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) undergoing HFOV.

Methods

We prospectively studied seven patients with ARDS who underwent HFOV after failed conventional ventilation. In addition, 11 healthy subjects were studied to validate measurements of changes in end-expiratory lung volume (∆EELV) using magnetometers. Using this validated method, plots of ∆EELV and MAP were constructed during decremental changes in MAP following a recruitment maneuver in seven ventilated patients with ARDS. The PMC was defined as the point where the slope of the ∆EELV versus MAP curve acutely changed. The MAP at the PMC was compared to that determined from plots of PaO2 versus MAP.

Results

In the healthy cohort, measurements of ∆EELV obtained by magnetometry approximated the line of identity when compared to those obtained by spirometry. The MAP determined using either the ∆EELV or PaO2 techniques were identical in all seven HFOV ventilated patients. Additionally, there was a significant correlation between the MAP associated changes in PaO2 and the MAP associated changes in ∆EELV (p < 0.001).

Conclusions

The finding that MAP at the PMC is the same whether determined by measures of ∆EELV or PaO2 suggest that bedside measures PaO2 may provide an acceptable surrogate for measures of EELV when determining “optimal” MAP during HFOV.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Frank JA, Matthay MA (2003) Science review: mechanisms of ventilator-induced injury. Crit Care 7(3):233–241

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Dreyfuss D, Soler P, Basset G et al (1988) High inflation pressure pulmonary edema. Respective effects of high airway pressure, high tidal volume, and positive end-expiratory pressure. Am Rev Respir Dis 137(5):1159–1164

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Webb HH, Tierney DF (1974) Experimental pulmonary edema due to intermittent positive pressure ventilation with high inflation pressures. Protection by positive end-expiratory pressure. Am Rev Respir Dis 110(5):556–565

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Goddon S, Fujino Y, Hromi JM et al (2001) Optimal mean airway pressure during high-frequency oscillation: predicted by the pressure–volume curve. Anesthesiology 94(5):862–869

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Amato MB, Barbas CS, Medeiros DM et al (1998) Effect of a protective-ventilation strategy on mortality in the acute respiratory distress syndrome. N Engl J Med 338(6):347–354

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Krishnan JA, Brower RG (2000) High-frequency ventilation for acute lung injury and ARDS. Chest 118(3):795–807

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Marini JJ (2001) Recruitment maneuvers to achieve an “open lung”—whether and how? Crit Care Med 29(8):1647–1648

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Bernard GR, Artigas A, Brigham KL et al (1994) The American-European Consensus Conference on ARDS. Definitions, mechanisms, relevant outcomes, and clinical trial coordination. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 149(3 Pt 1):818–824

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Thome U, Pohlandt F (1998) Effect of the TI/TE ratio on mean intratracheal pressure in high-frequency oscillatory ventilation. J Appl Physiol 84(5):1520–1527

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Menzel M, Soukup J, Henze D et al (2003) Experiences with continuous intra-arterial blood gas monitoring: precision and drift of a pure optode-system. Intensive Care Med 29(12):2180–2186

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. McCool FD, Wang J, Ebi KL (2002) Tidal volume and respiratory timing derived from a portable ventilation monitor. Chest 122(2):684–691

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Bland JM, Altman DG (1986) Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet 1(8476):307–310

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. The Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome Network (2000) Ventilation with lower tidal volumes as compared with traditional tidal volumes for acute lung injury and the acute respiratory distress syndrome. N Engl J Med 342(18):1301–1308

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Arnold JH, Hanson JH, Toro-Figuero LO et al (1994) Prospective, randomized comparison of high-frequency oscillatory ventilation and conventional mechanical ventilation in pediatric respiratory failure. Crit Care Med 22(10):1530–1539

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Clark RH, Yoder BA, Sell MS (1994) Prospective, randomized comparison of high-frequency oscillation and conventional ventilation in candidates for extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. J Pediatr 124(3):447–454

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Gerstmann DR, Minton SD, Stoddard RA et al (1996) The Provo multicenter early high-frequency oscillatory ventilation trial: improved pulmonary and clinical outcome in respiratory distress syndrome. Pediatrics 98(6 Pt 1):1044–1057

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Lachmann B (1992) Open up the lung and keep the lung open. Intensive Care Med 18(6):319–321

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Venegas JG, Fredberg JJ (1994) Understanding the pressure cost of ventilation: why does high-frequency ventilation work? Crit Care Med 22(9 Suppl):S49–S57

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Derdak S, Mehta S, Stewart TE et al (2002) High-frequency oscillatory ventilation for acute respiratory distress syndrome in adults: a randomized, controlled trial. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 166(6):801–808

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Wunsch H, Mapstone J, Takala J (2005) High-frequency ventilation versus conventional ventilation for the treatment of acute lung injury and acute respiratory distress syndrome: a systematic review and Cochrane analysis. Anesth Analg 100(6):1765–1772

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Bryan AC, Froese AB (1991) Reflections on the HIFI trial. Pediatrics 87(4):565–567

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Fessler HE, Hager DN, Brower RG (2008) Feasibility of very high-frequency ventilation in adults with acute respiratory distress syndrome. Crit Care Med 36(4):1043–1048

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Fort P, Farmer C, Westerman J et al (1997) High-frequency oscillatory ventilation for adult respiratory distress syndrome—a pilot study. Crit Care Med 25(6):937–947

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Mehta S, Lapinsky SE, Hallett DC et al (2001) Prospective trial of high-frequency oscillation in adults with acute respiratory distress syndrome. Crit Care Med 29(7):1360–1369

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Hickling KG (1998) The pressure–volume curve is greatly modified by recruitment. A mathematical model of ARDS lungs. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 158(1):194–202

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Hickling KG (2001) Best compliance during a decremental, but not incremental, positive end-expiratory pressure trial is related to open-lung positive end-expiratory pressure: a mathematical model of acute respiratory distress syndrome lungs. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 163(1):69–78

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Habib RH, Pyon KH, Courtney SE (2002) Optimal high-frequency oscillatory ventilation settings by nonlinear lung mechanics analysis. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 166(7):950–953

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Crotti S, Mascheroni D, Caironi P et al (2001) Recruitment and derecruitment during acute respiratory failure: a clinical study. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 164(1):131–140

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Pellicano A, Tingay DG, Mills JF et al (2009) Comparison of four methods of lung volume recruitment during high frequency oscillatory ventilation. Intensive Care Med 35(11):1990–1998

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Victorino JA, Borges JB, Okamoto VN et al (2004) Imbalances in regional lung ventilation: a validation study on electrical impedance tomography. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 169(7):791–800

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of interest

None.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Brian Casserly.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Casserly, B., Dennis McCool, F., Sethi, J.M. et al. A Method for Determining Optimal Mean Airway Pressure in High-Frequency Oscillatory Ventilation. Lung 191, 69–76 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00408-012-9434-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00408-012-9434-4

Keywords

Navigation