Skip to main content
Log in

A modification of incisionless otoplasty for correcting the prominent ear deformity

  • Head and Neck
  • Published:
European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This article describes a modification of the incisionless otoplasty. We investigated the complication rates, recurrence risks, and patient satisfaction with this modified procedure. In total, 26 patients (49 ears) complaining of prominent ear were operated on. Auriculocephalic distances were measured at three different levels, pre-operatively, at the end of the surgery, and at 4 weeks and 6 months after surgery to evaluate the efficacy of the technique. Patient satisfaction was evaluated using a visual analog scale and the global aesthetic improvement scale was applied by an independent non-participating plastic surgeon at 6 months after the surgery. The mean loss of medialization was ~1 mm at 4 weeks after surgery and 2 mm at 6 months after surgery for all levels. According to visual analog scale, patient or parent satisfaction increased significantly. The global aesthetic improvement scale rated the patients as 93.9 % “improved” and 6.1 % as “no change.” No rating was “worse.” There are many advantages of this technique. The operation is not time-consuming, does not require a dressing, and it can be performed in adults with local anesthesia under office conditions, with no need for hospitalization. After the operation, patients can return to their daily activities immediately. It is associated with a low complication rate and high patient satisfaction. This technique is a good option for otoplasty in patients with isolated, inadequate development of anti-helical ridge, and with soft auricular cartilage.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Adamson PA, Strecker HD (1995) Otoplasty techniques. Facial Plast Surg 11:284–300

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Janis JE, Rohrich RJ, Gutowski KA (2005) Otoplasty. Plast Reconstr Surg 115:60–72

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Becker DG, Lai SS, Wise JB, Steiger JD (2006) Analysis in otoplasty. Facial Plast Surg Clin North Am 14:63–71

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Kalcioglu MT, Miman MC, Toplu Y, Yakinci C, Ozturan O (2003) Anthropometric growth study of normal human auricle. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 67:1169–1177

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Brucker MJ, Patel J, Sullivan PK (2003) A morphometric study of the external ear: age- and sex-related differences. Plast Reconstr Surg 112:647–652

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Adamson PA, Strecker HD (2006) Otoplasty techniques. Facial Plast Surg Clin North Am 14:79–87

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Macgregor FC (1978) Ear deformities: social and psychological implications. Clin Plast Surg 5:347–350

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Balogh B, Millesi H (1992) Are growth alterations a consequence of surgery for prominent ears? Plast Reconstr Surg 89:623–630

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Maniglia AJ, Maniglia JV (1981) Congenital lop ear deformity. Otolaryngol Clin North Am 14:83–93

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Ely ET (1881) An operation for prominence of the auricles. Arch Otolaryngol 10:97–99

    Google Scholar 

  11. Mustardé JC (1967) The treatment of prominent ears by buried mattress sutures: a ten-year survey. Plast Reconstr Surg 39:382–386

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Nazarian R, Eshraghi AA (2011) Otoplasty for the protruded ear. Semin Plast Surg 25:288–294

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Fritsch MH (2009) Incisionless otoplasty. Otolaryngol Clin N Am 42:1199–1208

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Ozturan O, Dogan R, Eren SB, Aksoy F, Veyseller B (2013) Percutaneous adjustable closed otoplasty for prominent ear deformity. J Craniofac Surg 24:398–404

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Raunig H (2005) Antihelix plasty without modeling sutures. Arch Facial Plast Surg. 7:334–341

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Richards SD, Jebreel A, Capper R (2005) Otoplasty: a review of the surgical technique. Clin Otolaryngol 30:2–8

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Nachlas NE (2002) Otoplasty. In: Papel ID (ed) Facial plastic and reconstructive surgery, 2nd edn. Thieme, New York, pp 309–321

    Google Scholar 

  18. Limandjaja GC, Breugem CC, Mink van der Molen AB, Kon M (2009) Complications of otoplasty: a literature review. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 62:19–27

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Tan KH (1986) Long-term survey of prominent ear surgery: a comparison of two methods. Br J Plast Surg 39:270–273

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Weerda H (2007) Surgery of the auricle: tumors-trauma-defects-abnormalities, 1st edn. Thieme, Stuttgart, pp 153–154

    Google Scholar 

  21. Weerda H, Siegert R (1994) Complications in otoplastic surgery and their treatment. Facial Plast Surg 10:287–297

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of interest

The authors declared no conflicts of interest with respect to the authorship and/or publication of this article.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Suheyl Haytoglu.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Haytoglu, S., Haytoglu, T.G., Yildirim, I. et al. A modification of incisionless otoplasty for correcting the prominent ear deformity. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 272, 3425–3430 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-014-3329-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-014-3329-3

Keywords

Navigation