Skip to main content
Log in

Eponymous hip joint approaches

  • Hip Arthroplasty
  • Published:
Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

After the low friction arthroplasty by John Charnley was no longer confined to specialized hospitals but commonplace in the general orthopedic practice, the issue remained how to most optimally reach the hip. The names of the authors of these approaches remain in a lot of cases connected to the approach. By evaluating the original articles in which the approaches are described we ascertain the original description and technique. By various sources we obtained the (short) biography of the people whose name is connected to the approach. Our research covers the biographies of colleagues Smith-Petersen, Watson-Jones, Hardinge, Charnley, Moore and Ludloff. The eponymous approaches are shown and described after the short biography on each individual. This study shows that without the work of our colleagues we cannot proceed in our profession. An understanding and knowledge of the people who dedicated themselves to developing the orthopedic surgery to the high standard it has today is the least honour we should give them.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Learmonth ID, Young C, Rorabeck C (2007) The operation of the century: total hip replacement. Lancet 370(9597):1508–1519

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Gomez PF, Morcuende JA (2005) A historical and economic perspective on Sir John Charnley, Chas F. Thackray Limited, and the early arthoplasty industry. Iowa Orthop J 25:30–37

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Mostofi SB (2005) Who’s who in orthopedics. In: Mostofi SB (ed). Springer-Verlag, London

  4. Smith-Petersen MN (1953) Lancet 265(6777):145–146

    Google Scholar 

  5. Smith-Petersen MN (1953) 1886–1953. J Bone Jt Surg Br 35-B(3):482–484

  6. Smith-Petersen MN (1978) The classic: evolution of mould arthroplasty of the hip joint by M. N. Smith-Petersen, J. Bone Jt Surg. 30B:L:59, 1948. Clin Orthop Relat Res (134):5–11

  7. Obituary MN Smith-Petersen (1953) J Bone Jt Surg 53:1042–1045

  8. Hoppenfeld S, DeBoer P, Buckley R (2009) Surgical exposures in orthopaedics, the anatomic approach, 4th edn. Lippincott Williams and Wilkins, Philadelphia

    Google Scholar 

  9. Petis S, Howard JL, Lanting BL, Vasarhelyi EM (2015) Surgical approach in primary total hip arthroplasty: anatomy, technique and clinical outcomes. Can J Surg 58(2):128–139

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Hagy M (2004) “Keeping up with the Joneses”—the story of Sir Robert Jones and Sir Reginald Watson-Jones. Iowa Orthop J 24:133–137

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. In memoriam (1972) Sir Reginald Watson-Jones. J Bone Jt Surg Am 54(8):1591–1592

  12. Medicine: Amazing thighbone. TIME magazine

  13. Watson-Jones R (1976) Fractures and joint injuries. Wilson JN (ed), 5th edn. Churchill-Livingstone, pp 328–337

  14. Watson-Jones R (1936) Fractures of the neck of the femur. Br J Surg 23:787–808

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Wroblewski BM (2002) Professor Sir John Charnley (1911–1982). Rheumatology (Oxford) 41(7):824–825

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Brand RA (2010) Biographical sketch: Sir John Charnley MD, 1911–1982. Clin Orthop Relat Res 468(12):3147–3148. doi:10.1007/s11999-010-1547-6

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Donald SM (2007) Sir John Charnley (1911–1982): inspiration to future generations of orthopaedic surgeons. Scott Med J 52(2):43–46

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Wroblewski BM, Siney PD, Fleming PA (2009) Charnley low-frictional torque arthroplasty: follow-up for 30 to 40 years. J Bone Jt Surg Br 91(4):447–450

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Charnley J (1979) Low friction arthroplasty of the hip. theory and practice. Springer-Verlag, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  20. Charnley J (1964) The bonding of prosthesis to bone by cement. J Bone Jt Surg Br 46-B:518–529

  21. Personal communication with Dr. Hardinge

  22. Hardinge K (1982) The direct lateral approach to the hip. J Bone Jt Surg Br 64(1):17–19

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. None listed (1964) Austin Talley Moore 1899–1963. J Bone Jt Surg Am 46(2):465–466

  24. Moore AT, Bohlman HR (2006) Metal hip joint: a case report. 1942. Clin Orthop Relat Res 453:22–24

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Moore AT (1952) Metal hip joint; a new self-locking vitallium prosthesis. South Med J 45(11):1015–1019

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Moore AT (1957) The self-locking metal hip prosthesis. J Bone Jt Surg Am 39-A(4):811–827

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Goldstein WM, Branson JJ (2004) Posterior-lateral approach to minimal incision total hip arthroplasty. Orthop Clin N Am 35(2):131–136

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Hahn O (1934) Karl Ludloff zum Siebzigsten Geburtstag. Klin Wochenschr 13(22):823

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Professor Dr. Karl Ludloff zu seinem 65. Geburtstage (1930) Arch für orthopädische und Unfall-CHirurgie, mit Bes Berücksichtigung der Frakturenlehre und der orthopädisch-chirurgischen Tech 28(1):131

  30. Ludloff K (1902) Zur Pathogenese und Therapie der angeborenen Hüftgelenksluxationen, 1st edn. Verlag von Gustav Fischer, Jena

    Google Scholar 

  31. Ludloff K (1908) Zur blutigen Einrenkung der angeborenen Huftluxation. Zeitsch Orthop Chir 22:272–276

    Google Scholar 

  32. Tarassoli P, Gargan MF, Atherton WG, Thomas SRYW (2014) The medial approach for the treatment of children with developmental dysplasia of the hip. Bone Jt J 96-B(3):406–413

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Rachbauer F (2006) Minimally invasive total hip arthroplasty. Anterior approach. Orthopade 35(7):723–724 (726–729)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Poehling-Monaghan KL, Kamath AF, Taunton MJ, Pagnano MW (2015) Direct anterior versus miniposterior THA with the same advanced perioperative protocols: surprising early clinical results. Clin Orthop Relat Res 473(2):623–631

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Graves SC, Dropkin BM, Keeney BJ, Lurie JD, Tomek IM (2016) Does surgical approach affect patient-reported function after primary THA? Clin Orthop Relat Res 474(4):971–981. doi:10.1007/s11999-015-4639-5

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. de Steiger RN, Lorimer M, Solomon M (2015) What is the learning curve for the anterior approach for total hip arthroplasty? Clin Orthop Relat Res 473(12):3860–3866

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Melman WPR, Mollen BP, Kollen BJ, Verheyen CCPM (2015) First experiences with the direct anterior approach in lateral decubitus position: learning curve and 1 year complication rate. Hip Int 25(3):251–257. doi:10.5301/hipint.5000221

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Park Y, Lee SB, Seok SO, Jo BW, Ha JW (2015) Perioperative surgical complications and learning curve associated with minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: a single-institute experience. Clin Orthop Surg 7(1):91–96

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  39. Berger RA (2003) Total hip arthroplasty using the minimally invasive two-incision approach. Clin Orthop Relat Res 417:232–241

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Yang B, Li H, He X, Wang G, Xu S (2012) Minimally invasive surgical approaches and traditional total hip arthroplasty: a meta-analysis of radiological and complications outcomes. PLoS One 7(5):e37947

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  41. Xu C-P, Li X, Song J-Q, Cui Z, Yu B (2013) Mini-incision versus standard incision total hip arthroplasty regarding surgical outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. PLoS One 8(11):e80021

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  42. Yue C, Kang P, Pei F (2015) Comparison of direct anterior and lateral approaches in total hip arthroplasty: a systematic review and meta-analysis (PRISMA). Medicine (Baltimore) 94(50):e2126

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Biau DJ, Porcher R, Roren A, Babinet A, Rosencher N, Chevret S et al (2015) Neither pre-operative education or a minimally invasive procedure have any influence on the recovery time after total hip replacement. Int Orthop 39(8):1475–1481

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Tilbury C, Schaasberg W, Plevier JWM, Fiocco M, Nelissen RGHH, Vliet Vlieland TPM (2014) Return to work after total hip and knee arthroplasty: a systematic review. Rheumatology (Oxford) 53(3):512–525

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. den Hartog YM, Mathijssen NMC, Vehmeijer SBW (2015) Total hip arthroplasty in an outpatient setting in 27 selected patients. Acta Orthop 86(6):667–670

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank Dr. Hardinge for giving valuable information on both himself and on Sir John Charnley. Without the help of Piet deBoer we would never been able to get a clear and anatomically correct overview of all the different approaches. Also the help of Rebecca Nieuwe Weme in the processing of the figures is deeply appreciated.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Matthijs P. Somford.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Somford, M.P., Hoornenborg, D., Wiegerinck, J.I. et al. Eponymous hip joint approaches. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 136, 1007–1014 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-016-2456-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-016-2456-2

Keywords

Navigation