Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Gene expression profiles in the liver of mice irradiated with 60Co gamma rays and treated with soybean isoflavone

  • ORIGINAL CONTRIBUTION
  • Published:
European Journal of Nutrition Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

To better understand the molecular mechanisms underlying the radio-protective effect of soybean isoflavone that we observed in our recent animal experiments.

Materials and methods

We utilized a cDNA microarray to investigate the expression profiles of 4,096 known genes in the livers of irradiated-mice with or without soybean isoflavone treatment. Dye swap approach was employed to control for gene-specific dye bias and quantitative real-time RT-PCR was performed on several genes to validate the cDNA microarray data.

Results

Compared with the control group, 68 genes were up-regulated and 28 genes were down-regulated in mice treated with irradiation alone, whereas only 6 genes were down-regulated and 35 genes were up-regulated in mice treated with soybean isoflavone. Interestingly, some of the down-regulated genes in the irradiated group, such as DNA repair and stress response genes and cytoskeleton-associated genes, which are markers of cellular damage after irradiation, were maintained at close to normal expression levels after soybean isoflavone treatment.

Conclusions

Comparison of gene expression profiles in the livers of irradiated-mice treated with or without soybean isoflavone suggested that soybean isoflavone may be an efficient tool to reverse irradiation damage of the liver through multiple-pathways and also provides important clues to further pursue the molecular mechanisms underlying the radio-protective activity of soybean isoflavone.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

SI::

soybean isoflavone

MAPK::

mitogen-activate protein kinase

MUK/DLK/ZPK::

Mitogen-activated protein kinase upstream kinase/dual leucine zipper-bearing kinase/leucine-zipper protein kinase

JNK::

c-Jun N-terminal kinase

MBIP::

MUK binding Inhibitory Protein

HERPUD1::

homocysteine-induced endoplasmic reticulum ubiquitin-like domain member 1

HSPA5 (GRP78)::

heat shock 70 kD protein 5 (glucose-regulated protein)

ER::

endoplasmic reticulum

Bok::

Bcl-2-related ovarian killer protein

Dusp16::

dual specificity phosphatase 16

Fdft1::

farnesyl diphosphate farnesyl transferase 1

Nfyb::

nuclear transcription factor-Y beta

Btg2::

B-cell translocation gene 2, anti-proliferative

References

  1. Weiss JF, Kumar KS, Walden TL, Neta R, Landauer MR, Clark ED (1990) Advances in radioprotection through the use of combined agent regimens. Int J Radiat Biol 57:709–722

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Ainsworth A (1988) From endotoxins to newer immunomodulators: Survival promoting effects of microbial polysaccharide complexes in irradiated animals. Pharmacol Ther 39:223–241

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Srinivasan V, Weiss JF (1992) Radioprotection by vitamin E: Injectable vitamin E administered alone or with WR 3689 enhances survival of irradiated mice. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 23:841–845

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Shimoi K, Masuda S, Furugori M, Esaki S, Kinae N (1994) Radioprotective effect of antioxidative flavonoids in gamma-ray irradiated mice. Carcinogenesis 15:2669–2672

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Uma-Devi P (2001) Radioprotecive, anticarcinogenic and antioxidant properties of the India holy basil, Ocimum sanctum (Tulasi). Indian J Exp Biol 39:185–190

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Ueda T, Toyoshima Y, Kushihashi T, Hishida T, Yasuhara H (1993) Effect of dimethyl sulfoxide pretreatment on activities of lipid peroxidase formation, superoxide dismutase, and glutathione peroxidase in the mouse liver after whole-body irradiation. J Toxicol Sci 18:239–244

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Slyshenkov VS, Omelyanchik SN, Moiseenok AG, Trebukhina RV (1998) Pantothenol protects rats against some deleterious effects of gamma radiation. Free Radic Biol Med 24:894–899

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Tham DM, Gardner CD, Haskell WL (1998) Potential health benefits of dietary phytoestrogens: a review of the clinical, epidemiological, and mechanistic evidence. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 83:2223–2235

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Messina M, Barnes S (1991) The role of soy products in reducing risk of cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst 83:541–546

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Messina MJ, Persky V, Setchell KD, Barnes S (1994) Soy intake and cancer risk: a review of the in vitro and in vivo data. Nutr Cancer 21:113–131

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Liu D, Jiang H, Grange RW (2005) Genistein activates the 3′, 5′-cyclic adenosine monophosphate signaling pathway in vascular endothelial cells and protects endothelial barrier function. Endocrinology 146:1312–1320

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Wei H, Saladi R, Lu Y, Wang Y, Palep SR, Moore J (2003) Isoflavone genistein: photoprotection and clinical implications in dermatology. J Nutr 133(11 Suppl 1):3811S–3819S

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Liu J, Chang SK, Wiesenborn D (2005) Antioxidant properties of soybean isoflavone extract and tofu in vitro and in vivo. J Agric Food Chem 53:2333–2340

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Wei H, Bowen R, Cai Q, Barnes S, Wang Y (1995) Antioxidant and antipromotional effects of the soybean isoflavone genistein. Proc Soc Exp Biol Med 208:124–130

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Wei H, Bowen R, Zhang X, Lebwohl M (1998) Isoflavone genistein inhibits the initiation and promotion of two-stage skin carcinogenesis in mice. Carcinogenesis 19:1509–1514

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Wei H, Wei L, Frenkel K, Bowen R, Barnes S (1993) Inhibition of tumor promoter-induced hydrogen peroxide formation in vitro and in vivo by genistein. Nutr Cancer 20:1–12

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Cai Q, Wei H (1996) Effect of dietary genistein on antioxidant enzyme activities in SENCAR mice. Nutr Cancer 25:1–7

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Wei H, Zhang X, Wang Y, Lebwohl M (2002) Inhibition of ultraviolet light-induced oxidative events in the skin and internal organs of hairless mice by isoflavone genistein. Cancer Lett 185:21–29

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Wei H, Cai Q, Rahn RO (1996) Inhibition of UV light- and Fenton reaction-induced oxidative DNA damage by the soybean isoflavone genistein. Carcinogenesis 17:73–77

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Terasaka S, Aita Y, Inoue A, Hayashi S, Nishigaki M, Aoyagi K, et al. (2004) Using a customized DNA microarray for expression profiling of the estrogen-responsive genes to evaluate estrogen activity among natural estrogens and industrial chemicals. Environ. Health Perspect 112:773–781

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Naciff JM, Overmann GJ, Torontali SM, Carr GJ, Tiesman JP, Daston GP (2004) Impact of the phytoestrogen content of laboratory animal feed on the gene expression profile of the reproductive system in the immature female rat. Environ. Health Perspect 112:1519–1526

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Rieger KE, Chu G (2004) Portrait of transcriptional responses to ultraviolet and ionizing radiation in human cells. Nucleic Acids Res 32:4786–4803

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Otomo T, Hishii M, Arai H, Sato K, Sasai K (2004) Microarray analysis of temporal gene responses to ionizing radiation in two glioblastoma cell lines: up-regulation of DNA repair genes. J Radiat Res (Tokyo) 45:53–60

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Kim TR, Yoon JH, Kim YC, Yook YH, Kim IG, Kim YS, et al. (2004) LPS-induced CD53 expression: a protection mechanism against oxidative and radiation stress. Mol Cells 17:125–131

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Kharbanda S, Saleem A, Shafman T, Emoto Y, Weichselbaum R, Kufe D (1994) Activation of the pp90rsk and mitogen-activated serine/threonine protein kinases by ionizing radiation. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 91:5416–5420

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Stevenson MA, Pollock SS, Coleman CN, Calderwood SK (1994) X-irradiation, phorbol esters, and H2O2 stimulate mitogen-activated protein kinase activity in NIH-3T3 cells through the formation of reactive oxygen intermediates. Cancer Res 54:12–15

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Samid D, Miller AC, Rimoldi D, Gafner J, Clark EP (1991) Increased radiation resistance in transformed and nontransformed cells with elevated ras proto-oncogene expression. Radiat Res 126:244–250

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Wei LL, Michelle AK, John AC (2005) The offloading model for dynein function: differential function of motor subunits. J Cell Biol 168: 201–207

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Mullen E, Brown RM, Osborne TF, Shay NF (2004) Soy isoflavones affect sterol regulatory element binding proteins (SREBPs) and SREBP-regulated genes in HepG2 cells. J Nutr 134:2942–2947

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Tovar PC, Potter SM, Hafermann JC, Shay NF (1998) Intake of soy protein and soy protein extracts influences lipid metabolism and hepatic gene expression in gerbils. J Nutr 128:839–842

    Google Scholar 

  31. Borradaile NM, de Dreu LE, Wilcox LJ, Edwards JY, Huff MW (2002) Soya phytoestrogens, genistein and daidzein, decrease apolipoprotein B secretion from HepG2 cells through multiple mechanisms. Biochem J 366:531–539

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Kanzawa T, Iwado E, Aoki H, Iwamaru A, Hollingsworth EF, Sawaya R, Kondo S, Kondo Y (2006) Ionizing radiation induces apoptosis and inhibits neuronal differentiation in rat neural stem cells via the c-Jun NH(2)-terminal kinase (JNK) pathway. Oncogene 25: 3638–3648

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Lynch AM, Moore M, Craig S, Lonergan PE, Martin DS, Lynch MA (2003) Analysis of interleukin-1 beta-induced cell signaling activation in rat hippocampus following exposure to gamma irradiation. Protective effect of eicosapentaenoic acid. J Biol Chem 278:51075–51084

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Benhar M, Dalyot I, Engelberg D, Levitzki A (2001) Enhanced ROS production in oncogenically transformed cells potentiates c-Jun N-terminal kinase and p38 mitogen-activated protein kinase activation and sensitization to genotoxic stress. Mol Cell Biol 21:6913–6926

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Behrens A, Sibilia M, Wagner EF (1999) Amino-terminal phosphorylation of c-Jun regulates stress-induced apoptosis and cellular proliferation. Nat Genet 21:326–329

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Butler LM, Zhou X, Xu WS, Scher HI, Rifkind RA, Marks PA, et al. (2002) The histone deacetylase inhibitor SAHA arrests cancer cell growth, up-regulates thioredoxin-binding protein-2, and down-regulates thioredoxin. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 99:11700–11705

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Kokame K, Agarwala KL, Kato H, Miyata T (2000) Herp, a new ubiquitin-like membrane protein induced by endoplasmic reticulum stress. J Biol Chem 275:32846–32853

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Chan SL, Fu W, Zhang P, Cheng A, Lee J, Kokame K, Mattson MP (2004) Herp stabilizes neuronal Ca2+ homeostasis and mitochondrial function during endoplasmic reticulum stress. J Biol Chem 279:28733–28743

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Little E, Ramakrishnan M, Roy B, Gazit G, Lee AS (1994) The glucose-regulated proteins (GRP78 and GRP94): functions, gene regulation, and applications. Crit Rev Eukaryot Gene Expr 4:1–18 (Review)

    Google Scholar 

  40. Liu H, Bowes RC, van de Water B, Sillence C, Nagelkerke JF, Stevens JL (1995) Generation of a mammalian cell line deficient in glucose-regulated protein stress induction through targeted ribozyme driven by a stress-inducible promoter. J Biol Chem 270:9526–9534

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Liu H, Bowes RC, van de Water B, Sillence C, Nagelkerke JF, Stevens JL (1997) Endoplasmic reticulum chaperones GRP78 and calreticulin prevent oxidative stress, Ca2+ disturbances, and cell death in renal epithelial cells. J Biol Chem 272:21751–21759

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Ramachandra K, Reddy CM, Baumeister P, Austin RC, Randal JK, Amy SL (2003) Endoplasmic Reticulum Chaperone Protein GRP78 Protects Cells from Apoptosis Induced by Topoisomerase Inhibitors. J Biol Chem 278: 20915–20924

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. Zhai L, Kita K, Wano C, Wu Y, Sugaya S, Suzuki N (2005) Decreased cell survival and DNA repair capacity after UVC irradiation in association with down-regulation of GRP78/BiP in human RSa cells. Exp Cell Res 305:244–252

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgement

This work was supported by grants from Natural Science Foundation of Shanghai (No.04ZR14083) and the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 30271167)

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Dong-lian Cai.

Additional information

Li-hua Song and Hong-li Yan contributed equally to this study

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Song, Lh., Yan, Hl. & Cai, Dl. Gene expression profiles in the liver of mice irradiated with 60Co gamma rays and treated with soybean isoflavone. Eur J Nutr 45, 406–417 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00394-006-0614-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00394-006-0614-y

Keywords

Navigation