Skip to main content
Log in

Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion versus corpectomy and fusion in treating two-level adjacent cervical spondylotic myelopathy: a minimum 5-year follow-up study

  • Orthopaedic Surgery
  • Published:
Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objective

A retrospective study was performed to compare the clinical and radiological outcomes of two-level anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) with those of single-level anterior cervical corpectomy and fusion (ACCF) in treating two adjacent level cervical spondylotic myelopathy (CSM) with at least 5-year follow-up.

Methods

A total of 46 consecutive patients who underwent surgery for the treatment of two-level CSM in our institution were evaluated from February 2002 to December 2007. In this series, 22 patients underwent two-level ACDF (group ACDF) and 24 received single-level ACCF (group ACCF). The operation duration, blood loss, perioperative complication, fusion rate, neural function (mJOA score) and the segmental lordosis of the surgical level were compared between the two groups.

Results

The mean follow-up time was 84.5 ± 13 months in group ACDF and 86 ± 11 months in group ACCF (P = 0.723). The rates of perioperative complications were 18.2 % in group ACDF and 20.8 % in group ACCF, respectively (P > 0.05). Although there was no significant difference in neural function (mJOA score) between the two groups at the final follow-up (P > 0.05), the blood loss and the operation duration were significantly less in group ACDF than those in group ACCF (P < 0.05). The fusion rates at the 12th week after surgery were 86.4 % (19/22) in group ACDF and 87.5 % (21/24) in group ACCF (P > 0.05). According to the radiographs measurement, the segmental lordosis at the surgical segment was significantly greater in group ACDF than that in group ACCF (P < 0.05).

Conclusion

There were high fusion rates and excellent clinical outcomes in both ACDF and ACCF for treating two adjacent level CSM. However, there were less blood loss, less operation duration and better cervical lordosis in group ACDF than those in group ACCF.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Fehlings MG, Barry S, Kopjar B et al (2013) Anterior versus posterior surgical approaches to treat cervical spondylotic myelopathy: outcomes of the prospective multicenter AOSpine North America CSM study in 264 patients. Spine 38(26):2247–2252

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Shamji MF, Massicotte EM, Traynelis VC et al (2013) Comparison of anterior surgical options for the treatment of multilevel cervical spondylotic myelopathy: a systematic review. Spine 38(22 Suppl 1):S195–S209

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Song KJ, Lee KB, Song JH (2012) Efficacy of multilevel anterior cervical discectomy and fusion versus corpectomy and fusion for multilevel cervical spondylotic myelopathy: a minimum 5-year follow-up study. Eur Spine J 21(8):1551–1557

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Silber JS, Anderson DG, Daffner SD et al (2003) Donor site morbidity after anterior iliac crest bone harvest for single-level anterior cervical discectomy and fusion. Spine 28:134–139

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Rao RD, Gourab K, David KS (2006) Operative treatment of cervical spondylotic myelopathy. J Bone Joint Surg Am 88:1619–1640

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Fukui M, Chiba K, Kawakami M et al (2007) An outcome measure for patients with cervical myelopathy: Japanese Orthopaedic Association Cervical Myelopathy Evaluation Questionnaire (JOACMEQ): Part 1. J Orthop Sci 12:227–240

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Mummaneni PV, Burkus JK, Haid RW et al (2007) Clinical and radiographic analysis of cervical disc arthroplasty compared with allograft fusion: a randomized controlled clinical trial. J Neurosurg Spine 6:198–209

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Dufour T, Huppert J, Louis C et al (2010) Radiological analysis of 37 segments in cervical spine implanted with a peek stand-alone device, with at least one year follow-up. Br J Neurosurg 24:633–640

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Traynelis VC, Arnold PM, Fourney DR et al (2013) Alternative procedures for the treatment of cervical spondylotic myelopathy: arthroplasty, oblique corpectomy, skip laminectomy: evaluation of comparative effectiveness and safety. Spine 38(22 Suppl 1):S210–S231

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Konya D, Ozgen S, Gercek A et al (2009) Outcomes for combined anterior and posterior surgical approaches for patients with multisegmental cervical spondylotic myelopathy. J Clin Neurosci 16:404–409

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Oh MC, Zhang HY, Park JY et al (2009) Two-level anterior cervical discectomy versus one-level corpectomy in cervical spondylotic myelopathy. Spine 34(7):692–696

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Park Y, Maeda T, Cho W et al (2010) Comparison of anterior cervical fusion after two-level discectomy or single-level corpectomy: sagittal alignment, cervical lordosis, graft collapse, and adjacent-level ossification. Spine J 10:193–199

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Aghayev K, Doulgeris JJ, Gonzalez-Blohm SA et al (2014) Biomechanical comparison of a two-level anterior discectomy and a one-level corpectomy, combined with fusion and anterior plate reconstruction in the cervical spine. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon) 29(1):21–25

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Burkhardt JK, Mannion AF, Marbacher S et al (2013) A comparative effectiveness study of patient-rated and radiographic outcome after 2 types of decompression with fusion for spondylotic myelopathy: anterior cervical discectomy versus corpectomy. Neurosurg Focus 35(1):E4

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Song KJ, Lee KB, Song JH (2012) Efficacy of multilevel anterior cervical discectomy and fusion versus corpectomy and fusion for multilevel cervical spondylotic myelopathy: a minimum 5-year follow-up study. Eur Spine J 21:1551–1557

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Wang JC, McDonough PW, Endow KK et al (2000) Increased fusion rates with cervical plating for two-level anterior cervical discectomy and fusion. Spine 25:41–45

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Swank ML, Lowery GL, Bhat AL et al (1997) Anterior cervical allograft arthrodesis and instrumentation: multilevel interbody grafting or strut graft reconstruction. Eur Spine J 6:138–143

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Chibbaro S, Benvenuti L, Carnesecchi S et al (2006) Anterior cervical corpectomy for cervical spondylotic myelopathy: experience and surgical results in a series of 70 consecutive patients. J Clin Neurosci 13:233–238

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Chagas H, Domingues F, Aversa A et al (2005) Cervical spondylotic myelopathy: 10 years of prospective outcome analysis of anterior decompression and fusion. Surg Neurol 64 Suppl 1:S30–S35

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Uribe JS, Sangala JR, Duckworth EA et al (2009) Comparison between anterior cervical discectomy fusion and cervical corpectomy fusion using titanium cages for reconstruction: analysis of outcome and long-term follow-up. Eur Spine J 18:654–662

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Gok B, Sciubba DM, McLoughlin GS et al (2008) Surgical treatment of cervical spondylotic myelopathy with anterior compression: a review of 67 cases. J Neurosurg Spine 9(2):152–157

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Liu Y, Qi M, Chen H et al (2012) Comparative analysis of complications of different reconstructive techniques following anterior decompression for multilevel cervical spondylotic myelopathy. Eur Spine J 21(12):2428–2435

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of interest

No benefits in any form have been or will be received from any commercial party related directly and indirectly to the subject of this manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Zhili Liu.

Additional information

J. Liu and X. Chen contributed equally to this study and share the first authorship.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Liu, J., Chen, X., Liu, Z. et al. Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion versus corpectomy and fusion in treating two-level adjacent cervical spondylotic myelopathy: a minimum 5-year follow-up study. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 135, 149–153 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-014-2123-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-014-2123-4

Keywords

Navigation