Skip to main content
Log in

Electroencephalogram alpha asymmetry in geriatric depression

Valid or vanished?

Alpha-Asymmetrie im Elektroenzephalogramm bei geriatrischer Depression

Valide oder verschwunden?

  • Original Contribution
  • Published:
Zeitschrift für Gerontologie und Geriatrie Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

A correlation between asymmetry in electroencephalographs (EEG) and depression has been demonstrated in many studies. To the best of our knowledge there are no studies including oldest old geriatric patients.

Objective

The objective of this study was to evaluate whether frontal and parietal alpha asymmetry can be used to differentiate between depressed and control patients in a cohort sample with a mean age of 80 years.

Material and methods

Differences in the EEG were investigated in 39 right-handed female geriatric patients (mean age 80 years) with respect to frontal alpha asymmetry (FAA) and parietal alpha asymmetry (PAA) in depression (n = 14), depression combined with anxiety (n = 11) and normal controls (n = 14) as assessed with the hospital anxiety and depression scale (HADS). Band power was calculated for alpha 1 (6.9–8.9 Hz), alpha 2 (8.9–10.9 Hz) and alpha 3 bands (10.9–12.9 Hz). Furthermore, correlations between frontal and parietal alpha asymmetry and the geriatric depression scale (GDS), the HADS and the mini mental state examination (MMSE) were calculated.

Results

A differentiation between the three groups was not possible with FAA and PAA. Significant correlations were found between PAA alpha 3 band and anxiety and depression.

Conclusion

The alpha asymmetry in EEG seemed to disappear with age. Correlations between PAA and anxiety and depression were found. The results are in line with the right (hemisphere) hemi-aging hypothesis.

Zusammenfassung

Hintergrund

Eine Korrelation zwischen einer Asymmetrie im Elektroenzephalogramm (EEG) und Depression konnte in vielen Studien bestätigt werden. Unserem Wissen nach gibt es keine Studien mit hochbetagten geriatrischen Patienten.

Ziel

Ziel der Arbeit ist die Analyse frontaler und parietaler Alpha-Asymmetrie hinsichtlich der Unterscheidungsfähigkeit zwischen Depressiven und Kontrollpersonen in einer Stichprobe von über 80-jährigen Patienten.

Material und Methoden

EEG-Unterschiede wurden bei 39 rechtshändigen weiblichen geriatrischen Patienten (Durchschnittsalter: 80 Jahre) bezüglich frontaler Alpha-Asymmetrie (FAA) und parietaler Alpha-Asymmetrie (PAA) bei depressiven (n = 14), ängstlich-depressiven (n = 11), und Kontrollpersonen (n = 14) untersucht. Für die Erfassung ängstlicher und depressiver Symptome wurde die Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) verwendet. Der Leistungspegel wurde für Alpha 1 (6.9–8.9 Hz), Alpha 2 (8.9–10.9 Hz) und Alpha 3 (10.9–12.9 Hz) berechnet. Des Weiteren wurden Korrelationen zwischen frontaler und parietaler Alpha-Asymmetrie und Geriatric Depression Scale (GDS), Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) sowie Mini Mental State Examination (MMSE) berechnet.

Ergebnisse

FAA und parietale Alpha Asymmetrie konnten nicht zwischen den drei Gruppen unterscheiden. Allerdings fanden wir eine Korrelation zwischen PAA Alpha 3 sowie Angst und Depression.

Diskussion

Die EEG Alpha Asymmetrie scheint mit dem Alter zu verschwinden. Korrelationen zwischen PAA und Angst und Depression konnten gefunden werden. Die Ergebnisse bestätigen die Hypothese zur rechts-hemispherischen Alterung (right hemi-aging hypothesis).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Allen JJ, Urry HL, Hitt SK, Coan JA (2004) The stability of resting frontal electroencephalographic asymmetry in depression. Psychophysiology 41:269–280

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Berlingeri M, Danelli L, Bottini G, Sberna M, Paulesu E (2013) Reassessing the HAROLD model: is the hemispheric asymmetry reduction in older adults a special case of compensatory-related utilisation of neural circuits? Exp Brain Res 224:393–410

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Blackhart GC, Minnix JA, Kline JP (2006) Can EEG asymmetry patterns predict future development of anxiety and depression? A preliminary study. Biol Psychol 72:46–50

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Bruder GE, Fong R, Tenke CE, Leite P, Towey JP, Stewart JE, McGrath PJ, Quitkin FM (1997) Regional brain asymmetries in major depression with or without an anxiety disorder: A quantitative electroencephalographic study. Biol Psychiatry 41:939–948

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Byers AL, Yaffe K, Covinsky KE, Friedman MB, Bruce ML (2010) High occurrence of mood and anxiety disorders among older adults: The National Comorbidity Survey Replication. Arch Gen Psychiatry 67:489–496

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Cabeza R (2002) Hemispheric asymmetry reduction in older adults: the HAROLD model. Psychol Aging 17:85–100

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Carvalho A, Moraes H, Silveira H, Ribeiro P, Piedade RAM, Deslandes AC, Laks J, Versiani M (2011) EEG frontal asymmetry in the depressed and remitted elderly: Is it related to the trait or to the state of depression? J Affect Disord 129:143–148

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Chandler MJ, Lacritz LH, Hynan LS, Barnard HD, Allen G, Deschner M, Weiner MF, Cullum CM (2005) A total score for the CERAD neuropsychological battery. Neurology. doi:10.1212/01.wnl.0000167607.63000.38

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Cooper NR, Croft RJ, Dominey SJ, Burgess AP, Gruzelier JH (2003) Paradox lost? Exploring the role of alpha oscillations during externally vs. internally directed attention and the implications for idling and inhibition hypotheses. Int J Psychophysiol 47:65–74

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Deslandes AC, de Moraes H, Pompeu FA, Ribeiro P, Cagy M, Capitao C, Alves H, Piedade RA, Laks J (2008) Electroencephalographic frontal asymmetry and depressive symptoms in the elderly. Biol Psychol 79:317–322

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Dolcos F, Rice HJ, Cabeza R (2002) Hemispheric asymmetry and aging: right hemisphere decline or asymmetry reduction. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 26:819–825

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Folstein MF, Folstein SE, McHugh PR (1975) “Mini-mental state” : A practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician. J Psychiatr Res 12:189–198

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Gianotti LR, Kunig G, Lehmann D, Faber PL, Pascual-Marqui RD, Kochi K, Schreiter-Gasser U (2007) Correlation between disease severity and brain electric LORETA tomography in Alzheimer’s disease. Clin Neurophysiol 118:186–196

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Gold C, Fachner J, Erkkila J (2013) Validity and reliability of electroencephalographic frontal alpha asymmetry and frontal midline theta as biomarkers for depression. Scand J Psychol 54:118–126

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Henriques JB, Davidson RJ (1990) Regional brain electrical asymmetries discriminate between previously depressed and healthy control subjects. J Abnorm Psychol 99:22–31

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Henriques JB, Davidson RJ (1991) Left frontal hypoactivation in depression. J Abnorm Psychol 100:535–545

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Kemp AH, Griffiths K, Felmingham KL, Shankman SA, Drinkenburg W, Arns M, Clark CR, Bryant RA (2010) Disorder specificity despite comorbidity: resting EEG alpha asymmetry in major depressive disorder and post-traumatic stress disorder. Biol Psychol 85:350–354

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Kentgen LM, Tenke CE, Pine DS, Fong R, Klein RG, Bruder GE (2000) Electroencephalographic asymmetries in adolescents with major depression: influence of comorbidity with anxiety disorders. J Abnorm Psychol 109:797–802

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Klimesch W, Sauseng P, Hanslmayr S (2007) EEG alpha oscillations: the inhibition-timing hypothesis. Brain Res Rev 53:63–88

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Leiser SC, Dunlop J, Bowlby MR, Devilbiss DM (2011) Aligning strategies for using EEG as a surrogate biomarker: a review of preclinical and clinical research. Biochem Pharmacol 81:1408–1421

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Mathersul D, Williams LM, Hopkinson PJ, Kemp AH (2008) Investigating models of affect: relationships among EEG alpha asymmetry, depression, and anxiety. Emotion 8:560–572

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Mathewson KJ, Hashemi A, Sheng B, Sekuler AB, Bennett PJ, Schmidt LA (2015) Regional electroencephalogram (EEG) alpha power and asymmetry in older adults: a study of short-term test-retest reliability. Front Aging Neurosci 7:177

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Moretti DV, Frisoni GB, Fracassi C, Pievani M, Geroldi C, Binetti G, Rossini PM, Zanetti O (2011) MCI patients’ EEGs show group differences between those who progress and those who do not progress to AD. Neurobiol Aging 32:563–571

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Moretti DV, Paternicò D, Binetti G, Zanetti O, Frisoni GB (2012) EEG markers are associated to gray matter changes in thalamus and basal ganglia in subjects with mild cognitive impairment. Neuroimage 60:489–496

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Morris JC, Mosh RC, Rogers H, Fillenbaum G, Heyman A (1988) Consortium to establish a registry for alzheimer’s disease. Psychopharmacol Bull 24:641–652

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Quinn CR, Rennie CJ, Harris AWF, Kemp AH (2013) The impact of melancholia versus non-melancholia on resting-state, EEG alpha asymmetry: Electrophysiological evidence for depression heterogeneity. Psychiatry Res. doi:10.1016/j.psychres.2013.12.049

    Google Scholar 

  27. Schaffer CE, Davidson RJ, Saron C (1983) Frontal and parietal electroencephalogram asymmetry in depressed and nondepressed subjects. Biol Psychiatry 18:753–762

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Segrave RA, Cooper NR, Thomson RH, Croft RJ, Sheppard DM, Fitzgerald PB (2011) Individualized alpha activity and frontal asymmetry in major depression. Clin EEG Neurosci 42:45–52

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Sheikh JI, Yesavage JA (1986) Geriatric Depression Scale (GDS). Recent evidence and development of a shorter version. In: Brink TL (ed) Clinical Gerontology: a Guide to Assessment and Intervention. Haworth Press, NY, pp 165–173

    Google Scholar 

  30. Stewart JL, Bismark AW, Towers DN, Coan JA, Allen JJ (2010) Resting frontal EEG asymmetry as an endophenotype for depression risk: sex-specific patterns of frontal brain asymmetry. J Abnorm Psychol 119:502–512

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. Stewart JL, Towers DN, Coan JA, Allen JJ (2011) The oft-neglected role of parietal EEG asymmetry and risk for major depressive disorder. Psychophysiology 48:82–95

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. Zigmond AS, Snaith RP (1983) The hospital anxiety and depression scale. Acta Psychiatr Scand 67:361–370

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Andreas K. Kaiser.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interests

A. K. Kaiser, M. Doppelmayr and B. Iglseder state that there are no conflicts of interest.

The study was approved be the local ethics committee. Written informed consent was obtained from all participants included in the study.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kaiser, A.K., Doppelmayr, M. & Iglseder, B. Electroencephalogram alpha asymmetry in geriatric depression. Z Gerontol Geriat 51, 200–205 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00391-016-1108-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00391-016-1108-z

Keywords

Schlüsselwörter

Navigation