Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Retrospective evaluation of borderline ovarian tumors: single center experience of 183 cases

  • Gynecologic Oncology
  • Published:
Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

Borderline ovarian tumors (BOTs) constitute about a quarter of epithelial ovarian malignancies and require different treatment approaches. The present study aims to document the experience of a single center on the treatment outcome of women who had conservative or comprehensive surgery for BOTs.

Methods

One hundred eighty-three patients with BOTs, diagnosed and/or treated in our center between January of 2000 and March of 2013, were reviewed retrospectively.

Results

The mean age at diagnosis was 40.6 years old (range 17–78). Ninety-five patients (51 %) were ≤40 years. Comprehensive surgical staging and fertility sparing surgery were performed in 49 % (n = 91) and 48 % of patients (n = 89) respectively. A hundred and forty-seven patients had stage IA disease (80 %). The most common type of BOT was serous in histology with 18 % bilateralism. CA-125 and CA-199 levels were increased in 29 (19 %) and 15 (10 %) patients with stage IA disease. Non-invasive tumor implants were diagnosed in 9 patients (4 %) and uterine involvement was 2 % among BOT patients that underwent hysterectomies. The mean post-operative follow-up period was 20.4 months (range 6–78 months). Disease recurrence was seen in 5 patients indicating overall recurrence rate of 2.7 %.

Conclusions

In our study, we evaluated a large data pool of 183 patients diagnosed with borderline epithelial ovarian tumors. BOTs have a relatively better prognosis than invasive epithelial ovarian cancer. Surgery with proper staging is the cornerstone of treatment. Patients with BOTs at the early stage can undergo fertility sparing surgery with close follow-up.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Seidman JD, Soslow RA, Vang R, Berman JJ, Stoler MH, Sherman ME, Oliva E, Kajdacsy-Balla A, Berman DM, Copeland LJ (2004) Borderline ovarian tumors: diverse contemporary viewpoints on terminology and diagnostic criteria with illustrative images. Hum Pathol 35(8):918–933

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Trope CG, Kaern J, Davidson B (2012) Borderline ovarian tumours. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol 26(3):325–336. doi:10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2011.12.006

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Ayhan A, Guvendag Guven ES, Guven S, Kucukali T (2005) Recurrence and prognostic factors in borderline ovarian tumors. Gynecol Oncol 98(3):439–445. doi:10.1016/j.ygyno.2005.05.033

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Poncelet C, Fauvet R, Yazbeck C, Coutant C, Darai E (2010) Impact of serum tumor marker determination on the management of women with borderline ovarian tumors: multivariate analysis of a French multicentre study. Eur J Surg Oncol J Eur Soc Surg Oncol Br Assoc Surg Oncol 36(11):1066–1072. doi:10.1016/j.ejso.2010.07.004

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Menczer J, Chetrit A, Sadetzki S (2012) The effect of hysterectomy on survival of patients with borderline ovarian tumors. Gynecol Oncol 125(2):372–375. doi:10.1016/j.ygyno.2012.02.017

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Kanat-Pektas M, Ozat M, Gungor T, Sahin I, Yalcin H, Ozdal B (2011) Complete lymph node dissection: is it essential for the treatment of borderline epithelial ovarian tumors? Arch Gynecol Obstet 283(4):879–884. doi:10.1007/s00404-010-1539-5

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Tinelli R, Tinelli A, Tinelli FG, Cicinelli E, Malvasi A (2006) Conservative surgery for borderline ovarian tumors: a review. Gynecol Oncol 100(1):185–191. doi:10.1016/j.ygyno.2005.09.021

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Yinon Y, Beiner ME, Gotlieb WH, Korach Y, Perri T, Ben-Baruch G (2007) Clinical outcome of cystectomy compared with unilateral salpingo-oophorectomy as fertility-sparing treatment of borderline ovarian tumors. Fertil Steril 88(2):479–484. doi:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2006.11.128

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Park JY, Kim DY, Kim JH, Kim YM, Kim YT, Nam JH (2009) Surgical management of borderline ovarian tumors: the role of fertility-sparing surgery. Gynecol Oncol 113(1):75–82. doi:10.1016/j.ygyno.2008.12.034

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Wu TI, Lee CL, Wu MY, Hsueh S, Huang KG, Yeh CJ, Lai CH (2009) Prognostic factors predicting recurrence in borderline ovarian tumors. Gynecol Oncol 114(2):237–241. doi:10.1016/j.ygyno.2009.05.018

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Morice P, Uzan C, Fauvet R, Gouy S, Duvillard P, Darai E (2012) Borderline ovarian tumour: pathological diagnostic dilemma and risk factors for invasive or lethal recurrence. Lancet Oncol 13(3):e103–e115. doi:10.1016/S1470-2045(11)70288-1

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Gotlieb WH, Chetrit A, Menczer J, Hirsh-Yechezkel G, Lubin F, Friedman E, Modan B, Ben-Baruch G (2005) Demographic and genetic characteristics of patients with borderline ovarian tumors as compared to early stage invasive ovarian cancer. Gynecol Oncol 97(3):780–783. doi:10.1016/j.ygyno.2005.02.022

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Romagnolo C, Gadducci A, Sartori E, Zola P, Maggino T (2006) Management of borderline ovarian tumors: results of an Italian multicenter study. Gynecol Oncol 101(2):255–260. doi:10.1016/j.ygyno.2005.10.014

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Messalli EM, Grauso F, Balbi G, Napolitano A, Seguino E, Torella M (2013) Borderline ovarian tumors: features and controversial aspects. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 167(1):86–89. doi:10.1016/j.ejogrb.2012.11.002

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. McCluggage WG (2010) The pathology of and controversial aspects of ovarian borderline tumours. Curr Opin Oncol 22(5):462–472. doi:10.1097/CCO.0b013e32833b0dc1

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Avril S, Hahn E, Specht K, Hauptmann S, Hoss C, Kiechle M, Hofler H, Schmalfeldt B (2012) Histopathologic features of ovarian borderline tumors are not predictive of clinical outcome. Gynecol Oncol 127(3):516–524. doi:10.1016/j.ygyno.2012.08.027

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Park JY, Kim DY, Kim JH, Kim YM, Kim KR, Kim YT, Nam JH (2011) Micropapillary pattern in serous borderline ovarian tumors: does it matter? Gynecol Oncol 123(3):511–516. doi:10.1016/j.ygyno.2011.08.008

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Acs G (2005) Serous and mucinous borderline (low malignant potential) tumors of the ovary. Am J Clin Pathol 123(Suppl):S13–S57

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Lesieur B, Kane A, Duvillard P, Gouy S, Pautier P, Lhomme C, Morice P, Uzan C (2011) Prognostic value of lymph node involvement in ovarian serous borderline tumors. Am J Obstet Gynecol 204(5):438 e1–438 e7. doi:10.1016/j.ajog.2010.12.055

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Tinelli R, Malzoni M, Cosentino F, Perone C, Tinelli A, Malvasi A, Cicinelli E (2009) Feasibility, safety, and efficacy of conservative laparoscopic treatment of borderline ovarian tumors. Fertil Steril 92(2):736–741. doi:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2008.07.1716

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. du Bois A, Ewald-Riegler N, de Gregorio N, Reuss A, Mahner S, Fotopoulou C, Kommoss F, Schmalfeldt B, Hilpert F, Fehm T, Burges A, Meier W, Hillemanns P, Hanker L, Hasenburg A, Strauss HG, Hellriegel M, Wimberger P, Keyver-Paik MD, Baumann K, Canzler U, Wollschlaeger K, Forner D, Pfisterer J, Schroder W, Munstedt K, Richter B, Kommoss S, Hauptmann S, Arbeitsgmeinschaft Gynakologische Onkologie Study G (2013) Borderline tumours of the ovary: a cohort study of the Arbeitsgmeinschaft Gynakologische Onkologie (AGO) Study Group. Eur J Cancer 49(8):1905–1914. doi:10.1016/j.ejca.2013.01.035

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Nam JH (2010) Borderline ovarian tumors and fertility. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol 22(3):227–234. doi:10.1097/GCO.0b013e3283384928

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Kanat-Pektas M, Ozat M, Gungor T, Dikici T, Yilmaz B, Mollamahmutoglu L (2011) Fertility outcome after conservative surgery for borderline ovarian tumors: a single center experience. Arch Gynecol Obstet 284(5):1253–1258. doi:10.1007/s00404-010-1804-7

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nilufer Cetinkaya.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Gungor, T., Cetinkaya, N., Yalcin, H. et al. Retrospective evaluation of borderline ovarian tumors: single center experience of 183 cases. Arch Gynecol Obstet 291, 123–130 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-014-3381-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-014-3381-7

Keywords

Navigation