Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Skin barrier function in infancy: a systematic review

  • Review
  • Published:
Archives of Dermatological Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The skin of neonates and infants exhibits distinct anatomical and functional properties that might be clinically reflected by its characteristic susceptibility to skin barrier disruption. In this systematic review, we aimed to characterize skin barrier maturation as reflected by transepidermal water loss (TEWL) and skin surface pH during the first 2 years of life. We systematically searched MEDLINE and EMBASE via OVID from 1975 to 2013 to identify primary studies reporting TEWL and/or skin surface pH values in healthy full-term infants aged 0–24 months without any cutaneous diseases. After full text assessment, 36 studies reporting n = 8,483 TEWL measurements for 26 anatomical areas and n = 6,437 skin surface pH measurements for 14 anatomical areas were included. The mean age of the subjects ranged from 1.4 h to 1.2 years. The lowest pH of 4.63 was identified on the forehead at the age of 25.6 weeks, whereas the highest of 7.31 was on the volar forearm at 0.0 weeks. The lowest TEWL value of 3.1 g/m2/h was reported for the back at 0.6 weeks and the highest of 43.1 g/m2/h for the upper leg at 58.7 weeks. The skin surface pH reveals a steep decline during the first postnatal week, succeeded by a further gradual site-specific acidification process during the first month. A competent permeability barrier in most anatomical areas is indicated by TEWL, which does not exhibit a time-dependent development during the first 2 years of life.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Ali SM, Yosipovitch G (2013) Skin pH: from basic science to basic skin care. Acta Derm Venereol 93(3):261–267. doi:10.2340/00015555-1531

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Behne MJ, Barry NP, Hanson KM, Aronchik I, Clegg RW, Gratton E, Feingold K, Holleran WM, Elias PM, Mauro TM (2003) Neonatal development of the stratum corneum pH gradient: localization and mechanisms leading to emergence of optimal barrier function. J Invest Dermatol 120(6):998–1006

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Berardesca E, Masson P, Rodrigues L, Gummer CL, Lévêque JL, Loden M, Piérard G, Rogiers V, Salter D, Sauermann G, Serup J, Trevethan MA (1997) EEMCO guidance for the assessment of stratum corneum hydration: electrical methods. Skin Res Technol 3(2):126–132

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Blume-Peytavi U, Hauser M, Stamatas GN, Pathirana D, Bartels NG (2012) Skin care practices for newborns and infants: review of the clinical evidence for best practices. Pediatr Dermatol 29(1):1–14

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Chan A, Mauro T (2011) Acidification in the epidermis and the role of secretory phospholipases. Dermatoendocrinol 3(2):84–90

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Chilcott RP, Farrar R (2000) Biophysical measurements of human forearm skin in vivo: effects of site, gender, chirality and time. Skin Res Technol 6(2):64–69

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Chiou YB, Blume-Peytavi U (2004) Stratum corneum maturation: a review of neonatal skin function. Skin Pharmacol Physiol 17(2):57–66

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Cork MJ, Danby SG, Vasilopoulos Y, Hadgraft J, Lane ME, Moustafa M, Guy RH, Macgowan AL, Tazi-Ahnini R, Ward SJ (2009) Epidermal barrier dysfunction in atopic dermatitis. J Invest Dermatol 129(8):1892–1908. doi:10.1038/jid.2009.133

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Crowther JM, Sieg A, Blenkiron P, Marcott C, Matts PJ, Kaczvinsky JR, Rawlings AV (2008) Measuring the effects of topical moisturizers on changes in stratum corneum thickness, water gradients and hydration in vivo. Br J Dermatol 159(3):567–577

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Darlenski R, Fluhr JW (2012) Influence of skin type, race, sex, and anatomic location on epidermal barrier function. Clin Dermatol 30(3):269–273. doi:10.1016/j.clindermatol.2011.08.013

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. De Benedetto A, Kubo A, Beck LA (2012) Skin barrier disruption: a requirement for allergen sensitization. J Invest Dermatol 132(3 Pt 2):949–963

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Du Plessis J, Stefaniak A, Eloff F, John S, Agner T, Chou TC, Nixon R, Steiner M, Franken A, Kudla I, Holness L (2013) International guidelines for the in vivo assessment of skin properties in non-clinical settings: Part 2. transepidermal water loss and skin hydration. Skin Res Technol 19(3):265–278. doi:10.1111/srt.12037

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Elias PM (2005) Stratum corneum defensive functions: an integrated view. J Invest Dermatol 125(2):183–200. doi:10.1111/j.0022-202X.2005.23668.x

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Elias PM (2006) Defensive functions of the stratum corneum: integrative aspects. In: Elias PM, Feingold K (eds) Skin barrier. Taylor & Francis, New York, pp 5–14

    Google Scholar 

  15. Elias PM, Wakefield JS (2011) Therapeutic implications of a barrier-based pathogenesis of atopic dermatitis. Clin Rev Allergy Immunol 41(3):282–295

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Elkeeb R, Hui X, Chan H, Tian L, Maibach HI (2010) Correlation of transepidermal water loss with skin barrier properties in vitro: comparison of three evaporimeters. Skin Res Technol 16(1):9–15

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Eriksson M, Storm H, Fremming A, Schollin J (2008) Skin conductance compared to a combined behavioural and physiological pain measure in newborn infants. Acta Paediatr 97(1):27–30. doi:10.1111/j.1651-2227.2007.00586.x

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Farahmand S, Tien L, Hui X, Maibach HI (2009) Measuring transepidermal water loss: a comparative in vivo study of condenser-chamber, unventilated-chamber and open-chamber systems. Skin Res Technol 15(4):392–398

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Flohr C, England K, Radulovic S, McLean WHI, Campbell LE, Barker J, Perkin M, Lack G (2010) Filaggrin loss-of-function mutations are associated with early-onset eczema, eczema severity and transepidermal water loss at 3 months of age. Br J Dermatol 163(6):1333–1336. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2133.2010.10068.x

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Fluhr JW, Behne MJ, Brown BE, Moskowitz DG, Selden C, Mao-Qiang M, Mauro TM, Elias PM, Feingold KR (2004) Stratum corneum acidification in neonatal skin: secretory phospholipase A2 and the sodium/hydrogen antiporter-1 acidify neonatal rat stratum corneum. J Invest Dermatol 122(2):320–329. doi:10.1046/j.0022-202X.2003.22204.x

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Fluhr JW, Darlenski R, Lachmann N, Baudouin C, Msika P, De Belilovsky C, Hachem JP (2012) Infant epidermal skin physiology: adaptation after birth. Br J Dermatol 166(3):483–490

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Fluhr JW, Darlenski R, Taieb A, Hachem J, Baudouin C, Msika P, De Belilovsky C, Berardesca E (2010) Functional skin adaptation in infancy-almost complete but not fully competent. Exp Dermatol 19(6):483–492

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Fluhr JW, Dickel H, Kuss O, Weyher I, Diepgen TL, Berardesca E (2002) Impact of anatomical location on barrier recovery, surface pH and stratum corneum hydration after acute barrier disruption. Br J Dermatol 146(5):770–776

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Fluhr JW, Feingold KR, Elias PM (2006) Transepidermal water loss reflects permeability barrier status: validation in human and rodent in vivo and ex vivo models. Exp Dermatol 15(7):483–492

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Fluhr JW, Mao-Qiang M, Brown BE, Hachem JP, Moskowitz DG, Demerjian M, Haftek M, Serre G, Crumrine D, Mauro TM, Elias PM, Feingold KR (2004) Functional consequences of a neutral pH in neonatal rat stratum corneum. J Invest Dermatol 123(1):140–151

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Garcia Bartels N, Massoudy L, Scheufele R, Dietz E, Proquitté H, Wauer R, Bertin C, Serrano J, Blume-Peytavi U (2012) Standardized diaper care regimen: a prospective, randomized pilot study on skin barrier function and epidermal IL-1α in newborns. Pediatr Dermatol 29(3):270–276. doi:10.1111/j.1525-1470.2011.01590.x

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Garcia Bartels N, Mleczko A, Schink T, Proquitté H, Wauer RR, Blume-Peytavi U (2009) Influence of bathing or washing on skin barrier function in newborns during the first four weeks of life. Skin Pharmacol Physiol 22(5):248–257

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Garcia Bartels N, Rösler S, Martus P, Stroux A, Lönnfors S, Reißhauer A, Blume-Peytavi U (2011) Effect of baby swimming and baby lotion on the skin barrier of infants aged 3–6 months. JDDG J Dtsch Dermatol Ges 9(12):1018–1025. doi:10.1111/j.1610-0387.2011.07710.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Garcia Bartels N, Scheufele R, Prosch F, Schink T, Proquitté H, Wauer RR, Blume-Peytavi U (2010) Effect of standardized skin care regimens on neonatal skin barrier function in different body areas. Pediatr Dermatol 27(1):1–8

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Gunathilake R, Schurer NY, Shoo BA, Celli A, Hachem JP, Crumrine D, Sirimanna G, Feingold KR, Mauro TM, Elias PM (2009) pH-regulated mechanisms account for pigment-type differences in epidermal barrier function. J Invest Dermatol 129(7):1719–1729

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. Hatano Y, Man MQ, Uchida Y, Crumrine D, Scharschmidt TC, Kim EG, Mauro TM, Feingold KR, Elias PM, Holleran WM (2009) Maintenance of an acidic stratum corneum prevents emergence of murine atopic dermatitis. J Invest Dermatol 129(7):1824–1835

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. Kleesz P, Darlenski R, Fluhr JW (2012) Full-body skin mapping for six biophysical parameters: baseline values at 16 anatomical sites in 125 human subjects. Skin Pharmacol Physiol 25(1):25–33. doi:10.1159/000330721

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Kottner J, Lichterfeld A, Blume-Peytavi U (2013) Transepidermal water loss in young and aged healthy humans: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Arch Dermatol Res 305(4):315–323

    Google Scholar 

  34. Ludriksone L, Garcia Bartels N, Kanti V, Blume-Peytavi U, Kottner J (2013) Skin barrier function in infancy: a systematic review. 2013 edn. PROSPERO: International prospective register of systematic reviews. CRD42013003794. Available from http://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/display_record.asp?ID=CRD42013003794

  35. Man MQ, Xin SJ, Song SP, Cho SY, Zhang XJ, Tu CX, Feingold KR, Elias PM (2009) Variation of skin surface pH, sebum content and stratum corneum hydration with age and gender in a large chinese population. Skin Pharmacol Physiol 22(4):190–199

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  36. Mauro TM (2006) SC pH: measurement, origins, and functions. In: Elias PM, Feingold K (eds) Skin barrier. Taylor & Francis, New York, pp 223–229

    Google Scholar 

  37. Myer K, Maibach H (2013) Stratum corneum evaluation methods: overview. Skin Res Technol 19(3):213–219

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Nikolovski J, Stamatas GN, Kollias N, Wiegand BC (2008) Barrier function and water-holding and transport properties of infant stratum corneum are different from adult and continue to develop through the first year of life. J Invest Dermatol 128(7):1728–1736

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Parra JL, Paye M (2003) EEMCO guidance for the in vivo assessment of skin surface pH. Skin Pharmacol Physiol 16(3):188–202

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Rodrigues L, Pereira LM (1998) Basal transepidermal water loss: right/left forearm difference and motoric dominance. Skin Res Technol 4(3):135–137

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Rogiers V (2001) EEMCO guidance for the assessment of transepidermal water loss in cosmetic sciences. Skin Pharmacol Physiol 14(2):117–128

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Schmid-Wendtner MH, Korting HC (2006) The pH of the skin surface and its impact on the barrier function. Skin Pharmacol Physiol 19(6):296–302

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Schreml S, Meier RJ, Wolfbeis OS, Maisch T, Szeimies RM, Landthaler M, Regensburger J, Santarelli F, Klimant I, Babilas P (2011) 2D luminescence imaging of physiological wound oxygenation. Exp Dermatol 20(7):550–554

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Sotoodian B, Maibach HI (2012) Noninvasive test methods for epidermal barrier function. Clin Dermatol 30(3):301–310

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Sparavigna A, Setaro M, Gualandri V (1999) Cutaneous pH in children affected by atopic dermatitis and in healthy children: a multicenter study. Skin Res Technol 5(4):221–227. doi:10.1111/j.1600-0846.1999.tb00134.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Stamatas GN, Nikolovski J, Luedtke MA, Kollias N, Wiegand BC (2010) Infant skin microstructure assessed in vivo differs from adult skin in organization and at the cellular level. Pediatr Dermatol 27(2):125–131. doi:10.1111/j.1525-1470.2009.00973.x

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Stefaniak AB, Plessis J, John SM, Eloff F, Agner T, Chou TC, Nixon R, Steiner MFC, Kudla I, Linn Holness D (2013) International guidelines for the in vivo assessment of skin properties in non-clinical settings: Part 1. pH. Skin Res Technol 19(2):59–68. doi:10.1155/2011/170693

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  48. Steiner M, Aikman-Green S, Prescott GJ, Dick FD (2011) Side-by-side comparison of an open-chamber (TM 300) and a closed-chamber (Vapometer™) transepidermal water loss meter. Skin Res Technol 17(3):366–372

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Tagami H, Kikuchi K (2005) Diseases that affect barrier function. In: Elias PM, Feingold KR (eds) Skin barrier. Taylor & Francis, New York, p 450

    Google Scholar 

  50. Telofski LS, Morello AP, MacK Correa MC, Stamatas GN (2012) The infant skin barrier: can we preserve, protect, and enhance the barrier? Dermatol Res Pract 2012. Art no:198789. doi:10.1155/2012/198789

Related article(s) recently published in Archives of Dermatological Research (selected by the journal’s editorial staff)

  1. Ishikawa J, Shimotoyodome Y, Ito S, Miyauchi Y, Fujimura T, Kitahara T, Hase T (2013) Variations in the ceramide profile in different seasons and regions of the body contribute to stratum corneum functions. Arch Dermatol Res 305:151–162

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Dermatology and Allergy, Clinical Research Center for Hair and Skin Science, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Charitéplatz 1, 10117, Berlin, Germany

    Laine Ludriksone, Natalie Garcia Bartels, Varvara Kanti, Ulrike Blume-Peytavi & Jan Kottner

Authors
  1. Laine Ludriksone
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Natalie Garcia Bartels
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Varvara Kanti
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Ulrike Blume-Peytavi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Jan Kottner
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ulrike Blume-Peytavi.

Additional information

L. Ludriksone and N. Garcia Bartels contributed equally to this paper.

Electronic supplementary material

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ludriksone, L., Garcia Bartels, N., Kanti, V. et al. Skin barrier function in infancy: a systematic review. Arch Dermatol Res 306, 591–599 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00403-014-1458-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00403-014-1458-6

Keywords

Search

Navigation