Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Total knee arthroplasty with rotating-hinge Endo-Model prosthesis: clinical results in complex primary and revision surgery

  • Knee Arthroplasty
  • Published:
Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Introduction

Rotating-hinge knee implants are highly constrained devices able to provide the stability needed for arthroplasty in case of severe bone loss and complex instability. Notable doubts still exist in using rotating-hinge devices, mainly due to risk of mechanical failure and risk of infection.

Materials and methods

We retrospectively evaluated the functional and clinical outcomes in a series of patients treated with the rotating-hinge Endo-Model prosthesis either for primary or revision total knee arthroplasty. Between 1997 and 2009 we implanted 123 Endo-Model prosthesis (118 patients) at our institution. At the time of this study we could evaluate 45 prosthesis (25 primary and 20 revision TKAs) from the clinical and radiological site, with average follow-up of 42.2 months.

Results

During the follow-up period, three patients reported complications, which in two cases finally led to revision with explantation. Mean survival of the implants attested at 93.3 %. The average post-operative clinical Knee Society score in the evaluated series was 94.2, the functional one 78.7. The average range of motion was 0°–108°. No signs of joint instability or misalignment were noted. Pain was present in a minority of patients, but always at a mild/occasional extent. No evidences of loosening or implant failure have been reported. No substantial divergences in the outcomes have been found across different patient categories after stratification in agreement with the Knee Society.

Conclusions

Coherent with previously published works, we confirm the Endo-Model prosthesis to provide excellent pain relief, restoration of walking capacity and intrinsic knee stability both in complex primary and in revision knee arthroplasty, with good or excellent results in the majority of patients and acceptable complication rate.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Morgan H, Battista V, Leopold SS (2005) Constraint in primary total knee arthroplasty. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 13:515–524

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Sculco TP (2006) The role of constraint in total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 21(4 Suppl 1):54–56

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Petrou G, Petrou H, Tilkeridis C, Stavrakis T, Kapetsis T, Kremmiddas N, Gavras M (2004) Medium-term results with a primary cemented rotating-hinge total knee replacement. J Bone Jt Surg 86-B:813–817

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Berend KD, Lombardi AV (2009) Distal femoral replacement in nontumor cases with severe bone loss and instability. Clin Orthop Relat Res 467:485–492

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Pacha-Vincente D, Malik A, Castellet-Feliu E, Nardi-Vilardaga J (2008) Dislocation of rotating hinge knee prosthesis with antidislocation mechanism. J Arthroplasty 23(2):299–303

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Wang CJ, Wang HE (2000) Early catastrophic failure of rotating hinge total knee prosthesis. J Arthroplasty 15(3):387–391

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Guenoun B, Latargez L, Freslon M, Defossez G, Salas N, Gayet LE (2009) Complications following rotating hinge Endo-Modell (Link) knee arthroplasty. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res 95:529–536

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Insall JN, Dorr LD, Scott RD, Scott WN (1989) Rationale of the Knee Society clinical rating system. Clin Orthop Relat Res 248:13–14

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Barrack RL (2001) Evolution of rotating hinge for complex total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 392:292–299

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Barrack RL (2002) Rise of rotating hinge in revision total knee arthroplasty. Orthopaedics 25(10):1020–1021

    Google Scholar 

  11. Pradhan NR, Bale L, Kay P, Porter ML (2004) Salvage revision total knee replacement using the Endo-Model rotating hinge prosthesis. Knee 11:469–473

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Back DL, David L, Hilton A, Blunn G, Briggs TW, Cannon SR (2008) The SMILES prosthesis in salvage revision knee surgery. Knee 15:40–44

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Barrack RL, Lyons TR, Ingraham RQ, Johnson JC (2000) The use of a modular rotating hinge component in salvage revision total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 15:858–866

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Jones RE, Barrack RL, Skedros J (2001) Modular, mobile-bearing total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 392:306–314

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Jones RE, Skedros JG, Chan AJ, Beauchamp DH, Harkins PC (2001) Total knee arthroplasty using the S-ROM mobile-bearing hinge prosthesis. J Arthroplasty 16:279–287

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Lombardi AV Jr, Mallory TH, Eberle RW, Adams JB (1997) Rotating hinge prosthesis in revision total knee arthroplasty: indications and results. Surg Tech Int 6:379–382

    Google Scholar 

  17. Pour AE, Parvizi J, Slenker N, Purtill JJ, Sharkey PF (2007) Rotating hinged knee replacement: use with caution. J Bone Jt Surg 89:1735–1741

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Springer BD, Hanssen AD, Sim FH, Lewallen DG (2001) The kinematic rotating hinge prosthesis for complex knee arhtroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 392:283–291

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Springer BD, Sim FH, Hanssen AD, Lewallen DG (2004) The modular segmental kinematic rotating hinge for nonneoplastic limb salvage. Clin Orthop Relat Res 421:181–187

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Ward WG, Haight D, Ritchie P, Gordon S, EcKardt JJ (2003) Dislocation of rotating hinge total knee prosthesis: a biomechanical analysis. J Bone Jt Surg Am 85:448–453

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Westrich GH, Mollano AV, Sculco TP, Buly RL, Laskins RS, Windsor S (2000) Rotating hinge total knee arthroplasty in severely affected knees. Clin Orthop Relat Res 379:195–208

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Gudnason A, Milbrink J, Hailer NP (2011) Implant survival and outcome after rotating-hinge total knee revision arthroplasty: a minimum 6-year follow-up. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 131(11):1601–1607

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Yang JH, Yoon JR, Oh CH, Kim TS (2012) Primary total knee arthroplasty using rotating-hinge prosthesis in severely affected knees. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 20(3):517–523

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Bistolfi A, Lustig S, Rosso F, Dalmasso P, Crova M, Massazza G (2013) Results with 98 Endo-Modell rotating hinge prostheses for primary knee arthroplasty. Orthopaedics 36(6):e746–e752

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Bistolfi A, Rosso F, Crova M, Massazza G (2013) Endo-Modell rotating-hinge total knee for revision total knee arthroplasty. Orthopaedics 36(10):e1299–e1306

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Efe T, Roessler PP, Heyse TJ, Hauk C, Pahrmann C, Getgood A, Schmitt J (2012) Mid-term results after implantation of rotating-hinge knee prostheses: primary versus revision. Orthop Rev 4(e35):155–159

    Google Scholar 

  27. Joshi N, Navarro-Quilis A (2008) Is there a place for rotating-hinge arthroplasty in knee revision surgery for aseptic loosening? J Arthroplasty 23(8):1204–1211

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Argenson J, Aubaniac JM (2000) Total knee arthroplasty in femorotibial instability. Orthopäde 29:S45–S47

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Engelbrecht E, Nieder E, Strickle E, Keller A (1981) Intracondylare Kniegelenksendo-prosthese mit Rotationsmöglichkeit Endo-Modell. Chirurg 52:368–375

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Zhang F, Liu Y, Xiao Y, Liu W (2014) Clinical outcomes of primary rotating-hinge knee arthroplasty for knees with severe deformity. Chin Med J 127(9):1791–1793

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of interest

The authors, their immediate family and any research foundation with which they are affiliated have not received any financial payments or other benefits from any commercial entity related to the subject of this article. The authors state that they have full control of all primary data and that they agree to allow the journal to review their data if requested.

Ethical standards

IRB approval: the IRB and Regional Ethical Committee were made aware of this work and of the submission of our data for publication, and gave formal approval. The study received the registration number 73/2014. All procedures followed were in accordance with the ethical standards of the responsible committee on human experimentation (institutional and national) and with the Helsinki Declaration of 1975, as revised in 2008. Informed consent was obtained from all patients for being included in the study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to T. Mangano.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Sanguineti, F., Mangano, T., Formica, M. et al. Total knee arthroplasty with rotating-hinge Endo-Model prosthesis: clinical results in complex primary and revision surgery. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 134, 1601–1607 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-014-2061-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-014-2061-1

Keywords

Navigation