Abstract
Introduction
X-ray defecography is considered the gold standard for imaging pelvic floor pathology. However, it is limited by the capability to demonstrate only the posterior pelvic compartment, significant radiation exposure, and inconvenience. Dynamic transperineal ultrasound (DTP-US) can visualize all of three pelvic floor compartments, is free of radiation, and does not cause significant discomfort. The aim of this study was to evaluate the level of consistency between defecography (DEF) and DTP-US in the diagnosis of pelvic floor deformations.
Methods
One hundred and five women (age 56 ± 11 years) suffering from constipation and fecal incontinence were clinically evaluated and further examined by DEF and DTP-US. The rate of diagnosis of pelvic floor hernias using the DTP-US was compared to that found on DEF.
Results
The specificity for the diagnosis of rectoceles was of 82 % for mid-size rectocele and 98 % for large rectoceles, and the sensitivity was of 59 % for mid-size rectoceles and 50 % for larger rectoceles. The sensitivity for the detection of intussusceptions, enteroceles, and rectal prolapse were 82, 74, and 75 %, respectively. The specificity was 84 % for the detection of intussusception, 92 % for enteroceles, and 97 % for the diagnosis of rectal prolapse. Higher rates of DTP-US diagnosis were obtained when the intussuscepted rectum moved closer toward the ultrasound probe.
Conclusions
The sensitivity of DTP-US was good to excellent and the specificity was high. The added value of this technique in exploring all the compartments of the pelvic floor as well as the perineal muscles makes DTP-US a preferred procedure.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Nygaard I, Barber MD, Burgio KL et al (2008) Prevalence of symptomatic pelvic floor disorders in US women. JAMA 300:1311–1316
Tally NJ, Weaver AL, Zinsmeister AR et al (1993) Functional constipation and outlet delay: a population based study. Gastroenterology 105:781–190
Felt-Bersma RJ, Luth WJ, Janssen JJ et al (1990) Defecography in patients with anorectal disorders. Which findings are clinically relevant? Dis Colon Rectum 33:277–284
Steensma AB, Oom DM, Burger CW et al (2010) Assessment of posterior compartment prolapse: a comparison of evacuation proctography and 3D transperineal ultrasound. Colorectal Dis 12:533–539
Maglinte DD, Hale DS, Sandrasegaran K (2013) Comparison between dynamic cystocolpoproctography and dynamic pelvic floor MRI: pros and cons: which is the "functional" examination for anorectal and pelvic floor dysfunction? Abdom Imaging 38:952–973
Kelvin FM, Maglinte DD, Benson JT (1994) Evacuation proctography (defecography): an aid to the investigation of pelvic floor disorders. Obstet Gynecol 83:307–314
Maglinte DD, Bartram CI, Hale DA et al (2011) Functional imaging of the pelvic floor. Radiology 258:23–39
Lalwani N, Moshiri M, Lee JH et al (2013) Magnetic resonance imaging of pelvic floor dysfunction. Radiol Clin North Am 51:1127–1139
Beer-Gabel M, Teshler M, Barzilai N, Lurie Y, Malnick S, Bass D, Zbar A (2002) Dynamic transperineal ultrasound in the diagnosis of pelvic floor disorders: pilot study. Dis Colon Rectum 45:239–245
Vitton V, Vignally P, Barthet M et al (2011) Dynamic anal endosonography and MRI defecography in diagnosis of pelvic floor disorders: comparison with conventional defecography. Dis Colon Rectum 54:1398–1404
Martellucci J, Naldini G (2011) Clinical relevance of transperineal ultrasound compared with evacuation proctography for the evaluation of patients with obstructed defaecation. Colorectal Dis 13:1167–1172
Agachan F, Chen T, Pfeifer J et al (1996) A constipation scoring system to simplify evaluation and management of constipated patients. Dis Colon Rectum 39:681–685
Jorge JMN, Wexner SD (1993) Etiology and management of fecal incontinence. Dis Colon Rectum 36:77–97
Drossman DA, Corazziarie E, Delvaux M et al (2006) Rome III. The functional gastrointestinal disorders. Degnon associates, Mclean
DeLancey JOL (1992) Anatomic aspects of vaginal eversion after hysterectomy. Am J Obstet Gynecol 166:1717–1728
Shorvon PJ, McHugh S, Diamant NE, Somers S, Stevenson GW (1989) Defecography in normal volunteers: results and implications. Gut 30:1737–1749
Law YM, Fielding JR (2008) MRI of pelvic floor dysfunction: review. AJR 191:S45–S53
Perniola G, Shek C, Chong CCW et al (2008) Defecation proctography and translabial ultrasound in the investigation of defecatory disorders. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 31:567–7
Kelvin FM, Hale DS, Maglinte DD et al (1999) Female pelvic organ prolapse: diagnostic contribution of dynamic cystoproctography and comparison with physical examination. AJR Am J Roentgenol 173:31–37
Beer-Gabel M, Assoulin Y, Amitai et al (2008) A comparison of dynamic transperineal ultrasound (DTP-US) with dynamic evacuation proctography (DEP) in the diagnosis of cul de sac hernia (enterocele) in patients with evacuatory dysfunction. Int J Colorectal Dis 23:513–519
Bremmer S, Mellgren A, Holmström B et al (1997) Pelvic anatomy and pathology is influenced by distention of the rectum: defecoperitoneography before and after rectal filling with contrast medium. Dis Colon Rectum 40:1477–1483
Grasso RF, Piciucchi S, Quattrocchi CC et al (2007) Posterior pelvic floor disorders: a prospective comparison using introital ultrasound and colpocystodefecography. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 30:86–94
Carter D, Beer-Gabel M (2012) Rectocele—does the size matter? Int J Colorectal Dis 27:975–980
Murthy VK, Orkin BA, Smith LE, Glassman LM (1996) Excellent outcome using selective criteria for rectocele repair. Dis Colon Rectum 39:374–378
Karlbom U, Graf W, Nilsson S et al (1996) Does surgical repair of a rectocele improve rectal emptying? Dis Colon Rectum 39:1296–1302
Kashyap AS, Kohli DR, Raizon A et al (2013) A prospective study evaluating emotional disturbance in subjects undergoing defecating proctography. World J Gastroenterol 19:3990–3995
Halligan S, Spence-Jones C, Kamm MA et al (1996) Dynamic cystoproctography and physiological testing in women with urinary stress incontinence and urogenital prolapse. Clin Radiol 51:785–790
Healy JC, Halligan S, Reznek RH et al (1997) Patterns of prolapse in women with symptoms of pelvic floor weakness: assessment with MR imaging. Radiology 203:77–81
Goei R, Kemerink G (1990) Radiation dose in defecography. Radiology 176:137–139
Müller-Lissner SA, Bartolo DC et al (1998) Interobserver agreement in defecography—an international study. Z Gastroenterol 36:273–279
Ott DJ, Donati DL, Kerr RM et al (1994) Defecography: results in 55 patients and impact on clinical management. Abdom Imaging 19:349–354
Hiltunen KM, Kolehmainen H, Matikainen M (1994) Does defecography help in diagnosis and clinical decision-making in defecation disorders? Abdom Imaging 19:355
Dvorkin LS, Gladman MA, Epstein J, Scott SM, Williams NS, Lunniss PJ (2005) Rectal intussusception in symptomatic patients is different from that in asymptomatic volunteers. Br J Surg 92:866–872
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Beer- Gabel holds a MD, FEBGH, Chaim Sheba Medical Center.
Carter holds a MD. FEBGH, Chaim Sheba Medical Center.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Beer-Gabel, M., Carter, D. Comparison of dynamic transperineal ultrasound and defecography for the evaluation of pelvic floor disorders. Int J Colorectal Dis 30, 835–841 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00384-015-2195-9
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00384-015-2195-9