Skip to main content
Log in

Percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy and interbody fusion with B-Twin expandable spinal spacer

  • Orthopaedic Surgery
  • Published:
Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF) is biomechanically sound as it ablates the degenerated disc, restores the intervertebral height, relieves foraminal stenosis, and positions the bone graft along the weight-bearing axis. But this conventional procedure also results in significant traction on the dural sac and the cauda equina and is thereby a potential source of neurologic damage. Therefore, we performed a minimally invasive technique: percutaneous endoscopic discectomy and interbody fusion (PEDIF) with B-Twin expandable spinal spacer (B-twin ESS) to treat symptomatic lumbar degenerative disc disease and explored the clinical outcome.

Methods

From June 2004 to December 2006, 43 consecutive patients with symptomatic lumbar degenerative disc disease were included in this study. There were 28 males and 15 females, with average age of 47 years (range 26–63). Following a routine micro-endoscopic discectomy or percutaneous nucleotomy, endplate curettage was meticulously carried out. The intervertebral space was packed with autograft cancellous bone cut from lumbar delivered through a 5-mm diameter funnel. The B-twin ESS was introduced into the intervertebral space and then expanded. Both stages were monitored by C-arm fluoroscopy.

Results

The mean operative time was 110 ± 36 min (80–150). The mean blood loss was 350 ± 68 ml (210–700). The mean length of hospitalization was 6.6 ± 2.9 days (3–10). All patients were evaluated in follow-up of 12–30 months (mean 18). According to radiological evidence of fusion on dynamic X-ray plain film, 31 cases (72.1%) achieved bone graft fusion after 6 months postoperatively; at the final follow-up, union of the bone graft has been established in all but one patient (97.7%). The subsidence degree of the B-twin ESS was 20–30% in 2 cases and in rest of the cases less than 10%. According to the modified criteria of Chinese Orthopaedic Association, excellent in 31 cases, good in 8 cases, fair in 3 cases, poor in 1 case, and the rate of excellent and good cases was 91%.

Conclusion

The PEDIF technique provided an option for percutaneous interbody fusion similar to that in open surgery while minimizing destruction to adjacent tissues. This technique was safe and exhibited a trend toward decreased intraoperative blood loss, length of stay and the risk of neurological complications.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Evans JH (1985) Biomechanics of lumbar fusion. Clin Orthop 193:38–46

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Kawaguchi Y, Matsui H, Tsuji H (1996) Back muscle injury after posterior lumbar spine surgery. A histologic and enzymatic analysis. Spine 21:941–944

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Bravda BM, Cinnella P (2000) Posterior endoscopic discectomy (and other procedure). Eur Spine J 9:24–29

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Foley KT, Smith MM (1997) Microendoscopic discectomy. Tech Neurosurg 3:301–307

    Google Scholar 

  5. Bergey DL, Villavicencio AT, Goldstein T, Regan JJ (2004) Endoscopic lateral transpsoas approach to the lumbar spine. Spine 29:1681–1688

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Jinkins JR (1999) The related consequences of acquired collapse of the intervertebral discs at and suprajacent to the lumbosacral junction. Riv Neuroradiol 12:15–26

    Google Scholar 

  7. Elias WJ, Simmons NE, Kaptain GJ, Chadduck JB, Whitehill R (2000) Complications of posterior lumbar interbody fusion when using a titanium-threaded cage device. J Neurosurg 93:45–52

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Isaacs RE, Podichetty VK, Santiago P et al (2005) Minimally invasive microendoscopy-assisted transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion with instrumentation. J Neurosurg 3:98–105

    Google Scholar 

  9. Schwender JD, Holly LT, Rouben DP et al (2005) Minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF): technical feasibility and initial results. J Spinal Disord Tech 18:S1–S613

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Foley KT, Holly LT, Schwender JD (2003) Minimally invasive lumbar fusion. Spine 28:S26–S35

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Jang JS, Lee SH (2005) Minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion with ipsilateral pedicle screw and contralateral facet screw fixation. J Neurosurg 3:218–223

    Google Scholar 

  12. Krismer M, Haid C, Rabl W (1996) The contribution of annulus fibers to torque resistance. Spine 21:2551–2557

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Albumi K, Panjabi MM, Kramer K et al (1990) Biomechanical evaluation of lumbar spine stability after graded facetectomies. Spine 15:1142–1147

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Fogel GR, Toohey JS, Neidre A (2006) Outcomes of L1–L2 posterior lumbar interbody fusion with the lumbar I/F cage and the variable screw placement system: reporting unexpected poor fusion results at L1–L2. Spine J 6:421–427

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Regan JJ, Yuan H, McAfee PC (1999) Laparoscopic fusion of the lumbar spine: minimally invasive spine surgery. A prospective multicenter study evaluating open and laparoscopic lumbar fusion. Spine 24:402–411

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Parikh K, Tomasino A, Knopman J, Boockvar J, Härtl R (2008) Operative results and learning curve: microscope-assisted tubular microsurgery for 1- and 2-level discectomies and laminectomies. Neurosurg Focus 25:E14

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Yoram F, Sang HL, Jose RS, Reuven G (2003) Posterior lumbar interbody fusion for degenerative disc disease using a minimally invasive B-Twin expandable spinal spacer. J Spinal Disord Tech 16:455–460

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Wenjun Wang.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Yao, N., Wang, W. & Liu, Y. Percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy and interbody fusion with B-Twin expandable spinal spacer. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 131, 791–796 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-010-1222-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-010-1222-0

Keywords

Navigation