Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Improved survival for older patients undergoing surgery for colorectal cancer between 2008 and 2011

  • Original Article
  • Published:
International Journal of Colorectal Disease Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Introduction

Older colorectal cancer patients have a higher risk of postoperative complications, and the impact of adverse events on survival is also significantly higher. Innovations like laparoscopic surgery which improve short-term outcome for older patients can also benefit their overall prognosis. We set out to analyse the impact of an increased utilisation of laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer in the Netherlands on overall survival.

Methods

All patients diagnosed with stages I–III colorectal cancer in the Netherlands between 2008 and 2011 were selected from the Netherlands Cancer Registry. Changes in perioperative mortality, 3-month mortality and 1-year mortality rates were analysed using year of diagnosis as an instrumental variable.

Results

Over 33,000 patients were included in the analyses. Data on surgical approach were not precisely known for 2008 and 2009; in 2010, 36.6 % of definitive surgical procedures were performed laparoscopically and 45.9 % in 2011. A laparoscopic approach was used less frequently in the patients aged ≥75 years (in 2011, 40.3 versus 49.2 % of younger patients; p < 0.001). Between 2008 and 2011, perioperative mortality decreased from 2.0 to 1.5 % (p = 0.02), 3-month mortality from 4.8 to 3.9 % (p = 0.01) and 1-year mortality from 9.6 to 8.3 % (p < 0.001). The absolute risk reduction was greatest for patients aged ≥75 years, reaching 2.1 % for 1-year mortality.

Conclusion

Between 2008 and 2011, the utilisation of a laparoscopic approach increases significantly, resulting in reduced mortality rates, particularly for the elderly. Therefore, a laparoscopic approach should be used whenever possible, which may allow for further improvement of outcomes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Netherlands Cancer registry. www.cijfersoverkanker.nl. Accessed 15 Nov 2013

  2. Statistics Netherlands. www.cbs.nl. Accessed 15 Nov 2013

  3. Gooiker GA, Dekker JW, Bastiaannet E et al (2012) Risk factors for excess mortality in the first year after curative surgery for colorectal cancer. Ann Surg Oncol 19:2428–2434

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Shahir MA, Lemmens VE, van de Poll-Franse LV, Voogd AC, Martijn H, Janssen-Heijnen ML (2006) Elderly patients with rectal cancer have a higher risk of treatment-related complications and a poorer prognosis than younger patients: a population-based study. Eur J Cancer 42:3015–3021

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Dekker JW, van den Broek CB, Bastiaannet E, van de Geest LG, Tollenaar RA, Liefers GJ (2011) Importance of the first postoperative year in the prognosis of elderly colorectal cancer patients. Ann Surg Oncol 18:1533–1539

    Article  PubMed  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Kuhry E, Schwenk W, Gaupset R, Romild U, Bonjer J (2008) Long-term outcome of laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer: a cochrane systematic review of randomised controlled trials. Cancer Treat Rev 34:498–504

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Schwenk W, Haase O, Neudecker J, Muller JM (2005) Short term benefits for laparoscopic colorectal resection. Cochrane Database Syst Rev CD003145

  8. Dutch Surgical Colorectal Audit (2012) DSCA yearly report 2011

  9. de Glas NA, Kiderlen M, Liefers GJ (2013) Survival after lumpectomy and mastectomy for early stage invasive breast cancer: the effect of age and hormone receptor status. Cancer 119:3253–3254

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Vandenbroucke JP (2004) When are observational studies as credible as randomised trials? Lancet 363:1728–1731

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Dutch Surgical Colorectal Audit (2010) DSCA yearly report 2009

  12. Kolfschoten NE, van Leersum NJ, Gooiker GA et al (2013) Successful and safe introduction of laparoscopic colorectal cancer surgery in Dutch hospitals. Ann Surg 257:916–921

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Elferink MA, van Steenbergen LN, Krijnen P et al (2010) Marked improvements in survival of patients with rectal cancer in the Netherlands following changes in therapy, 1989-2006. Eur J Cancer 46:1421–1429

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. van den Broek CB, Dekker JW, Bastiaannet E et al (2011) The survival gap between middle-aged and elderly colon cancer patients. Time trends in treatment and survival. Eur J Surg Oncol 37:904–912

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. (2000) Surgery for colorectal cancer in elderly patients: a systematic review. Colorectal Cancer Collaborative Group. Lancet 356:968–974

  16. Wichmann MW, Huttl TP, Winter H et al (2005) Immunological effects of laparoscopic vs open colorectal surgery: a prospective clinical study. Arch Surg 140:692–697

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Kehlet H, Dahl JB (2003) Anaesthesia, surgery, and challenges in postoperative recovery. Lancet 362:1921–1928

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Biffl WL, Moore EE, Moore FA, Peterson VM (1996) Interleukin-6 in the injured patient. Marker of injury or mediator of inflammation? Ann Surg 224:647–664

    Article  PubMed  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Guillou PJ, Quirke P, Thorpe H et al (2005) Short-term endpoints of conventional versus laparoscopic-assisted surgery in patients with colorectal cancer (MRC CLASICC trial): multicentre, randomised controlled trial. Lancet 365:1718–1726

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Marusch F, Gastinger I, Schneider C et al (2001) Importance of conversion for results obtained with laparoscopic colorectal surgery. Dis Colon Rectum 44:207–214

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to M. E. Hamaker.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Hamaker, M.E., Schiphorst, A.H., Verweij, N.M. et al. Improved survival for older patients undergoing surgery for colorectal cancer between 2008 and 2011. Int J Colorectal Dis 29, 1231–1236 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00384-014-1959-y

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00384-014-1959-y

Keywords

Navigation