Abstract
Purpose
To compare different repair techniques and different suture materials for episiotomy.
Methods
160 women having vertex delivery with right-mediolateral episiotomy were randomly allocated to four groups. In the groups where continuos technique was performed, vaginal mucosa, perineal muscles and the skin were sutured continuously. In the groups of interrupted technique, vaginal mucosa was sutured with continuous sutures, then muscle layers and skin were closed by interrupted sutures. Two different types of synthetic absorbed suture material were used: monofilament type is in form of polyglycolide-co-caprolactone and multifilament one is polyglactin 910-Rapide. Perineal pain during different activities on the first and tenth day postpartum and also during sexual intercourse 6 weeks after the delivery was questioned by visual analogous scale (VAS). Furthermore, repair time, amount of suture and episiotomy complications were investigated in each groups.
Results
On the first day after delivery, the perineal pain scores, the repair time, the amount of suture were statistically less in the continuous technique groups. The differences between the pain at tenth day and during sexual intercourse 6 weeks after the delivery were statistically same.
Conclusions
The continuous suturing techniques for episiotomy closure, compared to interrupted methods, are associated with less short-term pain, are quicker and also need less suture material.
References
Thacker SB, Banta HD (1983) Benefits and risks of episiotomy: an interpretative review of the english language literature, 1860–1980. Obstet Gynecol Surv 38:322–338
Scott JR (2005) Episotomy and vaginal trauma. Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am 32:307–321
Hartmenn K, Viswanathan M, Palmieri R, Gartlehner G, Thorp J Jr, Lohr KN (2005) Outcomes of routine episiotomy: a systematic review. JAMA 293:2141–2148
Weber AM, Meyn L (2002) Episiotomy use in the United States, 1979–1997. Obstet Gynecol 100:1177–1182
Sleep J (1991) Perineal care, a series of 5 randomized controlled trials. In: Robinson S, Thomson A (eds) Midwives research and childbirth. Chapman and Hall, London, pp 199–251
Kettle C, Johanson RB (2000) Continuous versus interrupted sutures for perineal repair. Cochrane Database Syst Rev CD000947
Kettle C, Johanson RB (2005) Absorbable synthetic versus catgut suture material for perineal repair (Cochrane Review). In: The Cochrane Library, issue 2. Update Software, Oxford
Kettle C, Johanson RB (2003) Continuous versus interrupted sutures for perineal repair. Cochrane Database Syst Rev CD000947
Isager-Sally L, Legarth J, Jacobsen B, Bostofte E (1986) Episiotomy and repair: immediate and long term sequelae—a prospective randomized study of three different methods of repair. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 93:420–425
Grant A (1989) The choice of suture materials and techniques for repair of perineal trauma: an overview of the evidence from controlled trials. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 96:1281–1289
Rucker MP (1930) Immediate perineorrhaphy with knotless sutures. Am J Obstet Gynaecol 38:707
Daniela P, Davide L, Sergio C, Nicola R (2006) A randomized comparison of suturing techniques for episiotomy and laceration repair after spontaneous vaginal birth. J Minim Invasive Gynaecol Sep 13(5):457–462
Fleming N (1990) Can the suturing method make a difference in postpartum, perineal pain. J Nurse Midwifery 35:19–25
Kettle C, Hills RK, Jones P et al (2002) Continuous versus interrupted perineal repair with standard or rapidly absorbed sutures after spontaneous vaginal birth: a randomised controlled trial. Lancet 359:2217–2223
Kettle C, Hills R, Ismail K (2007) Continuous versus interrupted sutures for repair of episiotomy or second degree tears. Cochrane Database Syst Rev CD000974
Valenzuela P, Saiz Puente MS, Valero JL, Azorin R, Ortega R, Guijarro R (2009) Continuous versus interrupted sutures for repair of episiotomy or second-degree perineal tears: a randomised controlled trial. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 116:436–441
McElhinney BR, Glenn DR, Dornan G, Harper MA (2000) Episiotomy repair: vicryl versus vicryl rapide. Ulster Med J 69:27–29
Conflict of interest
None.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Kokanalı, D., Ugur, M., Kuntay Kokanalı, M. et al. Continuous versus interrupted episiotomy repair with monofilament or multifilament absorbed suture materials: a randomised controlled trial. Arch Gynecol Obstet 284, 275–280 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-010-1620-0
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-010-1620-0