Skip to main content
Log in

Effectiveness of the contemporary treatment of preterm labor: a comparison with a historical cohort

  • Maternal-Fetal Medicine
  • Published:
Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objective

To compare the effectiveness of contemporary treatment of preterm labor to a historical cohort.

Study design

Retrospective matched case–control study to compare the outcomes of patients that were treated for preterm labor at the University Hospital of Tuebingen, Germany in 2014/2015 (current treatment cohort) and 2006/2007 (historical cohort). The study included women with singleton gestations who were admitted with the diagnosis of preterm labor between 24 + 0 and 34 + 0 weeks’ gestation and a cervical length of ≤15 mm. Women in the historical cohort were hospitalized until either 34 weeks’ gestation or until complete cessation of uterine contractions. They were treated with intravenous beta-mimetics continuously, received antibiotics based on the vaginal culture and corticosteroids regardless of cervical length measurement. Bed rest was always recommended. The current treatment cohort was tocolyzed with an oral calcium channel blocker for approximately 3 days followed by vaginal progesterone until 34 weeks’ gestation. Corticosteroids were given only if the cervical length is ≤15 mm. Bed rest was not recommended.

Results

The study population consisted of 110 pregnancies, 55 in the historical cohort and 55 in the current treatment cohort. At the time of admission, mean gestational age in both groups was 29.3 and 29.7 weeks. In the historical and current treatment cohort the length of the hospitalization was 24.0 and 5.5 days and tocolysis was given for 19.5 and 3.4 days, respectively. In the historical cohort, mean gestational age at delivery was 35.6 weeks. In 63.6% cases delivery occurred prior to 37 weeks. In the current treatment group mean gestational age at the delivery was 37.0 weeks and 36.4% were delivered prior to 37 weeks.

Conclusion

Short-term hospitalization and tocolysis followed by vaginal progesterone for maintenance tocolysis is more effective than a protocol which includes long-term hospital stay, beta-mimetics, antibiotics, and bed rest.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Walker KF, Thornton JG (2016) Tocolysis and preterm labour. Lancet 387:2068–2070. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(16)00590-0

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Kenyon SL, Taylor DJ, Tarnow-Mordi W (2001) Broad-spectrum antibiotics for spontaneous preterm labour: the ORACLE II randomised trial. Lancet 357:989–994. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(00)04234-3

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Honest H, Forbes CA, Durée KH et al (2009) Screening to prevent spontaneous preterm birth: systematic reviews of accuracy and effectiveness literature with economic modelling. Health Technol Assess 13:1–351. doi:10.3310/hta13430

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Sotiriadis A, Papatheodorou S, Kavvadias A, Makrydimas G (2010) Transvaginal cervical length measurement for prediction of preterm birth in women with threatened preterm labor: a meta-analysis. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 35:54–64. doi:10.1002/uog.7457

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Kagan KO, To M, Tsoi E, Nicolaides KH (2006) Preterm birth: the value of sonographic measurement of cervical length. BJOG Int J Obs Gynaecol 113(Suppl 3):52–56. doi:10.1111/j.1471-0528.2006.01124.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Wax JR, Cartin A, Pinette MG (2016) Biophysical and biochemical screening for the risk of preterm labor: an update. Clin Lab Med 36:369–383. doi:10.1016/j.cll.2016.01.019

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Haas DM, Caldwell DM, Kirkpatrick P et al (2012) Tocolytic therapy for preterm delivery: systematic review and network meta-analysis. BMJ 345:e6226. doi:10.1136/bmj.e6226

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Roos C, Spaanderman MEA, Schuit E et al (2013) Effect of maintenance tocolysis with nifedipine in threatened preterm labor on perinatal outcomes: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA 309:41–47. doi:10.1001/jama.2012.153817

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. van Vliet E, Dijkema GH, Schuit E et al (2016) Nifedipine maintenance tocolysis and perinatal outcome: an individual participant data meta-analysis. BJOG Int J Obs Gynaecol 123:1753–1760. doi:10.1111/1471-0528.14249

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. van Vliet EOG, Nijman TAJ, Schuit E et al (2016) Nifedipine versus atosiban for threatened preterm birth (APOSTEL III): a multicentre, randomised controlled trial. Lancet 387:2117–2124. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(16)00548-1

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Suhag A, Saccone G, Berghella V (2015) Vaginal progesterone for maintenance tocolysis: a systematic review and metaanalysis of randomized trials. Am J Obstet Gynecol 213:479–487. doi:10.1016/j.ajog.2015.03.031

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Navathe R, Berghella V (2016) Progesterone as a tocolytic agent for preterm labor: a systematic review. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol 28:464–469. doi:10.1097/GCO.0000000000000327

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Martinez de Tejada B, Karolinski A, Ocampo MC et al (2015) Prevention of preterm delivery with vaginal progesterone in women with preterm labour (4P): randomised double-blind placebo-controlled trial. BJOG Int J Obs Gynaecol 122:80–91. doi:10.1111/1471-0528.13061

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Bowes WA (2009) The role of antibiotics in the prevention of preterm birth. F1000 Med Rep. doi:10.3410/M1-22

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Kenyon S, Pike K, Jones DR et al (2008) Childhood outcomes after prescription of antibiotics to pregnant women with spontaneous preterm labour: 7-year follow-up of the ORACLE II trial. Lancet 372:1319–1327. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(08)61203-9

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Sosa CG, Althabe F, Belizán JM, Bergel E (2015) Bed rest in singleton pregnancies for preventing preterm birth. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. doi:10.1002/14651858.CD003581.pub3

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. de Lange TS, Roos C, Bloemenkamp KWM et al (2015) Impact of a randomized trial on maintenance tocolysis on length of hospital admission of women with threatened preterm labor in The Netherlands. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 186:8–11. doi:10.1016/j.ejogrb.2014.12.003

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Flenady V, Wojcieszek AM, Papatsonis DNM et al (2014) Calcium channel blockers for inhibiting preterm labour and birth. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. doi:10.1002/14651858.CD002255.pub2

    Google Scholar 

  19. Roberts D, Dalziel S (2006) Antenatal corticosteroids for accelerating fetal lung maturation for women at risk of preterm birth. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. doi:10.1002/14651858.CD004454.pub2

    Google Scholar 

  20. van Vliet E, Dijkema GH, Schuit E et al (2016) Nifedipine maintenance tocolysis and perinatal outcome: an individual participant data meta-analysis. BJOG Int J Obs Gynaecol 123:1753–1760. doi:10.1111/1471-0528.14249

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Wagner P, Sonek J, Heidemeyer M et al (2016) Repeat measurement of cervical length in women with threatened preterm labor. Geburtsh Frauenheilk 76:779–784. doi:10.1055/s-0042-104282

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Sotiriadis A, Kavvadias A, Papatheodorou S et al (2010) The value of serial cervical length measurements for the prediction of threatened preterm labour. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 148:17–20. doi:10.1016/j.ejogrb.2009.08.020

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Flenady V, Hawley G, Stock OM et al (2013) Prophylactic antibiotics for inhibiting preterm labour with intact membranes. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. doi:10.1002/14651858.CD000246.pub2

    Google Scholar 

  24. Romero R, Nicolaides KH, Conde Agudelo A et al (2016) Vaginal progesterone decreases preterm birth ≤34 weeks of gestation in women with a singleton pregnancy and a short cervix: an updated meta-analysis including data from the OPPTIMUM study. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 48:308–317. doi:10.1002/uog.15953

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Palacio M, Ronzoni S, Sanchez-Ramos L, Murphy KE (2016) Progestogens as maintenance treatment in arrested preterm labor. Obstet Gynecol 128:989–1000. doi:10.1097/AOG.0000000000001676

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Sanchez-Ramos L, Kaunitz AM, Gaudier FL, Delke I (1999) Efficacy of maintenance therapy after acute tocolysis: a meta-analysis. Am J Obstet Gynecol 181:484–490. doi:10.1016/S0002-9378(99)70582-X

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Elliott JP, Morrison JC (2013) The evidence regarding maintenance tocolysis. Obs Gynecol Int 2013:1–11. doi:10.1155/2013/708023

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Chawanpaiboon S, Laopaiboon M, Lumbiganon P et al (2014) Terbutaline pump maintenance therapy after threatened preterm labour for reducing adverse neonatal outcomes. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. doi:10.1002/14651858.CD010800.pub2

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Amin SB, Sinkin RA, Glantz JC (2007) Metaanalysis of the effect of antenatal indomethacin on neonatal outcomes. Am J Obstet Gynecol 197(486):e1–e10. doi:10.1016/j.ajog.2007.04.019

    Google Scholar 

  30. Amin SB, Kamaluddeen M, Sangem M (2008) Neurodevelopmental outcome of premature infants after exposure to antenatal indomethacin. Am J Obstet Gynecol 199(41):e1–e8. doi:10.1016/j.ajog.2007.12.037

    Google Scholar 

  31. Flenady V, Reinebrant HE, Liley HG et al (2014) Oxytocin receptor antagonists for inhibiting preterm labour. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. doi:10.1002/14651858.CD004452.pub3

    Google Scholar 

  32. Han S, Crowther CA, Moore V (2013) Magnesium maintenance therapy for preventing preterm birth after threatened preterm labour. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. doi:10.1002/14651858.CD000940.pub3

    Google Scholar 

  33. Handelzalts JE, Becker G, Ahren M-P et al (2015) Personality, fear of childbirth and birth outcomes in nulliparous women. Arch Gynecol Obstet 291:1055–1062. doi:10.1007/s00404-014-3532-x

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Handelzalts JE, Krissi H, Levy S et al (2016) Personality, preterm labor contractions, and psychological consequences. Arch Gynecol Obstet 293:575–582. doi:10.1007/s00404-015-3898-4

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

PW: data collection and analysis. JS: manuscript writing and editing. HA: manuscript writing and editing. LS: data collection. MH: manuscript writing and editing. SB: manuscript writing and editing. QW: manuscript writing and editing. KOK: project development, data analysis, manuscript writing and editing

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Karl Oliver Kagan.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

All authors declare that there is no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. This is a retrospective study from patients that were treated at the University of Tuebingen, Germany. The study was approved by the local ethical committee. This is also stated in the Methods section.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Wagner, P., Sonek, J., Abele, H. et al. Effectiveness of the contemporary treatment of preterm labor: a comparison with a historical cohort. Arch Gynecol Obstet 296, 27–34 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-017-4389-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-017-4389-6

Keywords

Navigation