Abstract
Introduction
Colposcopic inspection of the vagina is a routine component of the safety assessment of intravaginal products. However, colposcopic findings occur frequently in healthy women, raising questions about their relevance to intravaginal product safety. Practical disadvantages limit the utility of colposcopy for evaluating menstrual tampons, among them the presence of background microtrauma, the inability to assess effects during menstruation, and, importantly, the question of whether post hoc assessments are sufficiently sensitive to detect small inflammatory changes. The Behind-The-Knee (BTK) test is an alternative for evaluating inflammatory and tissue dryness effects of physical articles by their repeated application to the popliteal fossa under an elastic bandage. It enables concurrent parallel comparisons of experimental and control articles over time and substantially increases the sensitivity of detecting small changes in tissue inflammation.
Material and methods
With the protocol, uncompressed experimental and control tampons yielded comparable relative and absolute erythema scores (after overnight recovery) as did colposcopic assessment of the lower genital tract 3–48 h after menstrual use. Scoring erythema in the BTK test immediately after product removal increased the level of visually discernible inflammation sixfold. In a study of commercial menstrual pads, subclinical inflammation visualized with cross-polarized light correlated with the frequency of subjective reports of discomfort during the test and discriminated the relative tolerability of the two products determined by market surveillance, providing added confidence in the predictive value of the test.
Conclusion
We believe the BTK test can be a valuable alternative to colposcopy for assessing inflammation and dryness associated with menstrual tampons.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
CONRAD/WHO (2011) Manual for standardization of colposcopy for the evaluation of vaginal products, update 2004. Available from http://www.conrad.org/assets/attachments/Revised_Manual.PDF (Cited 7 Feb 2011)
Mauck CK, Baker JM, Birnkrant DB, Rowe PJ, Gabelnick HL (2000) The use of colposcopy in assessing vaginal irritation in research. AIDS (London, England) 14(15):2221–2227
O’Neill E, Reeves MF, Creinin MD (2008) Baseline colposcopic findings in women entering studies on female vaginal products. Contraception 78(2):162–166
Fraser IS, Lahteenmaki P, Elomaa K, Lacarra M, Mishell DR Jr, Alvarez F et al (1999) Variations in vaginal epithelial surface appearance determined by colposcopic inspection in healthy, sexually active women. Hum reprod (Oxford, England) 14(8):1974–1978
Norvell MK, Benrubi GI, Thompson RJ (1984) Investigation of microtrauma after sexual intercourse. J Reprod Med 29(4):269–271
Ballagh SA, Mauck CK, Henry D, Archer DF, Abercrombie T, Callahan MM et al (2004) A comparison of techniques to assess cervicovaginal irritation and evaluation of the variability between two observers. Contraception 70(3):241–249
Farage MA, Singh M, Ledger WJ (2009) Investigation of the sensitivity of a cross-polarized light visualization system to detect subclinical erythema and dryness in women with vulvovaginitis. Am J Obstet Gynecol 201(1):20.e1–20.e6
Wensveen C, Kagie M, Nagelkerke N, Trimbos B (2007) Interobserver agreement on interpreting hand drawings of colposcopy in women with borderline cytology to predict high-grade lesions. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 135(1):123–126
Cummins JE Jr, Doncel GF (2009) Biomarkers of cervicovaginal inflammation for the assessment of microbicide safety. Sex Transm Dis 36(3 Suppl):S84–S91
Farage MA, Gilpin DA, Enane NA, Baldwin S (2001) Development of a new test for mechanical irritation: behind the knee as a test site. Skin Res Technol 7(3):193–203
Farage MA (2009) Sensory effects and irritation: a strong relationship. In: Barel AO, Paye M, Maibach HI (eds) Handbook of cosmetic science and technology, 3rd edn. Informa Health Care, New York, pp 381–389
Farage MA, Miller KW, Ledger WJ (2011) Can the BTK clinical test be used to evaluate the mechanical irritation potential for products intended for contact with mucous membranes? In: Surber C, Elsner P, Farage MA (eds) Topical applications and the mucosa. Curr Prob Dermatol, vol 40. Karger, Basel, pp 125–132
Acknowledgments
The authors acknowledge Deborah Hutchins, PhD ELS for assistance in preparing the manuscript.
Conflict of interest
None.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
With kind permission from Open Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology (OJOG, ISSN: 2160-8806) Scientific Research Publishing (SCIRP). Farage, Miller, Ledger .2012; The “Behind-The-Knee” test for menstrual tampon irritation. Open Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 2012, 2, 34–38.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Farage, M.A., Miller, K.W. & Ledger, W.J. Assessing menstrual tampon irritation using the “Behind-The-Knee” test. Arch Gynecol Obstet 287, 435–439 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-012-2641-7
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-012-2641-7