Skip to main content
Log in

Biliary-enteric reconstruction with hepaticoduodenostomy following laparoscopic excision of choledochal cyst is associated with better postoperative outcomes: a single-centre experience

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Pediatric Surgery International Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

With the advent of laparoscopic surgery, more choledochal cysts are excised laparoscopically. In this study, we compared the outcomes from laparoscopic hepaticojejunostomy (HJ) and hepaticoduodenostomy (HD) for biliary-enteric reconstruction.

Methods

A retrospective analysis of patients who had undergone laparoscopic choledochal cyst excision between February 2005 and January 2014 in a tertiary referral centre was performed. Demographics data, operative techniques and surgical outcomes were analysed according to the way of biliary-enteric reconstruction.

Results

A total of 31 patients were identified, 20 of whom underwent HJ and 11 underwent HD. There were no significant differences in terms of demographics. Median operative time was significantly shorter in HD group (211.0 ± 96.4 vs. 386.0 ± 90.4 min, p = 0.001). Although postoperative enteral feeding was initiated later in HD group (5.0 ± 0.8 vs. 4.0 ± 3.6 days, p = 0.036), postoperative stay in intensive care unit (ICU) (0.7 ± 1.0 vs. 2.4 ± 1.7 days, p = 0.007) and overall hospital stay (9.1 ± 1.0 vs. 14.4 ± 12.2 days, p = 0.157) favoured HD group. There was no perioperative mortality. Median follow-up duration was 24.0 (±11.0) months in HD group and 67.5 (±23.7) months in HJ group. One patient in HJ group had postoperative cholangitis related to anastomotic stricture whereas no cholangitis noted in HD group. In total, five patients in HJ group required second operation for complications and residual diseases whereas none in HD group required reoperation.

Conclusions

Laparoscopic excision of choledochal cyst with hepaticoduodenostomy reconstruction is safe and feasible with shorter operative time, ICU stay and overall hospital stay. It is not inferior to HJ in terms of short-term postoperative outcomes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Singham J, Schaeffer D et al (2007) Choledochal cysts: analysis of disease pattern and optimal treatment in adult and paediatric patients. HPB (Oxford) 9:383–387

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Ohi R, Yaoita S et al (1990) Surgical treatment of congenital dilatation of the bile duct with special reference to late complications after total excisional operation. J Pediatr Surg 25:613–617

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Stringer MD et al (2007) Wide hilar hepaticojejunostomy: the optimum method of reconstruction after choledochal cyst excision. Pediatr Surg Int 23:529–532

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Farello GA, Cerofolini A et al (1995) Congenital choledochal cyst: video-guided laparoscopic treatment. Surg Laparosc Endosc 5:354–358

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Li L, Liu SL et al (2008) Laparoscopic correction of biliary duct stenosis in choledochal cyst. J Pediatr Surg 43:644–646

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Liu SL, Li L et al (2009) Laparoscopic excision of choledochal cyst and Roux-en-Y hepaticojejunostomy in symptomatic neonates. J Pediatr Surg 44:508–511

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Liu DC, Rodriguez JA et al (2000) Laparoscopic excision of a rare type II choledochal cyst: case report and review of the literature. J Pediatr Surg 35:1117–1119

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Shimotakahara A, Yamataka A et al (2005) Roux-en-Y hepaticojejunostomy or hepaticoduodenostomy for biliary reconstruction during the surgical treatment of choledochal cyst: which is better? Pediatr Surg Int 21:5–7

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Takada K, Hamada Y et al (2005) Duodenogastric reflux following biliary reconstruction after excision of choledochal cyst. Pediatr Surg Int 21:1–4

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Tan HL, Shankar KR et al (2003) Laparoscopic resection of type I choledochal cyst. Surg Endosc 17:1495

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Santore MT, Deans KJ et al (2011) Laparoscopic hepaticoduodenostomy versus open hepaticoduodenostomy for reconstruction after resection of choledochal cyst. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech 21:4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Santore MT, Behar BJ et al (2011) Hepaticoduodenostomy vs hepaticojejunostomy for reconstruction after resection of choledochal cyst. J Pediatr Surg 46:209–213

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Mukhopadhyay B, Shukla RM et al (2011) Choledochal cyst: a review of 79 cases and the role of hepaticodochoduodenostomy. J Indian Assoc Pediatr Surg 16:54–57

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Aspelund G, Ling SC et al (2007) A role for laparoscopic approach in the treatment of biliary atresia and choledochal cysts. J Pediatr Surg 42:869–872

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Palanivelu C, Rangarajan M et al (2008) Laparoscopic management of choledochal cysts: technique and outcome—A retrospective study of 35 patients from a tertiary center. J Am Coll Surg 207:839–846

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Liem NT, Pham HD et al (2011) Is the laparoscopic operation is as safe as open operation for choledochal cyst in children? J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 21:367–370

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Liem NT, Pham HD et al (2012) Early and intermediate outcomes of laparoscopic surgery for choledochal cysts with 400 patients. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 22:599–603

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Diao M, Li L et al (2012) Timing of surgery for prenatally diagnosed asymptomatic choledochal cysts: a prospective randomized study. J Pediatr Surg 47:506–512

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Foo DCC, Wong KKY (2009) Impact of prenatal diagnosis on choledochal cysts and the benefits of early excision. J Paediatr Child Health 45:28–30

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Narayanan SK, Chen Y et al (2013) Hepaticoduodenostomy versus hepaticojejunostomy after resection of choledochal cyst: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Pediatr Surg 48:2336–2342

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Ishibashi T, Kasahara K et al (1997) Malignant change in the biliary tract after excision of choledochal cyst. Br J Surg 84:1687–1691

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Todani T, Watanabe Y et al (2002) Hilar duct carcinoma developed after cyst excision followed by hepaticoduodenostomy. In: Koyanagi Y, Aoki T (eds) Pancreaticobiliary malfunction. Igaku tosho shuppan, Tokyo, pp 17–21

    Google Scholar 

  23. Miwa K, Hattori T et al (2005) Duodenogastric reflux and foregut carcinogenesis. Cancer 75:1426–1432

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Liem NT, le Dung A et al (2009) Laparoscopic complete cyst excision and hepaticoduodenostomy for choledochal cyst: early results in 74 cases. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 19:87–90

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Fujisaki S, Akiyama T et al (1999) A case of carcinoma associated with the remained intrapancreatic biliary tract 17 years after the primary excision of a choledochal cyst. Hepatogastroenterology 46:1655–1659

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of interest

No any relationships/conditions/circumstances that present a potential conflict of interest.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kenneth K. Y. Wong.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Yeung, F., Chung, P.H.Y., Wong, K.K.Y. et al. Biliary-enteric reconstruction with hepaticoduodenostomy following laparoscopic excision of choledochal cyst is associated with better postoperative outcomes: a single-centre experience. Pediatr Surg Int 31, 149–153 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00383-014-3648-x

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00383-014-3648-x

Keywords

Navigation