Abstract
Introduction
Older colorectal cancer patients have a higher risk of postoperative complications, and the impact of adverse events on survival is also significantly higher. Innovations like laparoscopic surgery which improve short-term outcome for older patients can also benefit their overall prognosis. We set out to analyse the impact of an increased utilisation of laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer in the Netherlands on overall survival.
Methods
All patients diagnosed with stages I–III colorectal cancer in the Netherlands between 2008 and 2011 were selected from the Netherlands Cancer Registry. Changes in perioperative mortality, 3-month mortality and 1-year mortality rates were analysed using year of diagnosis as an instrumental variable.
Results
Over 33,000 patients were included in the analyses. Data on surgical approach were not precisely known for 2008 and 2009; in 2010, 36.6 % of definitive surgical procedures were performed laparoscopically and 45.9 % in 2011. A laparoscopic approach was used less frequently in the patients aged ≥75 years (in 2011, 40.3 versus 49.2 % of younger patients; p < 0.001). Between 2008 and 2011, perioperative mortality decreased from 2.0 to 1.5 % (p = 0.02), 3-month mortality from 4.8 to 3.9 % (p = 0.01) and 1-year mortality from 9.6 to 8.3 % (p < 0.001). The absolute risk reduction was greatest for patients aged ≥75 years, reaching 2.1 % for 1-year mortality.
Conclusion
Between 2008 and 2011, the utilisation of a laparoscopic approach increases significantly, resulting in reduced mortality rates, particularly for the elderly. Therefore, a laparoscopic approach should be used whenever possible, which may allow for further improvement of outcomes.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Netherlands Cancer registry. www.cijfersoverkanker.nl. Accessed 15 Nov 2013
Statistics Netherlands. www.cbs.nl. Accessed 15 Nov 2013
Gooiker GA, Dekker JW, Bastiaannet E et al (2012) Risk factors for excess mortality in the first year after curative surgery for colorectal cancer. Ann Surg Oncol 19:2428–2434
Shahir MA, Lemmens VE, van de Poll-Franse LV, Voogd AC, Martijn H, Janssen-Heijnen ML (2006) Elderly patients with rectal cancer have a higher risk of treatment-related complications and a poorer prognosis than younger patients: a population-based study. Eur J Cancer 42:3015–3021
Dekker JW, van den Broek CB, Bastiaannet E, van de Geest LG, Tollenaar RA, Liefers GJ (2011) Importance of the first postoperative year in the prognosis of elderly colorectal cancer patients. Ann Surg Oncol 18:1533–1539
Kuhry E, Schwenk W, Gaupset R, Romild U, Bonjer J (2008) Long-term outcome of laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer: a cochrane systematic review of randomised controlled trials. Cancer Treat Rev 34:498–504
Schwenk W, Haase O, Neudecker J, Muller JM (2005) Short term benefits for laparoscopic colorectal resection. Cochrane Database Syst Rev CD003145
Dutch Surgical Colorectal Audit (2012) DSCA yearly report 2011
de Glas NA, Kiderlen M, Liefers GJ (2013) Survival after lumpectomy and mastectomy for early stage invasive breast cancer: the effect of age and hormone receptor status. Cancer 119:3253–3254
Vandenbroucke JP (2004) When are observational studies as credible as randomised trials? Lancet 363:1728–1731
Dutch Surgical Colorectal Audit (2010) DSCA yearly report 2009
Kolfschoten NE, van Leersum NJ, Gooiker GA et al (2013) Successful and safe introduction of laparoscopic colorectal cancer surgery in Dutch hospitals. Ann Surg 257:916–921
Elferink MA, van Steenbergen LN, Krijnen P et al (2010) Marked improvements in survival of patients with rectal cancer in the Netherlands following changes in therapy, 1989-2006. Eur J Cancer 46:1421–1429
van den Broek CB, Dekker JW, Bastiaannet E et al (2011) The survival gap between middle-aged and elderly colon cancer patients. Time trends in treatment and survival. Eur J Surg Oncol 37:904–912
(2000) Surgery for colorectal cancer in elderly patients: a systematic review. Colorectal Cancer Collaborative Group. Lancet 356:968–974
Wichmann MW, Huttl TP, Winter H et al (2005) Immunological effects of laparoscopic vs open colorectal surgery: a prospective clinical study. Arch Surg 140:692–697
Kehlet H, Dahl JB (2003) Anaesthesia, surgery, and challenges in postoperative recovery. Lancet 362:1921–1928
Biffl WL, Moore EE, Moore FA, Peterson VM (1996) Interleukin-6 in the injured patient. Marker of injury or mediator of inflammation? Ann Surg 224:647–664
Guillou PJ, Quirke P, Thorpe H et al (2005) Short-term endpoints of conventional versus laparoscopic-assisted surgery in patients with colorectal cancer (MRC CLASICC trial): multicentre, randomised controlled trial. Lancet 365:1718–1726
Marusch F, Gastinger I, Schneider C et al (2001) Importance of conversion for results obtained with laparoscopic colorectal surgery. Dis Colon Rectum 44:207–214
Conflict of interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Hamaker, M.E., Schiphorst, A.H., Verweij, N.M. et al. Improved survival for older patients undergoing surgery for colorectal cancer between 2008 and 2011. Int J Colorectal Dis 29, 1231–1236 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00384-014-1959-y
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00384-014-1959-y