Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Efficacies and pregnant outcomes of fertility-sparing treatment with medroxyprogesterone acetate for endometrioid adenocarcinoma and complex atypical hyperplasia: our experience and a review of the literature

  • Gynecologic Oncology
  • Published:
Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

We retrospectively analyzed oncologic and reproductive outcomes of fertility-seeking premenopausal women with complex atypical hyperplasia (CAH) or Grade 1 endometrial adenocarcinoma (G1EA) who underwent medical management with high-dose medroxyprogesterone acetate (MPA) therapy.

Methods

Patients were given a dose of 400–600 mg of MPA orally on a daily basis. They had histologically confirmed CAH or G1EA at presumed stage IA and wished to preserve fertility. Endometrial tissue sampling was carried out by dilation and curettage before and after the treatment and the pathologic response to MPA treatment was assessed.

Results

A total of 27 premenopausal patients received MPA therapy. The median follow-up time was 39.2 months (3.4–153.8 months). Complete response was achieved in 81.8 % (9/11) of CAH cases and 68.8 % (11/16) of G1EA. Although no recurrences were found in CAH patients, nine G1EA patients (81.8 %) eventually recurred and underwent total hysterectomy. Neither therapeutic death nor irreversible toxicities were observed during the follow-up periods. Five patients (4 CAH and 1 G1EA) became pregnant and had nine live births.

Conclusion

The high efficacy of fertility-sparing treatment with MPA was shown demonstrated. MPA therapy can be considered acceptable for the purpose of enabling patients to preserve their fertility. However, the rate of recurrence was high in patients with G1EA. Even in responders, close follow-up is required and a total hysterectomy needs to be considered without delay. Patients should be aware of the risks and limitations of this conservative treatment.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Gallup DG, Stock RJ (1984) Adenocarcinoma of the endometrium in women 40 years of age or younger. Obstet Gynecol 64(3):417–420

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Center for Cancer Control and Information Services. Cancer statistics in Japan; Table download. http://ganjoho.jp/professional/statistics/statistics.html. Accessed 23 Feb 2014

  3. Matsuda T, Marugame T, Kamo K, Katanoda K, Ajiki W, Sobue T et al (2011) Cancer incidence and incidence rates in Japan in 2005: based on data from 12 population-based cancer registries in the monitoring of cancer incidence in Japan (MCIJ) project. Jpn J Clin Oncol 41(1):139–147

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Gunderson CC, Fader AN, Carson KA, Bristow RE (2012) Oncologic and reproductive outcomes with progestin therapy in women with endometrial hyperplasia and grade 1 adenocarcinoma: a systematic review. Gynecol Oncol 125(2):477–482

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Chiva L, Lapuente F, González-Cortijo L, Carballo N, García JF, Rojo A et al (2008) Sparing fertility in young patients with endometrial cancer. Gynecol Oncol 111:S101–S104

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Erkanli S, Ayhan A (2010) Fertility-sparing therapy in young women with endometrial cancer: 2010 update. Int J Gynecol Cancer 20(7):1170–1187

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Ramirez PT, Frumovitz M, Bodurka DC, Sun CC, Levenback C (2004) Hormonal therapy for the management of grade 1 endometrial adenocarcinoma: a literature review. Gynecol Oncol 95(1):133–138

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Park JY, Seong SJ, Kim TJ, Kim JW, Kim SM, Bae DS et al (2013) Pregnancy outcomes after fertility-sparing management in young women with early endometrial cancer. Obstet Gynecol 121(1):136–142

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Ushijima K, Yahata H, Yoshikawa H, Konishi I, Yasugi T, Saito T et al (2007) Multicenter phase II study of fertility-sparing treatment with medroxyprogesterone acetate for endometrial carcinoma and atypical hyperplasia in young women. J Clin Oncol 25(19):2798–2803

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Tangjitgamol S, Manusirivithaya S, Hanprasertpong J (2009) Fertility-sparing in endometrial cancer. Gynecol Obstet Invest 67(4):250–268

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Demirkiran F, Yavuz E, Erenel H, Bese T, Arvas M, Sanioglu C (2012) Which is the best technique for endometrial sampling? Aspiration (pipelle) versus dilatation and curettage (D&C). Arch Gynecol Obstet 286:1277–1282

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. National Cancer Institute Cancer Therapy Evaluation Program Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE). http://ctep.cancer.gov/protocolDevelopment/electronic_applications/ctc.htm#ctc_40. Accessed 3 Feb 2014

  13. Minaguchi T, Nakagawa S, Takazawa Y, Nei T, Horie K, Fujiwara T et al (2007) Combined phospho-Akt and PTEN expressions associated with post-treatment hysterectomy after conservative progestin therapy in complex atypical hyperplasia and stage Ia, G1 adenocarcinoma of the endometrium. Cancer Lett 248(1):112–122

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Kaku T, Yoshikawa H, Tsuda H, Sakamoto A, Fukunaga M, Kuwabara Y et al (2001) Conservative therapy for adenocarcinoma and atypical endometrial hyperplasia of the endometrium in young women: central pathologic review and treatment outcome. Cancer Lett 167(1):39–48

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Hahn HS, Yoon SG, Hong JS, Hong SR, Park SJ, Lim JY et al (2009) Conservative treatment with progestin and pregnancy outcomes in endometrial cancer. Int J Gynecol Cancer 19(6):1068–1073

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Yamazawa K, Hirai M, Fujito A, Nishi H, Terauchi F, Ishikura H et al (2007) Fertility-preserving treatment with progestin, and pathological criteria to predict responses, in young women with endometrial cancer. Hum Reprod 22(7):1953–1958

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Yahata T, Fujita K, Aoki Y, Tanaka K (2006) Long-term conservative therapy for endometrial adenocarcinoma in young women. Hum Reprod 21(4):1070–1075

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Ota T, Yoshida M, Kimura M, Kinoshita K (2005) Clinicopathologic study of uterine endometrial carcinoma in young women aged 40 years and younger. Int J Gynecol Cancer 15(4):657–662

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Park H, Seok JM, Yoon BS, Seong SJ, Kim JY, Shim JY et al (2012) Effectiveness of high-dose progestin and long-term outcomes in young women with early-stage, well-differentiated endometrioid adenocarcinoma of uterine endometrium. Arch Gynecol Obstet 285(2):473–478

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Niwa K, Tagami K, Lian Z, Onogi K, Mori H, Tamaya T (2005) Outcome of fertility-preserving treatment in young women with endometrial carcinomas. BJOG 112(3):317–320

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Fujiwara H, Jobo T, Takei Y, Saga Y, Imai M, Arai T et al (2012) Fertility-sparing treatment using medroxyprogesterone acetate for endometrial carcinoma. Oncol Lett 3(5):1002–1006

    CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Evans-Metcalf ER, Brooks SE, Reale FR, Baker SP (1998) Profile of women 45 years of age and younger with endometrial cancer. Obstet Gynecol 91:349–354

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Morice P, Fourchotte V, Sideris L, Gariel C, Duvillard P, Castaigne D (2005) A need for laparoscopic evaluation of patients with endometrial carcinoma selected for conservative treatment. Gynecol Oncol 96:245–248

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Lee SY, Kim MK, Park H, Yoon BS, Seong SJ, Kang JH et al (2010) The effectiveness of levonorgestrel releasing intrauterine system in the treatment of endometrial hyperplasia in Korean women. J Gynecol Oncol 21(2):102–10525

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Klipstein S, Regan M, Ryley DA, Goldman MB, Alper MM, Reindollar RH (2005) One last chance for pregnancy: a review of 2,705 in vitro fertilization cycles initiated in women age 40 years and above. Fertil Steril 84:435–445

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Govender Y, Avenant C, Verhoog NJ, Ray RM, Grantham NJ, Africander D, Hapgood JP (2014) The injectable-only contraceptive medroxyprogesterone acetate, unlike norethisterone acetate and progesterone, regulates inflammatory genes in endocervical cells via the glucocorticoid receptor. PLoS One 9:e96497

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Africander DJ, Storbeck KH, Hapgood JP (2014) A comparative study of the androgenic properties of progesterone and the progestins, medroxyprogesterone acetate (MPA) and norethisterone acetate (NET-A). J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol 143C:404–415

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Creasman WT, Soper JT, McCarty KS, Hinshaw W, Clarke-Pearson DL (1985) Influence of cytoplasmic steroid receptor content on prognosis of early stage endometrial carcinoma. Am J Obstet Gynecol 151(7):922–932

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. National Comprehensive Cancer Network. NCCN Practice guidelines in oncology. http://www.nccn.org/professionals/physician_gls/recently_updated.asp. Accessed 26 Jul 2013

  30. Gallos ID, Shehmar M, Thangaratinam S, Papapostolou TK, Coomarasamy A, Gupta JK (2010) Oral progestogens vs levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system for endometrial hyperplasia: a systematic review and metaanalysis. Am J Obstet Gynecol 203(6):547e1–547e10

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Montz FJ, Bristow RE, Bovicelli A, Tomacruz R, Kurman RJ (2002) Intrauterine progesterone treatment of early endometrial cancer. Am J Obstet Gynecol 186(4):651–657

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Dhar KK, NeedhiRajan T, Koslowski M, Woolas RP (2005) Is levonorgestrel intrauterine system effective for treatment of early endometrial cancer? report of four cases and review of the literature. Gynecol Oncol 97(3):924–927

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Kim MK, Seong SJ, Kim YS, Song T, Kim ML, Yoon BS et al (2013) Combined medroxyprogesterone acetate/levonorgestrel-intrauterine system treatment in young women with early-stage endometrial cancer. Am J Obstet Gynecol 209(4):358e1–358e4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Gallos ID, Yap J, Rajkhowa M, Luesley DM, Coomarasamy A, Gupta JK (2012) Regression, relapse, and live birth rates with fertility-sparing therapy for endometrial cancer and atypical complex endometrial hyperplasia: a systematic review and metaanalysis. Am J Obstet Gynecol 207(4):266e1–266e12

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Ichinose M, Fujimoto A, Osuga Y, Minaguchi T, Kawana K, Yano T et al (2013) The influence of infertility treatment on the prognosis of endometrial cancer and atypical complex endometrial hyperplasia. Int J Gynecol Cancer 23(2):288–293

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We thank Yuko Nishimura for her secretarial assistance and Yuri Matsumoto for her statistical advices.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest in the research.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kenjiro Sawada.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ohyagi-Hara, C., Sawada, K., Aki, I. et al. Efficacies and pregnant outcomes of fertility-sparing treatment with medroxyprogesterone acetate for endometrioid adenocarcinoma and complex atypical hyperplasia: our experience and a review of the literature. Arch Gynecol Obstet 291, 151–157 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-014-3417-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-014-3417-z

Keywords

Navigation