Skip to main content
Log in

Multidisciplinary management of colorectal cancer enhances access to multimodal therapy and compliance with National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) guidelines

  • Original Article
  • Published:
International Journal of Colorectal Disease Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

Multidisciplinary teams have become increasingly desirable for managing complex disease but little objective data exist to support this approach. The aim of our study was to determine the impact of a multidisciplinary clinic on the management of colorectal cancer.

Methods

Data were prospectively collected on all patients with newly diagnosed colorectal cancer referred to the multidisciplinary clinic at our institution in 2009 and compared to a control group of all patients managed outside the clinic from 2008 to 2009. Comprehensiveness of preoperative evaluation was determined by frequency of abdominal and chest CT, CEA testing, and transrectal ultrasound. Access to multimodal care was measured by frequency of oncology consultation and treatment, advanced pathology testing, genetics counseling, and trial enrollment.

Results

Two hundred eighty-eight patients met inclusion criteria; 88 patients were referred to the clinic (40 preoperative, 48 postoperative) and 200 patients were managed outside. Complete preoperative evaluation was accomplished three times more frequently in clinic patients (85 vs. 23 %, p < 0.0001) with significant improvements in all parameters. Enhanced access to multimodal therapy was demonstrated in clinic patients by increased frequency of oncology consultation (98.9 vs. 61.5 %, p < 0.0001) and treatment (62.5 vs. 41.5 %, p = 0.02), advanced pathology testing (29.6 vs. 10.6 %, p = 0.0001), and genetics counseling (6.8 vs. 1.6 %, p = 0.28). Clinic patients also received significantly higher rates of neoadjuvant therapy for stage II or greater rectal cancer (82.6 vs. 30.9 %, p = 0.0001).

Conclusions

Multidisciplinary clinic management of colorectal cancer is associated with a significantly more complete preoperative evaluation as well as improved access to multimodal therapy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. American Cancer Society Website. Available at http://www.cancer.org/cancer/ colonandrectumcancer/detailedguide/colorectal-cancer-key-statistics. Accessed 19 Nov 2010

  2. Mitry E, Fields ALA, Bleiberg H et al (2008) Adjuvant chemotherapy after potentially curative resection of metastases from colorectal cancer: a pooled analysis of two randomized trials. J Clin Oncol 26:4906–4911

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Sargent DJ, Goldberg RM, Jacobson SD et al (2001) A pooled analysis of adjuvant chemotherapy for resected colon cancer in elderly patients. N Engl J Med 345:1091–1097

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Sargent D, Sobrero A, Grothey A et al (2009) Evidence for cure by adjuvant therapy in colon cancer: observations based on individual patient data from 20,898 patients on 18 randomized trials. J Clin Oncol 27:872–877

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Wong RKS, Tandan V, De Silva S, Figueredo A (2007) Pre-operative radiotherapy and curative surgery for the management of localized rectal carcinoma. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2:CD002102

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Fleissig A, Jenkins V, Catt S, Fallowfield L (2006) Multidisciplinary teams in cancer care: are they effective in the UK? Lancet Oncol 7:935–943

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Valicenti RK, Gomella LG, El-Gabry EA et al (2000) The multidisciplinary clinic approach to prostate cancer counseling and treatment. Semin Urol Oncol 18:188–191

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Garcia-Granero E, Marti-Obiol R, Gomez-Barbadillo J et al (2001) Impact of surgeon organization and specialization in rectal cancer outcome. Colorectal Dis 3:179–194

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Khani MH, Smedh K (2010) Centralization of rectal cancer surgery improves long-term survival. Colorectal Dis 12:874–879

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Morris E, Haward RA, Gilthorpe MS, Craigs C, Forman D (2008) The impact of the Calman–Hine report on the processes and outcomes of care for Yorkshire’s breast cancer patients. Ann Oncol 19:284–291

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Morris E, Haward RA, Gilthorpe MS, Craigs C, Forman D (2006) The impact of the Calman–Hine report on the processes and outcomes of care for Yorkshire’s colorectal cancer patients. Br J Cancer 95:979–985

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Smedh K, Olsson L, Johansson H, Aberg C, Andersson M (2001) Reduction of postoperative morbidity and mortality in patients with rectal cancer following the introduction of a colorectal unit. Br J Surg 88:273–277

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Wilks JA, Liebig C, Tasleem SH et al (2009) Rectal cancer patients benefit from implementation of a dedicated colorectal cancer center in a Veterans affairs medical center. Am J Surg 198:100–104

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Dahlberg M, Glimelius B, Pahlman L (1999) Changing strategy for rectal cancer is associated with improved outcome. Br J Surg 86:379–384

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Dillman RO, Chico SD (2005) Cancer patient survival improvement is correlated with the opening of a community cancer center: comparisons with intramural and extramural benchmarks. J Oncol Pract 1:84–92

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Bokey EL, Chapuis PH, Dent OF, Newland RC, Koorey SG, Zelas PJ, Stewart PJ (1997) Factors affecting survival after excision of the rectum for cancer: a multivariate analysis. Dis Colon Rectum 40:3–10

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Aitken RJ (1996) Mesorectal excision for rectal cancer. Br J Surg 83:214–216

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Enker WE, Thaler HT, Cranor ML, Polyak T (1995) Total mesorectal excision in the operative treatment of carcinoma of the rectum. J Am Coll Surg 181:335–346

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Holm T, Johansson H, Cedermark B, Ekelund G, Rutqvist LE (1997) Influence of hospital- and surgeon-related factors on outcome after treatment of rectal cancer with or without preoperative radiotherapy. Br J Surg 84:657–663

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Porter GA, Soskolne CL, Yakimets WW, Newman SC (1998) Surgeon-related factors and outcome in rectal cancer. Ann Surg 227:157–167

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Read TE, Myerson RJ, Fleshman JW et al (2002) Surgeon specialty is associated with outcome in rectal cancer treatment. Dis Colon Rectum 45:904–914

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Menon S, Valentini RP, Kapur G, Layfield S, Mattoo TK (2009) Effectiveness of a multidisciplinary clinic in managing children with chronic kidney disease. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol 4:1170–1175

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Branagan G, Davies N (2004) Early impact of centralization of oesophageal cancer surgery services. Br J Surg 91:1630–1632

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Newman EA, Guest AB, Helvie MA et al (2006) Changes in surgical management resulting from case review at a breast cancer multidisciplinary tumor board. Cancer 107:2346–2351

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Stephens MR, Lewis WG, Brewster AE et al (2006) Multidisciplinary team management is associated with improved outcomes after surgery for esophageal cancer. Dis Esophagus 19:164–171

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Granger SR, Glasgow RE, Battaglia J et al (2005) Development of a dedicated hepatopancreaticobiliary program in a university hospital system. J Gastrointest Surg 9:891–895

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Forrest LM, McMillan DC, McArdle CS, Dunlop DJ (2005) An evaluation of the impact of a multidisciplinary team, in a single centre, on treatment and survival in patients with inoperable non-small-cell lung cancer. Br J Cancer 93:977–978

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Junor EJ, Hole DJ, Gillis CR (1994) Management of ovarian cancer: referral to a multidisciplinary team matters. Br J Cancer 70:363–370

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Vasen HF, Moslein G, Alonso A et al (2010) Recommendations to improve identification of hereditary and familial colorectal cancer in Europe. Fam Cancer 9:109–115

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Rodriguez-Moranta F, Castells A, Andreu M et al (2006) Clinical performance of original and revised Bethesda guidelines for the identification of MSH2/MLH1 gene carriers in patients with newly diagnosed colorectal cancer: proposal of a new and simpler set of recommendations. Am J Gastroenterol 101:1104–1111

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Julie C, Tresallet C, Brouquet A et al (2008) Identification in daily practice of patients with Lynch syndrome (hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer): revised Bethesda guidelines-based approach versus molecular screening. Am J Gastroenterol 103:2825–2835

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Southey MC, Jenkins MA, Mead L et al (2005) Use of molecular tumor characteristics to prioritize mismatch repair gene testing in early-onset colorectal cancer. J Clin Oncol 23:6524–6532

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Terdiman JP, Gum JR Jr, Conrad PG et al (2001) Efficient detection of hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer gene carriers by screening for tumor microsatellite instability before germline genetic testing. Gastroenterology 120:21–30

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Trano G, Sjursen W, Wasmuth HH, Hofsli E, Vatten LJ (2010) Performance of clinical guidelines compared with molecular tumour screening methods in identifying possible Lynch syndrome among colorectal cancer patients: a Norwegian population-based study. Br J Cancer 102:482–488

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Sauer R, Becker H, Hohenberger W et al (2004) Preoperative versus postoperative chemoradiotherapy for rectal cancer. N Engl J Med 351:1731

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Roh MS, Colangelo LH, O’Connell MJ et al (2009) Preoperative multimodality therapy improves disease-free survival in patients with carcinoma of the rectum: NSABP R-03. J Clin Oncol 27:5124–5130

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors thank Thomas Riggs, MD; Dana Zakalik, MD and Lyndsay Dohany, CGC (Beaumont Cancer Genetics Program); and Joyce Tull, RN, BSN (Beaumont Cancer Clinical Trials Office) for their contributions to this study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rebecca A. Levine.

Additional information

This paper was submitted as poster presentation at the meeting of The American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons, Minneapolis, MN, May 15 to 19, 2010.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Levine, R.A., Chawla, B., Bergeron, S. et al. Multidisciplinary management of colorectal cancer enhances access to multimodal therapy and compliance with National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) guidelines. Int J Colorectal Dis 27, 1531–1538 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00384-012-1501-z

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00384-012-1501-z

Keywords

Navigation