Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Osteochondral transplantation for the treatment of osteochondral defects at the talus with the Diamond twin system® and graft harvesting from the posterior femoral condyles

  • Arthroscopy and Sports Medicine
  • Published:
Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

The aim of this study is to analyze clinical results after osteochondral cylinder transplantation for osteochondral defects at the medial or lateral talar dome using the Diamond twin system (Karl Storz). We hypothesize that grafts harvesting from the posterior femoral condyles are associated with less donor site morbidity than reported by previous studies.

Methods

We have surgically treated 20 patients with an osteochondral defect of the talus by osteochondral transplantation with the Diamond twin system via an osteotomy of the ankle. The osteochondral cylinders were harvested from the posterior aspects of the femoral condyles of the ipsilateral knee. The defects at donor site were filled with a bone substitute of tricalcium phosphate (Synthricer, Karl Storz). The mean age was 25.4 years. After a mean time of 12.6 months, the screws at the medial malleolus were removed and an arthroscopy was performed. The functional outcome was evaluated with the visual analog scale for pain at walking, running, stair climbing, quality of life at the time of implant removal and at a mean follow-up of 25.8 months. Activity was assessed with the Tegner scale. Knee function was evaluated with the Lysholm score.

Results

In one case, the osteochondral cylinder did not heal and an osteochondral fragment was removed arthroscopically. In all other cases, the osteochondral cylinder was stable with surrounding cartilage. The average ICRS Cartilage Repair Assessment was 10.1 points (±1.3). All malleolar osteotomies healed radiologically. In 15 patients, a synovectomy and local debridement of the ankle were performed at second-look arthroscopy. Ankle pain at walking, running and stair climbing as measured by a visual analog scale (10-0) decreased significantly from preoperatively to the first follow-up (mean 12.6 months) and to the second follow-up (mean 25.8 months). The ankle-related quality of life increased significantly from preoperatively to postoperatively. There was no significant change in the Lysholm score. The activity measured with the Tegner activity scale increased significantly from preoperatively to the last follow-up, but only two out of nine patients continued pivoting sports.

Conclusions

Autologous osteochondral grafting with the Diamond twin system is a reliable treatment option for symptomatic osteochondral defects of the talus. After 1 year, the majority of patients had still some complaints. However, after screw removal and second-look arthroscopy, the pain and ankle-related quality of life further improved.

Clinical relevance

The donor site morbidity after graft harvesting from the posterior aspects of the femoral condyles is lower than previously reported.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Al-Shaikh RA, Chou LB, Mann JA, Dreeben SM, Prieskorn D (2002) Autologous osteochondral grafting for talar cartilage defects. Foot Ankle Int 23(5):381–389

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Emre TY, Ege T, Cift HT, Demircioğlu DT, Seyhan B, Uzun M (2012) Open mosaicplasty in osteochondral lesions of the talus: a prospective study. J Foot Ankle Surg 51(5):556–560

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Fansa AM, Murawski CD, Imhauser CW, Nguyen JT, Kennedy JG (2011) Autologous osteochondral transplantation of the talus partially restores contact mechanics of the ankle joint. Am J Sports Med 39(11):2457–2465

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Gautier E, Kolker D, Jakob RP (2002) Treatment of cartilage defects of the talus by autologous osteochondral grafts. J Bone Jt Surg Br 84(2):237–244

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Gudas R, Kalesinskas RJ, Kimtys V, Stankevicius E, Toliusis V, Bernotavicius G, Smailys A (2005) A prospective randomized clinical study of mosaic osteochondral autologous transplantation versus microfracture for the treatment of osteochondral defects in the knee joint in young athletes. Arthroscopy 21(9):1066–1075

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Haasper C, Zelle BA, Knobloch K, Jagodzinski M, Citak M, Lotz J, Krettek C, Zeichen J (2008) No mid-term difference in mosaicplasty in previously treated versus previously untreated patients with osteochondral lesions of the talus. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 128(5):499–504

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Hangody L, Kish G, Kärpäti Z, Szerb I, Eberhardt R (1997) Treatment of osteochondritis dissecans of the talus: use of the mosaicplasty technique: a preliminary report. Foot Ankle Int 18:628–634

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Hangody L, Dobos J, Baló E, Pánics G, Hangody LR, Berkes I (2010) Clinical experiences with autologous osteochondral mosaicplasty in an athletic population: a 17-year prospective multicenter study. Am J Sports Med 38(6):1125–1133

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. http://www.fomt.info/Frageboegen/TAS-Tegner-acitivity-scale-deutsche-Version.pdf

  10. Imhoff AB, Paul J, Ottinger B, Wörtler K, Lämmle L, Spang J, Hinterwimmer S (2011) Osteochondral transplantation of the talus: long-term clinical and magnetic resonance imaging evaluation. Am J Sports Med 39(7):1487–1493

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Kim YS, Park EH, Kim YC, Koh YG, Lee JW (2012) Factors associated with the clinical outcomes of the osteochondral autograft transfer system in osteochondral lesions of the talus: second-look arthroscopic evaluation. Am J Sports Med 40(12):2709–2719

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Kitaoka HB, Alexander IJ, Adelaar RS, Nunley JA, Myerson MS, Sanders M (1994) Clinical rating systems for the ankle-hindfoot, midfoot, hallux, and lesser toes. Foot Ankle Int 15(7):349–353

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Kreuz PC, Steinwachs M, Erggelet C, Lahm A, Henle P, Niemeyer P (2006) Mosaicplasty with autogenous talar autograft for osteochondral lesions of the talus after failed primary arthroscopic management: a prospective study with a 4-year follow-up. Am J Sports Med 34(1):55–63

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Laprell H, Petersen W (2001) Autologous osteochondral transplantation using the diamond bone-cutting system (DBCS): 6–12 years’ follow-up of 35 patients with osteochondral defects at the knee joint. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 121(5):248–253

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Lin JS, Andersen LB, Juliano PJ (2010) Effectiveness of composite bone graft substitute plugs in the treatment of chondral and osteochondral lesions of the talus. J Foot Ankle Surg 49(3):224–231

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Lysholm J, Gillquist J (1982) Evaluation of knee ligament surgery results with special emphasis on use of a scoring scale. Am J Sports Med 10:150–154

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Marcacci M, Kon E, Delcogliano M, Filardo G, Busacca M, Zaffagnini S (2007) Arthroscopic autologous osteochondral grafting for cartilage defects of the knee: prospective study results at a minimum 7-year follow-up. Am J Sports Med 35(12):2014–2021

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Murawski CD, Kennedy JG (2013) Operative treatment of osteochondral lesions of the talus. J Bone Jt Surg Am 95(11):1045–1054

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Paul J, Sagstetter M, Lämmle L, Spang J, El-Azab H, Imhoff AB, Hinterwimmer S (2012) Sports activity after osteochondral transplantation of the talus. Am J Sports Med 40(4):870–874

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Paul J, Sagstetter A, Kriner M, Imhoff AB, Spang J, Hinterwimmer S (2009) Donor-site morbidity after osteochondral autologous transplantation for lesions of the talus. J Bone Jt Surg Am 91(7):1683–1688

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Reddy S, Pedowitz DI, Parekh SG, Sennett BJ, Okereke E (2007) The morbidity associated with osteochondral harvest from asymptomatic knees for the treatment of osteochondral lesions of the talus. Am J Sports Med 35(1):80–85

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Schöttle PB, Oettl GM, Agneskirchner JD, Imhoff AB (2001) Operative therapy of osteochondral lesions of the talus with autologous cartilage-bone transplantation]. Orthopade 30(1):53–58

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Smith GD, Taylor J, Almqvist KF, Erggelet C, Knutsen G, Garcia Portabella M, Smith T, Richardson JB (2005) Arthroscopic assessment of cartilage repair: a validation study of 2 scoring systems. Arthroscopy 21(12):1462–1467

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Tegner Y, Lysholm J (1985) Rating systems in the evaluation of knee ligament injuries. Clin Orthop 198:43–49

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Valderrabano V, Leumann A, Rasch H, Egelhof T, Hintermann B, Pagenstert G (2009) Knee-to-ankle mosaicplasty for the treatment of osteochondral lesions of the ankle joint. Am J Sports Med 37(Suppl 1):105S–111S

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Woelfle JV, Reichel H, Nelitz M (2013) Indications and limitations of osteochondral autologous transplantation in osteochondritis dissecans of the talus. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 21(8):1925–1930

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Woelfle JV, Reichel H, Javaheripour-Otto K, Nelitz M (2013) Clinical outcome and magnetic resonance imaging after osteochondral autologous transplantation in osteochondritis dissecans of the talus. Foot Ankle Int 34(2):173–179

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Yang C, Unursaikhan O, Lee JS, Jung UW, Kim CS, Choi SH (2013) Osteoconductivity and biodegradation of synthetic bone substitutes with different tricalcium phosphate contents in rabbits. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater. doi:10.1002/jbm.b.32984

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery, Martin Luther Hospital, Grunewald, Caspar Theyss Strasse 27-31, 14193, Berlin, Germany

    Wolf Petersen, Pouria Taheri, Andrea Achtnich, Cara Winter & Phillip Forkel

  2. Department of Trauma-, Hand- and Reconstructive Surgery, University Hospital Muenster, Muenster, Germany

    Benedikt Schliemann

Authors
  1. Wolf Petersen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Pouria Taheri
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Benedikt Schliemann
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Andrea Achtnich
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Cara Winter
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Phillip Forkel
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Wolf Petersen.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Petersen, W., Taheri, P., Schliemann, B. et al. Osteochondral transplantation for the treatment of osteochondral defects at the talus with the Diamond twin system® and graft harvesting from the posterior femoral condyles. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 134, 843–852 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-014-1991-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-014-1991-y

Keywords

Search

Navigation