Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Risk factors for preeclampsia in Japanese twin pregnancies: comparison with those in singleton pregnancies

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objective

To identify the factors associated with the increased risk of developing preeclampsia in twin pregnancies compared with those in singleton pregnancies.

Methods

We reviewed the obstetric records of all deliveries at ≥22 weeks’ gestation managed at the Japanese Red Cross Katsushika Maternity Hospital between 2001 and 2007.

Results

The incidence of preeclampsia in the twin pregnancies (7.6%: 45 in 593) was significantly higher than that in the singleton pregnancies (1.7%: 196 in 11,311; P < 0.01). In singleton pregnancies, the developing preeclampsia was associated with maternal age at ≥35 years, primiparity, maternal BMI ≥25 before pregnancy, history of infertility therapies such as IVF and having a history of previous preeclampsia. In twin pregnancies, however, the developing preeclampsia was not associated with these variables.

Conclusions

In Japanese women, the factors reported to be associated with the increased risk of preeclampsia in singleton pregnancies may not alter the increased risk of preeclampsia in twin pregnancies.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Coonrod DV, Hickok DE, Zhu K, Eastering TR, Daling JR (1995) Risk factors for preeclampsia in twin pregnancies: a population-based cohort study. Obstet Gynecol 85:645–650. doi:10.1016/0029-7844(95)00049-W

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Duckitt K, Harrington D (2005) Risk factors for pre-eclampsia at antenatal booking: systematic review of controlled studies. BMJ 330:565. doi:10.1136/bmj.38380.674340.E0

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Rao A, Sairam S, Shehata H (2004) Obstetric complications of twin pregnancies. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol 18:557–576. doi:10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2004.04.007

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Hardardottir H, Kelly K, Bork MD, Cusick W, Campbell WA, Rodis JF (1996) Atypical presentation of preeclampsia in high-order multifetal gestations. Obstet Gynecol 87:370–374. doi:10.1016/0029-7844(95)00425-4

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Sibai BM (1990) The HELLP syndrome (hemolysis, elevated liver enzymes, and low platelets): much ado about nothing? Am J Obstet Gynecol 162:311–316

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Campbell DM, MacGillivray I (1999) Preeclampsia in twin pregnancies: incidence and outcome. Hypertens Pregnancy 18:197–207. doi:10.3109/10641959909016193

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Erez O, Vardi IS, Hallak M, Hershkovitz R, Dukler D, Mazor M (2006) Preeclampsia in twin pregnancies: association with IVF treatments, parity and maternal age. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 19:141–146. doi:10.1080/14767050500246045

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Jackson RA, Gibson KA, Wu YW, Crougham MS (2004) Perinatal outcomes in singletons following in vitro fertilization: a meta-analysis. Obstet Gynecol 103:551–563

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Joseph KS, Allen AC, Dodds L, Turner LA, Scott H, Liston R (2005) The perinatal effects of delayed childbearing. Obstet Gynecol 105:1410–1418

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Reddy UM, Wapner RJ, Rebar RW, Tasca RJ (2007) Infertility, assisted reproductive technology, and adverse pregnancy outcomes: executive summary of National Institute of Child Health and Human Development workshop. Obstet Gynecol 109:967–977

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Savvidou MD, Karanastasi E, Skentou C, Greets L, Nicolaides KH (2001) Twin chorionicity and pre-eclampsia. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 18:228–231. doi:10.1046/j.0960-7692.2001.00470.x

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Ziadeh SM (2002) Maternal and perinatal outcome in nulliparous women aged 35 and more. Gynecol Obstet Invest 54:6–10. doi:10.1159/000064689

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Berkowitz KM (1998) Insulin-resistance and preeclampsia. Clin Perinatol 25:873–885

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of interest statement

None.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Shunji Suzuki.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Suzuki, S., Igarashi, M. Risk factors for preeclampsia in Japanese twin pregnancies: comparison with those in singleton pregnancies. Arch Gynecol Obstet 280, 389–393 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-009-0932-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-009-0932-4

Keywords

Navigation