Skip to main content
Log in

Surgical repair of genitourinary fistulae: comparison of our experience at Turkey and Niger

Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objective

Report of the personal experience at repairing urogenital fistulae comparing the etiology, management, and outcomes in a developed and underdeveloped countries.

Materials and methods

Fifty-three patients with urogenital fistulae were surgically repaired at two different countries. Twenty-nine of those were treated in Istanbul, Turkey during last 10 years period and the other 24 patients were operated in Maradi, Niger in August 2007. Detailed information on obstetric history and previous surgical procedures were questioned in all of the patients. Specific evaluation included instillation of dye in the bladder to locate the site of the fistula and intravenous urography were applied to patients with suspected urogenital fistula to confirm the fistula tract. The site, number and the size of fistula, as well as the pliability of tissues was assessed before the operation. The position of patients for surgery and the route of repair were individualized according to the appropriate access to the fistulae. Patients were reviewed 4–10 weeks after surgery to determine the end results of the operations.

Results

Over all, obstetric complications (47%) were the most common cause of urogenital fistulae. Gynecologic surgeries were responsible for 41% of the cases. Although obstetric causes were prominent at patients in Niger, gynecological surgery was the main cause in Turkey. The most common type of fistulae was vesicovaginal. With regard to surgical approach to urogenital fistulae; the transabdominal approach was chosen in 12 (22.6%) of patients and transvaginal repair was performed in 41 (77.4%) of patients; 94.34% of the patients were completely dry after the first attempt.

Conclusion

A high percentage of patients with genital fistulae can be rendered dry and continent by assessment of these conditions; meticulous attention must be applied for the absence of inflammation and infection at the fistula site before the operation. Surgical team must be experienced at both abdominal and vaginal repair. Broad-spectrum antibiotics and continuous bladder drainage must be applied to all patients for at least 2 weeks. Interposition flaps must be used in complex cases.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Romics I, Zs. Kelemen ZS, Fazakas ZS (2002) The diagnosis and management of vesicovaginal fistulae. BJU Int 89:764–766

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Lee AL, Symmonds RE, Williams TJ (1988) Current status of genitourinary fistula. Obstet Gynecol 72:313–319

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Mueller ER, Kenton KS, Burubaker L (2005) Modern management of genitourinary fistula. J Pelvic Med Surg 11:223–234

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Waaldijk K (2004) The immediate management of fresh obstetric fistulas. Am J Obstet Gynecol 191:795–799

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Holme A, Breen M, MacArthur C (2007) Obstetric fistulae: a study of women managed at the Monze Mission Hospital, Zambia. Br J Obstet Gynecol 114:1010–1017

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Kelly J (1995) Ethiopia: an epidemiological study of vesicovaginal fistula in Addis Ababa. World Health Statistics Quarterly Rapport Trimestriel de Statistiques Sanitaries Mondiales 48:15–17

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Wook Bai S, Hahun E, Jung DJ, Park JH, Ra KH, Kim SK, Hyun Park K (2006) Urinary tract injuries during pelvic surgery: incidence rates and predisposing factors. Int Urogynecol J 17:360–364

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Dorairajan G, Reddi Rani P, Habeebullah S (2004) Urological injuries during hysterectomies: a six-year review. J Obstet Gynaecol 30(6):430–435

    Google Scholar 

  9. Tancer ML (1986) Vesicouterine fistula: a review. Obstet Gynecol Surv 41:743–753

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Ayed M, Atat R, Benhassine L, Sfaxi M, Chebil M, Zmerli S (2006) Prognostic factors of recurrence after vesicovaginal fistula repair. Int J Urol 13:345–349

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Collins CG, Collins JH, Harrison BR (1971) Early repair of vesicovaginal fistula. Am J Obstet Gynecol 111:524–528

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Persky L, Herman G, Guerrier K (1979) Non-delay in vesico-vaginal fistula repair. J Urol 13:273

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Cruikshank SH (1988) Early closure of post hysterectomy vesicovaginal fistulas. South Med J 81:1525

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Lawson J (1972) Vesical fistulae into the vaginal vault. Br J Urol 44:623–631

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Dupont MC, Raz S (1996) Vaginal approach to vesicovaginal fistula repair. Urology 48:7–9

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Browning A (2006) Risk factors for developing residual urinary incontinence after obstetric fistula repair. Br J Obstet Gynecol 113:482–485

    CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Murat Ekin.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Savan, K., Ekin, M., Kupelioglu, L. et al. Surgical repair of genitourinary fistulae: comparison of our experience at Turkey and Niger. Arch Gynecol Obstet 282, 649–653 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-009-1311-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-009-1311-x

Keywords

Navigation